Directions: Below in each question are given two statements (I) and (I...
Understanding the Relationship Between the Statements
To analyze the relationship between the two statements provided, we need to assess their causal connection:
Statement I: The Prime Minister has visited the drought-affected areas and promised government assistance to help the farmers.
Statement II: A large number of farmers in the drought-affected areas have been suffering due to the drought situation and are unable to feed their families.
Identifying the Cause and Effect
- Effect of Drought: The situation described in Statement II outlines the consequences of the drought, highlighting the suffering of farmers who are struggling to feed their families.
- Response to the Situation: Statement I presents a response to this situation; the Prime Minister's visit and promise of assistance is a reaction to the farmers' plight described in Statement II.
Conclusion on Causality
- Since Statement II illustrates the problem (the farmers' suffering due to the drought), and Statement I represents a response to that problem, it is clear that:
- Statement II is the cause: The farmers' suffering due to the drought is the reason for the Prime Minister's visit.
- Statement I is the effect: The promise of government assistance is a direct result of the conditions faced by the farmers.
Thus, the correct answer is option (b): If statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect. The response of the Prime Minister is a direct reaction to the suffering highlighted in Statement II, establishing a clear causal relationship.
Directions: Below in each question are given two statements (I) and (I...
B) Statement 2 is that farmers are facing difficulties due to drought.
This is the reason why pm is visiting the area and promising help as stated in Statement 1.
HOPE IT HELPS