All Exams >
CLAT >
4 Months Preparation Course for CLAT UG >
All Questions
All questions of Critical Reasoning for CLAT Exam
In what way can understanding paradoxes enhance critical thinking?- a) It encourages acceptance of contradictions
- b) It promotes a rigid way of thinking
- c) It simplifies complex ideas
- d) It helps in finding a resolution that satisfies both sides
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
In what way can understanding paradoxes enhance critical thinking?
a)
It encourages acceptance of contradictions
b)
It promotes a rigid way of thinking
c)
It simplifies complex ideas
d)
It helps in finding a resolution that satisfies both sides
|
Kalyan Mehta answered |
Understanding Paradoxes and Critical Thinking
Understanding paradoxes is essential for enhancing critical thinking skills, as it encourages individuals to explore complex ideas and reconcile seemingly contradictory viewpoints.
Promoting Resolution
- Paradoxes often present conflicting ideas that challenge our usual ways of thinking.
- By grappling with these contradictions, individuals are pushed to think more deeply and creatively.
- This process can lead to innovative solutions that satisfy both sides of the paradox, fostering a more nuanced understanding of the issue at hand.
Encouraging Open-Mindedness
- Engaging with paradoxes encourages open-mindedness, allowing individuals to consider perspectives they might typically dismiss.
- This shift in thinking promotes flexibility, as one learns to navigate gray areas rather than adhering strictly to black-and-white reasoning.
Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills
- When faced with a paradox, critical thinkers are prompted to analyze the problem from multiple angles.
- This multifaceted analysis often uncovers underlying assumptions and biases, leading to more comprehensive and effective solutions.
Real-World Applications
- In real-life situations, paradoxes can be found in ethical dilemmas, policy decisions, and interpersonal relationships.
- Understanding how to resolve these contradictions can lead to better decision-making and conflict resolution.
In summary, engaging with paradoxes enriches critical thinking by promoting resolution, encouraging open-mindedness, enhancing problem-solving skills, and applying these lessons to real-world challenges.
Understanding paradoxes is essential for enhancing critical thinking skills, as it encourages individuals to explore complex ideas and reconcile seemingly contradictory viewpoints.
Promoting Resolution
- Paradoxes often present conflicting ideas that challenge our usual ways of thinking.
- By grappling with these contradictions, individuals are pushed to think more deeply and creatively.
- This process can lead to innovative solutions that satisfy both sides of the paradox, fostering a more nuanced understanding of the issue at hand.
Encouraging Open-Mindedness
- Engaging with paradoxes encourages open-mindedness, allowing individuals to consider perspectives they might typically dismiss.
- This shift in thinking promotes flexibility, as one learns to navigate gray areas rather than adhering strictly to black-and-white reasoning.
Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills
- When faced with a paradox, critical thinkers are prompted to analyze the problem from multiple angles.
- This multifaceted analysis often uncovers underlying assumptions and biases, leading to more comprehensive and effective solutions.
Real-World Applications
- In real-life situations, paradoxes can be found in ethical dilemmas, policy decisions, and interpersonal relationships.
- Understanding how to resolve these contradictions can lead to better decision-making and conflict resolution.
In summary, engaging with paradoxes enriches critical thinking by promoting resolution, encouraging open-mindedness, enhancing problem-solving skills, and applying these lessons to real-world challenges.
What role do logical connectives play in arguments?- a) They summarize the argument
- b) They introduce new premises
- c) They link ideas and establish relationships between statements
- d) They provide evidence for claims
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What role do logical connectives play in arguments?
a)
They summarize the argument
b)
They introduce new premises
c)
They link ideas and establish relationships between statements
d)
They provide evidence for claims
|
EduRev CLAT answered |
Logical connectives are words that link ideas in arguments, helping to clarify relationships between different statements. They are essential for constructing coherent and logical arguments.
Telemedicine, the delivery of healthcare services via digital platforms, has surged in India, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2024, over 40 million consultations were conducted online, with 65% of users from rural and semi-urban areas. Telemedicine enables patients to consult specialists without traveling, addressing the shortage of doctors in remote regions, where only 1 doctor serves every 10,000 people. A 2024 study found that telemedicine reduced patient travel costs by 30% and improved timely diagnosis for 50% of users. Proponents argue that telemedicine enhances healthcare access, reduces hospital overcrowding, and supports preventive care through regular virtual check-ups.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.The passage suggests that proponents of telemedicine primarily advocate for:- a)Eliminating in-person care entirely
- b)Training programs and hybrid care models
- c)Reducing investments in rural internet infrastructure
- d)Prioritizing urban over rural healthcare access
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Telemedicine, the delivery of healthcare services via digital platforms, has surged in India, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2024, over 40 million consultations were conducted online, with 65% of users from rural and semi-urban areas. Telemedicine enables patients to consult specialists without traveling, addressing the shortage of doctors in remote regions, where only 1 doctor serves every 10,000 people. A 2024 study found that telemedicine reduced patient travel costs by 30% and improved timely diagnosis for 50% of users. Proponents argue that telemedicine enhances healthcare access, reduces hospital overcrowding, and supports preventive care through regular virtual check-ups.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.
The passage suggests that proponents of telemedicine primarily advocate for:
a)
Eliminating in-person care entirely
b)
Training programs and hybrid care models
c)
Reducing investments in rural internet infrastructure
d)
Prioritizing urban over rural healthcare access
|
Crafty Classes answered |
Proponents suggest “training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care,” aligning with (B).
- (A)contradicts the passage’s balanced approach.
- (C)is incorrect; infrastructure improvement is implied.
- (D)contradicts the rural focus.
Critical Reasoning Skill
: Identifying the main argument focuses on proponents’ solutions.
What is the primary purpose of Critical Reasoning in the context of the CLAT exam?- a) To improve writing skills
- b) To assess the ability to understand and evaluate arguments
- c) To memorize case laws
- d) To test knowledge of legal statutes
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What is the primary purpose of Critical Reasoning in the context of the CLAT exam?
a)
To improve writing skills
b)
To assess the ability to understand and evaluate arguments
c)
To memorize case laws
d)
To test knowledge of legal statutes
|
|
EduRev CLAT answered |
Critical Reasoning is designed to assess a candidate's ability to understand and evaluate arguments. This skill is essential for law students, as it enables them to analyze legal issues effectively and construct sound legal arguments.
What type of question seeks to explain how two seemingly contradictory statements can both be true?- a) Paradox questions
- b) Structure of the argument
- c) Evaluate the conclusion
- d) Flaw in the argument
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
What type of question seeks to explain how two seemingly contradictory statements can both be true?
a)
Paradox questions
b)
Structure of the argument
c)
Evaluate the conclusion
d)
Flaw in the argument
|
|
EduRev CLAT answered |
Paradox questions are designed to explore explanations for how two seemingly contradictory statements can coexist. This involves finding a perspective or context that reconciles the differences, which helps develop critical thinking by challenging the way we perceive contradictions in reasoning.
Which type of Critical Reasoning question asks you to determine what must be true?- a)Drawing Inferences and Conclusions
- b)Argument Evaluation
- c)Weaken and Strengthen
- d)Flaw in the Argument
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which type of Critical Reasoning question asks you to determine what must be true?
a)
Drawing Inferences and Conclusions
b)
Argument Evaluation
c)
Weaken and Strengthen
d)
Flaw in the Argument
|
|
Crafty Classes answered |
"Drawing Inferences and Conclusions" questions require the test-taker to deduce what must logically follow from the information presented. This type of question emphasizes understanding and applying critical reasoning skills.
Telemedicine, the delivery of healthcare services via digital platforms, has surged in India, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2024, over 40 million consultations were conducted online, with 65% of users from rural and semi-urban areas. Telemedicine enables patients to consult specialists without traveling, addressing the shortage of doctors in remote regions, where only 1 doctor serves every 10,000 people. A 2024 study found that telemedicine reduced patient travel costs by 30% and improved timely diagnosis for 50% of users. Proponents argue that telemedicine enhances healthcare access, reduces hospital overcrowding, and supports preventive care through regular virtual check-ups.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.According to the passage, what is a key challenge limiting telemedicine adoption?- a)High costs of virtual consultations
- b)Lack of specialist doctors in urban areas
- c)Digital illiteracy among elderly patients
- d)Overcrowding in rural healthcare facilities
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Telemedicine, the delivery of healthcare services via digital platforms, has surged in India, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2024, over 40 million consultations were conducted online, with 65% of users from rural and semi-urban areas. Telemedicine enables patients to consult specialists without traveling, addressing the shortage of doctors in remote regions, where only 1 doctor serves every 10,000 people. A 2024 study found that telemedicine reduced patient travel costs by 30% and improved timely diagnosis for 50% of users. Proponents argue that telemedicine enhances healthcare access, reduces hospital overcrowding, and supports preventive care through regular virtual check-ups.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.
According to the passage, what is a key challenge limiting telemedicine adoption?
a)
High costs of virtual consultations
b)
Lack of specialist doctors in urban areas
c)
Digital illiteracy among elderly patients
d)
Overcrowding in rural healthcare facilities
|
|
EduRev CLAT answered |
The passage states that “digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption,” with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine, making (C) correct.
- (A)is incorrect; the passage doesn’t mention high costs.
- (B)is irrelevant; the shortage is in rural areas.(D)contradicts the passage’s focus on access issues.
Critical Reasoning Skill
: Detail-based reasoning recalls specific challenges.
What is a common method used to solve Weaken and Strengthen questions?- a) Find assumptions
- b) Look for statements that support or undermine the argument
- c) Identify the conclusion
- d) Evaluate evidence
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What is a common method used to solve Weaken and Strengthen questions?
a)
Find assumptions
b)
Look for statements that support or undermine the argument
c)
Identify the conclusion
d)
Evaluate evidence
|
|
EduRev CLAT answered |
To solve Weaken and Strengthen questions, one should look for statements that either support the argument (to strengthen it) or challenge the assumptions or conclusions (to weaken it). This directly addresses the argument's validity.
What is a common error to look for when identifying flaws in an argument's logic?- a) Clear conclusions
- b) Multiple perspectives considered
- c) Strong supporting evidence
- d) Inclusion of irrelevant data
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
What is a common error to look for when identifying flaws in an argument's logic?
a)
Clear conclusions
b)
Multiple perspectives considered
c)
Strong supporting evidence
d)
Inclusion of irrelevant data
|
|
Crafty Classes answered |
A common error in identifying flaws in an argument's logic is the inclusion of irrelevant data. This can lead to poor reasoning and can misguide the audience. It's crucial to ensure that all information presented directly supports the argument's conclusion. Understanding how to identify and eliminate irrelevant information can significantly enhance critical thinking skills.
Which of the following components is NOT part of an argument structure?- a) Premises
- b) Assumptions
- c) Conclusion
- d) Evidence
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following components is NOT part of an argument structure?
a)
Premises
b)
Assumptions
c)
Conclusion
d)
Evidence
|
|
EduRev CLAT answered |
While premises, conclusions, and assumptions are integral components of an argument structure, "evidence" is not explicitly defined as a part of this structure. Arguments rely on premises to support conclusions, but evidence is a broader term often used to substantiate those premises.
What is the primary focus when analyzing the structure of an argument?- a) The length of the argument
- b) The relationships between the parts of the argument
- c) The emotional tone of the argument
- d) The number of examples provided
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What is the primary focus when analyzing the structure of an argument?
a)
The length of the argument
b)
The relationships between the parts of the argument
c)
The emotional tone of the argument
d)
The number of examples provided
|
|
EduRev CLAT answered |
The primary focus when analyzing the structure of an argument is to understand the relationships between its various parts. This includes identifying how premises connect to conclusions and whether the argument follows a logical flow. Grasping the structure helps in deconstructing complex arguments and enhances overall comprehension.
In the context of Critical Reasoning, what does the term "assumption" refer to?- a) A statement of opinion
- b) A hidden idea necessary for the argument to hold
- c) A conclusion drawn from evidence
- d) A fact that is universally accepted
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
In the context of Critical Reasoning, what does the term "assumption" refer to?
a)
A statement of opinion
b)
A hidden idea necessary for the argument to hold
c)
A conclusion drawn from evidence
d)
A fact that is universally accepted
|
|
Crafty Classes answered |
An assumption is a hidden idea or belief that must be true for the argument to be valid. Identifying these assumptions is crucial for evaluating the strength of an argument.
Which of the following best describes a paradox question?- a) A question focusing on the argument's structure
- b) A question that reveals a contradiction that can both be true
- c) A question about the argument's conclusion
- d) A question that asks for the assumption
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following best describes a paradox question?
a)
A question focusing on the argument's structure
b)
A question that reveals a contradiction that can both be true
c)
A question about the argument's conclusion
d)
A question that asks for the assumption
|
|
EduRev CLAT answered |
A paradox question presents two seemingly contradictory statements and asks for an explanation that reconciles them. This type of question tests deeper analytical skills and understanding of complex relationships.
What does the term "flaw in the argument" typically refer to?- a) An irrelevant point made by the arguer
- b) A series of unrelated claims
- c) A statement that is incorrect
- d) A logical error that undermines the argument
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
What does the term "flaw in the argument" typically refer to?
a)
An irrelevant point made by the arguer
b)
A series of unrelated claims
c)
A statement that is incorrect
d)
A logical error that undermines the argument
|
|
EduRev CLAT answered |
A "flaw in the argument" refers to a logical error that compromises the argument's validity. Identifying these flaws is essential for critiquing the strength of any argument presented.
Telemedicine, the delivery of healthcare services via digital platforms, has surged in India, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2024, over 40 million consultations were conducted online, with 65% of users from rural and semi-urban areas. Telemedicine enables patients to consult specialists without traveling, addressing the shortage of doctors in remote regions, where only 1 doctor serves every 10,000 people. A 2024 study found that telemedicine reduced patient travel costs by 30% and improved timely diagnosis for 50% of users. Proponents argue that telemedicine enhances healthcare access, reduces hospital overcrowding, and supports preventive care through regular virtual check-ups.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the critics’ argument that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care?- a)In-person examinations are critical for 80% of complex diagnoses.
- b)Hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care improve diagnostic accuracy by 20%.
- c)Rural internet connectivity remains unreliable in most regions.
- d)Elderly patients prefer traditional hospital visits over telemedicine.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Telemedicine, the delivery of healthcare services via digital platforms, has surged in India, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2024, over 40 million consultations were conducted online, with 65% of users from rural and semi-urban areas. Telemedicine enables patients to consult specialists without traveling, addressing the shortage of doctors in remote regions, where only 1 doctor serves every 10,000 people. A 2024 study found that telemedicine reduced patient travel costs by 30% and improved timely diagnosis for 50% of users. Proponents argue that telemedicine enhances healthcare access, reduces hospital overcrowding, and supports preventive care through regular virtual check-ups.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the critics’ argument that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care?
a)
In-person examinations are critical for 80% of complex diagnoses.
b)
Hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care improve diagnostic accuracy by 20%.
c)
Rural internet connectivity remains unreliable in most regions.
d)
Elderly patients prefer traditional hospital visits over telemedicine.
|
|
EduRev CLAT answered |
Critics argue telemedicine cannot replace in-person care due to the need for physical examinations. Option (B) weakens this by showing hybrid models, which include in-person elements, improve accuracy, suggesting telemedicine can be effective when combined with traditional care.
- (A)strengthens critics by emphasizing in-person care’s importance.
- (C)is irrelevant to replacing in-person care.
- (D)supports critics by highlighting limited adoption.
Critical Reasoning Skill
: Weakening an argument involves countering critics’ objections with supportive evidence.
Telemedicine, the delivery of healthcare services via digital platforms, has surged in India, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2024, over 40 million consultations were conducted online, with 65% of users from rural and semi-urban areas. Telemedicine enables patients to consult specialists without traveling, addressing the shortage of doctors in remote regions, where only 1 doctor serves every 10,000 people. A 2024 study found that telemedicine reduced patient travel costs by 30% and improved timely diagnosis for 50% of users. Proponents argue that telemedicine enhances healthcare access, reduces hospital overcrowding, and supports preventive care through regular virtual check-ups.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.What is a primary benefit of telemedicine highlighted in the passage?- a)Enhanced healthcare access for rural areas
- b)Complete replacement of in-person consultations
- c)Elimination of all diagnostic errors
- d)Increased hospital overcrowding
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Telemedicine, the delivery of healthcare services via digital platforms, has surged in India, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2024, over 40 million consultations were conducted online, with 65% of users from rural and semi-urban areas. Telemedicine enables patients to consult specialists without traveling, addressing the shortage of doctors in remote regions, where only 1 doctor serves every 10,000 people. A 2024 study found that telemedicine reduced patient travel costs by 30% and improved timely diagnosis for 50% of users. Proponents argue that telemedicine enhances healthcare access, reduces hospital overcrowding, and supports preventive care through regular virtual check-ups.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.
Despite its benefits, telemedicine faces hurdles. Unreliable internet connectivity in rural areas disrupts consultations, affecting 25% of sessions. Additionally, digital illiteracy among elderly patients limits adoption, with only 15% of those over 60 using telemedicine. Critics argue that telemedicine cannot replace in-person care, which is essential for accurate physical examinations and complex diagnoses. They caution that over-reliance on virtual care may lead to misdiagnoses, citing a study where 10% of telemedicine cases required follow-up hospital visits. Supporters counter that training programs for digital literacy and hybrid models combining virtual and in-person care can address these issues. The debate centers on whether telemedicine can sustainably bridge India’s healthcare gap or merely serve as a supplementary tool, with policymakers tasked to improve infrastructure and ensure quality care.
What is a primary benefit of telemedicine highlighted in the passage?
a)
Enhanced healthcare access for rural areas
b)
Complete replacement of in-person consultations
c)
Elimination of all diagnostic errors
d)
Increased hospital overcrowding
|
|
Crafty Classes answered |
The passage emphasizes that telemedicine enables rural patients to consult specialists without traveling, addressing the doctor shortage in remote areas, making (A) the correct choice.
- (B)is incorrect; the passage doesn’t claim telemedicine replaces in-person care.
- (C)exaggerates; diagnostic errors persist.
- (D)contradicts the passage, which notes reduced overcrowding.
Critical Reasoning Skill
: Identifying the main benefit requires focusing on the passage’s core advantage.
What logical fallacy involves assuming that correlation implies causation?- a) Scope Shift
- b) Personal Attack
- c) Correlation vs. Cause
- d) Only Two Options
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
What logical fallacy involves assuming that correlation implies causation?
a)
Scope Shift
b)
Personal Attack
c)
Correlation vs. Cause
d)
Only Two Options
|
|
Crafty Classes answered |
The "Correlation vs. Cause" fallacy occurs when it is assumed that because two events occur together, one must be causing the other. This is a common error in reasoning that can lead to incorrect conclusions.
What should you look for when identifying a flaw in the argument's logic?- a) The number of supporting examples
- b) The eloquence of the arguments presented
- c) The clarity of the conclusion
- d) Wrong assumptions or ignoring other possibilities
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
What should you look for when identifying a flaw in the argument's logic?
a)
The number of supporting examples
b)
The eloquence of the arguments presented
c)
The clarity of the conclusion
d)
Wrong assumptions or ignoring other possibilities
|
|
EduRev CLAT answered |
When identifying a flaw in an argument's logic, one should look for wrong assumptions or the failure to consider other possibilities. These flaws can undermine the argument's validity and can lead to incorrect conclusions. Recognizing these issues is key to improving one's analytical reasoning and argumentation skills.
In evaluating the conclusion of an argument, what should be checked?- a) The clarity of the language used
- b) The emotional appeal of the argument
- c) The popularity of the argument
- d) If the premises fully support the conclusion
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
In evaluating the conclusion of an argument, what should be checked?
a)
The clarity of the language used
b)
The emotional appeal of the argument
c)
The popularity of the argument
d)
If the premises fully support the conclusion
|
|
Crafty Classes answered |
When evaluating the conclusion of an argument, it is essential to check if the premises fully support the conclusion. This means examining whether the reasoning presented logically leads to the conclusion drawn. A strong conclusion is built on solid, relevant premises, and recognizing gaps in this support can help improve analytical skills in argumentation.
Chapter doubts & questions for Critical Reasoning - 4 Months Preparation Course for CLAT UG 2025 is part of CLAT exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Critical Reasoning - 4 Months Preparation Course for CLAT UG in English & Hindi are available as part of CLAT exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
4 Months Preparation Course for CLAT UG
283 videos|1003 docs|331 tests
|
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup