All questions of The Interview for Class 12 Exam

Lewis Carroll was said to have a just horror of the interviewer and he never consented to be interviewed, Caroline, the wife of Rudyard Kipling said that an interview is vile, crime and all offence. No respectable person, would ask it, much less give it.

Umberto Eco says that he has philosophical interests which reflect in all his writings : fiction and non-fiction. In this way, he does the same thing, though he seems to pursue various activities : writing notes for newspapers, novels, teaching, writing essays, children’s books etc.

Because it provides a space for communication and help to know our innnerself

The expression 'thumbprints on his windpipe' means an aggressive invasion into the private views and utterances of the interviewee, ft is also suggestive of answers being forced out of the person who is being interviewed.

Lewis Carroll was said to have a just horror of the interviewer and he never consented to be interviewed, Caroline, the wife of Rudyard Kipling said that an interview is vile, crime and all offence. No respectable person, would ask it, much less give it.

Umberto shares a secret with the interviewer. He thinks that if we eliminate the empty spaces from the universe, the world will shrink. It will become as big as a fist. Similarly, we have a lot of empty spaces or ‘interstices’ in our lives. He works in these spaces and uses them to his advantage.

Despite getting famous as a novelist, Umberto Eco always associated himself with the academic community. He has written only five novels as compared to the forty scholarly works of non-fiction. He considers himself as a university professor who writes novels on Sundays. When he presented his first Doctoral dissertation in Italy, one of the professors was impressed by the way he told the story of his research, including his trials and errors. His essays always have a narrative aspect. He started writing novels quite late, at the age of 50, by accident to satisfy his taste for narration.

Introduction:
When perceptions are made about a person, it refers to the act of forming opinions or judgments about someone based on their appearance, behavior, or other external factors. These perceptions can have various impacts on the individual being perceived.

Loss of Original Identity:
When perceptions are made about a person, the original identity of their soul can be lost. This means that the essence of who they truly are, their inner being, can be overshadowed or disregarded due to the judgments and opinions formed by others. This can be detrimental to the individual as it may lead to a disconnect between their true self and the way they are perceived by others.

Consequences of Losing Original Identity:
1. Self-Doubt and Insecurity: When perceptions are made about a person, they may start questioning their own worth and value. The constant scrutiny and judgment from others can lead to self-doubt and feelings of insecurity.

2. Lack of Authenticity: In order to fit into the perceptions others have formed, individuals may feel compelled to alter their behavior, beliefs, or appearance. This can result in a lack of authenticity as they are no longer able to express their true selves.

3. Emotional Distress: Being constantly judged and misunderstood can cause emotional distress. The individual may feel frustrated, anxious, or even depressed due to the pressure of living up to the perceptions formed by others.

4. Difficulty in Building Meaningful Relationships: If others have preconceived notions about a person, it can be challenging to form genuine connections. The perceptions may act as barriers, preventing others from truly getting to know the individual and vice versa.

5. Limited Opportunities: Perceptions can also limit the opportunities available to a person. If they are perceived in a negative or inaccurate way, they may be overlooked for promotions, job opportunities, or social engagements.

Conclusion:
When perceptions are made about a person, the original identity of their soul can be lost. This can have detrimental effects on the individual's self-esteem, authenticity, relationships, and opportunities. It is important to recognize the impact of perceptions and strive to understand others on a deeper level, beyond surface-level judgments.

The Interview by Christopher Silvester is an excerpt taken from his Penguin Book of interviews. In this, he talks about various opinions of the celebrities regarding an interview; its functions, methods and merits. It also consists of an excerpt from an interview with the infamous writer Umberto Eco.

They want to be challenged,” he told the Guardian in 2011. While his first novel was not published until 1980, Eco said he had always had a “narrative impulse” and began writing stories at the age of 10 or 12. Eco's first book published at the age of 22.

Umberto Eco feels elevated on calling him a professor. People think that he is doing many things but he concludes of doing himself the same thing. It is because that Umberto Eco had some philosophical interest which he followed in his novels and other academic work. His children books are based on peace and non-violence. There is a touch of philosophical and ethical interest as well.

In his interview with Mukand Padmanabhan, Umberto Eco points out that he is a university professor who writes novels on Sundays. Though he readily participates in academic conferences but he has no interest to attend to the meetings of Pen Clubs and the writers. He is very much clear about himself and identifies himself with the academic community. One can estimate that Eco is a modest cooperative and firm in his convictions. He does not call himself a successful novelist. Through his interview with Mukund we get aspects of his writings, style and ideas. Even then most of the people take him to be a novelist because of the huge success of his novel “The Name of the Rose” yet he remains committed to his regular professional academic work. In his novels for children one can find non-violence and peace.

Umberto Eco prefers himself to be called an academician rather than a novelist. He wrote more than 40 philosophical writings against just five novels. He started writing novels just by accident and that too at a late age of 50. Modesty and honesty are the signs of a great writer like Eco. Mukund Padmanabhan asks the reason behind the huge success of ‘The Name of the Rose’. Umberto honestly replies that the success of this novel is a mystery even to him. Perhaps, he wrote it at an appropriate time. Had it been written 10 years before or after, perhaps it wouldn’t have been such a huge success.

Between 10 to 15 million copies of the novel have been sold. In a way it has reached only a small percentage of readers. This shows that readers do not want easy experiences. The novel deals with a period of medieval history.

The American publisher thought that the novel The Name of the Rose won't sell in America because it was a country where nobody had seen a cathedral or studied Latin. The novel, however, sold two or three million copies in the U.S. Umberto Eco rightly pointed out that the success is a mystery.

The Name of the Rose is a serious detective story but delved into metaphysics, theology and medieval history. The novel got a huge success and the reason Umberto Eco assesses is its favourable publication time.

Eco replies that just like the universe has empty spaces, our lives too, have a lot of empty spaces or 'interstices', as he calls them. Whenever he has a few moments to spare in between two different tasks, instead of wasting them, he uses the time to write.

Umberto Eco points out towards empty space in this universe. According to him if the empty space is eliminated from the universe, and as well as from the atoms, this universe will turn as big as our fist. In the same way, our lives are full of empty spaces. Umberto Eco calls them interstices. Eco says: “ Suppose you are coming over to my place on the third floor. You are in an elevator from the first to third floor and I am waiting for you. This is an interstice.”

Umberto Eco’s famous novel ‘The Name of the Rose’ is a very ‘serious novel’ But it enjoyed a mass audience. The interviewer wants to know the reason of its huge success. Even journalists and publishers are puzzled. People like what is served to them. If they are given to read even serious novels, they will read them. They accepted and digested a serious novel like ‘The Name of the Rose’. Its ‘timing’ was perfect. About 10 to 15 million copies of the novel were sold.

V.S. Naipaul vehemently condemns the cause of the interview. He believes that it is more than losing something from our body. He says that through interviews many would lose a part of our self. In reality, it is horrific for the interviewing candidate. This is the cause why people refuse to give their consent for an interview.

In modern times, the chief source of information on personalities is the interviewer, who, through his power and influence, gathers information and provides us with the best possible information on the interviewees.

Many celebrities consider the interview ‘an unwarranted intrusion’ in their lives. But it has become a commonplace feature of journalism. It is a great serviceable medium of communication. We get the most vivid impressions of our contemporaries only through interviews. Everything reaches us in the simplest and true form when one asks questions of another.

The Interview is an excerpt from Christopher's introduction to The Penguin Book of Interviews, which is a book of interviews compiled by Christopher Silvester.

Introduction:
Umberto's taste for narration was satisfied by novels. Novels provide a comprehensive narrative experience that engages the reader through a combination of storytelling, character development, and thematic exploration.

Explanation:
1. Stories: While stories can also be engaging and entertaining, they are typically shorter and may not provide the depth and complexity that Umberto desired. Novels, on the other hand, allow for a more in-depth exploration of characters, plotlines, and themes.

2. Children's works: Children's works are often simplified and cater to a younger audience. They may not offer the same level of intellectual stimulation and narrative complexity that Umberto sought. Novels, on the other hand, are generally written for a more mature audience and can delve into deeper themes and ideas.

3. Interviews: Interviews are typically focused on gathering information or insights from a specific individual. While they can be informative and provide valuable perspectives, they are not necessarily structured as narratives. Umberto may have desired a more cohesive and immersive storytelling experience that novels provide.

4. Novels: Novels are a form of long-form storytelling that can captivate readers with their intricate plots, well-developed characters, and exploration of complex themes. They allow for a deeper immersion into the narrative world and can satisfy Umberto's taste for narration by providing a comprehensive and engaging reading experience.

Conclusion:
Out of the given options, novels best satisfy Umberto's taste for narration. They offer a more in-depth and immersive narrative experience compared to stories, children's works, and interviews. Novels provide an opportunity to explore complex themes and characters, making them a preferred choice for individuals seeking a rich and engaging storytelling experience.

Umberto Eco firstly considered himself as an academic scholar because he was a professor and wrote many academic texts while he wrote his first novel at the age of 50 accidently.

Interview is considered as a reliable source of truth. Contemporaries and their success can be read through the interviews. A very important part of journalism is interview now a days.

He write the novels on sunday because he was free on that day. He think very much free on that day.

Umberto Eco has many philosophical interests. He pursues them through his academic works and novels. Even his children’ works are about non-violence and peace. They are the same bunch of ethical and philosophical interests. Eco wrote more than 40 scholarly works on non-fiction. Eco considers himself ‘a university professor who writes novels (only) on Sundays’. He prefers to be called an academician.

Many celebrities consider the interview ‘an unwarranted intrusion’ in their lives. But it has become a commonplace feature of journalism. It is a great serviceable medium of communication. We get the most vivid impressions of our contemporaries only through interviews. Everything reaches us in the simplest and true form when one asks questions of another.

Most celebrities despise being interviewed because they see it as unwanted interference in their private lives.

Eco’s writing style was a personalised and interesting one, contrary to regular academic writings. In his writings, he told the story of his research, instead of simply presenting his research, which gave his academic writing a narrative quality.

Most of the celebrity writers shun interviews as they feel that interviews leave a disparaging effect on their personalities. They consider them as an encroachment on their privacy. Writers like V.S. Naipaul feel they are being wounded by interviews and thus losing a part of themselves.

There are several celebrities mentioned in this chapter like Rudyard Kipling, V.S. Naipaul, H.G. Wells, Saul Bellow and etc. who dislike interviews very strongly. They never became ready to be interviewed. Most of them considered interviews as an unwarranted intrusion into their lives. They did not want to reveal the secrets of their personal lives.

The interview held between Eco and Padamnabhan reveals several facts about Padamnabhan's career and interests. Let's go through each option and see which facts are being showcased in the interview.

a) He takes pride in being an academician, a university Professor first:
In the interview, Padamnabhan mentions that he has been a professor for many years and still teaches at the university. He emphasizes the importance of being an academician and mentions that he takes pride in his profession. This indicates that being an academician and a university professor is his primary focus and priority.

b) Being a novelist is a secondary thing for him:
Padamnabhan mentions that writing novels is something he does in his free time. It is not his main profession or source of income. This suggests that being a novelist is a secondary pursuit for him, and his primary focus is on his academic career.

c) He uses his free time for writing novels:
During the interview, Padamnabhan mentions that he writes novels in his spare time. He explains that he enjoys writing and finds it to be a creative outlet. This indicates that he utilizes his free time for writing novels, further highlighting that it is not his primary occupation.

d) All these:
Based on the information provided in the interview, all of the above facts are being showcased. Padamnabhan takes pride in being an academician and a university professor first, and being a novelist is a secondary pursuit for him. He uses his free time for writing novels as a creative outlet. Therefore, option D is the correct answer as it encompasses all the facts mentioned in the interview.

There are several celebrities mentioned in this chapter like Rudyard Kipling, V.S. Naipaul, H.G. Wells, Saul Bellow and etc. who dislike interviews very strongly. They never became ready to be interviewed. Most of them considered interviews as an unwarranted intrusion into their lives. They did not want to reveal the secrets of their personal lives.

Introduction:
In the novel "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, the protagonist, William of Baskerville, writes a book to document his investigation of a series of murders that took place in a medieval monastery. The success of this book is referred to as a mystery by Eco.

Reasons for calling the success a mystery:
There are several reasons why Eco refers to the success of the book as a mystery.

1. Factors contributing to success:
Eco suggests that there are many factors contributing to the success of the book. These factors are not explicitly mentioned, making it difficult to identify them. This lack of clarity adds to the mystery surrounding the success of the book.

2. Popularity:
One possible reason for calling the success a mystery is the book's popularity. It becomes widely read and discussed within the fictional world of the novel. The reasons for its popularity are not explicitly stated, which adds to the sense of mystery surrounding its success.

3. Competition with other books:
Another reason for the mystery is the existence of other books written on the same medieval period. Eco mentions that many other books were written on the same topic, making it even more surprising that William's book gained such success. The presence of competition raises questions about what makes William's book stand out among the others.

4. Lack of clear explanation:
Eco intentionally leaves the success of the book unexplained, allowing readers to speculate and draw their own conclusions. This ambiguity adds to the intrigue and mystery surrounding the book's success.

Conclusion:
By calling the success of William's book a mystery, Eco emphasizes the complexity and unpredictability of literary success. The combination of factors contributing to the success, the book's popularity, competition with other books, and the lack of a clear explanation all contribute to the sense of mystery surrounding its achievement.

Some primitive cultures believed that photographing a person is no less than stealing his/her soul out of the body and rendering him incomplete and slighted.

An interview is essentially a structured conversation where one participant asks questions, and the other provides answers. In common parlance, the word "interview" refers to a one-on-one conversation between an interviewer and an interviewee.

Denis Brain's statement "Almost everything of moment reaches us through one man asking questions of others" can be understood as follows:

Introduction:
Denis Brain's statement highlights the significance of an interviewer or a questioner in the process of gathering important information or insights. It suggests that the majority of significant knowledge or news is obtained through the act of one person posing questions to others.

Analysis:
1. The interviewer has the power:
The act of asking questions gives the interviewer a certain level of power in the conversation. By initiating the interaction and steering the direction of the conversation, the interviewer can control the flow of information. This power allows the interviewer to delve deeper into the subject matter and extract valuable insights that may not have been revealed otherwise.

2. The interviewer has status:
As an interviewer, one holds a certain level of authority or status in the conversation. This status can influence the responses of the interviewees, as they may feel obligated to provide accurate and meaningful answers to maintain credibility or to be seen in a favorable light. The interviewee may be more inclined to share important information due to the interviewer's perceived expertise or position.

3. The interviewer can elicit the truth and has the power to influence:
The act of asking questions allows the interviewer to dig deeper and uncover the truth behind a given situation or topic. By skillfully framing questions and following up on responses, the interviewer can uncover hidden facts, motivations, or perspectives. Moreover, the interviewer's influence through the tone, body language, or choice of questions can shape the direction of the conversation and prompt interviewees to reveal more insightful or truthful information.

Conclusion:
Denis Brain's statement emphasizes the crucial role of an interviewer in acquiring significant information. The power, status, ability to elicit the truth, and influence held by the interviewer enable them to extract valuable insights from others. This process of questioning and gathering information is essential in various fields, including journalism, research, and even everyday conversations.

Charles Dodgson, a mathematician at Christ Church, Oxford, first told his surreal story to the daughters of dean Henry Liddell as they rowed down the Thames. After the boating trip, 10-year-old Alice Liddell badgered Dodgson to write it down and Alice in Wonderland - under the pseudonym Lewis Carroll - was born.