Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.Q. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes thata)Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaguesb)Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envyc)A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important researchd)Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new researche)No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientistsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Generally, marine biologists enter their fiel...

Join the Discussion on the App

a)
Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
b)
Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
c)
A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important research
d)
Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new research
e)
No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

GMAT Full Mock Test- 3

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing ...

The conclusion that biologists who make documentaries should no longer be regarded as true colleagues is based on the assumption that such biologists will not longer do important new research

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes that

View answer

The pronghorn, an antelope-like mammal that lives on the western plains of North America, is the continent’s fastest land animal, capable of running 90 kilometers per hour and of doing so for several (5) kilometers. Because no North American predator is nearly fast enough to chase it down, biologists have had difficulty explaining why the pronghorn developed its running prowess. One biologist, however, has recently claimed that pronghorns run as (10) fast as they do because of adaptation to predators known from fossil records to have been extinct for 10,000 years, such as American cheetahs and long- legged hyenas, either of which, it is believed, were fast enough to run down the pronghorn.(15) Like all explanations that posit what is called a relict behavior—a behavior that persists though its only evolutionary impetus comes from long-extinct environ- mental conditions—this one is likely to meet with skep- ticism. Most biologists distrust explanations positing relict (20) behaviors, in part because testing these hypotheses is so difficult due to the extinction of a principal component. They typically consider such historical explanations only when a lack of alternatives forces them to do so. But present-day observations sometimes yield (25) evidence that supports relict behavior hypotheses.In the case of the pronghorn, researchers have identified much supporting evidence, as several aspects of pronghorn behavior appear to have been shaped by enemies that no longer exist. For example, (30) pronghorns—like many other grazing animals—roam in herds, which allows more eyes to watch for predators and diminishes the chances of any particular animal being attacked but can also result in overcrowding and increased competition for food. But, since (35) pronghorns have nothing to fear from present-day carnivores and thus have nothing to gain from herding, their herding behavior appears to be another adaptation to extinct threats. Similarly, if speed and endurance were once essential to survival, researchers would (40) expect pronghorns to choose mates based on these athletic abilities, which they do—with female pronghorns, for example, choosing the victor after male pronghorns challenge each other in sprints and chases.Relict behaviors appear to occur in other animals (45) as well, increasing the general plausibility of such a theory. For example, one study reports relict behavior in stickleback fish belonging to populations that have long been free of a dangerous predator, the sculpin. In the study, when presented with sculpin, these (50) stickleback fish immediately engaged in stereotypical antisculpin behavior, avoiding its mouth and swimming behind to bite it. Another study found that ground squirrels from populations that have been free from snakes for 70,000 to 300,000 years still clearly recognize (55) rattlesnakes, displaying stereotypical antirattlesnake behavior in the presence of the snake. Such fear, however, apparently does not persist interminably. Arctic ground squirrels, free of snakes for about 3 million years, appear to be unable to recognize the (60) threat of a rattlesnake, exhibiting only disorganized caution even after being bitten repeatedly.Which one of the following most accurately states the main point of the passage?

View answer

Over the past 50 years, expansive, low-density communities have proliferated at the edges of many cities in the United States and Canada, creating a phenomenon known as suburban sprawl. Andres (5) Duany, Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and Jeff Speck, a group of prominent town planners belonging to a movement called New Urbanism, contend that suburban sprawl contributes to the decline of civic life and civility. For reasons involving the flow of (10) automobile traffic, they note, zoning laws usually dictate that suburban homes, stores, businesses, and schools be built in separate areas, and this separation robs people of communal space where they can interact and get to know one another. It is as difficult (15) to imagine the concept of community without a town square or local pub, these town planners contend, as it is to imagine the concept of family independent of the home.Suburban housing subdivisions, Duany and his (20) colleagues add, usually contain homes identical not only in appearance but also in price, resulting in a de facto economic segregation of residential neighborhoods. Children growing up in these neighborhoods, whatever their economic (25) circumstances, are certain to be ill prepared for life in a diverse society. Moreover, because the widely separated suburban homes and businesses are connected only by “collector roads,” residents are forced to drive, often in heavy traffic, in order to (30) perform many daily tasks. Time that would in a town center involve social interaction within a physical public realm is now spent inside the automobile, where people cease to be community members and instead become motorists, competing for road space, (35) often acting antisocially. Pedestrians rarely act in this manner toward each other. Duany and his colleagues advocate development based on early-twentieth- century urban neighborhoods that mix housing of different prices and offer residents a “gratifying (40) public realm” that includes narrow, tree-lined streets, parks, corner grocery stores, cafes, small neighborhood schools, all within walking distance. This, they believe, would give people of diverse backgrounds and lifestyles an opportunity to interact (45) and thus develop mutual respect.Opponents of New Urbanism claim that migration to sprawling suburbs is an expression of people’s legitimate desire to secure the enjoyment and personal mobility provided by the automobile and the (50) lifestyle that it makes possible. However, the New Urbanists do not question people’s right to their own values; instead, they suggest that we should take a more critical view of these values and of the sprawl conducive zoning and subdivision policies that reflect (55) them. New Urbanists are fundamentally concerned with the long-term social costs of the now-prevailing attitude that individual mobility, consumption, and wealth should be valued absolutely, regardless of their impact on community life.The passage most strongly suggests that which one of the following would occur if new housing subdivisions in suburban communities were built in accordance with the recommendations of Duany and his colleagues?

View answer

The pronghorn, an antelope-like mammal that lives on the western plains of North America, is the continent’s fastest land animal, capable of running 90 kilometers per hour and of doing so for several (5) kilometers. Because no North American predator is nearly fast enough to chase it down, biologists have had difficulty explaining why the pronghorn developed its running prowess. One biologist, however, has recently claimed that pronghorns run as (10) fast as they do because of adaptation to predators known from fossil records to have been extinct for 10,000 years, such as American cheetahs and long- legged hyenas, either of which, it is believed, were fast enough to run down the pronghorn.(15) Like all explanations that posit what is called a relict behavior—a behavior that persists though its only evolutionary impetus comes from long-extinct environ- mental conditions—this one is likely to meet with skep- ticism. Most biologists distrust explanations positing relict (20) behaviors, in part because testing these hypotheses is so difficult due to the extinction of a principal component. They typically consider such historical explanations only when a lack of alternatives forces them to do so. But present-day observations sometimes yield (25) evidence that supports relict behavior hypotheses.In the case of the pronghorn, researchers have identified much supporting evidence, as several aspects of pronghorn behavior appear to have been shaped by enemies that no longer exist. For example, (30) pronghorns—like many other grazing animals—roam in herds, which allows more eyes to watch for predators and diminishes the chances of any particular animal being attacked but can also result in overcrowding and increased competition for food. But, since (35) pronghorns have nothing to fear from present-day carnivores and thus have nothing to gain from herding, their herding behavior appears to be another adaptation to extinct threats. Similarly, if speed and endurance were once essential to survival, researchers would (40) expect pronghorns to choose mates based on these athletic abilities, which they do—with female pronghorns, for example, choosing the victor after male pronghorns challenge each other in sprints and chases.Relict behaviors appear to occur in other animals (45) as well, increasing the general plausibility of such a theory. For example, one study reports relict behavior in stickleback fish belonging to populations that have long been free of a dangerous predator, the sculpin. In the study, when presented with sculpin, these (50) stickleback fish immediately engaged in stereotypical antisculpin behavior, avoiding its mouth and swimming behind to bite it. Another study found that ground squirrels from populations that have been free from snakes for 70,000 to 300,000 years still clearly recognize (55) rattlesnakes, displaying stereotypical antirattlesnake behavior in the presence of the snake. Such fear, however, apparently does not persist interminably. Arctic ground squirrels, free of snakes for about 3 million years, appear to be unable to recognize the (60) threat of a rattlesnake, exhibiting only disorganized caution even after being bitten repeatedly.The last paragraph most strongly supports which one of the following statements?

View answer

Biographer: Arnold’s belief that every offer of assistance on the part of his colleagues was a disguised attempt to make him look inadequate and that no expression of congratulations on his promotion should be taken at face value may seem irrational. In fact, this belief was a consequence of his early experiences with an admired older sister who always made fun of his ambitions and achievements. In light of this explanation, therefore, Arnold’s stubborn belief that his colleagues were duplicitous emerges as clearly justified.The flawed reasoning in the biographer’s argument is most similar to that in which one of the following?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.Q. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes thata)Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaguesb)Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envyc)A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important researchd)Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new researche)No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientistsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.Q. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes thata)Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaguesb)Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envyc)A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important researchd)Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new researche)No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientistsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.Q. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes thata)Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaguesb)Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envyc)A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important researchd)Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new researche)No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientistsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.Q. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes thata)Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaguesb)Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envyc)A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important researchd)Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new researche)No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientistsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.Q. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes thata)Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaguesb)Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envyc)A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important researchd)Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new researche)No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientistsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.Q. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes thata)Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaguesb)Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envyc)A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important researchd)Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new researche)No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientistsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.Q. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes thata)Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaguesb)Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envyc)A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important researchd)Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new researche)No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientistsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.Q. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes thata)Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaguesb)Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envyc)A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important researchd)Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new researche)No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientistsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.Q. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes thata)Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaguesb)Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envyc)A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important researchd)Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new researche)No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientistsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Generally, marine biologists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research. They expect their colleagues to have similar goals. Therefore, when any marine biologist becomes a household name in the field of documentary nature films, most other scientists conclude that this biologist should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.Q. The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which marine biologists who make documentary films are held by research scientists assumes thata)Serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleaguesb)Research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envyc)A scientist can become famous as a marine biologist who makes documentary films without having completed any important researchd)Research scientists believe that those who are well known as marine biologists who make documentary films are not motivated to do important new researche)No important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientistsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam