Political Science Q1. Discuss critically about new international econo...
Ans.
The New International Economic Order
The New International Economic Order (NIEO) was a set of proposals put forward during the 1970s by some developing countries through the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development to promote their interests by improving their terms of trade, increasing development assistance, developed-country tariff reductions, and other means. It was meant to be a revision of the international economic system in favour of Third World countries, replacing the Bretton Woods system, which had benefited the leading states that had created it – especially the United States. This order was demanded by the Non-Aligned Movement.
The major consequences of the disintegration of the USSR upon countries like India were:
• In the economic area, financial aid from Soviet to India almost dried due to the disintegration of the USSR. This was also one of the reasons for balance of payments crisis of India in 1991.
• Bilateral trade between USSR and India largely deteriorated after the disintegration. However, now it is in a better position.
• Multipolar system was preferred over a bipolar system, after the Second World War, where no single power could prevail and dominate over another. In such a situation, NAM countries (countries that accepted and were a part of the Non Aligned movement) could play an important role in world politics, of which India was also a part.
• Although India had always been a non aligned state, it was more inclined towards USSR and had friendly relations with it. India and USSR had a healthy trade of economic and military goods. USSR was like a ‘parent state’ to India. Therefore, in cold war when USSR was defeated, not only did it weaken the soviet but also cast its weakening effect upon India and its security and strategic interests were badly impacted.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Humanities/Arts courses
Political Science Q1. Discuss critically about new international econo...
The New International Economic Order (NIEO) was a set of proposals put forward by developing countries in the 1970s to address the perceived imbalances and inequalities in the global economic system. It aimed to provide a more equitable and just framework for international economic relations, particularly between developed and developing countries.
Critically discussing the NIEO involves examining its goals, achievements, and limitations. While the NIEO had noble intentions, it faced significant challenges and ultimately did not achieve its desired outcomes.
The Goals of the NIEO:
- Redistribution of wealth: The NIEO sought to address the unequal distribution of wealth and resources between developed and developing countries. It aimed to promote a fairer distribution of economic benefits and reduce poverty in the developing world.
- Sovereignty and self-determination: The NIEO emphasized the right of countries to determine their own economic policies and to safeguard their national interests. It called for increased control over natural resources and greater autonomy in decision-making.
- International cooperation: The NIEO recognized the need for international cooperation to address global economic issues. It called for enhanced cooperation between developed and developing countries, as well as a restructuring of international economic institutions to give more voice and representation to the developing world.
Achievements of the NIEO:
- Increased awareness: The NIEO brought global attention to the issues of economic inequality and imbalances in the international system. It raised awareness about the need for a more equitable economic order, sparking debates and discussions.
- Policy changes: The NIEO influenced some policy changes in international economic institutions. For example, the establishment of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) were seen as partial responses to the NIEO's demands.
Limitations and Challenges of the NIEO:
- Opposition from powerful countries: The NIEO faced opposition from powerful countries, particularly the United States and other Western nations, who were reluctant to change the existing economic order. They viewed the NIEO as a threat to their interests and resisted its implementation.
- Lack of consensus among developing countries: Developing countries had diverse interests and priorities, making it challenging to form a unified front in advocating for the NIEO. This lack of consensus weakened their bargaining power and hindered the realization of the NIEO's goals.
- Economic realities and structural constraints: Implementing the NIEO's proposals required significant financial resources and structural changes. Many developing countries lacked the necessary resources and faced domestic constraints that limited their ability to implement the NIEO's recommendations.
Conclusion:
While the NIEO did not achieve its desired outcomes, it played a crucial role in highlighting the issues of economic inequality and imbalances in the international system. It raised awareness and contributed to some policy changes. However, the NIEO faced significant challenges and opposition from powerful countries, as well as internal divisions among developing nations. The quest for a more equitable international economic order continues, with evolving debates on issues such as fair trade, debt relief, and sustainable development.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Humanities/Arts study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Humanities/Arts.