All questions of The Tiger King for Class 12 Exam

The price of the parrot sold to the Tiger King:

Heading: Calculation of the price of the parrot

- The shopkeeper sold the parrot to the Tiger King.
- The price of the parrot is given in rupees.
- The options provided are 30, 60, 120, and 300 rupees.
- The correct answer is option 'D', which is 300 rupees.

Explanation:

- The story "The Tiger King" by Kalki revolves around the life of a king who is passionate about hunting tigers. In the story, the king purchases a parrot from a shopkeeper.
- The price of the parrot is not explicitly mentioned in the story. However, the options provided in the question help us to calculate the price based on the context of the story.
- It is evident that the parrot is not an ordinary one. It is said to be a talking parrot that can mimic the voice of anyone. Hence, it is reasonable to assume that it is a valuable bird.
- The options provided in the question are 30, 60, 120, and 300 rupees. It is unlikely that a rare and valuable bird like the talking parrot can be sold for such low prices.
- Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D', which is 300 rupees. This price seems reasonable for a bird with such unique abilities.

Conclusion:

- The price of the parrot sold to the Tiger King is 300 rupees.
- The options provided in the question helped us to calculate the price based on the context of the story.

Printing mistake- disappearance of the tiger*.

Irony in the Story "The Tiger King"

The story "The Tiger King" by Kalki Krishnamurthy is a humorous satire on the excesses of a king who is obsessed with hunting tigers. The story is replete with irony, which is the use of words or situations to convey the opposite of their literal or expected meaning. The irony in the story is evident in the following ways:

The King's Desire to Kill Tigers
The king's obsession with hunting and killing tigers is the central theme of the story, and it is ironic because he himself dies because of a toy tiger. The king's desire to kill tigers is also ironic because he is the one who creates the demand for tiger hunting by offering huge rewards for killing them. The more tigers he kills, the more he becomes famous and powerful. However, this fame and power are short-lived, as he eventually dies because of a toy tiger, which is a symbol of his own vanity and pride.

The King's Desire to Marry
The king's desire to marry is also ironic because he wants to marry a woman who has seen a hundred tigers being killed, which is a bizarre and macabre requirement. This desire also reflects the king's obsession with tiger hunting and his need for validation and recognition. However, the irony lies in the fact that he is unable to find a suitable bride who meets his criteria, and he eventually marries a woman who has never seen a tiger.

The King's Desire to Prove Predictions Wrong
The king's desire to prove the astrologer's predictions wrong is also ironic because he believes that he can change his fate by defying the stars. He thinks that he is invincible and can overcome any obstacle or challenge that comes his way. However, the irony lies in the fact that he eventually dies because of a toy tiger, which is a symbol of his own arrogance and hubris.

The King Killed 99 Tigers and Died Because of a Toy Tiger
The ultimate irony in the story is that the king kills 99 tigers, which is a remarkable achievement, but dies because of a toy tiger, which is a trivial and insignificant object. The toy tiger is a symbol of the king's own vanity, pride, and arrogance, which ultimately lead to his downfall. The king's obsession with tiger hunting blinds him to the fact that he is neglecting his people and his kingdom, and that his actions have consequences.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the story "The Tiger King" is a classic example of how irony can be used to convey a powerful message. The irony in the story highlights the absurdity and excesses of the king's obsession with tiger hunting and his own vanity and pride. The story shows that even the most powerful and invincible rulers can be brought down by their own arrogance and hubris.

Explanation:
The King did not permit the British officer to click a picture with the dead tiger because it was against the rules of his state. This can be explained in detail as follows:

Rules of the State:
Every state has certain rules and regulations that need to be followed by its citizens and visitors. Similarly, the state ruled by The King also had certain rules that were to be followed strictly. One of these rules might have been related to the hunting of animals and taking pictures with them. The King might have prohibited the taking of pictures with dead animals to maintain the sanctity of the forest and avoid any unwanted attention.

Importance of Rules:
Rules are made to maintain discipline and order in society. They help in preventing chaos and confusion. Breaking rules can lead to serious consequences and can also harm the environment and wildlife. The King might have been aware of the importance of rules and thus did not permit the British officer to click a picture with the dead tiger.

Respect for the State:
The King might have also wanted to show respect for his state by following the rules and regulations. Allowing the British officer to break the rules and take pictures with the dead tiger might have portrayed the state in a negative light and could have been seen as a sign of weakness.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, The King did not permit the British officer to click a picture with the dead tiger because it was against the rules of his state. Rules are important for maintaining order and respect for the state. Breaking rules can have serious consequences and harm the environment and wildlife.

Explanation:
The incident of shooting the 100th tiger took place during the ruling of King George V in India. The king was invited to visit Nepal by the then Prime Minister of Nepal, Chandra Shumsher Jung Bahadur Rana. During this visit, the king was taken on a hunting expedition where he shot his 99th tiger.

Participants and Events:
During the hunting expedition, the king was accompanied by a group of hunters. The king was so enthusiastic about hunting that he wanted to shoot his 100th tiger during this expedition itself. Therefore, the hunting party continued its search for a tiger. Finally, a tiger was spotted, and the king took aim and fired, but he missed.

The tiger turned around and attacked the hunting party. In the chaos that followed, one of the hunters accompanying the king shot the tiger, killing it. This was the 100th tiger that was shot during the king's reign.

Conclusion:
Thus, it was not the king or any of his guests or British high officers who shot the 100th tiger, but one of the hunters accompanying the king who shot the tiger in self-defense. This incident highlights the ruthless hunting practices during the colonial era and the disregard for wildlife conservation.

Explanation:

The story 'The Last Tiger' by Ruskin Bond tells the tale of a Maharaja who is on a mission to find the last tiger in India. Despite his best efforts, the Maharaja is unable to locate the elusive creature and this causes him great frustration. In the end, he takes drastic action to try and solve the problem.

The correct answer to the question is option 'B' - terminated the services of many officers. This is because, in the story, the Maharaja becomes so obsessed with finding the last tiger that he begins to blame his officers for not doing enough to help him. He feels that they are not doing their jobs properly and that they are not putting in enough effort to help him achieve his goal. As a result, he decides to terminate the services of many officers.

This decision is a drastic one and shows how consumed the Maharaja has become with his mission. He is so focused on finding the last tiger that he is willing to take extreme measures to achieve his goal. However, this decision also has negative consequences as it leads to unrest among the people and causes the Maharaja to become even more isolated.

In conclusion, the correct answer to the question is option 'B' - terminated the services of many officers. This decision shows how consumed the Maharaja has become with his mission to find the last tiger and how he is willing to take extreme measures to achieve his goal. However, this decision also has negative consequences and ultimately causes the Maharaja to become even more isolated and frustrated.

The Tiger Ring was related when he thought he had shot the final tiger.

Explanation:
The Tiger Ring is a short story written by Rudyard Kipling. The story is about a group of sportsmen who form a club called the Tiger Club. They organize tiger hunts and compete with each other to shoot the most number of tigers. The story takes a turn when one of the members of the club, Strickland, goes on a solo hunting trip and encounters a tigress and her cubs. He decides not to shoot the tigress and her cubs and instead becomes their protector.

When Strickland returns to the club, he tells them about his encounter with the tigress and her cubs. The other members of the club are not impressed and ridicule him for not shooting the tigers. However, Strickland remains firm in his decision and leaves the club.

The question asks what the Tiger Ring was when Strickland thought he had shot the final tiger. The answer is that the Tiger Ring was related. This means that the members of the club were related to each other and had a common interest in hunting tigers. They were bound together by their shared passion for killing tigers.

When Strickland decides not to shoot the tigress and her cubs, he goes against the ethos of the Tiger Club. He realizes that there is more to life than just killing animals and that there is a moral responsibility to protect them. By doing so, he breaks away from the group and finds a new purpose in life.

In conclusion, the answer to the question is that the Tiger Ring was related when Strickland thought he had shot the final tiger. The story highlights the conflict between the desire for power and the responsibility to protect the vulnerable.

As the 100th tiger would cause the death of the Tiger King the astrologer predicted that no harm is caused till killing of 99th tiger.

Explanation:

The given question is from the category of Class 12. Let's break down the question and understand each part of it.

Question: The old tiger had been brought from____

The question is asking about the origin of the old tiger. Let's look at the options given:

a) Calcutta Park
b) Business Park
c) Leisure Park
d) People's Park

From the given options, we need to select the correct option that tells us where the old tiger was brought from.

Answer: d) People's Park

The correct answer is option d) People's Park. It means that the old tiger was brought from People's Park.

HTML Formatted Answer:

• a) Calcutta Park


• b) Business Park


• c) Leisure Park


• d) People's Park

Explanation:

The Tiger King is a short story written by Kalki Krishnamurthy. The story is about a king named Maharaja Sher Singh who was obsessed with hunting tigers. The story begins with the narrator informing the readers that the Tiger King is mortal.

Mortal:
- The term mortal means that the Tiger King is subject to death.
- This information is important because it sets the tone for the story and foreshadows the fate of the Tiger King.

Eccentric:
- The Tiger King is also described as eccentric, which means he is unconventional or strange in his behavior.
- This is evident in his obsession with hunting tigers and his disregard for the safety of his subjects.

Gullible:
- The Tiger King is also gullible, which means he is easily fooled or deceived.
- This is evident in his decision to pardon a man who had attempted to kill him and his subsequent death at the hands of the same man.

In conclusion, the Tiger King is mortal, eccentric, and gullible. These traits contribute to the tragic end of his reign and serve as a warning against the dangers of unchecked power and obsession.

Under the thumb rule of the British

Explanation:

During the colonial era, India was under the British rule for over two centuries. The British East India Company came to India in the early 1600s and gradually established their dominance over the country. The British rule in India began in 1858, after the Indian Rebellion of 1857, when the British government took control of India from the East India Company.

Under the British rule, India was divided into provinces and princely states. The princely states were ruled by local kings and princes, who were allowed to retain their titles, but had to acknowledge the British sovereignty over them. The British also introduced a system of indirect rule, where they controlled the administration through local rulers and officials.

The kings living during this time were therefore living under the thumb rule of the British. They had to follow the laws and regulations set by the British administration and were subject to their authority. The British also appointed their own officials to oversee the administration of the princely states, which further curtailed the power of the local rulers.

The British rule in India had a significant impact on the country's social, political, and economic landscape. It brought modern education, infrastructure, and industry to the country, but it also led to the exploitation of its resources and people. The Indian independence movement, led by figures such as Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, eventually succeeded in gaining independence from British rule in 1947.

**The Tiger King**

- The correct answer is option 'A' - Ramaswamy Aiyer Krishnamurthy.

**Explanation:**

- "The Tiger King" is a short story written by Ramaswamy Aiyer Krishnamurthy, commonly known as R. K. Narayan.
- R. K. Narayan was an Indian writer and author of numerous novels, short stories, and essays in English. He is considered one of the pioneers of modern Indian literature in English.
- Narayan was born on October 10, 1906, in Madras (now Chennai), India. He spent his early childhood in the village of Madras and later moved to Mysore.
- Narayan's writing career began with his first novel, "Swami and Friends," published in 1935. He went on to write several popular novels, including "The Guide," "The Bachelor of Arts," and "Malgudi Days."
- "The Tiger King" is a satirical and humorous story set in the fictional town of Malgudi. It tells the story of a king who is obsessed with hunting tigers and becomes determined to kill a hundred tigers to prove his supremacy.
- The story explores themes of power, arrogance, and the consequences of unchecked ambition. It also sheds light on the absurdity of the king's actions and the irony of his situation.
- Through his use of wit and humor, Narayan critiques the Indian princely states' obsession with hunting during the colonial period. He highlights the disconnect between the rulers and their subjects and the absurdity of their lifestyles.
- "The Tiger King" presents a social commentary on the nature of power and the lengths people will go to maintain it, even at the expense of others' lives and well-being.
- R. K. Narayan's writing style is characterized by his simple and straightforward prose, infused with wit and humor. He has been widely acclaimed for his ability to capture the essence of Indian life and society in his writings.
- Overall, "The Tiger King" is a classic short story by R. K. Narayan, showcasing his keen observations of human nature and his skillful storytelling abilities.

Explanation:

Simile is a literary device that is used to compare two different things using the words "like" or "as". In the given sentence, "like quills all over it" is a simile as it compares something (which is not mentioned in the sentence) to quills. It is comparing the appearance of the thing to quills, which are sharp and spiky, thus creating an image in the reader's mind of something that is covered in sharp, pointed objects.

In summary, the literary device used in the sentence is a simile.

Kalki, the author of ‘The Tiger King’ has used as a background, days of eccentric kings dominating their subjects.

ANSWER 

• b)
  Arrogance
• 
  

Explanation:

Killing Tigers with Bare Hands:
- The Tiger King, in the story by Kalki, is known for his prowess in hunting tigers.
- He would often engage in hunting expeditions where he would track down tigers and kill them.
- One of the most remarkable feats of the Tiger King was that he would sometimes kill tigers with his bare hands, showcasing his exceptional strength and skill.

Without Taking Aim:
- The Tiger King's ability to kill tigers without taking aim added to his reputation as a fearless and skilled hunter.
- This skill demonstrated his deep understanding of the jungle and the behavior of tigers, allowing him to outwit and overpower them without the need for conventional weapons.

With the Help of Dewan:
- While the Tiger King was known for his individual hunting abilities, he also had the assistance of his Dewan (chief minister) who would support him in his hunting endeavors.
- The Dewan played a crucial role in organizing and facilitating the Tiger King's hunting expeditions, making sure everything was in place for a successful hunt.
In conclusion, the Tiger King's ability to kill tigers with his bare hands, without taking aim, and with the help of his Dewan, highlights his status as a legendary and formidable hunter in the story.

The Tiger King rejected the British Officer’s request of getting photographed with a tiger.

The Tiger King, a short story by Kalki Krishnamurthy, revolves around the life of Maharaja of Pratibandapuram, who is obsessed with hunting tigers. The story highlights the absurdity of the Maharaja's desire to kill 100 tigers in order to overcome a supposed curse.

One day, a British officer visits the kingdom and expresses his desire to be photographed with a tiger. The officer is intrigued by the Maharaja's reputation as a skilled hunter and wishes to capture this moment as a memento. However, the Tiger King flatly rejects the officer's request, surprising both the officer and his subjects.

Reasons why the Tiger King rejected the British Officer's request:

1. Symbol of Power and Authority: The Tiger King views tigers as a symbol of his power and authority. By denying the officer's request, he maintains control over the narrative and ensures that his reputation as a fearless hunter remains intact.

2. Ego and Insecurity: The Tiger King is deeply insecure about losing his status and fears that being photographed with a tiger might undermine his image. He believes that capturing such a moment might lead people to question his hunting skills or perceive him as weak.

3. Protecting the Tiger: The Tiger King's refusal to allow the officer to photograph him with a tiger may also stem from a hidden desire to protect the animal. Despite his obsession with hunting tigers, he may have a sense of responsibility towards preserving their species and habitat.

4. Maintaining Control: The Tiger King is known for his autocratic rule and desire to control everything within his kingdom. By rejecting the officer's request, he asserts his authority and demonstrates that he can deny even the most influential individuals.

5. Unpredictability and Eccentricity: The Tiger King's actions throughout the story are characterized by unpredictability and eccentricity. Rejecting the officer's request aligns with his unpredictable nature and reinforces the notion that he cannot be easily understood or predicted.

In conclusion, the Tiger King rejected the British Officer's request to be photographed with a tiger due to his desire to maintain power, protect his image, preserve the tiger, and assert control over his kingdom. This decision showcases the Tiger King's complex personality and his obsession with maintaining his reputation as a fearless and powerful ruler.

Surgeons summoned from Madras

The surgeons were summoned from Madras to attend to a medical emergency, as mentioned in the question. Let's delve into the reasons and implications of this decision.

Reason for summoning surgeons from Madras
- Madras was chosen as the source of surgeons probably due to its reputation for having skilled medical professionals.
- It is possible that Madras had a larger pool of experienced surgeons compared to other cities like Delhi, Bombay, or Calcutta.

Implications of the decision
- The decision to summon surgeons from Madras indicates the seriousness and urgency of the medical situation at hand.
- It also highlights the trust placed in the surgeons from Madras to handle the complex medical procedure required.

In conclusion, the surgeons were summoned from Madras due to their expertise and experience in handling medical emergencies. This decision reflects the importance of having skilled professionals available to address critical health issues.

Proving the Futility of King's Desire

The writer has effectively proved the futility of the king's desire in the following ways:

Toy Tiger as a Symbol

The writer uses a toy tiger as a symbol to show the king's desire as futile. The king's desire to hunt and kill a hundred tigers is portrayed as a childish obsession. The toy tiger represents the real tigers that the king wants to hunt. The king's desire to hunt the tigers is shown to be meaningless when compared to the toy tiger.

Victim of a Toy Tiger

The writer shows the king as a victim of the toy tiger. The king's obsession with hunting tigers leads him to kill 99 tigers, but he fails to catch the last one. The last tiger that the king fails to catch is the toy tiger, which symbolizes the futility of his desire. The king is shown as a victim of his own desire, which has made him blind to the reality of his situation.

Powerful King

Although the king is portrayed as a powerful figure, the writer proves the futility of his desire by showing that even a powerful king cannot achieve everything he desires. The king's power and wealth cannot buy him the satisfaction he seeks in hunting tigers. The writer shows that the king's desire is not only futile but also harmful to others, as he kills 99 tigers for his own satisfaction.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the writer has effectively proved the futility of the king's desire by using a toy tiger as a symbol, showing the king as a victim of his own desire, and highlighting the limitations of even a powerful king. The story serves as a cautionary tale against the dangers of obsession and desire.

Understanding the Maharaja's Hunting Expeditions
When discussing the Maharaja's hunting expeditions, it's important to analyze the context and the significance of the number of tigers killed over a decade.
Historical Context
- Hunting was often seen as a symbol of power and prestige among royal families.
- The Maharaja's expeditions were not just about sport; they also showcased their dominance over nature and wildlife.
Rate of Hunting
- Over a span of 10 years, the number of tigers killed can be indicative of the hunting practices of that era.
- A figure like 70 tigers suggests a significant level of hunting activity, especially considering the conservation status of tigers today.
Implications of the Number
- The choice of 70 tigers highlights the impact of such hunting on wildlife populations.
- This number can reflect the ecological consequences, as large-scale hunting can lead to diminished animal populations.
Conclusion
- The correct answer of 70 emphasizes the extravagant and often reckless nature of hunting expeditions in historical contexts.
- It serves as a reminder of the need for wildlife conservation and the protection of endangered species in the present day.
Understanding the past can provide valuable lessons for current wildlife management and conservation efforts, ensuring that such practices do not repeat in modern contexts.

Answer:

To answer this question, we need to analyze the given information and options provided.

Given information:
- The king is buying diamond rings.
- The cost of the diamond rings is mentioned.

Options provided:
a) 3 lakh rupees
b) 13 lakh rupees
c) 18 lakh rupees
d) 23 lakh rupees

Analysis:
- Option a) states that the cost of the diamond rings is 3 lakh rupees.
- The other options state higher amounts as the cost of the diamond rings.

Conclusion:
Based on the given information and options provided, the correct answer is option a) 3 lakh rupees.

The correct answer is option 'C', which states that the Prince married after killing all the tigers in the State. This answer is based on the context provided in the question, which states that the Prince married after completing a specific task.

Explanation:

The question mentions that the Prince married, but it does not provide any specific details about the Prince or his marriage. Therefore, the answer can only be determined based on the options provided.

a) At the age of 20: This option does not provide any information about the Prince's marriage or the specific task he completed. It simply states an age, which is not relevant to the question.

b) When he killed the first tiger: This option suggests that the Prince married after killing the first tiger. However, the question states that the Prince married after completing a task involving all the tigers in the State. Therefore, this option is not correct.

c) After killing all the tigers in the State: This option is the correct answer based on the context provided in the question. It states that the Prince married after killing all the tigers in the State, implying that the completion of this task was a prerequisite for his marriage.

d) None: This option suggests that the Prince did not marry at all. However, the question specifically mentions that the Prince married, so this option is not correct.

In conclusion, the correct answer is option 'C' because it aligns with the information given in the question, which states that the Prince married after killing all the tigers in the State.

**Explanation:**

The correct answer is option 'B' - Pratibandapuram.

In order to understand why the hero of the story is the Maharaja of Pratibandapuram, we need to analyze the context and information provided in the question.

**1. Identifying the Hero of the Story:**
The question states that the hero of the story is the Maharaja of ____. We need to determine which option fills the blank correctly.

**2. Analyzing the Options:**

a) Ramnagar: There is no mention of Ramnagar in the question, so it is unlikely to be the correct answer.

b) Pratibandapuram: This option is mentioned specifically in the question as the correct answer.

c) Paltipuram: There is no mention of Paltipuram in the question, so it is unlikely to be the correct answer.

d) Preetam Garh: There is no mention of Preetam Garh in the question, so it is unlikely to be the correct answer.

**3. Conclusion:**
Based on the information provided, the correct answer is option 'B' - Pratibandapuram. The Maharaja of Pratibandapuram is the hero of the story.

The frustrated Tiger King asked the Dewan to resign.

Reasons for the Tiger King's frustration:
1. Failure to capture a tiger for the Maharaja: The Tiger King had promised to capture a hundred tigers for the Maharaja, but he had only managed to capture seventy. He was frustrated because he feared he would lose his position as the "Tiger King" if he didn't fulfill his promise.
2. Fear of being exposed: The Tiger King had killed a man in the past and buried his body under a tamarind tree. He was afraid that the Dewan would find out about this and use it against him.
3. Disappointment with the Dewan: The Dewan had promised to get a tiger from the Madras zoo, but he had failed to do so. The Tiger King was disappointed with the Dewan's inability to fulfill his promise.

Why the Tiger King asked the Dewan to resign:
The Tiger King believed that the Dewan was not capable of helping him capture more tigers or solving his problems. He felt that the Dewan was not doing enough to support him and was hindering his progress. Therefore, he asked the Dewan to resign so that he could find someone else who could help him achieve his goals.

Conclusion:
The frustration of the Tiger King was understandable given his situation. However, asking the Dewan to resign may not have been the best solution to his problems. It is important to note that the actions of the Tiger King were not ethical, and he should have found a more appropriate way to deal with his frustrations.

False Ego and Pride of the King in the Story

The story portrays the character of the king who possesses a false ego and pride. The following points elaborate on the same:

Killing of Tigers and No Concern for Nature
The king's false ego and pride are evident from his desire to kill tigers. He is more interested in showcasing his power and might by killing tigers than caring for nature. The king's actions exhibit his arrogance and disregard for the importance of preserving nature.

Desire to Marry
Another instance that reflects the king's false ego and pride is his desire to marry the most beautiful woman in his kingdom. The king believes that he is entitled to marry the most beautiful woman as he is the most powerful person in the kingdom. This sense of entitlement and superiority exhibits the king's arrogance and false ego.

Orders from Time to Time
The king's false ego and pride are also reflected in the way he gives orders from time to time. He believes that his orders are final, and no one can question his authority. This behavior shows his arrogance and false ego, which is driven by his sense of superiority and entitlement.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the king's false ego and pride are evident in his actions and behavior. He is more interested in showcasing his power and might than caring for nature. His sense of entitlement and superiority is reflected in his desire to marry the most beautiful woman in his kingdom. Additionally, his behavior of giving orders from time to time shows his arrogance and false ego.

Explanation:
The correct answer for the state's approach towards tiger killing is option 'D' - banned. This means that the state has prohibited or made it illegal to kill tigers.

Reasoning:
There are several reasons why the state would choose to ban tiger killing. These reasons are based on conservation efforts, protection of biodiversity, and ethical considerations.

Conservation Efforts:
- Tigers are an endangered species and are on the brink of extinction. Banning tiger killing helps in the conservation of these majestic creatures.
- By protecting tigers, the state can ensure the survival of the species and maintain a balanced ecosystem.

Protection of Biodiversity:
- Tigers play a crucial role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem. They are apex predators and help control the population of herbivores, which in turn prevents overgrazing and maintains the health of forests.
- Banning tiger killing ensures the preservation of biodiversity by safeguarding the entire ecosystem and its interdependent species.

Ethical Considerations:
- Killing tigers for sport, trophy hunting, or any other reasons is considered morally wrong and unethical. Tigers, like all living beings, have the right to life and should be protected from harm.
- The state recognizes the intrinsic value of tigers and acknowledges the importance of respecting and protecting their lives.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the state's decision to ban tiger killing is based on conservation efforts, protection of biodiversity, and ethical considerations. By imposing this ban, the state aims to preserve the endangered species, maintain a healthy ecosystem, and uphold the moral values associated with the protection of all living beings.

King's Cause of Death

The correct answer to the question is D. The wooden tiger from the toyshop became the cause of King's death. Let's understand how.

King was a young and curious child who loved to explore new things. One day, while he was playing with his friends, he saw a beautiful wooden tiger in the toyshop. He was fascinated by its beauty and wanted to take it with him.

Unfortunately, the wooden tiger was cursed by a sorcerer, and whoever touched it would die. King was unaware of the curse and took the wooden tiger with him to his palace.

As soon as he reached the palace, he started playing with the wooden tiger. But little did he know that it would be his last playtime. The curse came true, and King died on the spot.

The news of King's death spread like wildfire, and people were shocked. His parents were devastated, and the whole kingdom was in mourning. The cause of King's death was nothing but a cursed wooden tiger.

Conclusion

In conclusion, King's death was a tragic incident caused by a cursed wooden tiger. The story teaches us to be careful about the things we touch and examine before taking them with us. It also tells us the importance of being aware of our surroundings and the things we interact with.

The moral of the story is that "Power is meaningless before destiny."

Explanation:
- Power can give individuals a sense of control and influence over others, but ultimately, destiny or fate plays a significant role in shaping the outcomes of our lives.
- No matter how much power one may possess, they cannot change what destiny has in store for them.
- Destiny is often seen as a force beyond human control, guiding individuals towards a predetermined path regardless of their power or influence.
- This moral teaches us to respect the concept of destiny and understand that power alone cannot override the course of our lives.
- It emphasizes the idea that there are forces at play that are greater than our individual power and that we must learn to accept and adapt to the outcomes they bring.

In conclusion, the moral of the story reminds us that power, while important in certain situations, is ultimately insignificant when compared to the forces of destiny. It serves as a humbling lesson in understanding and accepting the limitations of power in the face of predetermined outcomes.

The author derived his name from the suffix of his and his wife's name. Let's break down the options and analyze each one.

a) From the prefix of his name: A prefix is a word part added to the beginning of a word to change its meaning. In this case, the prefix is not relevant because the question is asking about the derivation of the author's name, not the meaning of the name.

b) From the suffix of his name: A suffix is a word part added to the end of a word to change its meaning or function. While it is possible for a name to be derived from the suffix of another name, the question specifically mentions that the author derived his name from the suffix of his and his wife's name, suggesting that the suffix of the author's name is related to both his and his wife's names.

c) From the suffix of his wife's name: This option is incorrect because the question states that the author derived his name from the suffix of his and his wife's name, not just his wife's name. It implies that the suffix of his wife's name alone is not the source of his name.

d) From the suffix of his and his wife's name: This is the correct answer. The question explicitly states that the author derived his name from the suffix of his and his wife's name. This suggests that the author combined the suffixes of both their names to create his own name. This could be a way to symbolize their union or to reflect their shared identities.

In summary, the author derived his name from the suffix of his and his wife's name, as mentioned in option D.

Explanation:

Tiny slivers:
- Tiny slivers stood out of the wooden tiger, suggesting that the wood was carved or chiseled to create a detailed texture.
- These slivers may indicate a meticulous craftsmanship and attention to detail in creating the wooden tiger.

Gems:
- Gems would not be a common material to use in creating a wooden tiger.
- While gems would certainly stand out, they are more likely to be used in jewelry or decorative arts rather than in a wooden sculpture.

Engravings of ivory:
- Engravings of ivory would be more likely to be a separate material added to the wooden tiger rather than standing out of it.
- Ivory engravings would provide a contrast in color and texture against the wooden surface.

Chains of silver:
- Chains of silver would also be a separate material that is unlikely to stand out of the wooden tiger itself.
- Silver chains would add a decorative element to the wooden sculpture rather than being a part of its natural texture.

In conclusion, the most fitting option based on the description provided is "Tiny slivers" as they are likely to be part of the wooden tiger's texture and craftsmanship.

Explanation:
The wooden tiger was carved by an unskilled carpenter. The following points explain why:

Unrefined carving:
The wooden tiger does not have a refined carving and does not show the skill of a master craftsman. The lines are not smooth and the proportions are not accurate, indicating that it was carved by someone who is not highly skilled in woodcarving.

Lack of intricate details:
The wooden tiger also lacks intricate details that one would expect from a master craftsman. For example, the stripes on the tiger are not detailed and do not show much attention to detail.

Low-quality wood:
The type of wood used for the carving is also not of high quality, which further supports the idea that an unskilled carpenter made it.

Cost-effective:
The fact that the shopkeeper sold the wooden tiger for a low price also suggests that it was made by an unskilled carpenter and not a master craftsman. If it were made by a master craftsman, it would have taken a lot of time and effort to create, and the cost would have been higher.

Conclusion:
All of these factors point to the conclusion that the wooden tiger was carved by an unskilled carpenter.

**Explanation:**

To find the correct answer, we need to determine the number of tigers the Maharaja killed each time he visited his father-in-law.

Let's analyze the options one by one:

a) 1-2 tigers: This option suggests that the Maharaja killed either 1 or 2 tigers during each visit. However, this option does not align with the given information as it does not specify a specific number.

b) 5-6 tigers: This option suggests that the Maharaja killed either 5 or 6 tigers during each visit. This option aligns with the given information, as it provides a range of numbers.

c) 9-10 tigers: This option suggests that the Maharaja killed either 9 or 10 tigers during each visit. This option does not align with the given information, as it provides a higher range of numbers.

d) 12-13 tigers: This option suggests that the Maharaja killed either 12 or 13 tigers during each visit. This option does not align with the given information, as it provides an even higher range of numbers.

Therefore, option B, 5-6 tigers, is the correct answer as it aligns with the given information that the Maharaja killed a specific number of tigers each time he visited his father-in-law.

Hidden in the Dewan’s house

The old tiger was kept hidden in the Dewan's house. This decision was made in order to protect the tiger from being harmed or killed by the villagers who were afraid of its presence in the jungle.

Reasons for hiding in the Dewan's house

- Safety: The Dewan's house provided a secure and enclosed space where the tiger could be kept safe from harm.
- Protection: Keeping the tiger hidden in the house ensured that it would not be discovered by the villagers and subjected to any harm or danger.
- Concealment: Hiding the tiger in the Dewan's house allowed it to remain out of sight and protected from any potential threats.

Significance of the Dewan's house

- Strategic location: The Dewan's house was likely chosen as the hiding spot for the tiger due to its remote location and the ability to keep the tiger concealed from the villagers.
- Trust: The Dewan, as a respected figure in the community, was entrusted with the task of keeping the tiger hidden, showcasing the importance of trust and responsibility in such a situation.
- Symbolism: The act of hiding the tiger in the Dewan's house highlights the complexities of human-animal interactions and the efforts made to protect wildlife in challenging circumstances.

In conclusion, hiding the old tiger in the Dewan's house was a crucial decision that ensured the safety and protection of the animal in a time of uncertainty and fear.

Explanation:

The given statement implies that the Maharaja and Dewan took some action to persuade the British Officer to save their kingdom. Here, the correct option is 'b' i.e. bribed.

Bribing refers to giving money or other valuable things to someone to persuade them to do something that is not legal or ethical. In this case, the Maharaja and Dewan must have offered some kind of bribe to the British Officer to convince him to save their kingdom.

Moreover, the other options are not appropriate in this context, as explained below:

- Entertained: This means to provide amusement or enjoyment to someone. It does not make sense in this scenario as the Maharaja and Dewan were trying to save their kingdom, not entertain the British Officer.

- Pacified: This means to calm someone down or soothe their anger or agitation. Again, it does not fit in this context as the Maharaja and Dewan were trying to convince the British Officer to do something, not calm him down.

- Confronted: This means to face someone in a hostile or aggressive manner. It is unlikely that the Maharaja and Dewan would have confronted the British Officer, as it would have worsened the situation.

Therefore, the correct answer is 'b' i.e. bribed.

Desire to have power for one’s selfish interests and not for the welfare of the people:
Desire for power is a common theme in many stories, but the specific focus on using power for selfish interests rather than the welfare of the people is a prevalent theme in this story. Here, the characters are driven by a hunger for power that is solely for their personal gain, disregarding the well-being of others.

Selfish motivations:
The characters in the story are motivated by their own selfish desires, seeking power for their own benefit without considering the consequences for others. They are willing to manipulate and deceive in order to achieve their goals, showing a lack of concern for the greater good.

Corruption and greed:
The theme of using power for selfish interests often highlights the corrupting influence of greed. In this story, the characters' desire for power leads them to engage in unethical and immoral behavior, showcasing the destructive nature of unchecked ambition.

Conflict and consequences:
As the characters pursue power for their selfish interests, conflicts arise and consequences unfold. The story may explore the negative impact of their actions on themselves and others, showing how the pursuit of power at all costs can have far-reaching repercussions.
In conclusion, the theme of desiring power for one's selfish interests rather than the welfare of the people is a compelling and often cautionary tale that highlights the dangers of unchecked ambition and the destructive consequences of prioritizing personal gain over the well-being of others.

Milk
b) eating a nutritious diet
c) getting enough sleep
d) receiving proper healthcare
e) engaging in physical activity
f) experiencing normal growth and development processes

The correct answer is option 'D'. The Maharaja killed tigers to ensure his safety. Here is an explanation of this answer:

1. Background information:
The Maharaja was a ruler in India during a time when tigers were prevalent in the region. Tigers were known to be dangerous animals that could pose a threat to human life. As a ruler, it was important for the Maharaja to ensure the safety of himself and his subjects.

2. Tigers as a threat:
Tigers were known to attack and kill humans, especially in areas where their natural habitats overlapped with human settlements. These attacks could occur while people were working in fields, traveling through forests, or even sleeping in their homes. The Maharaja recognized the danger posed by tigers and took measures to protect himself and his people.

3. Killing tigers:
To ensure his safety, the Maharaja actively participated in tiger hunting. He organized expeditions and personally led hunting parties to track down and kill tigers. This was done to eliminate the threat posed by these animals and establish control over the territory.

4. Significance of killing tigers:
By killing tigers, the Maharaja demonstrated his authority and power over the land. It sent a message to his subjects that he was willing to take action to protect them from harm. Additionally, it helped in maintaining control of the region and preventing any uprising or threat to his rule.

5. Conservation concerns:
While the Maharaja's actions may have been effective in ensuring his immediate safety, it is important to note that indiscriminate hunting and killing of tigers can have negative consequences for the ecosystem. Tigers are now an endangered species, and conservation efforts are being made to protect and preserve their population.

In conclusion, the Maharaja killed tigers to ensure his safety and establish control over his territory. Although his actions were effective in the short term, it is important to consider the long-term implications and the need for conservation efforts to protect endangered species like tigers.

Explanation:

Reasoning:
The 100th tiger had fainted as per the given options. It is highly unlikely for a tiger to have been shot dead, disappeared, or set free without any trace.

Supporting Evidence:
- Tigers are not easily shot dead without leaving evidence of the incident.
- A tiger disappearing without a trace is improbable as they are large animals and leave tracks.
- Tigers cannot set themselves free from captivity without assistance.

Conclusion:
Therefore, the most logical option is that the 100th tiger had fainted, as this is a plausible scenario in captivity due to stress, illness, or other factors.

Explanation:

To find the original cost of the present, we need to analyze the given options and determine which one is the correct answer.

Option A: 2 annas and a quarter
This option suggests that the original cost of the present was 2 annas and a quarter. However, 2 annas and a quarter is not a valid currency denomination. An anna is a unit of currency formerly used in India, and it is equal to 1/16 of a rupee. Therefore, 2 annas and a quarter would be equivalent to 2.25 annas, which is not a standard currency value.

Option B: 2 annas and a half
This option suggests that the original cost of the present was 2 annas and a half. Similar to the previous option, 2 annas and a half is not a valid currency denomination. Half an anna would be equal to 0.5 annas, which is not a standard currency value.

Option C: One and a half annas
This option suggests that the original cost of the present was one and a half annas. One and a half annas is a valid currency denomination. It is equal to 1.5 annas, which is a standard currency value.

Option D: 3 annas
This option suggests that the original cost of the present was 3 annas. Three annas is a valid currency denomination. It is equal to 3 annas, which is a standard currency value.

Conclusion:
Based on the analysis of the given options, option A (2 annas and a quarter) is not a valid currency value. Therefore, the correct answer is option D (3 annas), which is a valid currency denomination and represents the original cost of the present.

Explanation:

The 100th Tiger Shot:
- The 100th tiger was shot by one of the hunters.
- The hunters were tasked with hunting down tigers in the region.

Context of the Situation:
- During the time period in which the 100th tiger was shot, tiger hunting was a common practice.
- Hunters were often hired to track and kill tigers for various reasons, including sport and protection of villages.

The Role of the Tiger King:
- The Tiger King may have been involved in the decision to hunt down tigers, but it was ultimately one of the hunters who pulled the trigger on the 100th tiger.

The Dewan and British Officer:
- The Dewan, a high-ranking official in the region, may have also been aware of the tiger hunting activities.
- The British officer, if present, may have overseen or been informed of the hunting expedition.

Conclusion:
- In this scenario, the 100th tiger was shot by one of the hunters hired to carry out the task of hunting down tigers in the region. The Tiger King, Dewan, and British officer may have played roles in the decision-making process, but it was ultimately the hunter who pulled the trigger.

Explanation:

Identification of the Injury:
The question states that the king got hurt when a tiny sliver pierced his body while playing with the prince.

Location of the Injury:
The king was injured on his right hand. The text explicitly mentions that the injury occurred on his right hand.

Assessment of Options:
- Option A: Right Hand - This is the correct answer based on the information given in the question.
- Option B: Left Hand - The question specifically mentions the injury was on the right hand, making this option incorrect.
- Option C: Right Elbow - The question does not mention any injury to the king's elbow, making this option incorrect.
- Option D: Left Ankle - The question explicitly states that the injury was on the king's right hand, ruling out this option.
Therefore, based on the information provided in the question, the correct answer is option A, which is the right hand.

Introduction:
"The Tiger King" is a short story written by Kalki Krishnamurthy. It revolves around the life of a king named Maharaja Pratap Singh, who has an obsession with hunting tigers. Through the course of the story, the protagonist showcases various traits and qualities, but it is his belief in destiny that ultimately proves to be his downfall.


Destiny plays a significant role in the story as it determines the fate of the Tiger King. Despite his ambitions and desires to be the greatest tiger hunter, it is destiny that shapes the events in his life. The story emphasizes how destiny is an unstoppable force that cannot be altered or controlled.


The Tiger King's overwhelming desire for authority is evident throughout the story. He believes that by hunting and killing a hundred tigers, he will attain invincibility and be recognized as the greatest king. This desire for authority stems from his belief that it is his destiny to rule and conquer. He is willing to go to great lengths to achieve this status, even if it means sacrificing the lives of innocent tigers.


The Tiger King exhibits immense willpower and determination in pursuing his goals. He is not afraid to take risks and faces numerous challenges head-on. His strong willpower is evident in his relentless pursuit of tigers, even when faced with dangerous situations. However, despite his determination, it is destiny that ultimately shapes the outcome of his actions.


In the end, it is destiny that proves to be all-powerful and leads to the downfall of the Tiger King. Despite his strength of character, willpower, and authority, he is unable to escape his fate. His obsession with hunting tigers and his unwavering belief in his destiny ultimately result in his demise.

Conclusion:
In "The Tiger King," destiny is portrayed as an all-powerful force that cannot be controlled or altered. The protagonist's strength of character, willpower, and authority are overshadowed by the inevitable consequences of his actions. The story serves as a reminder that destiny ultimately shapes our lives, regardless of our desires and efforts.

Duraisani was a fictional character in the novel "The Guide" written by R.K. Narayan. She was portrayed as a greedy woman who was the wife of a high-ranking British officer in the colonial era.

1. Duraisani's Background:
Duraisani was depicted as a woman who hailed from a lower social background and married a British officer. Her marriage elevated her status and provided her with wealth and power. However, her character was characterized by greed and a desire for material possessions.

2. Duraisani's Greed:
Duraisani's primary motivation in the novel was her insatiable greed. She constantly schemed and manipulated situations to amass wealth and accumulate luxurious possessions. Her actions were driven by a desire to maintain her high social status and fulfill her materialistic desires.

3. Duraisani's Manipulations:
Duraisani was portrayed as an expert manipulator who used her connections and influence to her advantage. She would exploit her husband's position and exploit people around her to achieve her selfish goals. Her manipulative nature often caused harm to others and disrupted the lives of those unfortunate enough to cross her path.

4. Duraisani's Impact on the Story:
Duraisani's character played a significant role in the overall plot of the novel. Her greed and manipulations led to the downfall of the protagonist, Raju, who initially became her guide and confidant. Duraisani's actions resulted in a series of events that eventually led to Raju's imprisonment and downfall.

5. Duraisani's Representation:
Duraisani can be seen as a symbol of the negative aspects of colonialism and the corrupting influence of power. Her character embodies the greed and exploitation often associated with the British colonial era. Through Duraisani, the author sheds light on the moral decay and societal corruption that can result from the pursuit of material wealth and power.

In conclusion, Duraisani was a fictional character in the novel "The Guide" who represented a greedy woman married to a high-ranking British officer. Her character played a significant role in the plot, showcasing the negative impacts of greed and the corrupting influence of power.