GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  ​The fewer restrictions there are on th... Start Learning for Free
​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?
  • a)
    The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.
  • b)
    The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.
  • c)
    Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.
  • d)
    Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.
  • e)
    Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal se...
If E is true, the lawyers who begin advertising when the restriction is removed might all be among those who do not lower their fees on beginning to advertise, in which case no decrease in consumer legal costs will occur. Therefore, E weakens the argument and is the best answer. Since A does not relate the recent removal of restrictions to changes in consumer legal costs, it alone does not weaken the argument. Since the argument is unconcerned with whatever restrictions remain in effect but focuses only on those that will be removed, B does not weaken the argument. C and D are irrelevant to an evaluation of the argument, which is concerned with cost considerations, not with the quality of legal services or the content of lawyers' advertisements. 
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about ​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for ​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for ​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of ​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of ​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for ​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of ​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice ​The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?a)The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.b)The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.c)Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.d)Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.e)Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev