A boy of 21 years for whose property a guardian has been appointed ent...
I think the option C is the correct answer because According to Indian Majority Act ,A minor attains majority at age of 18 but there are 2 exception cases when they attains majority at age of 21 one of them is when guardian is appointed by court to look after the minor or his property or both .
in question the boy has attain the age of 21 so guardian has no right on the property of that boy ..
let me know if I am wrong .
A boy of 21 years for whose property a guardian has been appointed ent...
Explanation:
Introduction:
In this scenario, a boy who is 21 years old enters into a contract with B in respect of his property. However, a guardian has been appointed for his property. We need to determine the validity of this contract.
Understanding the Law:
To understand the validity of this contract, we need to refer to the Indian Contract Act, 1872. According to the Act, a person is considered a minor if he is below the age of 18 years. A minor is not competent to enter into contracts and any agreement entered into by a minor is void ab initio, which means it is null and void from the beginning.
Applicability:
In this case, the boy is 21 years old, which means he is not a minor. Therefore, the provisions related to minors would not apply to him. As a result, the contract entered into by the boy with B in respect of his property would be valid.
Conclusion:
Based on the above analysis, it can be concluded that the contract entered into by the boy with B is valid. It is important to note that the appointment of a guardian for the boy's property does not affect the validity of the contract as long as the boy is of legal age to enter into contracts.