Question Description
The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.FACT: “Ramanuj telegrammed to the Shyamsunder, writing: “will you sell me your Rolls Royce CAR? Telegram the lowest cash price.” Shyamsunder replied, too by telegram: “Lowest price for CAR is Rs. 20 lacs.’ Ramanuj immediately sends his consent through telegram starting: ‘I agree to buy the CAR for 20 lakhs asked by you.’ Now Shyamsunder refused to sell the CAR.a)He cannot refuse to sell the CAR because the contract has already been made.b)He can refuse to sell the CAR because it was only invitation to offer and not the real offer.c)It was not a valid offer because willingness to enter into a contract was absent.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.FACT: “Ramanuj telegrammed to the Shyamsunder, writing: “will you sell me your Rolls Royce CAR? Telegram the lowest cash price.” Shyamsunder replied, too by telegram: “Lowest price for CAR is Rs. 20 lacs.’ Ramanuj immediately sends his consent through telegram starting: ‘I agree to buy the CAR for 20 lakhs asked by you.’ Now Shyamsunder refused to sell the CAR.a)He cannot refuse to sell the CAR because the contract has already been made.b)He can refuse to sell the CAR because it was only invitation to offer and not the real offer.c)It was not a valid offer because willingness to enter into a contract was absent.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.FACT: “Ramanuj telegrammed to the Shyamsunder, writing: “will you sell me your Rolls Royce CAR? Telegram the lowest cash price.” Shyamsunder replied, too by telegram: “Lowest price for CAR is Rs. 20 lacs.’ Ramanuj immediately sends his consent through telegram starting: ‘I agree to buy the CAR for 20 lakhs asked by you.’ Now Shyamsunder refused to sell the CAR.a)He cannot refuse to sell the CAR because the contract has already been made.b)He can refuse to sell the CAR because it was only invitation to offer and not the real offer.c)It was not a valid offer because willingness to enter into a contract was absent.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.FACT: “Ramanuj telegrammed to the Shyamsunder, writing: “will you sell me your Rolls Royce CAR? Telegram the lowest cash price.” Shyamsunder replied, too by telegram: “Lowest price for CAR is Rs. 20 lacs.’ Ramanuj immediately sends his consent through telegram starting: ‘I agree to buy the CAR for 20 lakhs asked by you.’ Now Shyamsunder refused to sell the CAR.a)He cannot refuse to sell the CAR because the contract has already been made.b)He can refuse to sell the CAR because it was only invitation to offer and not the real offer.c)It was not a valid offer because willingness to enter into a contract was absent.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.FACT: “Ramanuj telegrammed to the Shyamsunder, writing: “will you sell me your Rolls Royce CAR? Telegram the lowest cash price.” Shyamsunder replied, too by telegram: “Lowest price for CAR is Rs. 20 lacs.’ Ramanuj immediately sends his consent through telegram starting: ‘I agree to buy the CAR for 20 lakhs asked by you.’ Now Shyamsunder refused to sell the CAR.a)He cannot refuse to sell the CAR because the contract has already been made.b)He can refuse to sell the CAR because it was only invitation to offer and not the real offer.c)It was not a valid offer because willingness to enter into a contract was absent.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.FACT: “Ramanuj telegrammed to the Shyamsunder, writing: “will you sell me your Rolls Royce CAR? Telegram the lowest cash price.” Shyamsunder replied, too by telegram: “Lowest price for CAR is Rs. 20 lacs.’ Ramanuj immediately sends his consent through telegram starting: ‘I agree to buy the CAR for 20 lakhs asked by you.’ Now Shyamsunder refused to sell the CAR.a)He cannot refuse to sell the CAR because the contract has already been made.b)He can refuse to sell the CAR because it was only invitation to offer and not the real offer.c)It was not a valid offer because willingness to enter into a contract was absent.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.FACT: “Ramanuj telegrammed to the Shyamsunder, writing: “will you sell me your Rolls Royce CAR? Telegram the lowest cash price.” Shyamsunder replied, too by telegram: “Lowest price for CAR is Rs. 20 lacs.’ Ramanuj immediately sends his consent through telegram starting: ‘I agree to buy the CAR for 20 lakhs asked by you.’ Now Shyamsunder refused to sell the CAR.a)He cannot refuse to sell the CAR because the contract has already been made.b)He can refuse to sell the CAR because it was only invitation to offer and not the real offer.c)It was not a valid offer because willingness to enter into a contract was absent.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.FACT: “Ramanuj telegrammed to the Shyamsunder, writing: “will you sell me your Rolls Royce CAR? Telegram the lowest cash price.” Shyamsunder replied, too by telegram: “Lowest price for CAR is Rs. 20 lacs.’ Ramanuj immediately sends his consent through telegram starting: ‘I agree to buy the CAR for 20 lakhs asked by you.’ Now Shyamsunder refused to sell the CAR.a)He cannot refuse to sell the CAR because the contract has already been made.b)He can refuse to sell the CAR because it was only invitation to offer and not the real offer.c)It was not a valid offer because willingness to enter into a contract was absent.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The question consist of two statements, one labeled as PRINCIPLE each other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.Q. PRINCIPLE: When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.FACT: “Ramanuj telegrammed to the Shyamsunder, writing: “will you sell me your Rolls Royce CAR? Telegram the lowest cash price.” Shyamsunder replied, too by telegram: “Lowest price for CAR is Rs. 20 lacs.’ Ramanuj immediately sends his consent through telegram starting: ‘I agree to buy the CAR for 20 lakhs asked by you.’ Now Shyamsunder refused to sell the CAR.a)He cannot refuse to sell the CAR because the contract has already been made.b)He can refuse to sell the CAR because it was only invitation to offer and not the real offer.c)It was not a valid offer because willingness to enter into a contract was absent.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.