GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > The strength of a suspension bridge rests in ...
Start Learning for Free
The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.
Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?
- a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.
- b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.
- c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.
- d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.
- e)The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towe...
The conclusion of the stimulus is: "regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage".
A. Since the bridge "should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage," the author implies that the bridge is currently safe but should be reinforced to prepare for future changes in usage.
B. Two reasons are given for reinforcing: (1) "updated architectural norms" (2) "to meet anticipated increases in usage." Since the changes must be made for these two reasons, we can conclude that the original standards did not anticipate these two reasons/factors.
C. This answer states that the bridge still "will not be safe." The passage never states or implies that the bridge will not be safe. In fact, the words "to meet" seem to imply that the bridge will be safe with the changes.
D. The new architectural norms advocate the addition of supplemental reinforcements for the Watergate Bridge "to meet anticipated increases in demand." We cannot conclude that the historic regulations are faulty or that the situation with the Watergate Bridge mirrors that of every other bridge (i.e., since not every bridge is like the Watergate in its "anticipated increases in usage," we cannot conclude that every bridge needs the same reinforcements as the Watergate does).
E. The action should be undertaken because it is advised by regulators and is consistent with current design theory. The bridge was originally constructed "consistent with best-practices at the time" and the new reinforcements will help "meet anticipated increases in usage." The stimulus gives no indication that current best-practices should be abandoned simply because it is impossible to predict future theory.
B. Two reasons are given for reinforcing: (1) "updated architectural norms" (2) "to meet anticipated increases in usage." Since the changes must be made for these two reasons, we can conclude that the original standards did not anticipate these two reasons/factors.
C. This answer states that the bridge still "will not be safe." The passage never states or implies that the bridge will not be safe. In fact, the words "to meet" seem to imply that the bridge will be safe with the changes.
D. The new architectural norms advocate the addition of supplemental reinforcements for the Watergate Bridge "to meet anticipated increases in demand." We cannot conclude that the historic regulations are faulty or that the situation with the Watergate Bridge mirrors that of every other bridge (i.e., since not every bridge is like the Watergate in its "anticipated increases in usage," we cannot conclude that every bridge needs the same reinforcements as the Watergate does).
E. The action should be undertaken because it is advised by regulators and is consistent with current design theory. The bridge was originally constructed "consistent with best-practices at the time" and the new reinforcements will help "meet anticipated increases in usage." The stimulus gives no indication that current best-practices should be abandoned simply because it is impossible to predict future theory.
Most Upvoted Answer
The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towe...
Support for Option B:
Original Regulations:
- The original regulations required engineers to anchor suspension bridge towers with a portion below ground at least half of the height of the tower.
- This standard was based on best practices at the time of construction.
Failure to Anticipate Future Changes:
- The regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory now advise for reinforcements to meet anticipated increases in usage.
- This suggests that the original regulations did not foresee the future changes in demand or architectural theory.
Conclusion:
- Based on the information provided, it is strongly supported that the original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.
- Therefore, Option B is the most strongly supported conclusion.
Original Regulations:
- The original regulations required engineers to anchor suspension bridge towers with a portion below ground at least half of the height of the tower.
- This standard was based on best practices at the time of construction.
Failure to Anticipate Future Changes:
- The regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory now advise for reinforcements to meet anticipated increases in usage.
- This suggests that the original regulations did not foresee the future changes in demand or architectural theory.
Conclusion:
- Based on the information provided, it is strongly supported that the original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.
- Therefore, Option B is the most strongly supported conclusion.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for GMATView all
The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The strength of a suspension bridge rests in part on how deep the towers are anchored into the ground. During the first wave of suspension bridge construction, consistent with best-practices at the time, regulations required engineers to drill holes for the towers such that the portion of the tower below ground accounted for at least half of the height of the tower. After conducting an inspection into the depth of the holes drilled for the towers of the Watergate Bridge, constructed over 50 years ago during the first wave of suspension bridge construction, regulators noted that updated architectural norms and theory advised that the bridge's towers should be reinforced to meet anticipated increases in usage.Q. Which of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?a)In light of current architectural theory, the Watergate Bridge should be closed until reinforcements can be added.b)The original regulations for the depth of the suspension tower failed to anticipate future changes in demand or architectural theory.c)Even with the implementation of the reinforcements advocated by the new architectural norms, the bridge will still not be safe.d)In light of the regulators’ findings, every suspension bridge built during the first wave of construction must be updated to provide additional strength and carrying capacity.e) The action advocated by current architectural theory should not be undertaken since there is no evidence to guarantee that the reinforcements will be adequate or advisable in light of future architectural research.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup