A contract caused by coercion isa)Voidb)Voidablec)Validd)IllegalCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Question

Answer

Answer:

A contract caused by coercion is voidable.

Explanation:

Coercion refers to the act of forcing someone to do something against their will, usually through threats, intimidation, or physical force. When a contract is entered into under coercion, it means that one party has been forced or pressured into agreeing to the contract.

Here's why a contract caused by coercion is considered voidable:

Void: A void contract is one that is considered to have never existed in the first place. It is completely invalid and has no legal effect. However, a contract caused by coercion is not automatically void.

Voidable: A voidable contract is one that is initially valid and enforceable, but can be voided or canceled by the party who was coerced. The coerced party has the option to affirm or disaffirm the contract, depending on the circumstances.

Coercion as a defense: Coercion can be used as a defense to void a contract. If the coerced party can prove that they were forced or threatened into entering the contract, they can seek to have the contract declared voidable.

Legal remedies: If a contract is voidable due to coercion, the coerced party may have legal remedies available to them, such as seeking restitution or damages from the party who coerced them.

In summary, a contract caused by coercion is not automatically void, but it is considered voidable, meaning that the coerced party has the option to affirm or disaffirm the contract.

Answer

It is voidable at the option of aggrieved party because of the voilation of free consent which is an essential of valid contract

Similar CA Foundation Doubts

A contract caused by coercion is

When the consent of a party is obtained by coercion undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation, the contract is

When the consent of a party is not free , the contract is known by. ( A ) Void ( B ) Voidable ( C ) illegal?

_________ is good in substance, but suffers from some technical defects like absence in writing, barred by limitation etc.

An agreement enforceable by law at the instance of one party & not of otherparty under section 2(i) is called

Top Courses for CA FoundationView all

Quantitative Aptitude for CA Foundation

Accounting for CA Foundation

Business Laws for CA Foundation

Business Economics for CA Foundation

Mock Tests & Past Year Papers for CA Foundation

Top Courses for CA Foundation

Top Courses for CA Foundation

Related Content

CA Foundation Courses

Other Courses

How To Prepare?

Other Exams

Company