All Exams  >   CLAT  >   Mock Test Series for PU LLB 2026  >   All Questions

All questions of Practice Tests for PU LLB for CLAT Exam

Who among the following wrote 'Mahabhashya' a commentary on Sanskrit book Ashtadhyayi?
  • a)
    Kshemendra
  • b)
    Kalahana
  • c)
    Chanakya
  • d)
    Patanjali
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Anaya Patel answered
Mahabhashya was written by Patanjali. It is a commentary on selected rules of Sanskrit grammar from Panini’s treatise, the Ashtadhyayi and Katyayan’s Vartika

Salary of which one of the following officials is not charged on the Consolidated Fund of India?
  • a)
    President of India
  • b)
    Chief Justice of India
  • c)
    Speaker of Lok Sabha
  • d)
    Prime Minister
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Dia Mehta answered
Expenditure embodied in the Budget Documents consists of two types being, (a) The sums required for charged expenditures. These are non-votable by the Parliament such as Salary and Allowances of the President, Speaker/ Deputy speaker of Lok Sabha, Supreme Court Judges, Pensions of Supreme Court as well as High Court Judges, Salaries and Allowances of CAG, Lok Pal, Chairman/ Deputy chairman of Rajya Sabha.
(b) The sums required for other expenditures as mentioned in the Budget Documents. These are votable.

Who shot dead John Saunders on 17th December 1927?
  • a)
    Bhagat Singh
  • b)
    Mangal Panday
  • c)
    Sukhdev
  • d)
    Bipin Chandra Pal Singh
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Faizan Khan answered
On December 17, 1927 the revolutionaries Bhagat Singh and Shivaram Rajguru shot and killed assistant superintendent of police John Saunders. They were supported in this act by their compatriots Sukhdev Thapar and Chandrashekhar Azad. However, their original target was not Saunders but superintendent of police James Scott who had ordered his men to lathi-charge protesters leading to the death of the nationalist leader Lala Lajpat Rai.

Window is to pane as book is to
  • a)
    novel
  • b)
    glass
  • c)
    cover
  • d)
    page
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Dia Mehta answered
A window is made up of panes, and a book is made up of pages. The answer is not (choice a) because a novel is a type of book. The answer is not (choice b) because glass has no relationship to a book. (Choice c) is incorrect because a cover is only one part of a book; a book is not made up of covers.

Who initiated the observation of World Maritime Day?
  • a)
    Western Maritime Organization
  • b)
    Eastern Maritime Command
  • c)
    International Maritime Organization
  • d)
    World Naval Command
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Aryan Khanna answered
World Maritime Day was initiated by the United Nations (UN), through the International Maritime Organization (IMO). The day is to celebrate the contribution offered by the industry of international maritime towards the world’s economy, especially in shipping. World Maritime Day was observed for the first time on 17 March 1978. The day is observed to mark when the IMO Convention entered into force in the year 1958.
Hence, the correct option is C.

निम्नलिखित कथनों पर विचार करें:
(i) एक उल्का एक छोटा सा अंतरिक्ष चट्टान है जो सौर मंडल से गुजरता है।
(ii) बुध ग्रह को सुबह के तारे के रूप में भी जाना जाता है
Q. ऊपर दिए गए कौन से कथन सही हैं / हैं?
  • a)
    1 ही
  • b)
    2 ही
  • c)
    दोनों 1 और 2
  • d)
    न तो 1 और न ही 2
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Mehul Malik answered
Answer:

(i)

(ii)

The correct answer is option 'D', which is "1 2".

Explanation:

The given options are 1 and 2. The correct answer is a combination of both the options. In option 'A', only 1 is mentioned, and in option 'B', only 2 is mentioned. In option 'C', both 1 and 2 are mentioned, but they are separated by a space. Option 'D' has both 1 and 2 mentioned with a double space between them.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D', which is "1 2".

Indira Gandhi Gold cup is associated with-
  • a)
    Table Tennis
  • b)
    Cricket
  • c)
    Hockey
  • d)
    Football
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Rohit Jain answered
The Indira Gandhi Gold Cup international women's hockey tournament was revived after a gap of nine years. The 7th edition of the tournament was held at the Dhyan Chand National Stadium from October 1 to 8 in 2005.

Read the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.
In a certain code language, codes are decided on the basis of following rules and conditions.
Rules:
1. All the consonants that appear before ‘N’ in alphabet series are to be coded as 0-9.(C =1, D= 2 and so on)
2. All the consonants that appear after ‘N’ in alphabet series are to be coded as 0-9.(Q=1, R=2 and so on)
3. ‘N’ is to be coded as 1.
Conditions:
I. If a word starts with a consonant but ends with a vowel then all the vowels of that word are to be coded as ‘#’ and codes for last and first letters will be interchanged.
II. If a word has more than two vowels then the first vowel is to be coded as &, second vowel as *, third vowel as @ and then repeat the codes in the same sequence from fourth vowel onwards.
III. If in a word a consonant that appears after M is either preceded or followed or both by a vowel then all the vowels of that word are to be coded as ‘%’ and 1 is added to the original code of all consonants. (If after adding 1, the original code comes in double-digit then add the digits until single digit is obtained.)
IV. If none of the above conditions is applicable in a word then vowels of such word are coded as ‘-‘.
V. If more than one condition is applicable in a single word then apply all the conditions as per the given order.
Code “#6!%” is for which of the following words?
  • a)
    Chronicle
  • b)
    Dramatic
  • c)
    Charisma
  • d)
    Parenting
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Aspire Academy answered
Conditions I, II and III are applicable on the word ‘Charisma’.
After Condition I: #5#1#291
After Condition II : #5&1*29@
After Condition III: #6!%
Final Code : #6!%

Legal Principle: The intentional use of force against another person without lawful justification constitutes the tort of battery.
Facts: During the freshers’ party in DNLU Law School, Ayushi a fourth-year student started pushing and forcing a first-year student, Amit to dance. Amit now wants to sue Ayushi for battery. Can he sue her?
  • a)
    Amit can bring an action under the Anti- Ragging policy.
  • b)
    Yes, Amit can sue Ayushi for the tort of battery.
  • c)
    No, because law does not take note of trifles.
  • d)
    Yes, because Ayushi had infringed upon Amit’s right to enjoy the party.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Uma rao answered
Explanation:

Facts Analysis:
- Ayushi intentionally used force against Amit by pushing and forcing him to dance.
- This intentional use of force without lawful justification constitutes the tort of battery.

Legal Principle Application:
- The legal principle states that intentional use of force against another person without lawful justification constitutes the tort of battery.
- In this case, Ayushi's actions clearly fall within the definition of battery as she intentionally used force against Amit.

Can Amit Sue Ayushi for Battery:
- Yes, Amit can sue Ayushi for the tort of battery.
- Ayushi's actions of pushing and forcing Amit to dance without lawful justification constitute battery.
- Therefore, Amit has the legal right to bring an action against Ayushi for battery.

Conclusion:
- Amit can sue Ayushi for the tort of battery as her intentional use of force against him without lawful justification constitutes battery under the legal principle.

Read the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.
In a certain code language, codes are decided on the basis of following rules and conditions.
Rules:
1. All the consonants that appear before ‘N’ in alphabet series are to be coded as 0-9.(C =1, D= 2 and so on)
2. All the consonants that appear after ‘N’ in alphabet series are to be coded as 0-9.(Q=1, R=2 and so on)
3. ‘N’ is to be coded as 1.
Conditions:
I. If a word starts with a consonant but ends with a vowel then all the vowels of that word are to be coded as ‘#’ and codes for last and first letters will be interchanged.
II. If a word has more than two vowels then the first vowel is to be coded as &, second vowel as *, third vowel as @ and then repeat the codes in the same sequence from fourth vowel onwards.
III. If in a word a consonant that appears after M is either preceded or followed or both by a vowel then all the vowels of that word are to be coded as ‘%’ and 1 is added to the original code of all consonants. (If after adding 1, the original code comes in double digit then add the digits until single digit is obtained.)
IV. If none of the above conditions is applicable in a word then vowels of such word are coded as ‘-‘.
V. If more than one condition is applicable in a single word then apply all the conditions as per the given order.
What is the code for “Highjacks”?
  • a)
    5E63
  • b)
    5-456-173
  • c)
    5&456*173
  • d)
    5-456-173
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

None of the above conditions is applicable on the word ‘Highjacks’.
After Condition IV: 5-456-173
Final Code: 5-456-173

In a certain code the word ‘PUSH’ is written as ‘NWQJ’, then how will ‘CATTLE’ written in same code?
  • a)
    ACRVJG
  • b)
    ACRJVG
  • c)
    CARVJG
  • d)
    CARVGJ
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Aryan Khanna answered
The given coding language follows a pattern in which the letters at the odd places are obtained by subtracting two from its position and the letters at the even places are obtained by adding two to its position. Therefore, ‘CATTLE’ can be coded as ‘ACRVJG’

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word.
Anna likes Joanna, But Maria doesn't like _________.
  • a)
    Her
  • b)
    Them
  • c)
    Your
  • d)
    Their
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Faizan Khan answered
The correct answer is Option A.
A pronoun is used in place of a noun. In the given sentence, Joanna is the person liked by Anna but disliked by Maria. Since Joanna is a female the corresponding female pronoun is to be used.
Hence HER is the correct answer.
The remaining options are incorrect because:
Option B and D are third-person plural pronouns whereas only 1 person is referred to in the given sentence.
Option C: YOUR is a second-person pronoun. In the given sentence we are talking of a third person.
Hence Option A is the correct answer.

Direction:
Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:
Question:
Principle: The communication of a proposal is complete when it comes to the knowledge of the person to whom it is made.
Facts: A told B's servant that he was ready to sell his house to B for 50 Lakhs. This was in response to an earlier inquiry made by B regarding the house's price.
  • a)
    The communication of the proposal is complete.
  • b)
    There is no proposal but an acceptance of A's offer.
  • c)
    The communication of the proposal is not complete.
  • d)
    None of the above.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Communication of a Proposal

The principle states that the communication of a proposal is complete when it comes to the knowledge of the person to whom it is made. In other words, for a proposal to be considered complete, the person to whom it is addressed must be aware of its content.

Facts of the Case

In this case, A told B's servant that he was ready to sell his house to B for 50 Lakhs. This statement by A was made in response to an earlier inquiry made by B regarding the price of the house.

Analysis

To determine whether the communication of the proposal is complete or not, we need to consider whether B, the person to whom the proposal is addressed, is aware of its content. In this case, the proposal was communicated to B's servant and not directly to B. Therefore, it cannot be said that the communication of the proposal is complete.

Conclusion

Based on the principle and the facts of the case, the correct answer is option 'C' - the communication of the proposal is not complete. Since the proposal was communicated to B's servant and not directly to B, it cannot be considered as complete. B must be made aware of the proposal for it to be considered complete.

Directions
In each of the following questions, a series is given with one/two term(s) missing. Choose the correct alternatives from the given ones that will complete the series.
ABDE, CEHJ, EHLO, ?
  • a)
    GLPT
  • b)
    GKPT
  • c)
    GLQT
  • d)
    GKQT
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Surbhi Kyal answered
ABCD-1,2,4,5
CEHJ-3,5,8,10
EHLO-5,8,12,15
see the difference
A,C,E there is difference of 2
B,E,H there is difference of 3
D,H,L there is multiplication of 4
D,J,O there is multiplication of 5
GKPL-7,11,16,20

Book ‘Fault Line’ is written by-
  • a)
    Raghuram G. Rajan
  • b)
    Montek Singh Ahluwalia
  • c)
    Vimal Jalan
  • d)
    D. Subba Rao
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Faizan Khan answered
Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy is a 2010 book by Indian economist Raghuram Rajan on the underlying causes of the 2008 financial crisis, and the structural weaknesses present in the world economy.

Remoteness of damages is determined by
  • a)
    the test of reasonable foresight
  • b)
    the test of directness
  • c)
    both, the test of directness and the test of reasonable foresight
  • d)
    None of the choices
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Aryan Khanna answered
Remoteness of damage is the term that is used to indicate that although the carelessness of a person has been a cause of the harm suffered by the plaintiff, nevertheless the harm is so far removed, is so remote, from the wrongdoing that the wrongdoer should not be legally liable for it. It is not for any harm that has been caused by carelessness, that the careless person is liable. It is only for that harm that is sufficiently close, or not too remote, that a careless person is liable. Unfortunately over the years, a number of different tests and descriptive terms have been used to determine whether harm is too remote from, or sufficiently close to, carelessness to render the careless person liable.
In English law, remoteness is a set of rules in both tort and contract, which limits the number of compensatory damages for a wrong.
In negligence, the test of causation not only requires that the defendant was the cause in fact but also requires that the loss or damage sustained by the claimant was not too remote. As with the policy issues in establishing that there was a duty of care and that that duty was breached, remoteness is designed as a further limit on a cause of action to ensure that the liability to pay damages is fairly placed on the defendant.

Double jeopardy means _________________.
  • a)
    no person can be punished twice for the same offence.
  • b)
    one who repeats the same offence can be punished twice.
  • c)
    neither (a) nor (b).
  • d)
    both (a) and (b).
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Shivam Unni answered
Double Jeopardy Explained
Double jeopardy refers to the legal principle that protects individuals from being tried or punished twice for the same offense. Here's a detailed explanation of why double jeopardy is important:

Protection Against Double Punishment
- The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution includes the double jeopardy clause, which states that no person shall "be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb."
- This principle ensures that once a person has been acquitted or convicted of a crime, they cannot be tried again for the same offense. This protection is crucial in preventing the government from unfairly targeting individuals with multiple trials for the same conduct.

Finality of Judgments
- Double jeopardy also serves to promote finality in legal judgments. Once a case has been resolved through trial or plea agreement, the parties involved can move on with certainty that the matter has been resolved.
- Allowing multiple prosecutions for the same offense would undermine the integrity of the legal system and create unnecessary burden on defendants.

Exceptions to Double Jeopardy
- While the general rule is that a person cannot be tried twice for the same offense, there are exceptions to double jeopardy protections. For example, if new evidence emerges that was not available during the first trial, a retrial may be permitted.
- Additionally, separate sovereigns (such as federal and state governments) can each prosecute an individual for the same conduct without violating double jeopardy protections.
In conclusion, double jeopardy is a fundamental legal principle that safeguards individuals from being subjected to multiple prosecutions for the same offense. This protection ensures fairness, finality, and integrity in the criminal justice system.

Directions : There are 8 people standing randomly. B is 4m to the east of A. C is 5m to the north of B. Distance between C and D is 10m. D is to the east of C. E is 10 m to the South of D. H is 5m to the west of G. E is 6m to the east of F.F is 1m to the south of G.
What is the shortest distance between A and H?
  • a)
    6m
  • b)
    4m
  • c)
    5m
  • d)
    3m
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Om Patel answered
Shortest Distance between A and H
The shortest distance between A and H can be calculated by finding the path that connects the two points with the least distance.
- First, we need to determine the positions of A and H in relation to the other given points.

Positions of A and H in relation to other points
- A is 4m to the east of B
- B is 5m to the north of C
- C is 10m to the east of D
- D is to the south of E
- E is 6m to the east of F
- F is to the south of G
- H is 5m to the west of G

Determining the shortest path between A and H
- To find the shortest distance between A and H, we need to connect A to H through the points given in the question.
- The shortest path would be to move from A to B, then to C, D, E, and finally to H.
- This path covers a total distance of 4m (A to B) + 5m (B to C) + 10m (C to D) + 10m (D to E) + 6m (E to F) + 5m (F to G) + 5m (G to H) = 35m
- Therefore, the shortest distance between A and H is 35m.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C) 5m.

Humayun had to runaway from India after he was defeated in the battle of :
  • a)
    Khanwa
  • b)
    Kannauj
  • c)
    Panipat
  • d)
    Gogra
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Dia Mehta answered
In the battle of Kannauj the Afghan soldiers were able to run away the Mughal army. This was a great a confusion for Mughals. Humayun ran away from the battlefield. For the next 15 years Humayum lived like a wanderer. By crossing the deserts of Thar, Humayun reached Sind. Here in Sind he lived for only three years . He fell in love, a fifteen years old girl, Hamida. Hamida was a daughter of a sheikh. Hamida gave birth to Akbar.

Acts done in moments of delusion are protected because :
  • a)
    Lack of intelligence to distinguish between good and evil.
  • b)
    Expediency grounds says so.
  • c)
    Circumstances are such that they are incompatible to the existence of Mens rea.
  • d)
    By virtue of absence of free will.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Aryan Khanna answered
A delusion is a firm and fixed belief based on inadequate grounds not amenable to rational argument or evidence to contrary, not in sync with regional, cultural and educational background. As a pathology, it is distinct from a belief based on false or incomplete information, confabulation, dogma, illusion, or some other misleading effects of perception.
They have been found to occur in the context of many pathological states (both general physical and mental) and are of particular diagnostic importance in psychotic disorders including schizophrenia, paraphrenia, manic episodes of bipolar disorder, and psychotic depression.

Direction:
Choose the correct alternative, keeping in mind the principle(s), if any:
Question:
Principle: Whoever, capable of doing so, does not arrest the killer and report the matter to the concerned authorities commits an offense.
Facts: A child of 5 years saw that a lady, living in the neighborhood was killing another child. He went back home and told his parents about the same. His parents didn't do anything about it and told the kid to be quiet.
  • a)
    The child has committed an offense by not reporting the matter.
  • b)
    The child is not liable because nothing done by a child below 7 years is an offense.
  • c)
    The child's parents are liable because were aware of the murder and therefore were responsible to report the matter on behalf of their child.
  • d)
    Both (a) and (c).
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Sounak Chawla answered
Principle: Whoever, capable of doing so, does not arrest the killer and report the matter to the concerned authorities commits an offense.

Facts: A child of 5 years saw that a lady, living in the neighborhood was killing another child. He went back home and told his parents about the same. His parents didn't do anything about it and told the kid to be quiet.

Explanation:
The given scenario involves the principle that states that whoever, capable of doing so, does not arrest the killer and report the matter to the concerned authorities commits an offense. Let's analyze the options in light of the facts and the principle.

a) The child has committed an offense by not reporting the matter:
This option is incorrect because the child, being only 5 years old, may not have the capability to understand the gravity of the situation or the responsibility to report the matter. Additionally, the child did inform his parents about the incident, which can be considered as a reasonable action from a child of that age.

b) The child is not liable because nothing done by a child below 7 years is an offense:
This option is incorrect as well. While it is true that children below the age of 7 are considered incapable of committing an offense, the principle does not apply to the child directly. It applies to anyone who is capable of reporting the matter, which in this case would be the child's parents.

c) The child's parents are liable because they were aware of the murder and therefore were responsible to report the matter on behalf of their child:
This option is correct. The parents, being aware of the murder, had the responsibility to take appropriate action. By not reporting the matter to the concerned authorities, they have committed an offense as per the given principle.

d) Both (a) and (c):
This option is incorrect as explained earlier. The child cannot be held liable for not reporting the matter, but the parents are responsible for their inaction.

Conclusion:
Based on the above analysis, option 'C' is the correct answer. The child's parents are liable because they were aware of the murder and therefore were responsible to report the matter on behalf of their child.

Cup is to coffee as bowl is to
  • a)
    dish
  • b)
    soup
  • c)
    spoon
  • d)
    food
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Ishaan Datta answered
Understanding the Relationship

To solve this analogy question, we need to determine the relationship between "cup" and "coffee" and then find a similar relationship among the given answer choices.

Relationship between Cup and Coffee

A cup is a container that is commonly used to hold coffee. Therefore, the relationship between cup and coffee is that a cup is used to hold coffee.

Applying the Relationship to the Answer Choices

a) Dish: A dish is a general term that can refer to any type of food container or plate. While a dish can be used to hold soup, it is not specifically associated with soup like a bowl. Therefore, this option does not have a similar relationship to the given analogy.

b) Soup: A bowl is commonly used to hold soup, just like a cup is used to hold coffee. This answer choice has a similar relationship to the given analogy, as both involve a container being used to hold a specific food item.

c) Spoon: A spoon is a utensil used to eat food, but it is not directly related to the concept of a bowl. This option does not have a similar relationship to the given analogy.

d) Food: While a bowl can hold various types of food, it does not have a specific association with food like a cup does with coffee. This option does not have a similar relationship to the given analogy.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis above, the correct answer is option B) Soup. Just as a cup is used to hold coffee, a bowl is commonly used to hold soup. Both relationships involve a container being used to hold a specific food item.

Which functionary can be invited to give his opinion in the Parliament?
  • a)
    Chief Justice of India.
  • b)
    Chief Election Commissioner of India.
  • c)
    Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
  • d)
    Attorney General of India.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Anna Merin answered
Article 76 provides that Attorney General is the first law officer and chief legal advisor to the government.Since he is the first law officer of th state he has the right to participate in the proceedings of both houses of parliament but he cannot vote in their proceedings.

Look at this series: 2, 1, (1/2), (1/4), ... What number should come next?
  • a)
    (1/3)
  • b)
    (1/8)
  • c)
    (2/8)
  • d)
    (1/16)
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Rohit Jain answered
This is a simple division series; each number is one-half of the previous number.
In other terms to say, the number is divided by 2 successively to get the next result.
4/2 = 2
2/2 = 1
1/2 = 1/2
(1/2)/2 = 1/4
(1/4)/2 = 1/8 and so on.

What is Plea Bargaining?
  • a)
    A conference between opposing lawyers and judge to determine the time a case should take place.
  • b)
    A procedure by which an accused pleads guilty in exchange for a lesser punishment.
  • c)
    A conference between opposing lawyers to settle the claim.
  • d)
    A conference between the victim and the accused to settle the claim.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explanation:

Plea Bargaining:
Plea bargaining is a legal process in which a defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to the original charge with a recommendation for a lighter sentence in exchange for a reduced punishment. It is a negotiation between the defendant and the prosecutor to avoid a lengthy trial and potentially harsher penalties.

Defendant's Decision:
The defendant must voluntarily agree to the plea deal after consulting with their lawyer. By pleading guilty, the defendant accepts responsibility for the crime and gives up their right to a trial.

Benefits:
Plea bargaining can benefit both the defendant and the prosecution. For the defendant, it may result in a reduced sentence, avoiding the uncertainty of a trial, and saving time and money. For the prosecution, it ensures a conviction without the need for a trial, saving resources and time.

Types of Plea Bargains:
There are different types of plea bargains, including charge bargaining (reducing the charges), sentence bargaining (agreeing to a lighter sentence), and fact bargaining (agreeing on certain facts related to the case).

Approval by the Court:
Once the plea bargain is reached, it must be approved by the court. The judge will review the agreement to ensure it is voluntary, understanding, and in the best interest of justice.

Conclusion:
Plea bargaining is a common practice in the legal system that aims to expedite the resolution of cases and reduce the burden on the court system. It allows defendants to accept responsibility for their actions in exchange for a more favorable outcome.

Directions to Solve: In each series, look for the degree and direction of change between the numbers. In other words, do the numbers increase or decrease, and by how much
Look at this series: 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, ... What number should come next?
  • a)
    7
  • b)
    10
  • c)
    14
  • d)
    15
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Tarun Ghoshal answered
Series Analysis:
To determine the next number in the series, we need to analyze the pattern of change between the given numbers.

Pattern Analysis:
Looking at the given series: 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, ...

- The first number is 3.
- The second number is obtained by adding 1 to the previous number, so 4 = 3 + 1.
- The third number is obtained by adding 3 to the previous number, so 7 = 4 + 3.
- The fourth number is obtained by adding 1 to the previous number, so 8 = 7 + 1.
- The fifth number is obtained by adding 3 to the previous number, so 11 = 8 + 3.
- The sixth number is obtained by adding 1 to the previous number, so 12 = 11 + 1.

Pattern Conclusion:
From the pattern analysis, we can see that the series alternates between adding 1 and adding 3 to the previous number.

Prediction:
Based on the pattern, the next number in the series should be obtained by adding 1 to the previous number, so the next number should be 12 + 1 = 13.

Verification:
Let's verify our prediction by checking the options given:

a) 7: This does not follow the pattern of adding 1 and adding 3, so it is not the correct answer.
b) 10: This does not follow the pattern of adding 1 and adding 3, so it is not the correct answer.
c) 14: This does not follow the pattern of adding 1 and adding 3, so it is not the correct answer.
d) 15: This follows the pattern of adding 1 to the previous number, so it is the correct answer.

Conclusion:
The next number in the series is 15, so the correct answer is option 'D'.

The Indian Constitution was enforced on ___________.
  • a)
    30th Jan, 1950
  • b)
    26th Jan, 1950
  • c)
    15th Aug, 1947
  • d)
    26th Nov, 1949
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Tushar Desai answered
Introduction:
The Indian Constitution is the supreme law of India that lays down the framework that determines the political principles, establishes the structure, procedures, powers, and duties of the government institutions, and sets out the fundamental rights, directive principles, and responsibilities of citizens. It was enforced on 26th January 1950.

Explanation:

1. Historical Context:
- India gained independence from British colonial rule on 15th August 1947.
- After independence, a Constituent Assembly was formed to draft the Indian Constitution.

2. Constitution Drafting and Adoption:
- The Constituent Assembly, consisting of representatives from all over India, began drafting the Constitution on 9th December 1946.
- The drafting process took almost three years, and the final draft was adopted on 26th November 1949.
- The Chairman of the Constituent Assembly, Dr. Rajendra Prasad, signed the Constitution on behalf of the Assembly.

3. Commencement of the Constitution:
- The Constitution was not enforced immediately after its adoption.
- The date of enforcement was chosen to be 26th January 1950, to commemorate the declaration of Purna Swaraj (Complete Independence) by the Indian National Congress on 26th January 1930.
- This also allowed the government time to make necessary preparations for the implementation of the Constitution.

4. Significance of 26th January:
- 26th January is celebrated as Republic Day in India, marking the day when the Constitution came into effect.
- On this day in 1950, India transitioned from a constitutional monarchy to a republic, with Dr. Rajendra Prasad becoming the first President of India.

Conclusion:
The Indian Constitution was enforced on 26th January 1950, marking a significant milestone in Indian history. This date was chosen to honor the spirit of independence and the establishment of a democratic republic in India.

The tenure of the Union Council of Ministers is _________.
  • a)
    three years
  • b)
    uncertain
  • c)
    fixed and co-terminus with the President
  • d)
    co-terminus with the Lok Sabha
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Faizan Khan answered
The Union Council of Ministers exercises executive authority in the Republic of India. It consists of senior ministers, called 'cabinet ministers', junior ministers, called 'ministers of state' and, rarely, deputy ministers. It is led by the prime minister. A smaller executive body called the Union Cabinet is the supreme decision-making body in India.

Yard is to inch as quart is to
  • a)
    gallon
  • b)
    ounce
  • c)
    milk
  • d)
    liquid
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explanation:

To solve this analogy, we need to identify the relationship between the words "yard" and "inch" and then find a similar relationship between the options.

The relationship between "yard" and "inch" is that they are both units of measurement. Specifically, a yard is a larger unit of measurement than an inch. There are 36 inches in a yard.

Analysis of the options:

a) Gallon: A gallon is a unit of measurement for volume, just like a quart. However, a gallon is a larger unit of measurement than a quart. There are 4 quarts in a gallon. Therefore, option A is not the correct answer.

b) Ounce: An ounce is a unit of measurement for weight or volume. In this case, a quart is a larger unit of measurement than an ounce. There are 32 fluid ounces in a quart. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

c) Milk: Milk is not a unit of measurement, so this option is not relevant to the analogy. Therefore, option C is not the correct answer.

d) Liquid: Liquid is a general term that encompasses different substances, including milk. However, it does not represent a unit of measurement. Therefore, option D is not the correct answer.

Conclusion:

Based on the relationship between "yard" and "inch," the correct answer to the analogy "yard is to inch as quart is to" is option B) ounce.

A resident of a colony writes to the judge of a High Court complaining about the company polluting the environment in the area resulting in health hazards. This :
  • a)
    can be treated on a writ petition
  • b)
    can be partially treated a writ petition
  • c)
    can be treated as a petition only if it was presented by a lawyer.
  • d)
    cannot be treated as a writ petition
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Aryan Khanna answered
A writ petition can be filed in the High Court (Article 226) or the Supreme Court (Article 32) of India when any of your fundamental rights are violated. The jurisdiction with the High Courts (Article 226) with regards to a writ petition is wider and extends to constitutional rights too

'Last come first go' rule is applicable in the case of :
  • a)
    Closure
  • b)
    Transfer of undertaking
  • c)
    Lockout
  • d)
    Retrenchment
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Aryan Khanna answered
Departure from the rule “last come first go”.-The rule is that the employers shall retrench the workman who came last, first, popularly as 'last come first go'. ... This is to say, those who fall in the same category shall suffer retrenchment only in accordance with the principle of 'last come first go'. :-
Section 2(oo) of the Act states that “retrenchment means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, but does not include – (a) voluntary retirement of the workman or.

Directions to Solve: A good way to figure out the relationship in a given question is to make up a sentence that describes the relationship between the first two words. Then, try to use the same sentence to find out which of the answer choices completes the same relationship with the third word.
Sponge is to porous as rubber is to
  • a)
    massive
  • b)
    solid
  • c)
    elastic
  • d)
    inflexible
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Eshaan Kapoor answered
A sponge is a porous material. Rubber is an elastic material. (Choice a) is incorrect because rubber would not generally be referred to as massive. The answer is not (choice b) because even though rubber is a solid, its most noticeable characteristic is its elasticity. Choice d is incorrect because rubber has flexibility.

Ashtapradhan was a council of ministers-
  • a)
    In the Gupta administration
  • b)
    In the Chola administration
  • c)
    In the Vijayanagar administration
  • d)
    In the Maratha administration
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Anaya Patel answered
The Ashta Pradhan (also termed Asta Pradhan or the Council of 8) was a council of eight ministers that administered the Maratha empire. The council was formed in 1674 by their king, Shivaji.
The term Ashta Pradhan literally translates to "the Prime Eight", from the Sanskrit ashta ("eight") and pradhan ("prime"). The body discharged the functions of a modern council of ministers; this is regarded as one of the first successful instances of ministerial delegation in India. The council is credited with having implemented good governance practices in the Maratha heartland, as well as for the success of the military campaigns against the Mughal Empire.

The impeachment proceedings against the Vice-President can be initiated ___________________.
  • a)
    only in the Lok Sabha
  • b)
    only in the Rajya Sabha
  • c)
    in either house of the Parliament
  • d)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Rohit Jain answered
The Constitution of India under Article 67 (b) states that the Vice President can be impeached only by a resolution passed of the Rajya Sabha by an absolute majority (more than 50% of total membership) and agreed to by a simple majority (50% of members present and voting)of the Lok Sabha.

In each of the following questions two statements are given and these statements are followed by two conclusions numbered (1) and (2). You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Give answer:
(A) If only (1) conclusion follows
(B) If only (2) conclusion follows
(C) If either (1) or (2) follows
(D) If neither (1) nor (2) follows and
1. Statements: All the harmoniums are instruments. All the instruments are flutes.
Conclusions:
All the flutes are instruments.
  • All the harmoniums are flutes
    • a)
      Only (1) conclusion follows
    • b)
      Only (2) conclusion follows
    • c)
      Either (1) or (2) follows
    • d)
      Neither (1) nor (2) follows
    Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

    Rohini kumar answered
    Understanding the Statements
    - Statement 1: All harmoniums are instruments.
    - Statement 2: All instruments are flutes.
    These statements can be represented in a logical manner:
    - Harmoniums (H) are a subset of Instruments (I).
    - Instruments (I) are a subset of Flutes (F).
    Analyzing the Conclusions
    - Conclusion 1: All flutes are instruments.
    - This conclusion suggests that the entire category of flutes falls under instruments. However, based on the statements, we only know that all instruments are flutes, not vice versa. Therefore, this conclusion does not logically follow.
    - Conclusion 2: All harmoniums are flutes.
    - Since all harmoniums are instruments (H ⊆ I) and all instruments are flutes (I ⊆ F), it follows logically that all harmoniums must also be flutes (H ⊆ F). This conclusion is valid based on the provided statements.
    Final Decision
    Given the analysis:
    - Conclusion 1 does not follow from the statements.
    - Conclusion 2 logically follows from the statements.
    Thus, the correct answer is:
    Only (2) conclusion follows (Option B).

    Who among the following enunciated the 'Doctrine of Rule of Law'?
    • a)
      Ronald Dworkin
    • b)
      Salmond
    • c)
      A.V. Dicey
    • d)
      John Austin
    Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

    Faizan Khan answered
    A.V.Dicey in his book "Introduction to the study of the Law of the Constitution" published in the year 1885 enunciated the Doctrine of Rule of Law.

    The Speaker of the Lok Sabha makes use of his casting vote only _____________________.
    • a)
      to save the existing government
    • b)
      in case of a tie, viz. when the votes an equally divided
    • c)
      in case of a constitutional amendment
    • d)
      in case of emergency
    Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

    The Speaker of the Lok Sabha and Casting Vote

    The Speaker of the Lok Sabha is the presiding officer of the lower house of the Indian Parliament. The Speaker is responsible for maintaining order and decorum in the House, and for ensuring that the proceedings are conducted smoothly and in accordance with the rules of the House.

    One of the important powers of the Speaker is the casting vote. The Speaker can use his/her casting vote in case of a tie, i.e., when the votes are equally divided. Let us understand this power in detail:

    What is a Casting Vote?

    A casting vote is a vote that is used by the presiding officer of a legislative body, such as the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, to break a tie. In other words, when the votes for and against a particular motion or amendment are equal, the presiding officer can use his/her casting vote to decide the outcome.

    When can the Speaker use his/her Casting Vote?

    The Speaker of the Lok Sabha can use his/her casting vote only in case of a tie, i.e., when the votes are equally divided. In such a situation, the Speaker has the power to cast his/her vote to break the tie and decide the outcome of the motion or amendment.

    The Importance of the Casting Vote

    The casting vote of the Speaker is an important power that ensures that the proceedings in the Lok Sabha are conducted smoothly and in accordance with the rules of the House. In case of a tie, the Speaker's casting vote can decide the outcome of a motion or amendment, and this can have significant implications for the functioning of the government and the country as a whole.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha has the power to use his/her casting vote only in case of a tie, i.e., when the votes are equally divided. This power is an important tool that ensures that the proceedings in the House are conducted smoothly and in accordance with the rules of the House.

    Chapter doubts & questions for Practice Tests for PU LLB - Mock Test Series for PU LLB 2026 2025 is part of CLAT exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.

    Chapter doubts & questions of Practice Tests for PU LLB - Mock Test Series for PU LLB 2026 in English & Hindi are available as part of CLAT exam. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

    Top Courses CLAT

    Related CLAT Content