All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >  Why did national leaders not accept the deman... Start Learning for Free
Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the some group of leaders ?
Clear all your Humanities/Arts doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the ...
Because
• All the Muslims did not leave,India during partition . some Muslims stayed in India as a minority, Jawaharlal Nehru wanted to deal with them in a very civilised and dignified manner.

• Jawaharlal Nehru believed that by making any religion the official religion we will not just undermine the religious identities of the minorities but it may lead to conflicts and further divisions.

• India's secular nature cherished it's long term goals and principles like socialism, equality , liberty, fraternity.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Read the following passage and answer the question.The process of nation-building did not come to an end with Partition and integration of Princely States. Now the challenge was to draw the internal boundaries of the Indian states. This was not just a matter of administrative divisions. The boundaries had to be drawn in a way so that the linguistic and cultural plurality of the country could be reflected without affecting the unity of the nation. During colonial rule, the state boundaries were drawn either on administrative convenience or simply coincided with the territories annexed by the British government or the territories ruled by the princely powers. Our national movement had rejected these divisions as artificial and had promised the linguistic principle as the basis of formation of states. In fact after the Nagpur session of Congress in 1920 the principle was recognised as the basis of the reorganisation of the Indian National Congress party itself. Many Provincial Congress Committees were created by linguistic zones, which did not follow the administrative divisions of British India.Why were the divisions created by the British rejected by the Indian national movement?

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follows:The Partition was not merely a division of properties, liabilities and assets, or a political division of the country and the administrative apparatus. What also got divided were the financial assets, and things like tables, chairs, typewriters, paper-clips, books and also musical instruments of the police band! The employees of the government and the railways were also ‘divided’. Above all, it was a violent separation of communities who had hitherto lived together as neighbours. It is estimated that the Partition forced about 80 lakh people to migrate across the new border. Between five to ten lakh people were killed in Partition related violence. Beyond the administrative concerns and financial strains, however, the Partition posed another deeper issue. The leaders of the Indian national struggle did not believe in the two-nation theory. And yet, partition on religious basis had taken place. The Muslim population in India accounted for 12 per cent of the total population in 1951. There were competing political interests behind these conflicts. The Muslim League was formed to protect the interests of the Muslims in colonial India. But most leaders of the national movement believed that India must treat persons of all religions equally and that India should not be a country that gave superior status to adherents of one faith and inferior to those who practiced another religion.Q. Why Muslim League was formed?

Read the following passage and answer the question.On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan. This was a result of ‘partition’, the division of British India into India and Pakistan. The drawing of the border demarcating the territory of each country marked the culmination of political developments that you have read about in the history textbooks. According to the ‘two-nation theory’ advanced by the Muslim League, India consisted of not one but two ‘people’, Hindus and Muslims. That is why it demanded Pakistan, a separate country for the Muslims. The Congress opposed this theory and the demand for Pakistan. But several political developments in 1940s, the political competition between the Congress and the Muslim League and the British role led to the decision for the creation of Pakistan.How did the Congress respond to the demand for Pakistan?

Read the following passage and answer the question.On 14-15 August 1947, not one but two nation-states came into existence – India and Pakistan. This was a result of ‘partition’, the division of British India into India and Pakistan. The drawing of the border demarcating the territory of each country marked the culmination of political developments that you have read about in the history textbooks. According to the ‘two-nation theory’ advanced by the Muslim League, India consisted of not one but two ‘people’, Hindus and Muslims. That is why it demanded Pakistan, a separate country for the Muslims. The Congress opposed this theory and the demand for Pakistan. But several political developments in 1940s, the political competition between the Congress and the Muslim League and the British role led to the decision for the creation of Pakistan.What event marked the culmination of political developments in British India leading to partition?

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follows:The Partition was not merely a division of properties, liabilities and assets, or a political division of the country and the administrative apparatus. What also got divided were the financial assets, and things like tables, chairs, typewriters, paper-clips, books and also musical instruments of the police band! The employees of the government and the railways were also ‘divided’. Above all, it was a violent separation of communities who had hitherto lived together as neighbours. It is estimated that the Partition forced about 80 lakh people to migrate across the new border. Between five to ten lakh people were killed in Partition related violence. Beyond the administrative concerns and financial strains, however, the Partition posed another deeper issue. The leaders of the Indian national struggle did not believe in the two-nation theory. And yet, partition on religious basis had taken place. The Muslim population in India accounted for 12 per cent of the total population in 1951. There were competing political interests behind these conflicts. The Muslim League was formed to protect the interests of the Muslims in colonial India. But most leaders of the national movement believed that India must treat persons of all religions equally and that India should not be a country that gave superior status to adherents of one faith and inferior to those who practiced another religion.Q. Who did not believe in “Two-Nation Theory”?

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the some group of leaders ?
Question Description
Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the some group of leaders ? for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the some group of leaders ? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the some group of leaders ?.
Solutions for Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the some group of leaders ? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the some group of leaders ? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the some group of leaders ?, a detailed solution for Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the some group of leaders ? has been provided alongside types of Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the some group of leaders ? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Why did national leaders not accept the demand of hindu nation by the some group of leaders ? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup