GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she ... Start Learning for Free
Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed. Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?
  • a)
    The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.
  • b)
    The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.
  • c)
    The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.
  • d)
    The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed.  
  • e)
    The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five. 
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is...
The generalization is only true for some birth years. A good criticism of the generalization would show when the generalization is not true. C does just that and thus is the correct answer. A is incorrect. It is false that the generalization holds for all years that do not end in two zeros. For example, 1970 is a birth year that does not end in two zeros. However, 1970 plus nine equals 1979, and hence this is a case for which the generalization is not valid. Since this answer choice is false, it cannot be a good criticism of the assertions. 
The second answer choice is also incorrect. In the example, the last two digits of the person’s birth year-67-are the same as the last two digits of the year of the person’s ninth birthday-76-except reversed. Thus, the example does in fact exhibit the same principle as the generalization. The fourth answer choice is incorrect. The difference between 1976 and 1967 is nine. The correctness of the first statement depends only on this fact and the fact that Roberta was born in 1967 and was still alive in 1976. Thus, the truth of the generalization is not presupposed. The last answer choice is also incorrect. Consider birth year 1923. a person born in 1923 would have been nine in 1932 and the generalization holds. So E is false. 
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed. Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?a)The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.b)The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.c)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.d)The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed. e)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed. Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?a)The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.b)The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.c)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.d)The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed. e)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed. Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?a)The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.b)The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.c)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.d)The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed. e)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed. Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?a)The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.b)The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.c)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.d)The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed. e)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed. Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?a)The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.b)The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.c)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.d)The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed. e)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed. Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?a)The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.b)The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.c)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.d)The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed. e)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed. Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?a)The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.b)The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.c)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.d)The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed. e)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed. Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?a)The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.b)The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.c)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.d)The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed. e)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed. Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?a)The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.b)The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.c)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.d)The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed. e)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed. Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?a)The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.b)The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.c)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.d)The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed. e)The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev