PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called consideration and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.a)he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contractb)he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwinic)Both a and bd)this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from RohitCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a cou...

a)
he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contract
b)
he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwini
c)
Both a and b
d)
this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from Rohit

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.I...

See Section 2[d], 2(h) and 13, 14 of Indian Contract Act.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Principles:1) An agreement enforceable by law is a contract2) In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds b/w both the parties3) Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called consideration and absence of consideration renders the contract unenforceable.Facts: A promised to take B out for a dinner in a restaurant. Even after two weeks, A did not fulfill the promise. B wants to sue A to enforce that promise. If B goes to court

View answer

Principles: 1) An agreement enforceable by law is a contract2) In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds b/w both the parties3) Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called consideration and absence of consideration renders the contract unenforceable.Facts: A promised to take B out for a dinner in a restaurant. Even after two weeks, A did not fulfill the promise. B wants to sue A to enforce that promise. If B goes to court

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:Agreement without consideration is void, unless it is in writing and registered, or it is a promise to compensate for something done, or is a promise to pay a debt barred by limitation.In India, contractual relationships between two or more parties are mainly dealt with by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, enacted by the British imperial government which exercised control over the country at that time. Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 states that every agreement in restraint of marriage, except those in restraint of marriage of minors, is void.The Contract Act was the first law to be placed in India which expressly made any such agreement, which in its effect would result in restraining the liberty of either of the parties to marry as per their wish, void. The fundamental idea behind this provision was to ensure that the citizens did not lose their right to marry as per their choice, which is an essential part of a civil society having both personal and social significance, due to some contractual obligation entered into at any point of time.Any agreement between the two parties that debars either or both of them from going to a court of law in case of non-compliance of the contract, is a void agreement. Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act says that any agreement that restricts an aggrieved party from enforcing his rights to approach a relevant court or tribunal in case of a breach of contract, or limits the time within which he may do so, is a void agreement. There are two exceptions to Section 28, i.e. a future dispute or a past dispute can be referred to arbitration and an agreement stating the limit of time as per the Limitation Act, 1963.An agreement may be uncertain either because the terms in it are ambiguous or vague or because it is incomplete. The general rule is that if the terms of an agreement are vague or indefinite which cannot be ascertained with reasonable certainty of the intention of the parties, then there is no contract enforceable by law.The Indian Contract Act, 1872 does not define wager or a wagering agreement. It only states that agreements by way of the wager will be void and no action can lie to contracting parties to recover anything or claim performance of the wagering agreements. A wagering agreement has the characteristic of a contingent contract but is not enforceable by Section 30.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Agreements without Consideration, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.A and B entered into a contract for the processing of 200 kg of cotton fiber of the highest quality, which would be used in Bs plant to make yarn. The contract stated that in the event of a default, the dispute would be resolved through arbitration rather than going to court. By processing cotton of poorer quality, A made a mistake. B sued, claiming that his legal rights had been violated. Decide.

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:Agreement without consideration is void, unless it is in writing and registered, or it is a promise to compensate for something done, or is a promise to pay a debt barred by limitation.In India, contractual relationships between two or more parties are mainly dealt with by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, enacted by the British imperial government which exercised control over the country at that time. Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 states that every agreement in restraint of marriage, except those in restraint of marriage of minors, is void.The Contract Act was the first law to be placed in India which expressly made any such agreement, which in its effect would result in restraining the liberty of either of the parties to marry as per their wish, void. The fundamental idea behind this provision was to ensure that the citizens did not lose their right to marry as per their choice, which is an essential part of a civil society having both personal and social significance, due to some contractual obligation entered into at any point of time.Any agreement between the two parties that debars either or both of them from going to a court of law in case of non-compliance of the contract, is a void agreement. Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act says that any agreement that restricts an aggrieved party from enforcing his rights to approach a relevant court or tribunal in case of a breach of contract, or limits the time within which he may do so, is a void agreement. There are two exceptions to Section 28, i.e. a future dispute or a past dispute can be referred to arbitration and an agreement stating the limit of time as per the Limitation Act, 1963.An agreement may be uncertain either because the terms in it are ambiguous or vague or because it is incomplete. The general rule is that if the terms of an agreement are vague or indefinite which cannot be ascertained with reasonable certainty of the intention of the parties, then there is no contract enforceable by law.The Indian Contract Act, 1872 does not define wager or a wagering agreement. It only states that agreements by way of the wager will be void and no action can lie to contracting parties to recover anything or claim performance of the wagering agreements. A wagering agreement has the characteristic of a contingent contract but is not enforceable by Section 30.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Agreements without Consideration, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.According to Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, which of the following statements regarding agreements in restraint of marriage is true?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:Agreement without consideration is void, unless it is in writing and registered, or it is a promise to compensate for something done, or is a promise to pay a debt barred by limitation.In India, contractual relationships between two or more parties are mainly dealt with by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, enacted by the British imperial government which exercised control over the country at that time. Section 26 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 states that every agreement in restraint of marriage, except those in restraint of marriage of minors, is void.The Contract Act was the first law to be placed in India which expressly made any such agreement, which in its effect would result in restraining the liberty of either of the parties to marry as per their wish, void. The fundamental idea behind this provision was to ensure that the citizens did not lose their right to marry as per their choice, which is an essential part of a civil society having both personal and social significance, due to some contractual obligation entered into at any point of time.Any agreement between the two parties that debars either or both of them from going to a court of law in case of non-compliance of the contract, is a void agreement. Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act says that any agreement that restricts an aggrieved party from enforcing his rights to approach a relevant court or tribunal in case of a breach of contract, or limits the time within which he may do so, is a void agreement. There are two exceptions to Section 28, i.e. a future dispute or a past dispute can be referred to arbitration and an agreement stating the limit of time as per the Limitation Act, 1963.An agreement may be uncertain either because the terms in it are ambiguous or vague or because it is incomplete. The general rule is that if the terms of an agreement are vague or indefinite which cannot be ascertained with reasonable certainty of the intention of the parties, then there is no contract enforceable by law.The Indian Contract Act, 1872 does not define wager or a wagering agreement. It only states that agreements by way of the wager will be void and no action can lie to contracting parties to recover anything or claim performance of the wagering agreements. A wagering agreement has the characteristic of a contingent contract but is not enforceable by Section 30.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Agreements without Consideration, blog by lawtimesjournal]Q.What does Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act state regarding agreements that restrict a party from approaching a court or tribunal in case of a breach of contract?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called 'consideration' and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.a)he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contractb)he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwinic)Both a and bd)this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from RohitCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called 'consideration' and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.a)he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contractb)he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwinic)Both a and bd)this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from RohitCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called 'consideration' and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.a)he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contractb)he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwinic)Both a and bd)this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from RohitCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called 'consideration' and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.a)he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contractb)he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwinic)Both a and bd)this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from RohitCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called 'consideration' and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.a)he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contractb)he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwinic)Both a and bd)this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from RohitCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called 'consideration' and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.a)he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contractb)he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwinic)Both a and bd)this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from RohitCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called 'consideration' and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.a)he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contractb)he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwinic)Both a and bd)this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from RohitCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called 'consideration' and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.a)he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contractb)he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwinic)Both a and bd)this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from RohitCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called 'consideration' and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.a)he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contractb)he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwinic)Both a and bd)this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from RohitCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PrincipleI. An agreement enforceable in a court of law is a contract.II. In order for an agreement to be enforceable in a court of law, there must be a meeting of minds between both the parties.III. Parties to a contract should do something for the other party. The obligation to do something for the other party is mutual. This is called 'consideration' and absence of consideration render the contract unenforceable.Facts Ashwini promised to take Rohit out or a dinner in Le Meridian. Even after 2 weeks, Ashwini did not fulfil his promise. Rohit wants to sue Ashwini to enforce that promise. If Rohit goes to court.a)he can compel Ashwini to buy him a dinner at Le Meridian, as both are competent to contractb)he can recover the value of dinner from Ashwinic)Both a and bd)this promise will not be enforced by a court of law as there is not consideration from RohitCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam