All questions of Cabinet Committees for BPSC (Bihar) Exam

Appointment of the Chairman of the Committee on Public Undertakings
The Committee on Public Undertakings is a significant parliamentary committee in India, primarily responsible for examining the reports and accounts of public sector undertakings. The appointment of its Chairman is a key aspect of its functioning.
Role of the Speaker of Lok Sabha
- The Speaker of the Lok Sabha plays a central role in the appointment of the Chairman of the Committee on Public Undertakings.
- This committee is constituted by the Speaker, who selects a member from the Lok Sabha to serve as its Chairman.
Importance of the Committee
- The Committee on Public Undertakings ensures accountability and transparency in the functioning of public enterprises.
- It reviews how government funds are utilized and assesses the performance of public sector undertakings.
Composition of the Committee
- The committee consists of members from both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.
- However, the Chairman is always a member of the Lok Sabha, reinforcing the significance of the Lok Sabha's role in parliamentary oversight.
Conclusion
- The Speaker's authority in appointing the Chairman emphasizes the legislative power vested in the Lok Sabha.
- This structure allows for a focused examination of public undertakings, ensuring they operate efficiently and in the public interest.
In conclusion, the correct answer to the question of who appoints the Chairman of the Committee on Public Undertakings is option 'C', the Speaker of Lok Sabha.

The correct answer is option 'C' - Appointments Committee.

The Appointments Committee is responsible for deciding all higher-level appointments in the Central Secretariat, Public Enterprises, Banks, and Financial Institutions. Let's delve into the details of the Appointments Committee and its role in the decision-making process.

1. Appointments Committee:
The Appointments Committee is a Cabinet Committee formed by the Government of India. It consists of the Prime Minister and the Minister of Home Affairs. The committee is responsible for making appointments to various key positions in the government and public sector organizations.

2. Composition and Functions:
a) Prime Minister: The Prime Minister is the chairperson of the Appointments Committee. As the head of the government, the Prime Minister plays a crucial role in the decision-making process regarding appointments to higher-level positions.

b) Minister of Home Affairs: The Minister of Home Affairs is the other member of the Appointments Committee. The ministry is responsible for maintaining internal security, law and order, and overall administration. The Minister of Home Affairs provides valuable inputs and insights during the appointment process.

3. Decision-making Authority:
The Appointments Committee has the authority to make decisions regarding appointments to higher-level positions in the Central Secretariat, Public Enterprises, Banks, and Financial Institutions. This includes appointments such as Secretary-level positions, Chairman and Managing Directors of Public Sector Undertakings, and CEOs of Financial Institutions.

4. Importance of the Appointments Committee:
a) Merit-based Appointments: The Appointments Committee ensures that appointments to key positions are made based on merit, competence, and suitability. This helps in maintaining the efficiency and effectiveness of the government and public sector organizations.

b) Transparency: The committee follows a transparent and objective approach in the appointment process. This ensures that appointments are made through a fair and unbiased selection process, promoting transparency in governance.

c) Accountability: The Appointments Committee holds the responsibility of ensuring that appointments are made in the best interest of the organization and the country. It ensures that qualified and competent individuals are chosen for key positions, thereby promoting accountability.

d) Stability and Continuity: The committee plays a vital role in ensuring stability and continuity in the functioning of the government and public sector organizations. By appointing well-qualified individuals to higher-level positions, it contributes to the smooth functioning and long-term growth of these institutions.

In conclusion, the Appointments Committee, consisting of the Prime Minister and the Minister of Home Affairs, is responsible for deciding all higher-level appointments in the Central Secretariat, Public Enterprises, Banks, and Financial Institutions. Its role in ensuring merit-based appointments, promoting transparency, accountability, stability, and continuity is crucial for effective governance.

The reason behind the abolition of GoMs and EGoMs in 2014 was to bring about greater accountability and empowerment.


In 2014, the Government of India decided to abolish the practice of setting up Group of Ministers (GoMs) and Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoMs). This decision was taken with the aim of streamlining decision-making processes, reducing delays, and increasing accountability in the functioning of the government.



1. Streamlining Decision-Making Processes:
The establishment of GoMs and EGoMs had become a common practice in the Indian government, leading to a proliferation of committees and sub-committees. This often resulted in delays in decision-making and a lack of accountability. By abolishing GoMs and EGoMs, the government aimed to streamline the decision-making process and make it more efficient.

2. Reducing Delays:
The presence of multiple committees often led to overlapping jurisdictions and conflicting decisions. This caused delays in implementing policies and projects. The abolition of GoMs and EGoMs was a step towards reducing such delays and ensuring faster decision-making.

3. Increasing Accountability:
The functioning of GoMs and EGoMs was often criticized for lack of transparency and accountability. Since decisions were taken by a small group of ministers, it was difficult to hold them accountable for the outcomes. By doing away with these committees, the government aimed to bring about greater accountability in decision-making.

4. Empowering Ministers:
The abolition of GoMs and EGoMs aimed to empower individual ministers and make them more accountable for their respective portfolios. Instead of relying on committees, the ministers were expected to take decisions within their own domains, thereby taking direct responsibility for the outcomes.

5. Efficiency and Cost-Saving:
The establishment and functioning of GoMs and EGoMs involved administrative costs and resources. By eliminating these committees, the government aimed to improve efficiency and save costs.


The abolition of GoMs and EGoMs in 2014 was a step towards bringing about greater accountability and empowerment in the decision-making processes of the Indian government. It aimed to streamline decision-making, reduce delays, and make individual ministers more responsible for their portfolios. This move was intended to improve the efficiency and transparency of the government's functioning.