Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshanandrsquo;s tuition Centre to Ashutoshandrsquo;s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.b)Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.c)Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutoshandrsquo;s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.d)Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where ...

Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.

Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?

Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?
Options:

a)
Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.
b)
Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.
c)
Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.
d)
Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a ...

Option C is correct that ashutosh has not violated any legal right of gulshan. Because principle clearly states that without any violation of legal right there is no remedy lies in law.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: CLAT 2018 Past Year Paper
200 Ques | 120 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a ...

Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation:Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan's tuition Centre to Ashutosh's Centre, forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment and suffer huge losses.Appropriate Statement in relation to the legal principle:Option C: Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh's Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss after he shut down his tuition Centre.Explanation:The legal principle states that no remedy lies in law when an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of their legal right. In this case, Ashutosh has started a tuition Centre next to Gulshan's Centre, and as a result, many students have chosen to shift to Ashutosh's Centre. This decision by the students to switch tuition Centres is not a violation of any legal right that Gulshan possesses.Gulshan cannot hold Ashutosh legally responsible for the loss he suffered due to the closure of his tuition Centre. Ashutosh has not infringed upon any of Gulshan's legal rights by starting his own Centre and attracting students. The students have the freedom to choose the tuition Centre that they prefer, and in this case, they chose Ashutosh's Centre over Gulshan's.Therefore, option C, which states that Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, is the most appropriate statement in relation to the legal principle provided.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Progress is possible when you are not afraid of competition. Each and every person is unique, but he/she may have better qualities than you. If you want to reach your goal, make sure that you are perfect in it because there are thousands of people out there who want the same goal and who will go out of their way to reach their goal. Here is where competition steps in; many people are scared of it and are against it, but they don’t know the importance of it. Competition makes your goal a living thing; it ignites that fire within you to make your dream possible. Many people dream a new dream every day but the reason why they don’t succeed is because of the lack of better preparation for competition. For example, if a writer knows that there are 80 people out there dreaming the same dream, then he will try to perfect his skill in writing, increase his vocabulary and will do all other things to make himself perfect. This is called preparing for competition in a right way, but, when a person knows the competition but tries to excel in it through unlawful means, then that competition becomes unworthy for him and even though it results in progress, it’s not worth the success. Economics taught us that human wants are unlimited. So beware, don’t let the fire within you burn the goodwill of others. A healthy competition leads to progress: increase in one’s skill, increase in employment capability which in turn results in increase in earning capacity. When competing is treated as a healthy one, it results in national progress. The place where competition is mostly present is, during exams. When you are competing among thousands of individuals, you are merely testing your knowledge and you also get to know where you stand in the crowd. This is the main purpose of the exam, to merely test your knowledge in a competitive way. I think students should know this particular point - competition is just a part of life and not life itself. Sometimes the hunger for success makes your values famished. Now, those people who are not competitive enough or those who don’t stand a chance in the competition, it is an experience for them to know about their flaws and learn from them. Competition is a boon to mankind which leads to progress, progress for him and progress for his country.Q. The statement “Sometimes the hunger for success makes your values famished” presents an observation by the author which can be postulated into a principle. Which of the following is an appropriate illustration of that principle?

View answer

Read the information given below and answer the questions based on it.The Trademark Act of 1999, both in letter and spirit, lays down that, while it encourages fair trade in every way and aims to foster and not to hamper competition, it also provides that no one, especially a trader, is justified in damaging or jeopardizing another’s business by fraud, deceit, trickery or unfair methods of any sort. This necessary precludes the trading by one dealer upon the good name and reputation built up by another. Passing off as an action arose as a part of tort and was very widely acknowledged in the common law countries. Passing off claims can be challenging and expensive to fight. It may be necessary to arrange market research surveys in order to demonstrate whether the claimant has a reputation in specific features of goods or services.The recognition of an infringement in various forms has garnered the required attention but passing off has yet not been able to establish a stage in the eyes of the common man and therefore it can still be seen taking place, unreported. The issues there under such as how clarity can be brought by characteristic difference between infringement and passing off has been brought to the public domain by the courts in India in a number of cases. The major hypothesis of the project is that the laws have not been able to demarcate a specific line between infringement and passing off beyond registration. Thereby leading to chaos in the common man’s mind with respect to the said. It is beneficial if combined action for infringement and passing off is brought in one suit as incorporating a plea of infringement, if the mark gets registered can always amend the plaint.Q.Which one of the following makes the best conclusion for the article?

View answer

The ideal market is the one in which various market participants are independent and act as competitive restraints on each other. This economic liberty of market participants is sine qua non for preserving free and unfettered competition in any market. Sometimes the market participants with an objective to make more money instead of competing with each other on merits may enter into agreements to restrict competition. The words of Adam Smith that “People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public or in some contrivance to raise prices” are still applicable and to some extent true even today. Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred as the Act) seeks to prohibit such agreements.Section 3(1) of the Act inter alia prohibits an agreement between an enterprise and a person causing or is likely to cause an appreciable effect on competition within India. As the definition of person under the Act includes an individual, it leads to possible interpretation that consumers can be a party to anti-competitive agreements. This proposition contradicts the whole philosophy of competition law behind prohibiting anti-competitive agreements, but still the Act nowhere negates this proposition on the other hand seems to support it.If this proposition is answered in affirmative, it may have multi-dimensional adverse implications on contractual relations. For instance, a consumer will be able to avoid a contract if subsequently such contract is proved to be anti-competitive. This is not something which the Competition Commission doesn't have the power to do, in fact the Commission in the case of Belarie Owners Association v. DLF Ltd. & HUDA has directed DLF to modify unfair conditions in a properly entered contract. However, the rationale behind this decision was that by imposing such unfair terms the DLF has abused its Dominance and not on the ground of such agreement being anti-competitive.The issue as to whether consumers can be party to anti-competitive agreements was raised before Competition Commission in the case of Yashoda Hospital and Research Centre Ltd. v. India Bulls Financial Services Ltd. (IFSL). The Commission held that for application of Section 3 there must be two or more enterprises and there must be an agreement between them. While adjudging the same issue the Gujarat High Court in case of Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. & Ans. v. Union of India has observed that the Consumers have no role to play in anti-competitive agreements. Thus, after these judicial pronouncements it is well established that a consumer can’t be party to any anti competitive agreement as prohibited under Section 3 of the Act.Q. Which of the following statements is true with respect to the agreement disputed in Belarie Owners Association v. DLF Ltd. HUDA?

View answer

The ideal market is the one in which various market participants are independent and act as competitive restraints on each other. This economic liberty of market participants is sine qua non for preserving free and unfettered competition in any market. Sometimes the market participants with an objective to make more money instead of competing with each other on merits may enter into agreements to restrict competition. The words of Adam Smith that “People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public or in some contrivance to raise prices” are still applicable and to some extent true even today. Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred as the Act) seeks to prohibit such agreements.Section 3(1) of the Act inter alia prohibits an agreement between an enterprise and a person causing or is likely to cause an appreciable effect on competition within India. As the definition of person under the Act includes an individual, it leads to possible interpretation that consumers can be a party to anti-competitive agreements. This proposition contradicts the whole philosophy of competition law behind prohibiting anti-competitive agreements, but still the Act nowhere negates this proposition on the other hand seems to support it.If this proposition is answered in affirmative, it may have multi-dimensional adverse implications on contractual relations. For instance, a consumer will be able to avoid a contract if subsequently such contract is proved to be anti-competitive. This is not something which the Competition Commission doesn't have the power to do, in fact the Commission in the case of Belarie Owners Association v. DLF Ltd. & HUDA has directed DLF to modify unfair conditions in a properly entered contract. However, the rationale behind this decision was that by imposing such unfair terms the DLF has abused its Dominance and not on the ground of such agreement being anti-competitive.The issue as to whether consumers can be party to anti-competitive agreements was raised before Competition Commission in the case of Yashoda Hospital and Research Centre Ltd. v. India Bulls Financial Services Ltd. (IFSL). The Commission held that for application of Section 3 there must be two or more enterprises and there must be an agreement between them. While adjudging the same issue the Gujarat High Court in case of Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. & Ans. v. Union of India has observed that the Consumers have no role to play in anti-competitive agreements. Thus, after these judicial pronouncements it is well established that a consumer can’t be party to any anti competitive agreement as prohibited under Section 3 of the Act.Q. Which of the following best describes the Anti-Competitive Agreement?

View answer

Progress is possible when you are not afraid of competition. Each and every person is unique, but he/she may have better qualities than you. If you want to reach your goal, make sure that you are perfect in it because there are thousands of people out there who want the same goal and who will go out of their way to reach their goal. Here is where competition steps in; many people are scared of it and are against it, but they don’t know the importance of it. Competition makes your goal a living thing; it ignites that fire within you to make your dream possible. Many people dream a new dream every day but the reason why they don’t succeed is because of the lack of better preparation for competition. For example, if a writer knows that there are 80 people out there dreaming the same dream, then he will try to perfect his skill in writing, increase his vocabulary and will do all other things to make himself perfect. This is called preparing for competition in a right way, but, when a person knows the competition but tries to excel in it through unlawful means, then that competition becomes unworthy for him and even though it results in progress, it’s not worth the success. Economics taught us that human wants are unlimited. So beware, don’t let the fire within you burn the goodwill of others. A healthy competition leads to progress: increase in one’s skill, increase in employment capability which in turn results in increase in earning capacity. When competing is treated as a healthy one, it results in national progress. The place where competition is mostly present is, during exams. When you are competing among thousands of individuals, you are merely testing your knowledge and you also get to know where you stand in the crowd. This is the main purpose of the exam, to merely test your knowledge in a competitive way. I think students should know this particular point - competition is just a part of life and not life itself. Sometimes the hunger for success makes your values famished. Now, those people who are not competitive enough or those who don’t stand a chance in the competition, it is an experience for them to know about their flaws and learn from them. Competition is a boon to mankind which leads to progress, progress for him and progress for his country.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the information mentioned in the passage?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.b)Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.c)Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.d)Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.b)Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.c)Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.d)Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.b)Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.c)Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.d)Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.b)Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.c)Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.d)Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.b)Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.c)Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.d)Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.b)Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.c)Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.d)Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.b)Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.c)Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.d)Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.b)Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.c)Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.d)Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.b)Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.c)Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.d)Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment suffering huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?Options:a)Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.b)Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.c)Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.d)Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam