All Exams >
BPSC (Bihar) >
Indian Polity for State PSC Exams >
All Questions
All questions of Union and its Territory for BPSC (Bihar) Exam
Consider the following statements:1. Laws made for the admission or establishment of new states under Article 2 and for the formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states under Article 3 are not considered amendments of the Constitution under Article 368.2. Such laws require a two-thirds majority in both houses of Parliament.3. The Supreme Court has held that the power of Parliament to diminish the area of a state is granted under Article 3.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a)1 Only
- b)1 and 2 Only
- c)1 and 3 Only
- d)1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. Laws made for the admission or establishment of new states under Article 2 and for the formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states under Article 3 are not considered amendments of the Constitution under Article 368.
2. Such laws require a two-thirds majority in both houses of Parliament.
3. The Supreme Court has held that the power of Parliament to diminish the area of a state is granted under Article 3.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
1 and 2 Only
c)
1 and 3 Only
d)
1, 2 and 3
|
Talent Triumphacademy answered |
Statement 1 is correct. Article 4 of the Indian Constitution declares that laws made for the admission or establishment of new states (under Article 2) and the formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states (under Article 3) are not considered amendments of the Constitution under Article 368. This means such laws can be passed by a simple majority and by the ordinary legislative process.
Statement 2 is incorrect. As stated above, these laws can be passed by a simple majority and not a two-thirds majority, contrary to what is required for constitutional amendments under Article 368.
Statement 3 is correct. The Supreme Court has held that the power of Parliament to diminish the area of a state is indeed granted under Article 3.
Thus, the correct answer is Option C
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:
Part I of the Indian Constitution, titled The Union and its Territory, includes articles from 1-4 and deals with the establishment, renaming, merging, or altering of state borders.Statement-II:
Article 2 of the Constitution deals with the admission or establishment of new states, granting Parliament the power to admit new states into the Union of India and to establish new states.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?- a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- b)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- c)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- d)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
Part I of the Indian Constitution, titled The Union and its Territory, includes articles from 1-4 and deals with the establishment, renaming, merging, or altering of state borders.
Part I of the Indian Constitution, titled The Union and its Territory, includes articles from 1-4 and deals with the establishment, renaming, merging, or altering of state borders.
Statement-II:
Article 2 of the Constitution deals with the admission or establishment of new states, granting Parliament the power to admit new states into the Union of India and to establish new states.
Article 2 of the Constitution deals with the admission or establishment of new states, granting Parliament the power to admit new states into the Union of India and to establish new states.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
a)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
b)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
c)
Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
d)
Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
|
Anika Iyer answered |
Explanation:
Statement Analysis:
- Statement-I: Part I of the Indian Constitution indeed includes articles from 1-4 and deals with The Union and its Territory.
- Statement-II: Article 2 of the Constitution does deal with the admission or establishment of new states.
Correct Explanation:
- Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, as they accurately describe the content of the Indian Constitution.
- However, Statement-II does not directly explain Statement-I, as they address different aspects of the Constitution.
- Therefore, option 'B' is the correct choice as it acknowledges the accuracy of both statements without stating that one explains the other.
Statement Analysis:
- Statement-I: Part I of the Indian Constitution indeed includes articles from 1-4 and deals with The Union and its Territory.
- Statement-II: Article 2 of the Constitution does deal with the admission or establishment of new states.
Correct Explanation:
- Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, as they accurately describe the content of the Indian Constitution.
- However, Statement-II does not directly explain Statement-I, as they address different aspects of the Constitution.
- Therefore, option 'B' is the correct choice as it acknowledges the accuracy of both statements without stating that one explains the other.
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:
Parliament may form a new State by separation of territory from any State or by uniting two or more States or parts of States.Statement-II:
Before recommending a bill related to changes in existing states, the President needs to refer the bill to the concerned state legislature, which can express its views within a specified period. The President (or Parliament) is not bound by the views of the state legislature and may either accept or reject them.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?- a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- b)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- c)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- d)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
Parliament may form a new State by separation of territory from any State or by uniting two or more States or parts of States.
Parliament may form a new State by separation of territory from any State or by uniting two or more States or parts of States.
Statement-II:
Before recommending a bill related to changes in existing states, the President needs to refer the bill to the concerned state legislature, which can express its views within a specified period. The President (or Parliament) is not bound by the views of the state legislature and may either accept or reject them.
Before recommending a bill related to changes in existing states, the President needs to refer the bill to the concerned state legislature, which can express its views within a specified period. The President (or Parliament) is not bound by the views of the state legislature and may either accept or reject them.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
a)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
b)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
c)
Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
d)
Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
|
Luminary Institute answered |
Both statements are factually correct. Statement-I pertains to the powers of Parliament in forming new states by various means as outlined in Article 3. Statement-II accurately describes the process wherein the President must refer a bill on state changes to the concerned state legislature for its views. However, Statement-II does not directly explain Statement-I; it offers a separate condition related to the referral process. Thus, while both are correct, Statement-II does not provide a direct explanation of Statement-I, making option (b) the correct answer.
Consider the following pairs:
1. Article 4: Laws made under Articles 2 and 3 are considered amendments under Article 368.
2. Article 2: Admission or establishment of new states.
3. Article 3: Formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states.
4. Article 368: Amendment of the Constitution.
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
- a)Only one pair
- b)Only three pairs
- c)Only two pairs
- d)All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following pairs:
1. Article 4: Laws made under Articles 2 and 3 are considered amendments under Article 368.
2. Article 2: Admission or establishment of new states.
3. Article 3: Formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states.
4. Article 368: Amendment of the Constitution.
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
a)
Only one pair
b)
Only three pairs
c)
Only two pairs
d)
All four pairs
|
Prateek Joshi answered |
Explanation:
1. Article 4:
- This statement is incorrect because Article 4 of the Indian Constitution deals with laws made for the regulation of the use of the official language of the Union.
2. Article 2:
- This statement is correct. Article 2 of the Indian Constitution deals with the admission or establishment of new states.
3. Article 3:
- This statement is correct. Article 3 of the Indian Constitution deals with the formation of new states and the alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states.
4. Article 368:
- This statement is incorrect because Article 368 of the Indian Constitution deals with the amendment of the Constitution.
Therefore, only two pairs out of the four given pairs are correctly matched. The correct pairs are:
- Article 2: Admission or establishment of new states.
- Article 3: Formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states.
1. Article 4:
- This statement is incorrect because Article 4 of the Indian Constitution deals with laws made for the regulation of the use of the official language of the Union.
2. Article 2:
- This statement is correct. Article 2 of the Indian Constitution deals with the admission or establishment of new states.
3. Article 3:
- This statement is correct. Article 3 of the Indian Constitution deals with the formation of new states and the alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states.
4. Article 368:
- This statement is incorrect because Article 368 of the Indian Constitution deals with the amendment of the Constitution.
Therefore, only two pairs out of the four given pairs are correctly matched. The correct pairs are:
- Article 2: Admission or establishment of new states.
- Article 3: Formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states.
Which of the following Union Territories is given partial statehood in India? - a)Chandigarh
- b)Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- c)Daman Diu
- d)Puducherry
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following Union Territories is given partial statehood in India?
a)
Chandigarh
b)
Dadra and Nagar Haveli
c)
Daman Diu
d)
Puducherry
|
Meera Kapoor answered |
Puducherry is a union territory in India.
- François Martin is considered as the father of Puducherry.
- Puducherry is the first union territory in India to form a legislative assembly.
- The administrative system of Puducherry consists of an elected legislative assembly and an executive council of ministers.
- Puducherry consists of a locally elected legislative assembly and government.
- The famous Romain Rolland library is located at Puducherry.
- The French left Puducherry in 1954.
- Puducherry became a union territory in 1962.
Consider the following pairs:1. Article 1: Deals with the Name and territory of the Union2. Article 2: Deals with the renaming of States3. Article 3: Deals with the formation of new States and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing States4. Article 4: Deals with laws made under Articles 2 and 3How many pairs given above are correctly matched?- a)Only one pair
- b)Only two pairs
- c)Only three pairs
- d)All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following pairs:
1. Article 1: Deals with the Name and territory of the Union
2. Article 2: Deals with the renaming of States
3. Article 3: Deals with the formation of new States and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing States
4. Article 4: Deals with laws made under Articles 2 and 3
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
a)
Only one pair
b)
Only two pairs
c)
Only three pairs
d)
All four pairs
|
Nandini Khurana answered |
Understanding the Articles of the Indian Constitution
The Indian Constitution outlines the structure and governance of the country, including provisions related to the territory and states. Let’s analyze the pairs provided:
1. Article 1: Deals with the Name and territory of the Union
- This is correct. Article 1 states that India shall be a Union of States and specifies the territory of the Union.
2. Article 2: Deals with the renaming of States
- This is incorrect. Article 2 allows for the admission of new states into the Union but does not specifically deal with the renaming of existing states.
3. Article 3: Deals with the formation of new States and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing States
- This is correct. Article 3 explicitly provides the Parliament the power to create new states and alter the boundaries or names of existing states.
4. Article 4: Deals with laws made under Articles 2 and 3
- This is correct. Article 4 states that laws made under Articles 2 and 3 shall not be deemed to be amendments to the Constitution.
Conclusion
In summary, the correctly matched pairs are as follows:
- Article 1: Correct
- Article 2: Incorrect
- Article 3: Correct
- Article 4: Correct
Thus, only three pairs are correctly matched. Therefore, the correct answer is option C: Only three pairs.
The Indian Constitution outlines the structure and governance of the country, including provisions related to the territory and states. Let’s analyze the pairs provided:
1. Article 1: Deals with the Name and territory of the Union
- This is correct. Article 1 states that India shall be a Union of States and specifies the territory of the Union.
2. Article 2: Deals with the renaming of States
- This is incorrect. Article 2 allows for the admission of new states into the Union but does not specifically deal with the renaming of existing states.
3. Article 3: Deals with the formation of new States and alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing States
- This is correct. Article 3 explicitly provides the Parliament the power to create new states and alter the boundaries or names of existing states.
4. Article 4: Deals with laws made under Articles 2 and 3
- This is correct. Article 4 states that laws made under Articles 2 and 3 shall not be deemed to be amendments to the Constitution.
Conclusion
In summary, the correctly matched pairs are as follows:
- Article 1: Correct
- Article 2: Incorrect
- Article 3: Correct
- Article 4: Correct
Thus, only three pairs are correctly matched. Therefore, the correct answer is option C: Only three pairs.
Consider the following pairs:1. Forming a new State by uniting two or more States or parts of States - Requires prior recommendation of the President.2. Increasing the area of any State - Does not require the views of the state legislature concerned.3. Altering the boundaries of any State - Requires the views of the state legislature concerned.4. Altering the name of any State - Parliament is bound by the views of the state legislature.How many pairs given above are correctly matched?- a)Only one pair
- b)Only two pairs
- c)Only three pairs
- d)All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following pairs:
1. Forming a new State by uniting two or more States or parts of States - Requires prior recommendation of the President.
2. Increasing the area of any State - Does not require the views of the state legislature concerned.
3. Altering the boundaries of any State - Requires the views of the state legislature concerned.
4. Altering the name of any State - Parliament is bound by the views of the state legislature.
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
a)
Only one pair
b)
Only two pairs
c)
Only three pairs
d)
All four pairs
|
|
Luminary Institute answered |
1. Forming a new State by uniting two or more States or parts of States - Requires prior recommendation of the President.
- Correct. Article 3 states that a bill for forming a new State can be introduced in Parliament only with the prior recommendation of the President.
2. Increasing the area of any State - Does not require the views of the state legislature concerned.
- Incorrect. Increasing the area of any State does require the views of the state legislature concerned as per Article 3.
3. Altering the boundaries of any State - Requires the views of the state legislature concerned.
- Correct. Article 3 requires that the President must refer the bill to the state legislature to obtain its views on altering the boundaries of any State.
4. Altering the name of any State - Parliament is bound by the views of the state legislature.
- Incorrect. Article 3 specifies that while the President must refer the bill to the state legislature, neither the President nor the Parliament is bound by the views of the state legislature.
Thus, the correctly matched pairs are pairs 1 and 3.
Consider the following statements:1. A bill for the formation of a new state or alteration of an existing state’s boundaries can be introduced in Parliament only with the prior recommendation of the President.2. The President is required to refer the bill to the state legislature concerned for expressing its views within a specified period before recommending the bill to Parliament.3. The President is bound by the views of the state legislature when recommending the bill to Parliament.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a)1 Only
- b)1 and 2 Only
- c)1 and 3 Only
- d)1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. A bill for the formation of a new state or alteration of an existing state’s boundaries can be introduced in Parliament only with the prior recommendation of the President.
2. The President is required to refer the bill to the state legislature concerned for expressing its views within a specified period before recommending the bill to Parliament.
3. The President is bound by the views of the state legislature when recommending the bill to Parliament.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
1 and 2 Only
c)
1 and 3 Only
d)
1, 2 and 3
|
|
Luminary Institute answered |
Statement 1: This statement is correct. Article 3 of the Indian Constitution states that a bill for the formation of a new state or alteration of boundaries of an existing state can be introduced in Parliament only with the prior recommendation of the President.
Statement 2: This statement is also correct. Before recommending the bill, the President must refer it to the state legislature concerned for expressing its views within a specified period. This step is mandatory to ensure that the state legislature has the opportunity to provide its opinion on the proposed changes.
Statement 3: This statement is incorrect. The President is not bound by the views of the state legislature. The President may accept or reject the views expressed by the state legislature, even if they are received within the specified period.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option B.
Who was Sikkim's last sovereign king?- a)Phuntsog Namgyal
- b)Tenzing Namgyal
- c)Tashi Namgyal
- d)Palden Namgyal
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Who was Sikkim's last sovereign king?
a)
Phuntsog Namgyal
b)
Tenzing Namgyal
c)
Tashi Namgyal
d)
Palden Namgyal
|
|
Saikat Nair answered |
Sikkim's last sovereign king was Palden Namgyal.
Background:
Sikkim was an independent kingdom until 1975 when it was merged with India as its 22nd state. The Namgyal dynasty ruled Sikkim for almost 300 years until its merger with India. Palden Namgyal was the last king of Sikkim.
Life of Palden Namgyal:
Palden Namgyal was born in 1923 in Gangtok. He was the son of the 11th Chogyal (king) Tashi Namgyal. He ascended to the throne in 1965 after the death of his father. Palden Namgyal was a progressive king and was known for his modern outlook. During his reign, he made efforts to modernize Sikkim and improve the standard of living of its people.
Merger with India:
In 1975, a referendum was held in Sikkim to decide whether it should remain an independent kingdom or merge with India. The referendum resulted in a majority in favor of the merger. On May 16, 1975, Sikkim became the 22nd state of India and Palden Namgyal lost his title as king.
Later Life and Death:
After the merger, Palden Namgyal remained in Sikkim and was granted a privy purse by the Indian government. He continued to be active in social and cultural activities in Sikkim. He died in 1982 at the age of 59.
Conclusion:
Palden Namgyal was the last king of Sikkim who ruled the kingdom during a crucial period in its history. He was known for his modern outlook and his efforts to modernize Sikkim. His reign came to an end with the merger of Sikkim with India in 1975.
Background:
Sikkim was an independent kingdom until 1975 when it was merged with India as its 22nd state. The Namgyal dynasty ruled Sikkim for almost 300 years until its merger with India. Palden Namgyal was the last king of Sikkim.
Life of Palden Namgyal:
Palden Namgyal was born in 1923 in Gangtok. He was the son of the 11th Chogyal (king) Tashi Namgyal. He ascended to the throne in 1965 after the death of his father. Palden Namgyal was a progressive king and was known for his modern outlook. During his reign, he made efforts to modernize Sikkim and improve the standard of living of its people.
Merger with India:
In 1975, a referendum was held in Sikkim to decide whether it should remain an independent kingdom or merge with India. The referendum resulted in a majority in favor of the merger. On May 16, 1975, Sikkim became the 22nd state of India and Palden Namgyal lost his title as king.
Later Life and Death:
After the merger, Palden Namgyal remained in Sikkim and was granted a privy purse by the Indian government. He continued to be active in social and cultural activities in Sikkim. He died in 1982 at the age of 59.
Conclusion:
Palden Namgyal was the last king of Sikkim who ruled the kingdom during a crucial period in its history. He was known for his modern outlook and his efforts to modernize Sikkim. His reign came to an end with the merger of Sikkim with India in 1975.
Consider the following statements:1. Article 1 of the Constitution of India states that "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States."2. Article 2 of the Constitution of India grants the Parliament the power to establish new states but not to admit new states into the Union.3. The territory of India, as defined in Article 1, includes the territories of the States, the Union territories specified in the First Schedule, and any other territories that may be acquired.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a)1 Only
- b)1 and 3 Only
- c)1 and 2 Only
- d)1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. Article 1 of the Constitution of India states that "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States."
2. Article 2 of the Constitution of India grants the Parliament the power to establish new states but not to admit new states into the Union.
3. The territory of India, as defined in Article 1, includes the territories of the States, the Union territories specified in the First Schedule, and any other territories that may be acquired.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
1 and 3 Only
c)
1 and 2 Only
d)
1, 2 and 3
|
Upsc Rank Holders answered |
- Statement 1 is correct: Article 1 of the Indian Constitution explicitly states, "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States." This establishes the nomenclature of India and its federal structure.
- Statement 2 is incorrect: Article 2 of the Constitution grants the Parliament the power to both admit new states into the Union and establish new states. Therefore, limiting it to only establishing new states is incorrect.
- Statement 3 is correct: The territory of India, as defined in Article 1, includes the territories of the States, the Union territories specified in the First Schedule, and any other territories that may be acquired.
Thus, the correct statements are 1 and 3. Therefore, the correct answer is Option B: 1 and 3 Only.
Chapter doubts & questions for Union and its Territory - Indian Polity for State PSC Exams 2025 is part of BPSC (Bihar) exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the BPSC (Bihar) exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for BPSC (Bihar) 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Union and its Territory - Indian Polity for State PSC Exams in English & Hindi are available as part of BPSC (Bihar) exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for BPSC (Bihar) Exam by signing up for free.
Indian Polity for State PSC Exams
144 videos|544 docs|207 tests
|
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Study with 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos & Tests
10M+ students study on EduRev
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup