Difference between Directive Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Rights




Directive Principles of State Policy:
- Directive Principles of State Policy are guidelines issued by the government for the establishment of a just society in India.
- They are non-justiciable in nature, meaning they are not enforceable by the courts.
- These principles are aimed at promoting social and economic democracy through legislative and administrative action.
- They are included in Part IV of the Indian Constitution and are considered fundamental in governance but not legally enforceable.




Fundamental Rights:
- Fundamental Rights are individual rights guaranteed by the Constitution that protect citizens against the arbitrary and absolute exercise of power by the state.
- They are justiciable, which means they can be enforced by the courts if violated.
- These rights ensure the dignity, liberty, and equality of individuals in the country.
- They are enshrined in Part III of the Indian Constitution and are legally enforceable.




Differences:
1. Nature: Directive Principles are non-justiciable guidelines for governance, while Fundamental Rights are justiciable individual rights.
2. Enforceability: Directive Principles cannot be enforced by the courts, whereas Fundamental Rights can be enforced through legal action.
3. Focus: Directive Principles focus on promoting social and economic democracy, while Fundamental Rights emphasize protecting individual liberties and equality.