Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that travel to potentially dangerous locations, such as the Amazon, to reject a potential customers if there is a 50 percent chance that thetraveler would contract malaria on the trip. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both travelers and tour operators.Q. This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if which of the following were true?a)The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.b)There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.c)Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.d)Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.e)The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Recently, a court ruled that current law allo...

Join the Discussion on the App

a)
The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.
b)
There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.
c)
Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.
d)
Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.
e)
The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

GMAT Full Mock Test- 3

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that tr...

The use of the court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if there were no accepted way of determining who the people susceptible to malaria were. Choice b states that there is no accepted method of calculating the risk of contracting malaria

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Proverbial wisdom states that birds of a feather flock together. Studies have shown that people of similar geographical and educational backgrounds and functional experience are extremely likely to found companies together. Not considering spousal teams in the dataset, it has been found that a founding team is five times more likely to be all-male or all-female team. Also, it is more likely to find founding teams that are remarkably homogenous with regard to skills and functional backgrounds. Homogeneity has important benefits. For the founder struggling to meet the challenges of a growing startup, selecting cofounders from among the people with whom he or she probably has important things in common is often the quickest and easiest solution. Not only does it generally take less time to find such people, but it also generally takes less time to develop effective working relationships with such similar people. When founders share a background, they share a common language that facilitates communication, ensuring that the team begins the work relationship with a mutual understanding and hence can skip over part of the learning curve that would absorb the energies of people with very different backgrounds. Increasing homogeneity may therefore be a particularly alluring- and, in some ways, a particularly sensible - approach for novice founders heading into unfamiliar territory. Certainly, studies have found that the greater the heterogeneity among executive team members, the greater the risk of interpersonal conflict and the lower the group-level integration. Even though it is very appealing to opt for the comfortable and easy decision to found with similar cofounders, by doing so founders may be causing long-term problems. Teams with a wide range of pertinent functional skills may be able to build more valuable and enduring startups. Conversely, homogenous teams tend to have overlapping human capital, making it more likely that the team will have redundant strengths and be missing critical skills.The authors main purpose of writing the passage is to

View answer

The poverty line, also known as the poverty threshold, is defined as the minimum level of income that is necessary for the people of a specific nation. The poverty line of a country is calculated by identifying the total amount of necessary expenses that an average adult requires over the course of one year, with the main such expense usually being house rent. Additionally, this calculation also typically includes the basic expenses of food and clothing. This measure of minimum income required is purely quantitative and does not estimate either the specific needs of people from different low-income groups or the different ways in which low-income groups experience poverty in different countries. The solely quantitative basis of calculating the minimum required income, therefore, may in fact lead to either the overestimation or the underestimation of the number of people who actually live under the poverty line in a given country. Another reason that renders the poverty line short of being a very reliable indicator of actual poverty levels is that certain nations, usually developed ones, with strong welfare systems fail to account for in-kind transfers when calculating the poverty threshold. Such calculations do not regard the benefits received from antipoverty programs such as food stamps, housing assistance, etc. as income, thereby presenting a distorted picture of the level of poverty in the nation.Which of the following can be inferred from the last two sentences of the passage?

View answer

This GMAT practice question is a verbal critical reasoning question. Concept tested in the question: Resolve the paradox in the argument.A survey conducted recently in the city indicated that most college welfare-aid applicants understate the number of luxury items - such as cars and TVs – that their family owned, in an effort to maximize the amount of aid they can claim from the city. Paradoxically, the same study also found that many applicants claimed that they had running water and a gas connection even when they did not.Q. Which of the following best explains the apparent paradox?

View answer

A survey conducted recently in the city indicated that most college welfare-aid applicants understate the number of luxury items - such as cars and TVs - that their family owned, in an effort to maximize the amount of aid they can claim from the city. Paradoxically, the same study also found that many applicants claimed that they had running water and a gas connection even when they did not.Q. Which of the following best explains the apparent paradox?

View answer

A survey conducted recently in the city indicated that most college welfare-aid applicants understate the number of luxury items - such as cars and TVs – that their family owned, in an effort to maximize the amount of aid they can claim from the city. Paradoxically, the same study also found that many applicants claimed that they had running water and a gas connection even when they did not.Which of the following best explains the apparent paradox?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that travel to potentially dangerous locations, such as the Amazon, to reject a potential customers if there is a 50 percent chance that thetraveler would contract malaria on the trip. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both travelers and tour operators.Q. This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if which of the following were true?a)The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.b)There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.c)Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.d)Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.e)The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that travel to potentially dangerous locations, such as the Amazon, to reject a potential customers if there is a 50 percent chance that thetraveler would contract malaria on the trip. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both travelers and tour operators.Q. This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if which of the following were true?a)The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.b)There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.c)Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.d)Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.e)The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that travel to potentially dangerous locations, such as the Amazon, to reject a potential customers if there is a 50 percent chance that thetraveler would contract malaria on the trip. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both travelers and tour operators.Q. This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if which of the following were true?a)The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.b)There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.c)Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.d)Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.e)The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that travel to potentially dangerous locations, such as the Amazon, to reject a potential customers if there is a 50 percent chance that thetraveler would contract malaria on the trip. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both travelers and tour operators.Q. This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if which of the following were true?a)The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.b)There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.c)Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.d)Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.e)The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that travel to potentially dangerous locations, such as the Amazon, to reject a potential customers if there is a 50 percent chance that thetraveler would contract malaria on the trip. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both travelers and tour operators.Q. This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if which of the following were true?a)The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.b)There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.c)Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.d)Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.e)The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that travel to potentially dangerous locations, such as the Amazon, to reject a potential customers if there is a 50 percent chance that thetraveler would contract malaria on the trip. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both travelers and tour operators.Q. This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if which of the following were true?a)The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.b)There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.c)Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.d)Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.e)The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that travel to potentially dangerous locations, such as the Amazon, to reject a potential customers if there is a 50 percent chance that thetraveler would contract malaria on the trip. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both travelers and tour operators.Q. This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if which of the following were true?a)The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.b)There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.c)Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.d)Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.e)The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that travel to potentially dangerous locations, such as the Amazon, to reject a potential customers if there is a 50 percent chance that thetraveler would contract malaria on the trip. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both travelers and tour operators.Q. This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if which of the following were true?a)The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.b)There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.c)Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.d)Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.e)The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that travel to potentially dangerous locations, such as the Amazon, to reject a potential customers if there is a 50 percent chance that thetraveler would contract malaria on the trip. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both travelers and tour operators.Q. This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if which of the following were true?a)The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.b)There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.c)Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.d)Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.e)The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Recently, a court ruled that current law allows tour operators that travel to potentially dangerous locations, such as the Amazon, to reject a potential customers if there is a 50 percent chance that thetraveler would contract malaria on the trip. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both travelers and tour operators.Q. This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective if which of the following were true?a)The best interests of travelers often conflict with the interests of tour operators.b)There is currently no legally accepted method existing for calculating the risk of contracting malaria as a result of being exposed to it in a particular location.c)Some trips might involve health risks other than the risk of malaria.d)Travelers who have a 50 percent chance of contracting malaria may be unaware that their risk is so great.e)The number of people signing up to take trips with a tour company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of malaria, seemed to suggest that the trip entailed high risk of getting the disease.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam