All Exams >
Humanities/Arts >
Political Science Class 12 >
All Questions
All questions of Challenges of Nation Building for Humanities/Arts Exam
The Cities that were divided into ‘communal zones’ during the partition violence were- a)Lahore, Amritsar and Calcutta.
- b)Kashmir, Lucknow and Allahabad.
- c)Madras, Hyderabad and Mysore.
- d)Delhi, Mumbai and Gwalior.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The Cities that were divided into ‘communal zones’ during the partition violence were
a)
Lahore, Amritsar and Calcutta.
b)
Kashmir, Lucknow and Allahabad.
c)
Madras, Hyderabad and Mysore.
d)
Delhi, Mumbai and Gwalior.
|
Swara Patel answered |
In these regions communal violence intensified and many innocents were killed and women were raped. Muslims would avoid going into an area where mainly Hindus or Sikhs lived; similarly the Hindus and Sikhs stayed away from areas of Muslim predominance.
The interim government formed under the cabinet mission plan was headed by- a)Dr. Rajendra Prasad.
- b)Jawaharlal Nehru.
- c)Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.
- d)Rajagopalachari.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The interim government formed under the cabinet mission plan was headed by
a)
Dr. Rajendra Prasad.
b)
Jawaharlal Nehru.
c)
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.
d)
Rajagopalachari.
|
Saptarshi Ghosh answered |
The interim government of India existed from 2 September 1946 to 15 August 1947 with the purpose of transitioning India from British Raj to independence. The interim government was formed on 2 September 1946 from the newly-elected Constituent Assembly of India. It was headed by Jawaharlal Nehru and Vallabhbhai Patel held the second-most powerful position in the council, heading the Department of Home Affairs, and Department of Information and Broadcasting.
Which of the following was a consequence of the creation of linguistic states in India after 1956?
i. It helped address regional demands for recognition.
ii. It led to a decrease in democratic participation.
iii. It strengthened national unity by accommodating diversity.
iv. It caused severe divisions within the Indian Union.- a)i and iii
- b)ii and iv
- c)i, ii and iii
- d)iii and iv
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following was a consequence of the creation of linguistic states in India after 1956?
i. It helped address regional demands for recognition.
ii. It led to a decrease in democratic participation.
iii. It strengthened national unity by accommodating diversity.
iv. It caused severe divisions within the Indian Union.
i. It helped address regional demands for recognition.
ii. It led to a decrease in democratic participation.
iii. It strengthened national unity by accommodating diversity.
iv. It caused severe divisions within the Indian Union.
a)
i and iii
b)
ii and iv
c)
i, ii and iii
d)
iii and iv
|
Athul Chawla answered |
Consequences of Linguistic States in India
The creation of linguistic states in India post-1956 had significant implications for the political and cultural landscape of the country. The correct answer to the question emphasizes the positive outcomes of this administrative reorganization.
Addressing Regional Demands for Recognition
- The formation of states based on linguistic lines allowed various linguistic and cultural groups to gain political representation.
- This move acknowledged the distinct identities and aspirations of different regions, helping to quell longstanding regional grievances.
Strengthening National Unity by Accommodating Diversity
- Rather than creating divisions, the linguistic state policy promoted a sense of belonging among diverse groups.
- By recognizing and accommodating various languages and cultures, India fostered a more inclusive national identity.
- This approach helped to unify the country while respecting its rich diversity, contributing to social harmony.
Decrease in Democratic Participation (Not Applicable)
- The assertion that it led to a decrease in democratic participation (option ii) is incorrect.
- In fact, the creation of linguistic states encouraged greater participation as local populations felt more connected to their governments.
Severe Divisions within the Indian Union (Not Applicable)
- While some critics argue that linguistic states could lead to fragmentation, the overall effect was one of greater cohesion rather than severe divisions.
- The policy facilitated smoother governance and better representation, which typically strengthens the union rather than undermining it.
In conclusion, options i and iii highlight the positive aspects of creating linguistic states, making option 'A' the correct choice.
The creation of linguistic states in India post-1956 had significant implications for the political and cultural landscape of the country. The correct answer to the question emphasizes the positive outcomes of this administrative reorganization.
Addressing Regional Demands for Recognition
- The formation of states based on linguistic lines allowed various linguistic and cultural groups to gain political representation.
- This move acknowledged the distinct identities and aspirations of different regions, helping to quell longstanding regional grievances.
Strengthening National Unity by Accommodating Diversity
- Rather than creating divisions, the linguistic state policy promoted a sense of belonging among diverse groups.
- By recognizing and accommodating various languages and cultures, India fostered a more inclusive national identity.
- This approach helped to unify the country while respecting its rich diversity, contributing to social harmony.
Decrease in Democratic Participation (Not Applicable)
- The assertion that it led to a decrease in democratic participation (option ii) is incorrect.
- In fact, the creation of linguistic states encouraged greater participation as local populations felt more connected to their governments.
Severe Divisions within the Indian Union (Not Applicable)
- While some critics argue that linguistic states could lead to fragmentation, the overall effect was one of greater cohesion rather than severe divisions.
- The policy facilitated smoother governance and better representation, which typically strengthens the union rather than undermining it.
In conclusion, options i and iii highlight the positive aspects of creating linguistic states, making option 'A' the correct choice.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: It was decided to follow the principle of religious majorities for the partition.
Reason: The process of partition was smooth and none of the violence took place.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: It was decided to follow the principle of religious majorities for the partition.
Reason: The process of partition was smooth and none of the violence took place.
Reason: The process of partition was smooth and none of the violence took place.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
Ojasvi Mehta answered |
During the Partition of India, violence against women was an extensive issue. It is estimated that during the partition between 75,000 and 100,000 women were kidnapped and raped. India and Pakistan later worked to repatriate the abducted women. Muslim women were to be sent to Pakistan and Hindu and Sikh women to India.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The Constitution also set out in the Directive Principles of State Policy the welfare goals that democratic politics must achieve.Reason: On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: The Constitution also set out in the Directive Principles of State Policy the welfare goals that democratic politics must achieve.
Reason: On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
|
Naina Sharma answered |
On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence India and Pakistan. This was a result of ‘partition’, the division of British India into India and Pakistan. Thus it was decided that what was till then known as ‘India’ would be divided into two countries, ‘India’ and ‘Pakistan’.
Read the following passage and answer the question.The process of nation-building did not come to an end with Partition and integration of Princely States. Now the challenge was to draw the internal boundaries of the Indian states. This was not just a matter of administrative divisions. The boundaries had to be drawn in a way so that the linguistic and cultural plurality of the country could be reflected without affecting the unity of the nation. During colonial rule, the state boundaries were drawn either on administrative convenience or simply coincided with the territories annexed by the British government or the territories ruled by the princely powers. Our national movement had rejected these divisions as artificial and had promised the linguistic principle as the basis of formation of states. In fact after the Nagpur session of Congress in 1920 the principle was recognised as the basis of the reorganisation of the Indian National Congress party itself. Many Provincial Congress Committees were created by linguistic zones, which did not follow the administrative divisions of British India.Why were the divisions created by the British rejected by the Indian national movement?- a)They were too large to govern
- b)They were too difficult to manage administratively
- c)They were imposed without consulting Indian leaders
- d)They were seen as artificial and not reflective of linguistic and cultural identities
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
The process of nation-building did not come to an end with Partition and integration of Princely States. Now the challenge was to draw the internal boundaries of the Indian states. This was not just a matter of administrative divisions. The boundaries had to be drawn in a way so that the linguistic and cultural plurality of the country could be reflected without affecting the unity of the nation. During colonial rule, the state boundaries were drawn either on administrative convenience or simply coincided with the territories annexed by the British government or the territories ruled by the princely powers. Our national movement had rejected these divisions as artificial and had promised the linguistic principle as the basis of formation of states. In fact after the Nagpur session of Congress in 1920 the principle was recognised as the basis of the reorganisation of the Indian National Congress party itself. Many Provincial Congress Committees were created by linguistic zones, which did not follow the administrative divisions of British India.
Why were the divisions created by the British rejected by the Indian national movement?
a)
They were too large to govern
b)
They were too difficult to manage administratively
c)
They were imposed without consulting Indian leaders
d)
They were seen as artificial and not reflective of linguistic and cultural identities
|
EduRev Humanities answered |
The Indian national movement rejected British divisions as artificial because they did not reflect the linguistic and cultural identities of the people.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: India adopted representative democracy based on the parliamentary form of government.Reason: These features ensure that the political competition would take place in a democratic framework.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: India adopted representative democracy based on the parliamentary form of government.
Reason: These features ensure that the political competition would take place in a democratic framework.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
Arun Yadav answered |
India is a parliamentary Democratic Republic in which the President of India is the head of state and the Prime Minister of India is the head of government. It is based on the federal structure of government, although the word is not used in the Constitution itself. It assures a healthy and democratic political competition.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:Assertion: The Nizam of Hyderabad never negotiated with Sardar Patel. He did not at all agreed to accept any offer to join India.Reason: The Nizam wanted an independent status for Hyderabad.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: The Nizam of Hyderabad never negotiated with Sardar Patel. He did not at all agreed to accept any offer to join India.
Reason: The Nizam wanted an independent status for Hyderabad.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
Akshita Saha answered |
Assertion: The Nizam of Hyderabad never negotiated with Sardar Patel. He did not at all agree to accept any offer to join India.
Reason: The Nizam wanted an independent status for Hyderabad.
The correct answer is option 'D', i.e., (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Explanation:
The Nizam of Hyderabad, Mir Osman Ali Khan, was the ruler of the princely state of Hyderabad at the time of India's independence in 1947. The Nizam had initially hesitated to join either India or Pakistan, hoping to maintain an independent status for Hyderabad. However, the situation soon escalated into a crisis as communal tensions and violence increased.
The Indian National Congress, led by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, who was the Minister of States and was responsible for the integration of princely states into India, wanted Hyderabad to join India. Sardar Patel made several attempts to negotiate with the Nizam and persuade him to accede to India. However, the Nizam refused to negotiate or accept any offer from the Indian government.
The Nizam's refusal to negotiate with Sardar Patel and his reluctance to join India can be attributed to his desire to maintain an independent status for Hyderabad. The Nizam feared that joining India would result in a loss of autonomy and power for himself and his state. He also had concerns about the treatment of the Muslim minority in India.
However, the Indian government, under the leadership of Sardar Patel, was determined to integrate Hyderabad into India. As the situation in Hyderabad deteriorated, the Indian government launched Operation Polo in September 1948 to annex Hyderabad. The operation was successful, and Hyderabad became a part of India.
In conclusion, the statement of reason is true. The Nizam of Hyderabad wanted an independent status for Hyderabad, which is why he did not negotiate with Sardar Patel or agree to join India. However, the statement of assertion is false because Sardar Patel did make efforts to negotiate with the Nizam.
Reason: The Nizam wanted an independent status for Hyderabad.
The correct answer is option 'D', i.e., (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Explanation:
The Nizam of Hyderabad, Mir Osman Ali Khan, was the ruler of the princely state of Hyderabad at the time of India's independence in 1947. The Nizam had initially hesitated to join either India or Pakistan, hoping to maintain an independent status for Hyderabad. However, the situation soon escalated into a crisis as communal tensions and violence increased.
The Indian National Congress, led by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, who was the Minister of States and was responsible for the integration of princely states into India, wanted Hyderabad to join India. Sardar Patel made several attempts to negotiate with the Nizam and persuade him to accede to India. However, the Nizam refused to negotiate or accept any offer from the Indian government.
The Nizam's refusal to negotiate with Sardar Patel and his reluctance to join India can be attributed to his desire to maintain an independent status for Hyderabad. The Nizam feared that joining India would result in a loss of autonomy and power for himself and his state. He also had concerns about the treatment of the Muslim minority in India.
However, the Indian government, under the leadership of Sardar Patel, was determined to integrate Hyderabad into India. As the situation in Hyderabad deteriorated, the Indian government launched Operation Polo in September 1948 to annex Hyderabad. The operation was successful, and Hyderabad became a part of India.
In conclusion, the statement of reason is true. The Nizam of Hyderabad wanted an independent status for Hyderabad, which is why he did not negotiate with Sardar Patel or agree to join India. However, the statement of assertion is false because Sardar Patel did make efforts to negotiate with the Nizam.
Assertion: The creation of linguistic states in India was seen as a potential threat to national unity.Reason: The formation of Andhra Pradesh in 1952 sparked further demands for state reorganization on linguistic lines across the country.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Assertion: The creation of linguistic states in India was seen as a potential threat to national unity.
Reason: The formation of Andhra Pradesh in 1952 sparked further demands for state reorganization on linguistic lines across the country.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
Learning Educators answered |
- Assertion is true: Initially, there was concern that creating states based on linguistic lines could lead to divisions and weaken national unity.
- Reason is true: The formation of Andhra Pradesh in 1952 did indeed encourage other regions to demand state reorganization based on linguistic identities.
- Reason does not correctly explain the Assertion: While the reason is true, it does not directly explain why the creation of linguistic states was seen as a potential threat to national unity. Thus, The correct option is B.
Assertion (A): The Nizam of Hyderabad resisted joining the Indian Union to maintain the state's independence. Reason (R): The people of Hyderabad were largely in favor of joining the Indian Union and opposed the Nizam's rule. - a)If both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
- b)If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
- c)If Assertion is true but Reason is false
- d)If both Assertion and Reason are false
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Assertion (A): The Nizam of Hyderabad resisted joining the Indian Union to maintain the state's independence.
Reason (R): The people of Hyderabad were largely in favor of joining the Indian Union and opposed the Nizam's rule.
a)
If both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
b)
If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
c)
If Assertion is true but Reason is false
d)
If both Assertion and Reason are false
|
Sarthak Joshi answered |
Understanding the Assertion and Reason
The assertion and reason in question revolve around the historical context of Hyderabad's accession to the Indian Union post-independence.
Assertion (A): The Nizam of Hyderabad resisted joining the Indian Union to maintain the state's independence.
- The Nizam, Mir Osman Ali, sought to retain Hyderabad's sovereignty.
- He was reluctant to integrate with India due to fears of losing power and autonomy.
Reason (R): The people of Hyderabad were largely in favor of joining the Indian Union and opposed the Nizam's rule.
- Many citizens supported the idea of joining India, partly due to dissatisfaction with the Nizam's autocratic governance.
- The popular sentiment favored integration to ensure democratic governance and social reforms.
Why Option 'B' is Correct
- Both assertion and reason are true.
- The Nizam's resistance was indeed aimed at preserving independence, reflecting his desire to maintain control.
- However, the people's support for joining the Indian Union did not directly explain the Nizam's actions. His resistance stemmed from a personal desire for power rather than a reflection of public sentiment.
Conclusion
In summary, while both the assertion and reason hold true, the reason does not accurately explain the assertion. The Nizam's motives were rooted in his own interests, making option 'B' the correct choice.
The assertion and reason in question revolve around the historical context of Hyderabad's accession to the Indian Union post-independence.
Assertion (A): The Nizam of Hyderabad resisted joining the Indian Union to maintain the state's independence.
- The Nizam, Mir Osman Ali, sought to retain Hyderabad's sovereignty.
- He was reluctant to integrate with India due to fears of losing power and autonomy.
Reason (R): The people of Hyderabad were largely in favor of joining the Indian Union and opposed the Nizam's rule.
- Many citizens supported the idea of joining India, partly due to dissatisfaction with the Nizam's autocratic governance.
- The popular sentiment favored integration to ensure democratic governance and social reforms.
Why Option 'B' is Correct
- Both assertion and reason are true.
- The Nizam's resistance was indeed aimed at preserving independence, reflecting his desire to maintain control.
- However, the people's support for joining the Indian Union did not directly explain the Nizam's actions. His resistance stemmed from a personal desire for power rather than a reflection of public sentiment.
Conclusion
In summary, while both the assertion and reason hold true, the reason does not accurately explain the assertion. The Nizam's motives were rooted in his own interests, making option 'B' the correct choice.
Assertion (A): The successful integration of 565 princely states into India post-independence was crucial for national unity.Reason (R): The princely states were primarily autonomous regions that had the option to choose their allegiance after independence.- a)If both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
- b)If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
- c)If Assertion is true but Reason is false
- d)If both Assertion and Reason are false
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Assertion (A): The successful integration of 565 princely states into India post-independence was crucial for national unity.
Reason (R): The princely states were primarily autonomous regions that had the option to choose their allegiance after independence.
a)
If both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
b)
If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
c)
If Assertion is true but Reason is false
d)
If both Assertion and Reason are false
|
|
EduRev Humanities answered |
- The Assertion (A) is true because the integration of the princely states was essential to create a unified nation after the division of British India and the establishment of Pakistan.
- The Reason (R) is also true as the princely states had significant autonomy and could choose whether to join India, Pakistan, or remain independent, which made their integration a vital issue for national unity.
- Since the Reason provides a correct explanation for why the Assertion is true, the correct answer is Option A.
Assertion: The Indian National Congress initially postponed the plan for linguistic state reorganization after independence.
Reason: The Congress was focused on addressing the status of princely states and the immediate challenges following partition.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Assertion: The Indian National Congress initially postponed the plan for linguistic state reorganization after independence.
Reason: The Congress was focused on addressing the status of princely states and the immediate challenges following partition.
Reason: The Congress was focused on addressing the status of princely states and the immediate challenges following partition.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
|
Learning Educators answered |
- Assertion is true: The Indian National Congress did indeed delay the plan for reorganizing states based on linguistic lines after independence because other issues, such as the integration of princely states and the aftermath of partition, were more immediate.
- Reason is true: The Congress was indeed focused on resolving the status of princely states and the consequences of partition immediately after independence, which took priority over linguistic reorganization.
- Reason correctly explains the Assertion. Thus, option A is correct.
The States Reorganisation Commission was appointed in which year?- a)1950
- b)1951
- c)1953
- d)1954
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The States Reorganisation Commission was appointed in which year?
a)
1950
b)
1951
c)
1953
d)
1954
|
|
Rohit Goyal answered |
The Central government had appointed a State Reorganisation Commission in 1953 to look into the question of redrawing the boundaries of states.
Which of the following was one of the three main challenges India faced after independence in 1947?
i. Building a united India by integrating princely states
ii. Setting up a monarchy across the country
iii. Establishing a democratic system with rights for all
iv. Ending foreign trade with other nations- a)i and iii
- b)ii and iv
- c)i, iii, and iv
- d)ii and iii
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following was one of the three main challenges India faced after independence in 1947?
i. Building a united India by integrating princely states
ii. Setting up a monarchy across the country
iii. Establishing a democratic system with rights for all
iv. Ending foreign trade with other nations
i. Building a united India by integrating princely states
ii. Setting up a monarchy across the country
iii. Establishing a democratic system with rights for all
iv. Ending foreign trade with other nations
a)
i and iii
b)
ii and iv
c)
i, iii, and iv
d)
ii and iii
|
Parth Chatterjee answered |
Challenges Faced by India After Independence
India gained independence from British rule in 1947, and the newly formed nation encountered several significant challenges. Among the options provided, the correct answer is a) i and iii. Here’s a breakdown of the primary challenges:
Building a United India by Integrating Princely States
- Fragmented Territory: At the time of independence, India was a patchwork of princely states and British territories.
- Integration Efforts: Leaders like Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel played a crucial role in persuading princely states to join the Indian Union.
- Significance: Successfully integrating these states was vital for national unity and governance.
Establishing a Democratic System with Rights for All
- Democratic Foundations: One of the foremost challenges was to establish a robust democratic framework post-independence.
- Universal Rights: The Indian Constitution, adopted in 1950, aimed to guarantee fundamental rights and equality for all citizens.
- Political Stability: Ensuring a stable and inclusive democracy was essential for the country’s progress.
Incorrect Options
- Setting Up a Monarchy Across the Country (ii): India opted for a democratic system rather than a monarchy, making this option invalid.
- Ending Foreign Trade with Other Nations (iv): India did not aim to end foreign trade; rather, it sought to engage with the global economy.
In conclusion, the challenges of building a united nation and establishing a democratic system with rights for all were paramount in shaping India's post-independence trajectory.
India gained independence from British rule in 1947, and the newly formed nation encountered several significant challenges. Among the options provided, the correct answer is a) i and iii. Here’s a breakdown of the primary challenges:
Building a United India by Integrating Princely States
- Fragmented Territory: At the time of independence, India was a patchwork of princely states and British territories.
- Integration Efforts: Leaders like Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel played a crucial role in persuading princely states to join the Indian Union.
- Significance: Successfully integrating these states was vital for national unity and governance.
Establishing a Democratic System with Rights for All
- Democratic Foundations: One of the foremost challenges was to establish a robust democratic framework post-independence.
- Universal Rights: The Indian Constitution, adopted in 1950, aimed to guarantee fundamental rights and equality for all citizens.
- Political Stability: Ensuring a stable and inclusive democracy was essential for the country’s progress.
Incorrect Options
- Setting Up a Monarchy Across the Country (ii): India opted for a democratic system rather than a monarchy, making this option invalid.
- Ending Foreign Trade with Other Nations (iv): India did not aim to end foreign trade; rather, it sought to engage with the global economy.
In conclusion, the challenges of building a united nation and establishing a democratic system with rights for all were paramount in shaping India's post-independence trajectory.
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: The British Government took the view that all these 565 states were free to join either India or Pakistan or remain independent if they so wished.
Reason: This was a very serious problem and could threaten the very existence of a united India.
- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
- d) (A) is true, but (R) is false.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion (A) is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as:
Assertion: The British Government took the view that all these 565 states were free to join either India or Pakistan or remain independent if they so wished.
Reason: This was a very serious problem and could threaten the very existence of a united India.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
d)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
|
Rajesh Gupta answered |
The official policy statement of the Government of India made by Sardar Patel on July 5, 1947 made no such threats. It reassured the princely states about the Congress’ intentions, and invited them to join independent India.
Read the following passage and answer the question.On the 15th August 1947 Mahatma Gandhi did not participate in any of the Independence Day celebrations. He was in Kolkata in the areas which were torn by gruesome riots between Hindus and Muslims. He was saddened by the communal violence and disheartened that the principles of ahimsa (non-violence) and satyagraha (active but non-violent resistance) that he had lived and worked for, had failed to bind the people in troubled times. Gandhiji went on to persuade the Hindus and Muslims to give up violence. His presence in Kolkata greatly improved the situation, and the coming of independence was celebrated in a spirit of communal harmony, with joyous dancing in the streets. Gandhiji’s prayer meetings attracted large crowds. But this was short lived as riots between Hindus and Muslims erupted once again and Gandhiji had to resort to a fast to bring peaceWhat was the initial impact of Gandhi’s presence in Kolkata during the Independence period?- a)The situation worsened
- b)The violence escalated further
- c)It temporarily improved the situation, leading to communal harmony
- d)It had no impact
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
On the 15th August 1947 Mahatma Gandhi did not participate in any of the Independence Day celebrations. He was in Kolkata in the areas which were torn by gruesome riots between Hindus and Muslims. He was saddened by the communal violence and disheartened that the principles of ahimsa (non-violence) and satyagraha (active but non-violent resistance) that he had lived and worked for, had failed to bind the people in troubled times. Gandhiji went on to persuade the Hindus and Muslims to give up violence. His presence in Kolkata greatly improved the situation, and the coming of independence was celebrated in a spirit of communal harmony, with joyous dancing in the streets. Gandhiji’s prayer meetings attracted large crowds. But this was short lived as riots between Hindus and Muslims erupted once again and Gandhiji had to resort to a fast to bring peace
What was the initial impact of Gandhi’s presence in Kolkata during the Independence period?
a)
The situation worsened
b)
The violence escalated further
c)
It temporarily improved the situation, leading to communal harmony
d)
It had no impact
|
Crafty Classes answered |
Gandhi’s presence greatly improved the situation initially, bringing about communal harmony and celebrations, although this peace was short-lived.
Read the following passage and answer the question.On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan. This was a result of ‘partition’, the division of British India into India and Pakistan. The drawing of the border demarcating the territory of each country marked the culmination of political developments that you have read about in the history textbooks. According to the ‘two-nation theory’ advanced by the Muslim League, India consisted of not one but two ‘people’, Hindus and Muslims. That is why it demanded Pakistan, a separate country for the Muslims. The Congress opposed this theory and the demand for Pakistan. But several political developments in 1940s, the political competition between the Congress and the Muslim League and the British role led to the decision for the creation of Pakistan.Which theory played a crucial role in the creation of Pakistan?- a)The One-Nation Theory
- b)The Two-Nation Theory
- c)The Self-Government Theory
- d)The Secularism Theory
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan. This was a result of ‘partition’, the division of British India into India and Pakistan. The drawing of the border demarcating the territory of each country marked the culmination of political developments that you have read about in the history textbooks. According to the ‘two-nation theory’ advanced by the Muslim League, India consisted of not one but two ‘people’, Hindus and Muslims. That is why it demanded Pakistan, a separate country for the Muslims. The Congress opposed this theory and the demand for Pakistan. But several political developments in 1940s, the political competition between the Congress and the Muslim League and the British role led to the decision for the creation of Pakistan.
Which theory played a crucial role in the creation of Pakistan?
a)
The One-Nation Theory
b)
The Two-Nation Theory
c)
The Self-Government Theory
d)
The Secularism Theory
|
|
EduRev Humanities answered |
- The Two-Nation Theory was proposed by the Muslim League, which argued that India consisted of two different 'people,' Hindus and Muslims.
- This theory demanded a separate nation for Muslims, leading to the creation of Pakistan.
Read the following passage and answer the question.The process of nation-building did not come to an end with Partition and integration of Princely States. Now the challenge was to draw the internal boundaries of the Indian states. This was not just a matter of administrative divisions. The boundaries had to be drawn in a way so that the linguistic and cultural plurality of the country could be reflected without affecting the unity of the nation. During colonial rule, the state boundaries were drawn either on administrative convenience or simply coincided with the territories annexed by the British government or the territories ruled by the princely powers. Our national movement had rejected these divisions as artificial and had promised the linguistic principle as the basis of formation of states. In fact after the Nagpur session of Congress in 1920 the principle was recognised as the basis of the reorganisation of the Indian National Congress party itself. Many Provincial Congress Committees were created by linguistic zones, which did not follow the administrative divisions of British India.What principle did the Indian National Congress adopt after the Nagpur session in 1920?- a)Formation of states based on religious divisions
- b)Linguistic principle for reorganization
- c)Integration of princely states
- d)Creation of new provinces by annexation
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
The process of nation-building did not come to an end with Partition and integration of Princely States. Now the challenge was to draw the internal boundaries of the Indian states. This was not just a matter of administrative divisions. The boundaries had to be drawn in a way so that the linguistic and cultural plurality of the country could be reflected without affecting the unity of the nation. During colonial rule, the state boundaries were drawn either on administrative convenience or simply coincided with the territories annexed by the British government or the territories ruled by the princely powers. Our national movement had rejected these divisions as artificial and had promised the linguistic principle as the basis of formation of states. In fact after the Nagpur session of Congress in 1920 the principle was recognised as the basis of the reorganisation of the Indian National Congress party itself. Many Provincial Congress Committees were created by linguistic zones, which did not follow the administrative divisions of British India.
What principle did the Indian National Congress adopt after the Nagpur session in 1920?
a)
Formation of states based on religious divisions
b)
Linguistic principle for reorganization
c)
Integration of princely states
d)
Creation of new provinces by annexation
|
|
Crafty Classes answered |
The Congress adopted the linguistic principle as the basis for reorganizing itself, which later influenced state formation in independent India.
Read the following passage and answer the question.The process of nation-building did not come to an end with Partition and integration of Princely States. Now the challenge was to draw the internal boundaries of the Indian states. This was not just a matter of administrative divisions. The boundaries had to be drawn in a way so that the linguistic and cultural plurality of the country could be reflected without affecting the unity of the nation. During colonial rule, the state boundaries were drawn either on administrative convenience or simply coincided with the territories annexed by the British government or the territories ruled by the princely powers. Our national movement had rejected these divisions as artificial and had promised the linguistic principle as the basis of formation of states. In fact after the Nagpur session of Congress in 1920 the principle was recognised as the basis of the reorganisation of the Indian National Congress party itself. Many Provincial Congress Committees were created by linguistic zones, which did not follow the administrative divisions of British India.How were the boundaries of Indian states drawn during colonial rule?- a)Based on linguistic divisions
- b)According to the wishes of local rulers
- c)Based on administrative convenience or British-annexed territories
- d)To reflect the cultural unity of the regions
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
The process of nation-building did not come to an end with Partition and integration of Princely States. Now the challenge was to draw the internal boundaries of the Indian states. This was not just a matter of administrative divisions. The boundaries had to be drawn in a way so that the linguistic and cultural plurality of the country could be reflected without affecting the unity of the nation. During colonial rule, the state boundaries were drawn either on administrative convenience or simply coincided with the territories annexed by the British government or the territories ruled by the princely powers. Our national movement had rejected these divisions as artificial and had promised the linguistic principle as the basis of formation of states. In fact after the Nagpur session of Congress in 1920 the principle was recognised as the basis of the reorganisation of the Indian National Congress party itself. Many Provincial Congress Committees were created by linguistic zones, which did not follow the administrative divisions of British India.
How were the boundaries of Indian states drawn during colonial rule?
a)
Based on linguistic divisions
b)
According to the wishes of local rulers
c)
Based on administrative convenience or British-annexed territories
d)
To reflect the cultural unity of the regions
|
|
Learning Educators answered |
During colonial rule, state boundaries were drawn for administrative convenience or coincided with territories annexed by the British.
Read the following passage and answer the question.On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan. This was a result of ‘partition’, the division of British India into India and Pakistan. The drawing of the border demarcating the territory of each country marked the culmination of political developments that you have read about in the history textbooks. According to the ‘two-nation theory’ advanced by the Muslim League, India consisted of not one but two ‘people’, Hindus and Muslims. That is why it demanded Pakistan, a separate country for the Muslims. The Congress opposed this theory and the demand for Pakistan. But several political developments in 1940s, the political competition between the Congress and the Muslim League and the British role led to the decision for the creation of Pakistan.How did the Congress respond to the demand for Pakistan?- a)Supported the demand wholeheartedly
- b)Ignored the demand
- c)Opposed the demand
- d)Negotiated for a third nation
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan. This was a result of ‘partition’, the division of British India into India and Pakistan. The drawing of the border demarcating the territory of each country marked the culmination of political developments that you have read about in the history textbooks. According to the ‘two-nation theory’ advanced by the Muslim League, India consisted of not one but two ‘people’, Hindus and Muslims. That is why it demanded Pakistan, a separate country for the Muslims. The Congress opposed this theory and the demand for Pakistan. But several political developments in 1940s, the political competition between the Congress and the Muslim League and the British role led to the decision for the creation of Pakistan.
How did the Congress respond to the demand for Pakistan?
a)
Supported the demand wholeheartedly
b)
Ignored the demand
c)
Opposed the demand
d)
Negotiated for a third nation
|
|
EduRev Humanities answered |
The Congress opposed the Two-Nation Theory and the demand for Pakistan, as they believed in a united India.
Read the following passage and answer the question.The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.What was one of the key challenges the interim government faced regarding the princely states?- a)Deciding whether to form a military alliance with them
- b)Preventing their division into small principalities
- c)Ensuring they all adopted democratic governments
- d)Maintaining British control over their territories
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.
What was one of the key challenges the interim government faced regarding the princely states?
a)
Deciding whether to form a military alliance with them
b)
Preventing their division into small principalities
c)
Ensuring they all adopted democratic governments
d)
Maintaining British control over their territories
|
|
Pj Commerce Academy answered |
The interim government was firm on preventing the division of India into numerous small principalities, a significant challenge during the integration process.
Arrange the following events related to the partition and integration of princely states in chronological order: - Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel persuades princely states to join India.
- India and Pakistan gain independence.
- The Instrument of Accession is signed by princely states.
- The Razakars commit atrocities in Hyderabad.
- a)4 → 2 → 1 → 3
- b)4 → 1 → 3 → 2
- c)2 → 1 → 3 → 4
- d)2 → 4 → 1 → 3
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Arrange the following events related to the partition and integration of princely states in chronological order:
- Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel persuades princely states to join India.
- India and Pakistan gain independence.
- The Instrument of Accession is signed by princely states.
- The Razakars commit atrocities in Hyderabad.
a)
4 → 2 → 1 → 3
b)
4 → 1 → 3 → 2
c)
2 → 1 → 3 → 4
d)
2 → 4 → 1 → 3
|
|
Learning Educators answered |
India and Pakistan gained independence first (2). Patel then worked to integrate the princely states (1), leading to the signing of the Instrument of Accession (3). Finally, the Razakars committed atrocities in Hyderabad, leading to its integration (4).
Read the following passage and answer the question.On the 15th August 1947 Mahatma Gandhi did not participate in any of the Independence Day celebrations. He was in Kolkata in the areas which were torn by gruesome riots between Hindus and Muslims. He was saddened by the communal violence and disheartened that the principles of ahimsa (non-violence) and satyagraha (active but non-violent resistance) that he had lived and worked for, had failed to bind the people in troubled times. Gandhiji went on to persuade the Hindus and Muslims to give up violence. His presence in Kolkata greatly improved the situation, and the coming of independence was celebrated in a spirit of communal harmony, with joyous dancing in the streets. Gandhiji’s prayer meetings attracted large crowds. But this was short lived as riots between Hindus and Muslims erupted once again and Gandhiji had to resort to a fast to bring peace.How did Gandhi attempt to restore peace during the riots in Kolkata?- a)By leaving Kolkata
- b)By organizing armed resistance
- c)By conducting prayer meetings and going on a fast
- d)By calling for British intervention
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
On the 15th August 1947 Mahatma Gandhi did not participate in any of the Independence Day celebrations. He was in Kolkata in the areas which were torn by gruesome riots between Hindus and Muslims. He was saddened by the communal violence and disheartened that the principles of ahimsa (non-violence) and satyagraha (active but non-violent resistance) that he had lived and worked for, had failed to bind the people in troubled times. Gandhiji went on to persuade the Hindus and Muslims to give up violence. His presence in Kolkata greatly improved the situation, and the coming of independence was celebrated in a spirit of communal harmony, with joyous dancing in the streets. Gandhiji’s prayer meetings attracted large crowds. But this was short lived as riots between Hindus and Muslims erupted once again and Gandhiji had to resort to a fast to bring peace.
How did Gandhi attempt to restore peace during the riots in Kolkata?
a)
By leaving Kolkata
b)
By organizing armed resistance
c)
By conducting prayer meetings and going on a fast
d)
By calling for British intervention
|
|
Crafty Classes answered |
Gandhi held prayer meetings and later resorted to a fast to bring about peace in the riot-affected areas.
Read the following passage and answer the question.On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan. This was a result of ‘partition’, the division of British India into India and Pakistan. The drawing of the border demarcating the territory of each country marked the culmination of political developments that you have read about in the history textbooks. According to the ‘two-nation theory’ advanced by the Muslim League, India consisted of not one but two ‘people’, Hindus and Muslims. That is why it demanded Pakistan, a separate country for the Muslims. The Congress opposed this theory and the demand for Pakistan. But several political developments in 1940s, the political competition between the Congress and the Muslim League and the British role led to the decision for the creation of Pakistan.What event marked the culmination of political developments in British India leading to partition?- a)Independence of India in 1942
- b)Formation of the Indian National Congress
- c)The drawing of the border between India and Pakistan
- d)The Quit India Movement
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan. This was a result of ‘partition’, the division of British India into India and Pakistan. The drawing of the border demarcating the territory of each country marked the culmination of political developments that you have read about in the history textbooks. According to the ‘two-nation theory’ advanced by the Muslim League, India consisted of not one but two ‘people’, Hindus and Muslims. That is why it demanded Pakistan, a separate country for the Muslims. The Congress opposed this theory and the demand for Pakistan. But several political developments in 1940s, the political competition between the Congress and the Muslim League and the British role led to the decision for the creation of Pakistan.
What event marked the culmination of political developments in British India leading to partition?
a)
Independence of India in 1942
b)
Formation of the Indian National Congress
c)
The drawing of the border between India and Pakistan
d)
The Quit India Movement
|
|
Learning Educators answered |
The drawing of the border demarcating the territories of India and Pakistan was the final step in the series of political developments that led to the partition.
Read the following passage and answer the question.On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan. This was a result of ‘partition’, the division of British India into India and Pakistan. The drawing of the border demarcating the territory of each country marked the culmination of political developments that you have read about in the history textbooks. According to the ‘two-nation theory’ advanced by the Muslim League, India consisted of not one but two ‘people’, Hindus and Muslims. That is why it demanded Pakistan, a separate country for the Muslims. The Congress opposed this theory and the demand for Pakistan. But several political developments in 1940s, the political competition between the Congress and the Muslim League and the British role led to the decision for the creation of Pakistan.What was a significant factor in the decision to create Pakistan?- a)Peaceful protests by the Congress
- b)Cooperation between the Congress and Muslim League
- c)Political competition between the Congress and Muslim League
- d)Economic reforms in British India
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan. This was a result of ‘partition’, the division of British India into India and Pakistan. The drawing of the border demarcating the territory of each country marked the culmination of political developments that you have read about in the history textbooks. According to the ‘two-nation theory’ advanced by the Muslim League, India consisted of not one but two ‘people’, Hindus and Muslims. That is why it demanded Pakistan, a separate country for the Muslims. The Congress opposed this theory and the demand for Pakistan. But several political developments in 1940s, the political competition between the Congress and the Muslim League and the British role led to the decision for the creation of Pakistan.
What was a significant factor in the decision to create Pakistan?
a)
Peaceful protests by the Congress
b)
Cooperation between the Congress and Muslim League
c)
Political competition between the Congress and Muslim League
d)
Economic reforms in British India
|
|
EduRev Humanities answered |
The political competition between the Congress and the Muslim League in the 1940s, along with the British role, was a significant factor in the decision to create Pakistan.
Read the following passage and answer the question.The process of nation-building did not come to an end with Partition and integration of Princely States. Now the challenge was to draw the internal boundaries of the Indian states. This was not just a matter of administrative divisions. The boundaries had to be drawn in a way so that the linguistic and cultural plurality of the country could be reflected without affecting the unity of the nation. During colonial rule, the state boundaries were drawn either on administrative convenience or simply coincided with the territories annexed by the British government or the territories ruled by the princely powers. Our national movement had rejected these divisions as artificial and had promised the linguistic principle as the basis of formation of states. In fact after the Nagpur session of Congress in 1920 the principle was recognised as the basis of the reorganisation of the Indian National Congress party itself. Many Provincial Congress Committees were created by linguistic zones, which did not follow the administrative divisions of British India.What was the main challenge in drawing the internal boundaries of Indian states after Partition and integration?- a)Ensuring administrative convenience
- b)Reflecting linguistic and cultural plurality without harming national unity
- c)Aligning with British territorial divisions
- d)Expanding the territories annexed by the British
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
The process of nation-building did not come to an end with Partition and integration of Princely States. Now the challenge was to draw the internal boundaries of the Indian states. This was not just a matter of administrative divisions. The boundaries had to be drawn in a way so that the linguistic and cultural plurality of the country could be reflected without affecting the unity of the nation. During colonial rule, the state boundaries were drawn either on administrative convenience or simply coincided with the territories annexed by the British government or the territories ruled by the princely powers. Our national movement had rejected these divisions as artificial and had promised the linguistic principle as the basis of formation of states. In fact after the Nagpur session of Congress in 1920 the principle was recognised as the basis of the reorganisation of the Indian National Congress party itself. Many Provincial Congress Committees were created by linguistic zones, which did not follow the administrative divisions of British India.
What was the main challenge in drawing the internal boundaries of Indian states after Partition and integration?
a)
Ensuring administrative convenience
b)
Reflecting linguistic and cultural plurality without harming national unity
c)
Aligning with British territorial divisions
d)
Expanding the territories annexed by the British
|
|
Learning Educators answered |
The challenge was to draw boundaries that respected the linguistic and cultural plurality of India while maintaining the unity of the nation.
Statement I: The integration of princely states into India was entirely peaceful and without any military intervention.
Statement II: The Razakars in Hyderabad were responsible for significant violence and atrocities before the state was integrated into India.Which statement(s) is/are true?- a)Both Statement I and Statement II are true
- b)Both Statement I and Statement II are false
- c)Statement I is true, but Statement II is false
- d)Statement I is false, but Statement II is true
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Statement I: The integration of princely states into India was entirely peaceful and without any military intervention.
Statement II: The Razakars in Hyderabad were responsible for significant violence and atrocities before the state was integrated into India.
Statement II: The Razakars in Hyderabad were responsible for significant violence and atrocities before the state was integrated into India.
Which statement(s) is/are true?
a)
Both Statement I and Statement II are true
b)
Both Statement I and Statement II are false
c)
Statement I is true, but Statement II is false
d)
Statement I is false, but Statement II is true
|
Divey Sethi answered |
Statement I is false because military intervention was necessary in cases like Hyderabad, where the Nizam resisted joining India. Statement II is true because the Razakars committed atrocities in Hyderabad before the Indian Army intervened.
Assertion: The integration of princely states into the Indian Union was largely due to the efforts of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.Reason: Sardar Patel's approach included offering complete autonomy to all princely states as a condition for their accession.- a)Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- c)(A) is true, but (R) is false.
- d)(A) is false, but (R) is true.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Assertion: The integration of princely states into the Indian Union was largely due to the efforts of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.
Reason: Sardar Patel's approach included offering complete autonomy to all princely states as a condition for their accession.
a)
Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
b)
Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
c)
(A) is true, but (R) is false.
d)
(A) is false, but (R) is true.
|
|
EduRev Humanities answered |
- Assertion is true: Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel was instrumental in ensuring that the princely states were integrated into the Indian Union, using a combination of diplomacy and, when necessary, force.
- Reason is false: Sardar Patel did not offer complete autonomy to princely states; rather, he persuaded them to accede to India by signing the Instrument of Accession, which involved giving up certain powers while retaining some autonomy in internal matters. Hence, the reason is incorrect.
- Thus, the correct answer is C.
Read the following passage and answer the question.The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.What was the Muslim League’s view on the status of princely states?- a)They should be forced to join India
- b)They should be free to choose their own course
- c)They should merge with Pakistan
- d)They should remain independent kingdoms
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.
What was the Muslim League’s view on the status of princely states?
a)
They should be forced to join India
b)
They should be free to choose their own course
c)
They should merge with Pakistan
d)
They should remain independent kingdoms
|
|
Pj Commerce Academy answered |
The Muslim League opposed the Congress's stance and believed that the princely states should have the freedom to decide their own future.
Read the following passage and answer the question.The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.How did the Indian government approach the integration of princely states?- a)By using military force
- b)By allowing full autonomy to all regions
- c)Through a flexible approach and accommodating plurality
- d)By immediately annexing all states without negotiations
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.
How did the Indian government approach the integration of princely states?
a)
By using military force
b)
By allowing full autonomy to all regions
c)
Through a flexible approach and accommodating plurality
d)
By immediately annexing all states without negotiations
|
|
Crafty Classes answered |
The Indian government's approach was flexible, allowing for autonomy in some regions while ensuring integration, particularly in the context of the challenges posed by Partition.
Read the following passage and answer the question.The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.What was Sardar Patel’s role in post-Independence India?- a)Prime Minister of India
- b)Leader of the Muslim League
- c)Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister
- d)Governor of Orissa
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
The interim government took a firm stance against the possible division of India into small principalities of different sizes. The Muslim League opposed the Indian National Congress and took the view that the States should be free to adopt any course they liked. Sardar Patel was India’s Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Minister during the crucial period immediately following Independence. He played a historic role in negotiating with the rulers of princely states firmly but diplomatically and bringing most of them into the Indian Union. It may look easy now. But it was a very complicated task which required skilful persuasion. For instance, there were 26 small states in today’s Orissa. Saurashtra region of Gujarat had 14 big states, 119 small states and numerous other different administrations. The government’s approach was guided by three considerations. Firstly, the people of most of the princely states clearly wanted to become part of the Indian union. Secondly, the government was prepared to be flexible in giving autonomy to some regions. The idea was to accommodate plurality and adopt a flexible approach in dealing with the demands of the regions. Thirdly, in the backdrop of Partition which brought into focus the contest over demarcation of territory, the integration and consolidation of the territorial boundaries of the nation had assumed supreme importance.
What was Sardar Patel’s role in post-Independence India?
a)
Prime Minister of India
b)
Leader of the Muslim League
c)
Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister
d)
Governor of Orissa
|
|
Crafty Classes answered |
Sardar Patel was India's Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister during the crucial period following Independence, playing a key role in integrating princely states into the Indian Union.
Read the following passage and answer the question.On the 15th August 1947 Mahatma Gandhi did not participate in any of the Independence Day celebrations. He was in Kolkata in the areas which were torn by gruesome riots between Hindus and Muslims. He was saddened by the communal violence and disheartened that the principles of ahimsa (non-violence) and satyagraha (active but non-violent resistance) that he had lived and worked for, had failed to bind the people in troubled times. Gandhiji went on to persuade the Hindus and Muslims to give up violence. His presence in Kolkata greatly improved the situation, and the coming of independence was celebrated in a spirit of communal harmony, with joyous dancing in the streets. Gandhiji’s prayer meetings attracted large crowds. But this was short lived as riots between Hindus and Muslims erupted once again and Gandhiji had to resort to a fast to bring peace.What did Gandhi feel had failed during the communal riots in Kolkata?- a)The leadership of the Indian National Congress
- b)The concept of Indian independence
- c)The principles of ahimsa and satyagraha
- d)The effectiveness of the British government in maintaining peace
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Read the following passage and answer the question.
On the 15th August 1947 Mahatma Gandhi did not participate in any of the Independence Day celebrations. He was in Kolkata in the areas which were torn by gruesome riots between Hindus and Muslims. He was saddened by the communal violence and disheartened that the principles of ahimsa (non-violence) and satyagraha (active but non-violent resistance) that he had lived and worked for, had failed to bind the people in troubled times. Gandhiji went on to persuade the Hindus and Muslims to give up violence. His presence in Kolkata greatly improved the situation, and the coming of independence was celebrated in a spirit of communal harmony, with joyous dancing in the streets. Gandhiji’s prayer meetings attracted large crowds. But this was short lived as riots between Hindus and Muslims erupted once again and Gandhiji had to resort to a fast to bring peace.
What did Gandhi feel had failed during the communal riots in Kolkata?
a)
The leadership of the Indian National Congress
b)
The concept of Indian independence
c)
The principles of ahimsa and satyagraha
d)
The effectiveness of the British government in maintaining peace
|
|
Pj Commerce Academy answered |
Gandhi was disheartened because the principles of ahimsa (non-violence) and satyagraha (non-violent resistance) had failed to keep peace during the riots.
- a)A- 3, B- 4, C-1, D- 2
- b)A- 1, B- 4, C-2, D- 3
- c)A- 3, B-1, C- 4, D- 2
- d)A- 1, B- 2, C- 3, D- 4
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
a)
A- 3, B- 4, C-1, D- 2
b)
A- 1, B- 4, C-2, D- 3
c)
A- 3, B-1, C- 4, D- 2
d)
A- 1, B- 2, C- 3, D- 4
|
Lohit Matani answered |
- A) Manipur → 3) Pressure on the king to sign the accession
- B) Travancore → 4) Initial refusal to join India
- C) Hyderabad → 1) Military intervention by Indian Army
- D) Kashmir → 2) Political and communal violence
Chapter doubts & questions for Challenges of Nation Building - Political Science Class 12 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Challenges of Nation Building - Political Science Class 12 in English & Hindi are available as part of Humanities/Arts exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Political Science Class 12
34 videos|308 docs|51 tests
|
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up
within 7 days!
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup