Which statement is NOT correct ? [1990]a)A sigma bond is weaker than a...
A σ - bond is stronger than a σ -bond hence option (a) is not correct. Sigma (σ) bonds are formed by head on overlap of unhybridised s–s, p–p or s–p orbitals and hybridised orbitals (sp, sp2, sp3, sp3d and sp3d2) hence σ bonds are strong bonds. Where as Pi (π)-bonds are formed by side ways overlap of unhybridised p- and d orbitals-hence σ bonds are weak bonds.
View all questions of this test
Which statement is NOT correct ? [1990]a)A sigma bond is weaker than a...
Understanding Sigma and Pi Bonds
A sigma (σ) bond and a pi (π) bond are two types of covalent bonds that differ in their formation and strength.
Strength of Sigma vs. Pi Bonds
- Sigma bonds are formed by the head-on overlap of atomic orbitals.
- Pi bonds are formed by the side-to-side overlap of atomic orbitals.
- Sigma bonds are generally stronger than pi bonds due to the direct overlap, which allows for a greater electron density between the nuclei of the bonding atoms.
Analysis of Statement A
- Statement A claims that a sigma bond is weaker than a pi bond.
- This statement is incorrect because, as discussed, sigma bonds are stronger due to the nature of their orbital overlap.
Comparison of Single and Double Bonds
- A double bond consists of one sigma bond and one pi bond, making it stronger than a single bond (which consists only of a sigma bond).
- Consequently, a double bond is not only stronger but also shorter than a single bond, due to the additional attraction from the pi bond.
Summary of Correct Statements
- Statement B (Sigma bond is stronger than a pi bond) is correct.
- Statement C (A double bond is stronger than a single bond) is correct.
- Statement D (A double bond is shorter than a single bond) is also correct.
Conclusion
In summary, the incorrect statement is option A, as sigma bonds are indeed stronger than pi bonds, contradicting the claim made in that statement. Understanding these bond types is crucial in grasping the fundamentals of molecular structure and stability.