All questions of Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency for Computer Science Engineering (CSE) Exam

1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App

 (Q.no: 16-20). Refer to the following table and answer the given questions.
If the number of male post graduate employees in company W is 1488, what percent of the female employees in that particular company are post graduate?
  • a)
    75%
  • b)
     100%
  • c)
    74%
  • d)
    73%
  • e)
    72%
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Preeti Khanna answered
Number of Females in Company W = 3360 *(5/14) = 1200
Number of Post graduate employees in Company W = 3360 *(80/100) = 2688
Number of female post graduate employees in Company W = 2688 – 1488 = 1200
Required Percentage = (1200 * 100)/1200 = 100%

Study the following graph carefully and answer the following questions given below.
What is the difference between Number of Girls in School A and Number of Girls in School B?
  • a)
    100
  • b)
    101
  • c)
    102
  • d)
    103
  • e)
    None
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Alok Verma answered
Difference between Number of Girls in School A and Number of Girls in School B

- Number of Girls in School A: (10035 - 373)/2 = 4831
- Number of Girls in School B: (10098 - 640)/2 =  4729
- Difference = 4831 - 4729= 102

Therefore, the difference between the number of girls in School A and School B is 102. So, the correct answer is C: 102.

How many children does Anuradha have?
I. Preeti is the only sister of Ravi who is grandson of Bhuvan. Anuradha is daughter-inlaw of Madhu and sister-in-law of Radhika.
II. Manish is married to Anuradha and is son of Bhuvan. Ritu, sister of Anuradha is married to Suraj. Ravi is the only brother of Preeti.
  • a)
    If the data in statement I alone is sufficient to answer the question.
  • b)
    If the data in statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question.
  • c)
    If the data either in statement I alone or statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question.
  • d)
    If the data given in both I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.
  • e)
    If the data in both the statements I and II together are necessary to answer the question.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Statement I:
Preeti is the only sister of Ravi who is the grandson of Bhuvan. Anuradha is the daughter-in-law of Madhu and sister-in-law of Radhika.

Statement II:
Manish is married to Anuradha and is the son of Bhuvan. Ritu, sister of Anuradha, is married to Suraj. Ravi is the only brother of Preeti.

To determine the number of children Anuradha has, we need to analyze the given statements.

Statement I:
From this statement, we can establish the following connections:
- Preeti is the sister of Ravi.
- Ravi is the grandson of Bhuvan.
- Anuradha is the daughter-in-law of Madhu.
- Anuradha is the sister-in-law of Radhika.

However, this statement does not provide any direct information about the number of children Anuradha has. It only establishes her relationships with other individuals.

Statement II:
From this statement, we can establish the following connections:
- Manish is married to Anuradha.
- Manish is the son of Bhuvan.
- Ritu is the sister of Anuradha.
- Ritu is married to Suraj.
- Ravi is the only brother of Preeti.

Similar to statement I, this statement also does not provide any direct information about the number of children Anuradha has. It only establishes her relationships with other individuals.

Combined Statements:
When we consider the information from both statements together, we can establish the following connections:
- Anuradha is married to Manish.
- Manish is the son of Bhuvan.
- Preeti is the sister of Ravi.
- Ravi is the grandson of Bhuvan.
- Ritu is the sister of Anuradha.
- Ritu is married to Suraj.

Although we have established multiple connections, none of them directly provide information about the number of children Anuradha has.

Therefore, the data given in both statements I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question of how many children Anuradha has. Hence, the correct answer is option D.

Study the following graph carefully to answer the given questions
Q and S work together for 5 days, the rest of the work is finished by M in two more days. If they get Rs. 6000 as wages for the whole work, what are the daily wages of Q, S and M respectively?
  • a)
    200, 250, 300
  • b)
    300, 200, 250
  • c)
    600, 400, 200
  • d)
    600, 400, 500
  • e)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Preeti Khanna answered
Explanation:
Q’s 5 days work = 50%
S’s 5 days work = 33.33%
M’s 2 days work = 16.66% [100- (50+33.33)] Ratio of work of Q, S and M = 3: 2: 1
Q’s total share = Rs. 3000
S’s total share = Rs. 2000
M’s total share = Rs. 1000
Q’s one day’s wage = Rs.600
S’s one day’s wage = Rs.400
M’s one day’s wage = Rs.500

 How many boys students are there in the class ?
I.65%girls students are there in the class
II.The no of boys students is half that of girls
  • a)
    If the data in statement I alone are sufficient
  • b)
    If the data in statement II alone are sufficient
  • c)
    If the data either in statement I alone or statement II alone are sufficient to answer
  • d)
    If the data given in both I and II together are not sufficient
  • e)
    If the data in both the statements I and II together are necessary to answer​
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Aarav Sharma answered
Statement I: 65% girls students are there in the class
Statement II: The number of boys students is half that of girls

To determine the number of boys students in the class, we need to know the total number of students in the class. However, neither statement provides this information.

Let's analyze each statement separately:

Statement I alone:
We are given that 65% of the students in the class are girls. However, without knowing the total number of students, we cannot determine the number of boys students. For example, if there are 100 students in the class, then 65% of them would be girls, which means there would be 35 boys students. However, if there are 200 students in the class, then 65% of them would be girls, which means there would be 70 boys students. Therefore, statement I alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Statement II alone:
We are given that the number of boys students is half that of girls. Again, without knowing the total number of students, we cannot determine the number of boys students. For example, if there are 10 girls students, then there would be 5 boys students. However, if there are 20 girls students, then there would be 10 boys students. Therefore, statement II alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Combining the two statements:
Even when we combine both statements, we still do not have enough information to determine the number of boys students. We know that 65% of the students are girls and that the number of boys students is half that of girls, but without knowing the total number of students, we cannot determine the actual number of boys students. Therefore, the data given in both statements I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.

In conclusion, neither statement alone nor the two statements together provide enough information to determine the number of boys students in the class. Hence, the correct answer is option D.

Among the four friends A, B, C and D, who works for the most hours(each works for different no of hours ? I.A works less than B, D works less than both A and C
II.C works less than B but more than D, A works more than C but not the most.
  • a)
    If the data in statement I alone are sufficient
  • b)
    If the data in statement II alone are sufficient
  • c)
    If the data either in statement I alone or statement II alone are sufficient to answer
  • d)
    If the data given in both I and II together are not sufficient
  • e)
    If the data in both the statements I and II together are necessary to answer
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Aarav Sharma answered
Given:

- A works less than B
- D works less than both A and C
- C works less than B but more than D
- A works more than C but not the most

To find:

- Who works for the most hours?

Solution:

From statement I, we only know that A works less than B. We cannot compare any of the other friends' working hours with this information alone. Hence, statement I alone is not sufficient.

From statement II, we know that C works less than B but more than D. This means that the order of working hours for these three friends is D < c="" />< b.="" however,="" we="" cannot="" compare="" the="" working="" hours="" of="" a="" with="" any="" of="" these="" friends="" with="" this="" information="" alone.="" hence,="" statement="" ii="" alone="" is="" not="" />

Combining both statements, we know:

- A works less than B
- D works less than both A and C
- C works less than B but more than D
- A works more than C but not the most

From statement II, we know that C works less than B, and from statement I, we know that A works less than B. This means that the order of working hours for these three friends is A < c="" />< b.="" also,="" from="" statement="" ii,="" we="" know="" that="" d="" works="" less="" than="" both="" a="" and="" c.="" thus,="" the="" order="" of="" working="" hours="" for="" these="" four="" friends="" />

- D < a="" />< c="" />< />

Therefore, B works for the most hours.

Hence, the data in statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question.

Answer: (B) If the data in statement II alone is sufficient.

What is the distance between points A and B?
I. Point P is 10 m west of point C. Point D is 5 m north of point A which is 5 m west of point C.
II. Point Q is equidistant from points A and B.
  • a)
    If the data in statement I alone is sufficient to answer the question.
  • b)
    If the data in statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question.
  • c)
    If the data either in statement I alone or statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question.
  • d)
    If the data given in both I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.
  • e)
    If the data in both the statements I and II together are necessary to answer the question.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Statement I:
- Point P is 10 m west of point C.
- Point D is 5 m north of point A, which is 5 m west of point C.
From Statement I alone, we can determine the relative positions of points A, C, D, and P. However, we still do not have the exact distances between points A and B. Therefore, Statement I alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Statement II:
- Point Q is equidistant from points A and B.
From Statement II alone, we know that point Q is equidistant from points A and B. However, this information does not provide us with the actual distance between points A and B. Therefore, Statement II alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Both Statements Together:
When we consider both statements together, we still do not have enough information to determine the distance between points A and B. Even though we have more details about the positions of various points, the exact distance between A and B cannot be calculated with the given information. Therefore, the data in both statements together are not sufficient to answer the question.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D - If the data given in both I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.

P, Q, R, S, T and U are sitting around a circular table, facing the centre. Who is sitting opposite P?
1) Q and R are sitting opposite each other.
2) T may sit either on the immediate left of Q or on the immediate right of R.
3) S cannot sit opposite T, and P cannot sit opposite T
  • a)
    only 1
  • b)
    only 1 and 2
  • c)
    only 2 and 3
  • d)
    all of them
  • e)
    none of these
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Saranya Ahuja answered


Statement 1:
- Q and R are sitting opposite each other.

Statement 2:
- T may sit either on the immediate left of Q or on the immediate right of R.

Statement 3:
- S cannot sit opposite T, and P cannot sit opposite T.

Explanation:
- From statement 1, we know that Q and R are opposite each other.
- From statement 2, T can only sit next to either Q or R.
- Combining statement 1 and 2, we can determine the positions of Q, R, and T around the table.
- From statement 3, S cannot be opposite T, so S must be in a position that is not opposite T.
- Since P cannot be opposite T as well, P must also be in a position that is not opposite T.
- By process of elimination, P must be sitting opposite U.
- Hence, all three statements together determine that P is sitting opposite U.

Therefore, the correct answer is option D, all of them.

How far is point S from point W?
I.A persons starts from point W walks 5m to the south, takes a right turn and walks 2m. He then takes a left turn and walks 4m. He takes a left turn again, walks for 4m and reaches point U. If the persons takes a left turn and walks 4m, he will reach point S.
II.A persons Starts from point W, walks 14m towards the east, takes a left turn and walks 3m. He then takes a left turn again and walks for 14m to reach point T. If he takes a right turn from point T and walks 5m, he will be 2om away from point S.
  • a)
    If the data in statement I alone are sufficient
  • b)
    If the data in statement II alone are sufficient
  • c)
    If the data either in statement I alone or statement II alone are sufficient to answer
  • d)
    If the data given in both I and II together are not sufficient
  • e)
    If the data in both the statements I and II together are necessary to answer
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

To determine the distance between point S and point W, we need to analyze the given information in both statements I and II.

Statement I:
According to statement I, a person starts from point W and walks 5m to the south, then takes a right turn and walks 2m. After that, the person takes a left turn and walks 4m and reaches point U. Finally, if the person takes a left turn and walks 4m, they will reach point S.

Based on this information, we can determine that point U is 6m to the east of point W (2m + 4m) and point S is 4m to the north of point U. However, we do not have any information about the distance between point U and point S. Therefore, statement I alone is not sufficient to determine the distance between point S and point W.

Statement II:
According to statement II, a person starts from point W and walks 14m towards the east, then takes a left turn and walks 3m. The person then takes a left turn again and walks for 14m to reach point T. If the person takes a right turn from point T and walks 5m, they will be 20m away from point S.

Based on this information, we can determine that point T is 17m to the east of point W (14m + 3m) and point S is 20m to the west of point T. However, we do not have any information about the distance between point W and point T. Therefore, statement II alone is not sufficient to determine the distance between point S and point W.

Combining both statements:
By combining both statements, we can determine that point U is 6m to the east of point W and point T is 17m to the east of point W. However, we still do not have any information about the distance between point U and point S or point W and point T.

Therefore, even when both statements are considered together, we cannot determine the distance between point S and point W. Hence, the correct answer is option A - the data in statement I alone is sufficient.

Who among Raj, Jyoti, Akash and Neelam is the heaviest?
1) Jyoti is heavier than Neelam.
2) Raj is not as heavy as either Akash or Jyoti.
3) Neelam is neither the heaviest nor the lightest.
  • a)
    only 1
  • b)
    only 2 and 3
  • c)
    all 1,2 and 3
  • d)
    Can’t be determined
  • e)
    none of these
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Based on the given information:

1) Jyoti is heavier than Neelam.
2) Raj is not as heavy as either Akash or Jyoti.
3) Neelam is neither the heaviest nor the lightest.

From statement 1, we know that Jyoti > Neelam.

From statement 2, we know that Raj < akash="" and="" raj="" />< />

From statement 3, we know that Neelam is not the heaviest or the lightest.

Combining all the information, we can determine the order of their weights:

Raj < akash="" />< jyoti="" /> Neelam

Therefore, Jyoti is the heaviest among Raj, Jyoti, Akash, and Neelam.

The answer is (a) only 1.

Chapter doubts & questions for Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency - RRB JE Mock Test Series for Computer Science Engineering 2025 2024 is part of Computer Science Engineering (CSE) exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the Computer Science Engineering (CSE) exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for Computer Science Engineering (CSE) 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.

Chapter doubts & questions of Data Interpretation and Data Sufficiency - RRB JE Mock Test Series for Computer Science Engineering 2025 in English & Hindi are available as part of Computer Science Engineering (CSE) exam. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Computer Science Engineering (CSE) Exam by signing up for free.

Top Courses Computer Science Engineering (CSE)

Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!

Study with 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos & Tests
10M+ students study on EduRev