UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Notes  >  Mathematics Optional Notes for UPSC  >  Function of a Real Variable

Function of a Real Variable | Mathematics Optional Notes for UPSC PDF Download

Download, print and study this document offline
Please wait while the PDF view is loading
 Page 1


Edurev123 
 
1. Function of a Real Variable 
1.1 Suppose that ?? ''
 is continuous on [?? ,?? ] and that ?? has three zeros in the 
interval (?? ,?? ) . Shov that ?? ''
 has at least one zero in the interval (?? ,?? ) . 
(2009 : 12 . Marks) 
Solution: 
Insight: This question uses the fact that continuity of any derivative of a function ensures 
continuity and differentiability of lower order derivatives and the Rolle's theorem. 
?? ''
 is continuous on [1,2] 
??? is continuous and differentiable on [1,2] 
??? is continuous and differentiable on [1,2] 
?? has three zeros in (1,2) . Let them be ?? 1
,?? 2
,?? 3
 with ?? 1
<?? 2
<?? 3
. 
 
Inflection Point 
In the interval [?? 1
,?? 2
], applying Rolle's theorem. 
?? is continuous on [?? 1
,?? 2
]. 
?? is differentiable on (?? 1
,?? 2
) . 
?? (?? 1
)=?? (?? 2
)=0 
???? ?(?? 1
,?? 2
) such that ?? (?? )=0 by Rolle's theorem. 
Page 2


Edurev123 
 
1. Function of a Real Variable 
1.1 Suppose that ?? ''
 is continuous on [?? ,?? ] and that ?? has three zeros in the 
interval (?? ,?? ) . Shov that ?? ''
 has at least one zero in the interval (?? ,?? ) . 
(2009 : 12 . Marks) 
Solution: 
Insight: This question uses the fact that continuity of any derivative of a function ensures 
continuity and differentiability of lower order derivatives and the Rolle's theorem. 
?? ''
 is continuous on [1,2] 
??? is continuous and differentiable on [1,2] 
??? is continuous and differentiable on [1,2] 
?? has three zeros in (1,2) . Let them be ?? 1
,?? 2
,?? 3
 with ?? 1
<?? 2
<?? 3
. 
 
Inflection Point 
In the interval [?? 1
,?? 2
], applying Rolle's theorem. 
?? is continuous on [?? 1
,?? 2
]. 
?? is differentiable on (?? 1
,?? 2
) . 
?? (?? 1
)=?? (?? 2
)=0 
???? ?(?? 1
,?? 2
) such that ?? (?? )=0 by Rolle's theorem. 
Similarly, applying Rolle's theorem in interval [?? 2
,?? 3
],??? 2
?(?? 2
,?? 3
) such that ?? (?? 2
)=0. 
As ?? 1
<?? 2
 and ?? 2
>?? 2
??? 1
<?? 2
. 
Applying Rolle's theorem on ?? in (?? 1
,?? 2
?
) . 
?? is continuous on [?? 1
,?? 2
]. 
?? is differentiable on (?? 1
,?? 2
) as ?? '
 is continuous on that interval. 
?? (?? 1
)=?? (?? 2
)=0 
???? ?(?? 1
,?? 2
) so that ?? '
(?? )=0 by Rolle's theorem. 
Also, (?? 1
,?? 2
)?(1,2)??? ?(1,2) 
1.2 If ?? is the derivative of some function defined on [?? ,?? ] prove that there exists a 
number ?? ?[?? ,?? ] such that 
? ?
?? ?? =?? ?? (?? )???? =?? (?? )(?? -?? ) 
(2009 : 12 Marks) 
Solution: 
Insight: This is the mean value theorem of integral calculus with the difference that ?? is 
not given as continuous but as derivative of some function. We use 2nd Fundamental 
Theorem of Calculus. 
?? is derivative on some function 
?                                                      ?? (?? )=?? (?? ) on [?? ,?? ] 
i.e., ?? (?? ) has an anti-derivative ?? (?? ) defined on [?? ,?? ]. 
By 2nd Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, for any ?? 1
,?? 2
?[?? ,?? ] 
? ?
?? 2
?? 1
?? (?? )???? =?? (?? 2
)-?? (?? 1
) 
Proof of 2nd Fundamental Theorem: ?? (?? ) is an anti-derivative of ?? (?? ) . 
Let 
?? (?? )=? ?
?? ?? 1
?? (?? )???? where ?? 1
?(?? ,?? ) 
Then ?? (?? ) is an anti-derivative. 
As two anti-derivatives differ by a constant 
Page 3


Edurev123 
 
1. Function of a Real Variable 
1.1 Suppose that ?? ''
 is continuous on [?? ,?? ] and that ?? has three zeros in the 
interval (?? ,?? ) . Shov that ?? ''
 has at least one zero in the interval (?? ,?? ) . 
(2009 : 12 . Marks) 
Solution: 
Insight: This question uses the fact that continuity of any derivative of a function ensures 
continuity and differentiability of lower order derivatives and the Rolle's theorem. 
?? ''
 is continuous on [1,2] 
??? is continuous and differentiable on [1,2] 
??? is continuous and differentiable on [1,2] 
?? has three zeros in (1,2) . Let them be ?? 1
,?? 2
,?? 3
 with ?? 1
<?? 2
<?? 3
. 
 
Inflection Point 
In the interval [?? 1
,?? 2
], applying Rolle's theorem. 
?? is continuous on [?? 1
,?? 2
]. 
?? is differentiable on (?? 1
,?? 2
) . 
?? (?? 1
)=?? (?? 2
)=0 
???? ?(?? 1
,?? 2
) such that ?? (?? )=0 by Rolle's theorem. 
Similarly, applying Rolle's theorem in interval [?? 2
,?? 3
],??? 2
?(?? 2
,?? 3
) such that ?? (?? 2
)=0. 
As ?? 1
<?? 2
 and ?? 2
>?? 2
??? 1
<?? 2
. 
Applying Rolle's theorem on ?? in (?? 1
,?? 2
?
) . 
?? is continuous on [?? 1
,?? 2
]. 
?? is differentiable on (?? 1
,?? 2
) as ?? '
 is continuous on that interval. 
?? (?? 1
)=?? (?? 2
)=0 
???? ?(?? 1
,?? 2
) so that ?? '
(?? )=0 by Rolle's theorem. 
Also, (?? 1
,?? 2
)?(1,2)??? ?(1,2) 
1.2 If ?? is the derivative of some function defined on [?? ,?? ] prove that there exists a 
number ?? ?[?? ,?? ] such that 
? ?
?? ?? =?? ?? (?? )???? =?? (?? )(?? -?? ) 
(2009 : 12 Marks) 
Solution: 
Insight: This is the mean value theorem of integral calculus with the difference that ?? is 
not given as continuous but as derivative of some function. We use 2nd Fundamental 
Theorem of Calculus. 
?? is derivative on some function 
?                                                      ?? (?? )=?? (?? ) on [?? ,?? ] 
i.e., ?? (?? ) has an anti-derivative ?? (?? ) defined on [?? ,?? ]. 
By 2nd Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, for any ?? 1
,?? 2
?[?? ,?? ] 
? ?
?? 2
?? 1
?? (?? )???? =?? (?? 2
)-?? (?? 1
) 
Proof of 2nd Fundamental Theorem: ?? (?? ) is an anti-derivative of ?? (?? ) . 
Let 
?? (?? )=? ?
?? ?? 1
?? (?? )???? where ?? 1
?(?? ,?? ) 
Then ?? (?? ) is an anti-derivative. 
As two anti-derivatives differ by a constant 
?? (?? )=?? (?? )+?? 
?                                                             ?? (?? 1
) =?? (?? 1
)+??            
 
 and                                            ? ?
?? 1
?? 1
??? (?? )=?? (?? 1
)=0
?                                        ?? (?? 1
)+?? =0?   ?? =-?? (?? 1
)
?                                                 ?? (?? )=?? (?? )-?? (?? 1
)
?                                           ? ?
?? ?? 1
??? (?? )???? =?? (?? )-?? (?? 1
)
?                                          ? ?
?? ?? 2
??? (?? )???? =?? (?? 2
)-?? (?? 1
)
 
Now, ?? '
(?? )=?? (?? ) on [?? ,?? ] so ?? (?? ) is continuous on [?? ,?? ] as every differentiable 
function is continuous and ?? (?? ) is differentiable on (?? ,?? ) . 
So by Mean Value Theorem, ??? ?(?? ,?? ) such that 
                                                     ?? (?? )=
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? ?                                ?? (?? )-?? (?? )=(?? -?? )?? (?? )
 ?                                  ? ?
?? ?? ??? (?? )???? =(?? -?? )?? (?? )
 
1.2 A twice differentiable function ?? (?? ) is such that ?? (?? )=?? =?? (?? ) and ?? (?? )>?? for 
?? <?? <?? . Prove that there is at least one point ?? ,?? <?? <?? , for which ?? ''
(?? )<?? . 
(2010 : 12 Marks) 
Solution: 
Given ?? (?? )=?? (?? )=0 and ?? ?(?? ,?? ) such that ?? (?? )>0. 
By Lagrange's Mean Value Theorem (LMVT), ??? ?(?? ,?? ) and ?? ?(?? ,?? ) : 
?? (?? )=
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? and ?? (?? )=
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? (1)
 
Now, let ?? ?(?? ,?? ) 
?                                                ?? ?(?? ,?? ) or ?? <?? <?? 
By Lagrange's Mean Value Theorem (LMVT) 
?? '
(?? )=
?? '
(?? )-?? '
(?? )
?? -?? 
Page 4


Edurev123 
 
1. Function of a Real Variable 
1.1 Suppose that ?? ''
 is continuous on [?? ,?? ] and that ?? has three zeros in the 
interval (?? ,?? ) . Shov that ?? ''
 has at least one zero in the interval (?? ,?? ) . 
(2009 : 12 . Marks) 
Solution: 
Insight: This question uses the fact that continuity of any derivative of a function ensures 
continuity and differentiability of lower order derivatives and the Rolle's theorem. 
?? ''
 is continuous on [1,2] 
??? is continuous and differentiable on [1,2] 
??? is continuous and differentiable on [1,2] 
?? has three zeros in (1,2) . Let them be ?? 1
,?? 2
,?? 3
 with ?? 1
<?? 2
<?? 3
. 
 
Inflection Point 
In the interval [?? 1
,?? 2
], applying Rolle's theorem. 
?? is continuous on [?? 1
,?? 2
]. 
?? is differentiable on (?? 1
,?? 2
) . 
?? (?? 1
)=?? (?? 2
)=0 
???? ?(?? 1
,?? 2
) such that ?? (?? )=0 by Rolle's theorem. 
Similarly, applying Rolle's theorem in interval [?? 2
,?? 3
],??? 2
?(?? 2
,?? 3
) such that ?? (?? 2
)=0. 
As ?? 1
<?? 2
 and ?? 2
>?? 2
??? 1
<?? 2
. 
Applying Rolle's theorem on ?? in (?? 1
,?? 2
?
) . 
?? is continuous on [?? 1
,?? 2
]. 
?? is differentiable on (?? 1
,?? 2
) as ?? '
 is continuous on that interval. 
?? (?? 1
)=?? (?? 2
)=0 
???? ?(?? 1
,?? 2
) so that ?? '
(?? )=0 by Rolle's theorem. 
Also, (?? 1
,?? 2
)?(1,2)??? ?(1,2) 
1.2 If ?? is the derivative of some function defined on [?? ,?? ] prove that there exists a 
number ?? ?[?? ,?? ] such that 
? ?
?? ?? =?? ?? (?? )???? =?? (?? )(?? -?? ) 
(2009 : 12 Marks) 
Solution: 
Insight: This is the mean value theorem of integral calculus with the difference that ?? is 
not given as continuous but as derivative of some function. We use 2nd Fundamental 
Theorem of Calculus. 
?? is derivative on some function 
?                                                      ?? (?? )=?? (?? ) on [?? ,?? ] 
i.e., ?? (?? ) has an anti-derivative ?? (?? ) defined on [?? ,?? ]. 
By 2nd Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, for any ?? 1
,?? 2
?[?? ,?? ] 
? ?
?? 2
?? 1
?? (?? )???? =?? (?? 2
)-?? (?? 1
) 
Proof of 2nd Fundamental Theorem: ?? (?? ) is an anti-derivative of ?? (?? ) . 
Let 
?? (?? )=? ?
?? ?? 1
?? (?? )???? where ?? 1
?(?? ,?? ) 
Then ?? (?? ) is an anti-derivative. 
As two anti-derivatives differ by a constant 
?? (?? )=?? (?? )+?? 
?                                                             ?? (?? 1
) =?? (?? 1
)+??            
 
 and                                            ? ?
?? 1
?? 1
??? (?? )=?? (?? 1
)=0
?                                        ?? (?? 1
)+?? =0?   ?? =-?? (?? 1
)
?                                                 ?? (?? )=?? (?? )-?? (?? 1
)
?                                           ? ?
?? ?? 1
??? (?? )???? =?? (?? )-?? (?? 1
)
?                                          ? ?
?? ?? 2
??? (?? )???? =?? (?? 2
)-?? (?? 1
)
 
Now, ?? '
(?? )=?? (?? ) on [?? ,?? ] so ?? (?? ) is continuous on [?? ,?? ] as every differentiable 
function is continuous and ?? (?? ) is differentiable on (?? ,?? ) . 
So by Mean Value Theorem, ??? ?(?? ,?? ) such that 
                                                     ?? (?? )=
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? ?                                ?? (?? )-?? (?? )=(?? -?? )?? (?? )
 ?                                  ? ?
?? ?? ??? (?? )???? =(?? -?? )?? (?? )
 
1.2 A twice differentiable function ?? (?? ) is such that ?? (?? )=?? =?? (?? ) and ?? (?? )>?? for 
?? <?? <?? . Prove that there is at least one point ?? ,?? <?? <?? , for which ?? ''
(?? )<?? . 
(2010 : 12 Marks) 
Solution: 
Given ?? (?? )=?? (?? )=0 and ?? ?(?? ,?? ) such that ?? (?? )>0. 
By Lagrange's Mean Value Theorem (LMVT), ??? ?(?? ,?? ) and ?? ?(?? ,?? ) : 
?? (?? )=
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? and ?? (?? )=
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? (1)
 
Now, let ?? ?(?? ,?? ) 
?                                                ?? ?(?? ,?? ) or ?? <?? <?? 
By Lagrange's Mean Value Theorem (LMVT) 
?? '
(?? )=
?? '
(?? )-?? '
(?? )
?? -?? 
 
Using values in eqn. (1), we get 
                                 ?? '
(?? )=
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? -
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? ?? -?? ?                             ?? ''
(?? )=
-
?? (?? )
?? -?? -
?? (?? )
?? -?? ?? -??                                                          [?? (?? )=?? (?? )=0]
               
                                             ?? '
(?? )=-[
?? (?? )
?? -?? +
?? '
(?? )
?? -?? ?? -?? ]<0 as ?? >?? ,?? >?? ,?? >?? 
1.4 Show that a box (rectangular parallelopiped) of maximum volume ?? with 
prescribed surface area is a cube. 
(2010 : 20 Marks) 
Solution: 
Let ?? ,?? ,?? be length of edges of given rectangular parallelopiped. Its surface area be ?? , 
volume be ?? .(?? ,?? , ?? ?0) . 
?                                                           ?? =2???? +2???? +2???? ,?? =?????? 
Let ?? be the Lagrange's multiplier (?? ?0) 
So, 
?? =?????? +?? (2???? +2???? +2???? -?? ) 
? At extremum, 
?? ?? =0????? +?? (2?? +2?? )=0 (1)
?? ?? =0????? +?? (2?? +2?? )=0 (2)
?? ?? =0????? +?? (2?? +???? )=0 (3)
 
Multiplying (1) by ?? and (2) by ?? and subtracting then, we get 
                    ?????? +?? (2???? +2???? )-?????? -?? (2???? +2???? )=0 
Page 5


Edurev123 
 
1. Function of a Real Variable 
1.1 Suppose that ?? ''
 is continuous on [?? ,?? ] and that ?? has three zeros in the 
interval (?? ,?? ) . Shov that ?? ''
 has at least one zero in the interval (?? ,?? ) . 
(2009 : 12 . Marks) 
Solution: 
Insight: This question uses the fact that continuity of any derivative of a function ensures 
continuity and differentiability of lower order derivatives and the Rolle's theorem. 
?? ''
 is continuous on [1,2] 
??? is continuous and differentiable on [1,2] 
??? is continuous and differentiable on [1,2] 
?? has three zeros in (1,2) . Let them be ?? 1
,?? 2
,?? 3
 with ?? 1
<?? 2
<?? 3
. 
 
Inflection Point 
In the interval [?? 1
,?? 2
], applying Rolle's theorem. 
?? is continuous on [?? 1
,?? 2
]. 
?? is differentiable on (?? 1
,?? 2
) . 
?? (?? 1
)=?? (?? 2
)=0 
???? ?(?? 1
,?? 2
) such that ?? (?? )=0 by Rolle's theorem. 
Similarly, applying Rolle's theorem in interval [?? 2
,?? 3
],??? 2
?(?? 2
,?? 3
) such that ?? (?? 2
)=0. 
As ?? 1
<?? 2
 and ?? 2
>?? 2
??? 1
<?? 2
. 
Applying Rolle's theorem on ?? in (?? 1
,?? 2
?
) . 
?? is continuous on [?? 1
,?? 2
]. 
?? is differentiable on (?? 1
,?? 2
) as ?? '
 is continuous on that interval. 
?? (?? 1
)=?? (?? 2
)=0 
???? ?(?? 1
,?? 2
) so that ?? '
(?? )=0 by Rolle's theorem. 
Also, (?? 1
,?? 2
)?(1,2)??? ?(1,2) 
1.2 If ?? is the derivative of some function defined on [?? ,?? ] prove that there exists a 
number ?? ?[?? ,?? ] such that 
? ?
?? ?? =?? ?? (?? )???? =?? (?? )(?? -?? ) 
(2009 : 12 Marks) 
Solution: 
Insight: This is the mean value theorem of integral calculus with the difference that ?? is 
not given as continuous but as derivative of some function. We use 2nd Fundamental 
Theorem of Calculus. 
?? is derivative on some function 
?                                                      ?? (?? )=?? (?? ) on [?? ,?? ] 
i.e., ?? (?? ) has an anti-derivative ?? (?? ) defined on [?? ,?? ]. 
By 2nd Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, for any ?? 1
,?? 2
?[?? ,?? ] 
? ?
?? 2
?? 1
?? (?? )???? =?? (?? 2
)-?? (?? 1
) 
Proof of 2nd Fundamental Theorem: ?? (?? ) is an anti-derivative of ?? (?? ) . 
Let 
?? (?? )=? ?
?? ?? 1
?? (?? )???? where ?? 1
?(?? ,?? ) 
Then ?? (?? ) is an anti-derivative. 
As two anti-derivatives differ by a constant 
?? (?? )=?? (?? )+?? 
?                                                             ?? (?? 1
) =?? (?? 1
)+??            
 
 and                                            ? ?
?? 1
?? 1
??? (?? )=?? (?? 1
)=0
?                                        ?? (?? 1
)+?? =0?   ?? =-?? (?? 1
)
?                                                 ?? (?? )=?? (?? )-?? (?? 1
)
?                                           ? ?
?? ?? 1
??? (?? )???? =?? (?? )-?? (?? 1
)
?                                          ? ?
?? ?? 2
??? (?? )???? =?? (?? 2
)-?? (?? 1
)
 
Now, ?? '
(?? )=?? (?? ) on [?? ,?? ] so ?? (?? ) is continuous on [?? ,?? ] as every differentiable 
function is continuous and ?? (?? ) is differentiable on (?? ,?? ) . 
So by Mean Value Theorem, ??? ?(?? ,?? ) such that 
                                                     ?? (?? )=
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? ?                                ?? (?? )-?? (?? )=(?? -?? )?? (?? )
 ?                                  ? ?
?? ?? ??? (?? )???? =(?? -?? )?? (?? )
 
1.2 A twice differentiable function ?? (?? ) is such that ?? (?? )=?? =?? (?? ) and ?? (?? )>?? for 
?? <?? <?? . Prove that there is at least one point ?? ,?? <?? <?? , for which ?? ''
(?? )<?? . 
(2010 : 12 Marks) 
Solution: 
Given ?? (?? )=?? (?? )=0 and ?? ?(?? ,?? ) such that ?? (?? )>0. 
By Lagrange's Mean Value Theorem (LMVT), ??? ?(?? ,?? ) and ?? ?(?? ,?? ) : 
?? (?? )=
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? and ?? (?? )=
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? (1)
 
Now, let ?? ?(?? ,?? ) 
?                                                ?? ?(?? ,?? ) or ?? <?? <?? 
By Lagrange's Mean Value Theorem (LMVT) 
?? '
(?? )=
?? '
(?? )-?? '
(?? )
?? -?? 
 
Using values in eqn. (1), we get 
                                 ?? '
(?? )=
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? -
?? (?? )-?? (?? )
?? -?? ?? -?? ?                             ?? ''
(?? )=
-
?? (?? )
?? -?? -
?? (?? )
?? -?? ?? -??                                                          [?? (?? )=?? (?? )=0]
               
                                             ?? '
(?? )=-[
?? (?? )
?? -?? +
?? '
(?? )
?? -?? ?? -?? ]<0 as ?? >?? ,?? >?? ,?? >?? 
1.4 Show that a box (rectangular parallelopiped) of maximum volume ?? with 
prescribed surface area is a cube. 
(2010 : 20 Marks) 
Solution: 
Let ?? ,?? ,?? be length of edges of given rectangular parallelopiped. Its surface area be ?? , 
volume be ?? .(?? ,?? , ?? ?0) . 
?                                                           ?? =2???? +2???? +2???? ,?? =?????? 
Let ?? be the Lagrange's multiplier (?? ?0) 
So, 
?? =?????? +?? (2???? +2???? +2???? -?? ) 
? At extremum, 
?? ?? =0????? +?? (2?? +2?? )=0 (1)
?? ?? =0????? +?? (2?? +2?? )=0 (2)
?? ?? =0????? +?? (2?? +???? )=0 (3)
 
Multiplying (1) by ?? and (2) by ?? and subtracting then, we get 
                    ?????? +?? (2???? +2???? )-?????? -?? (2???? +2???? )=0 
?                                     ?? (2???? -2???? )=0
?                                     2???? -2???? =0                                                            (?? ?0)
?                                     ?? =?? as ?? ?0                                                               (4)
 
Similarly, multiplying ( 2 ) by ?? and (3) by ?? and subtracting, we get 
?????? +?? (2???? +2?? ?? )-?????? -?? (2???? +2???? )=0 
?                                                      ?? (2???? -2???? )=0 
?                                                                      ?? =?? (?? ?0)                                            (5) 
? from (4) and (5), it can be concluded ?? =?? =?? which is a cube. 
1.5 Let ?? be a function defined on R such that ?? (?? )=-?? and ?? '
(?? )=?? for all 
values of ?? in R. How long can ?? (?? ) possibly be? 
(2011: 10 marks) 
Solution : 
  ?? (?? ) =?? ??? ??? 
   
Let ?? (?? ) 
=5+ where 
?? (?? )=0 
 
?  ?? (?? ) 
=5?? +?? (?? )+?? 1
,h(?? )=??? (?? )???? is a 
decreasing function 
?  ?? (0) =?? (0)+?? 1
=-3 
? ?? 1
 =-3-?? (0)  
?  ?? (?? ) =5?? +?? (?? )-3-?? (0) 
?  ?? (2) =10+?? (2)-3-?? (0) 
   =7+(?? (2)-?? (0)) 
   
=7 (??? is a decreasing function, ?? (2)-?? (0)<
0) 
?  (2) =7 
 
                                                           
?? '
(?? )=5??? ??? 
Read More
387 videos|203 docs

Top Courses for UPSC

387 videos|203 docs
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Viva Questions

,

ppt

,

Semester Notes

,

Function of a Real Variable | Mathematics Optional Notes for UPSC

,

pdf

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Sample Paper

,

MCQs

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

study material

,

practice quizzes

,

past year papers

,

Important questions

,

video lectures

,

Exam

,

Extra Questions

,

mock tests for examination

,

Function of a Real Variable | Mathematics Optional Notes for UPSC

,

Objective type Questions

,

Free

,

Summary

,

Function of a Real Variable | Mathematics Optional Notes for UPSC

;