CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: Each question below is followed by...
Start Learning for Free
Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?
Arguments
I. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.
II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.
Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?
Arguments
I. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.
II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.
- a)if only Argument I is strong
- b)if only Argument II is strong
- c)if neither I nor II is strong
- d)if both I and II are strong
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I...
'LK Advani' authored the book 'my country my life'. Argument II is weak as it is an argument by giving example.
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I...
Introduction:
The question asks whether cricket should replace hockey as the national sport of India. Two arguments are presented: Argument I states that the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years, while Argument II argues that cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries should have the same national sport.
Argument I: Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.
- The argument highlights the poor performance of the hockey team in recent years. It suggests that since the team has been consistently underperforming, it may be justified to replace hockey with cricket as the national sport.
- This argument can be considered a strong argument as the national sport should ideally represent the sporting culture and achievements of a nation. If the national hockey team is consistently failing to perform at a competitive level, it raises questions about its ability to represent the country's sporting prowess.
- By replacing hockey with cricket, which has a stronger following and a more successful national team, India can showcase its sporting excellence on an international stage.
Argument II: No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.
- This argument suggests that since cricket is already the national sport of Australia, India should not adopt it as well, as it is important for countries to have distinct national sports.
- However, this argument is weak because the national sport of a country should be chosen based on its popularity, cultural significance, and achievements in that particular sport. It should not be influenced by the national sport of other countries.
- Just because Australia has cricket as its national sport does not mean India cannot adopt it as its own. Each country should have the freedom to choose its national sport based on its unique sporting culture and preferences.
Conclusion:
Considering the arguments presented, Argument I is a strong argument as it highlights the poor performance of the national hockey team, which is a valid reason to consider replacing hockey with cricket as the national sport of India. Argument II, on the other hand, is a weak argument as it is based on the premise that no two countries should have the same national sport, which does not hold much weight in the decision-making process.
The question asks whether cricket should replace hockey as the national sport of India. Two arguments are presented: Argument I states that the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years, while Argument II argues that cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries should have the same national sport.
Argument I: Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.
- The argument highlights the poor performance of the hockey team in recent years. It suggests that since the team has been consistently underperforming, it may be justified to replace hockey with cricket as the national sport.
- This argument can be considered a strong argument as the national sport should ideally represent the sporting culture and achievements of a nation. If the national hockey team is consistently failing to perform at a competitive level, it raises questions about its ability to represent the country's sporting prowess.
- By replacing hockey with cricket, which has a stronger following and a more successful national team, India can showcase its sporting excellence on an international stage.
Argument II: No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.
- This argument suggests that since cricket is already the national sport of Australia, India should not adopt it as well, as it is important for countries to have distinct national sports.
- However, this argument is weak because the national sport of a country should be chosen based on its popularity, cultural significance, and achievements in that particular sport. It should not be influenced by the national sport of other countries.
- Just because Australia has cricket as its national sport does not mean India cannot adopt it as its own. Each country should have the freedom to choose its national sport based on its unique sporting culture and preferences.
Conclusion:
Considering the arguments presented, Argument I is a strong argument as it highlights the poor performance of the national hockey team, which is a valid reason to consider replacing hockey with cricket as the national sport of India. Argument II, on the other hand, is a weak argument as it is based on the premise that no two countries should have the same national sport, which does not hold much weight in the decision-making process.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
Question Description
Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Direction: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide, which of the arguments is a 'strong argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement Should cricket, replace hockey as the national sport of India?ArgumentsI. Yes, the performance of the hockey team has been dismal for the last few years.II. No, cricket is the national sport of Australia and no two countries must have the same national sport.a)if only Argument I is strongb)if only Argument II is strongc)if neither I nor II is strongd)if both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup to solve all Doubts
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup