A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singers well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the low suit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers services cost more than those of their imitators. This paragraph best supports the statement thata)commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singersb)most people are unable to distinguish a famous singers rendition of a song from a good imitators rendition of the same songc)the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercialsd)the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercialsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > A famous singer recently won a low suit again...

a)
commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers
b)
most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same song
c)
the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercials
d)
the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm fo...

Option (B) best supports the paragraph given in question, in that it is the basic assumption for the advertising costs to rise in the changed scenario.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm fo...

Explanation:
The paragraph states that a famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer to evoke the famous singer's rendition of a certain song in a commercial. As a result of this lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials, leading to an increase in advertising costs because famous singers' services cost more than those of their imitators.

Support for Option B:
The paragraph indirectly supports option B, which states that most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same song. This is supported by the fact that the advertising firm used an imitator in the commercial to evoke the famous singer's rendition of the song. If most people were able to distinguish between the two, the advertising firm would not have used an imitator in the first place. The fact that the famous singer won the lawsuit also suggests that there was a significant similarity between the imitator's rendition and the famous singer's rendition, further supporting the notion that most people are unable to distinguish between the two.

Contradiction to Option A:
The paragraph does not provide any direct evidence to support option A, which states that commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers. While it can be inferred that the advertising firm used an imitator to evoke the famous singer's rendition, there is no information provided about the effectiveness of the commercial. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that commercials using famous singers are usually more effective.

Irrelevance of Options C and D:
Options C and D are not relevant to the information provided in the paragraph. The paragraph does not mention anything about the availability of original versions of well-known songs for use in commercials or the advertising industry's use of well-known renditions of songs in commercials. Therefore, options C and D cannot be supported based on the given information.

In conclusion, the paragraph indirectly supports option B, which states that most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same song. This is supported by the fact that the advertising firm used an imitator in the commercial and the subsequent lawsuit won by the famous singer.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The COVID-1919 pandemic damage is taking the bottom out of commercial contracts. It is becoming commercially impracticable to perform such contracts. Is the pandemic an 'act of god' ? Does it amount to a force majeure event ? Has it made performance impossible ? Is a party to a contract relieved from its obligation to perform, as the COVID-1919 instigated lockdown amounts to a material adverse event ? What will be the economic consequences if we default on our obligations and commit a breach ?To perform such contracts, on the other hand, is to invite financial disaster. Like Hamlet, to perform or not to perform is the question agitating the minds of CEO's, CFO's and general counsel of India's corporates. Long term commitments to purchase goods or render services have suddenly become commercially unveil. The coveted acquisition that seemed so lucrative has turned into a nightmare. A single breach may trigger several such breaches through multiple, interlinked contracts. Corporate reputations and carefully cultivated long-term business relationships are at stake.Request for extending time and forbearance in performance will soon turn into nasty correspondence and, subsequently, legal notices being exchanged. Most of these contracts contain an arbitration clause, with reference to a three-member arbitral tribunal. If the counterparty to the dispute is not interested in expeditious disposal, the constitution of such tribunal itself can be a long drawn-out affair. Meanwhile, if interim orders are required to be obtained, the parties will be compelled to approach a court of law. This translates into multiple legal proceedings before different fora, and mounting cost of litigation.Cash flows are the biggest victims of this crisis. At the same time, when commercial stakes are so high, most corporates would like to avail of the best possible professional assistance. Success fees are not legally permissible in India. At the same time, law firms can't be expected to provide credit to clients for work done as also third-party liability like payment of fees to senior counsel.To compound matters, the jurisprudence on the subject in India is hardly enlightening. If there is no express provision in the contract for force majeure, Indian law ordinarily does not imply such a clause. The same goes for material adverse change (MAC) clauses in a contract. The doctrine of commercial impracticability to perform a contract, developed under New York law, has not found much favour with the Indian Supreme Court. The legal outcome of such disputes is, therefore, anybody's guess.Needless to add, the time taken in arriving at a final determination of such a dispute can be horrendously long. Even if an arbitral tribunal publishes its award fairly quickly, challenges to such an award before the high court and the Supreme Court are inevitable.The privy council has caustically observed that the trouble of a litigant in India begins when he gets hold of a decree. To implement or execute such a judgment is another long-drawn-out process. In this Kafkaesque scenario, the litigants could well become sick or insolvent. In these circumstances, is there a practical commercial solution before a corporate embarks upon a highly unproductive litigation? Courts highly encourage mediation.Unlike arbitration, mediation is not legally binding. However, in the current scenario, formal mediation may not work so effectively. Disputing parties to a contract may, instead, explore obtaining a dispassionate view of the dispute from a seasoned person having commercial experience and knowledge, not necessarily a lawyer. What is required is a creative commercial solution to the dispute. Courts do not rewrite contracts for the parties.However, such an informal mediator can rewrite and redesign the contract that causes minimal damage or disruption to both disputing parties. Of course, if such a mediation effort fails, the contracting parties are at liberty to litigate. Such an exercise is bound to narrow differences and result in a solution that may have escaped both the contracting parties.Q. What is the main issue discussed in this passage ?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The COVID-1919 pandemic damage is taking the bottom out of commercial contracts. It is becoming commercially impracticable to perform such contracts. Is the pandemic an 'act of god' ? Does it amount to a force majeure event ? Has it made performance impossible ? Is a party to a contract relieved from its obligation to perform, as the COVID-1919 instigated lockdown amounts to a material adverse event ? What will be the economic consequences if we default on our obligations and commit a breach ?To perform such contracts, on the other hand, is to invite financial disaster. Like Hamlet, to perform or not to perform is the question agitating the minds of CEO's, CFO's and general counsel of India's corporates. Long term commitments to purchase goods or render services have suddenly become commercially unveil. The coveted acquisition that seemed so lucrative has turned into a nightmare. A single breach may trigger several such breaches through multiple, interlinked contracts. Corporate reputations and carefully cultivated long-term business relationships are at stake.Request for extending time and forbearance in performance will soon turn into nasty correspondence and, subsequently, legal notices being exchanged. Most of these contracts contain an arbitration clause, with reference to a three-member arbitral tribunal. If the counterparty to the dispute is not interested in expeditious disposal, the constitution of such tribunal itself can be a long drawn-out affair. Meanwhile, if interim orders are required to be obtained, the parties will be compelled to approach a court of law. This translates into multiple legal proceedings before different fora, and mounting cost of litigation.Cash flows are the biggest victims of this crisis. At the same time, when commercial stakes are so high, most corporates would like to avail of the best possible professional assistance. Success fees are not legally permissible in India. At the same time, law firms can't be expected to provide credit to clients for work done as also third-party liability like payment of fees to senior counsel.To compound matters, the jurisprudence on the subject in India is hardly enlightening. If there is no express provision in the contract for force majeure, Indian law ordinarily does not imply such a clause. The same goes for material adverse change (MAC) clauses in a contract. The doctrine of commercial impracticability to perform a contract, developed under New York law, has not found much favour with the Indian Supreme Court. The legal outcome of such disputes is, therefore, anybody's guess.Needless to add, the time taken in arriving at a final determination of such a dispute can be horrendously long. Even if an arbitral tribunal publishes its award fairly quickly, challenges to such an award before the high court and the Supreme Court are inevitable.The privy council has caustically observed that the trouble of a litigant in India begins when he gets hold of a decree. To implement or execute such a judgment is another long-drawn-out process. In this Kafkaesque scenario, the litigants could well become sick or insolvent. In these circumstances, is there a practical commercial solution before a corporate embarks upon a highly unproductive litigation? Courts highly encourage mediation.Unlike arbitration, mediation is not legally binding. However, in the current scenario, formal mediation may not work so effectively. Disputing parties to a contract may, instead, explore obtaining a dispassionate view of the dispute from a seasoned person having commercial experience and knowledge, not necessarily a lawyer. What is required is a creative commercial solution to the dispute. Courts do not rewrite contracts for the parties.However, such an informal mediator can rewrite and redesign the contract that causes minimal damage or disruption to both disputing parties. Of course, if such a mediation effort fails, the contracting parties are at liberty to litigate. Such an exercise is bound to narrow differences and result in a solution that may have escaped both the contracting parties.Q. Which of the following creative commercial solution is provided by the writer to the parties ?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The COVID-1919 pandemic damage is taking the bottom out of commercial contracts. It is becoming commercially impracticable to perform such contracts. Is the pandemic an 'act of god' ? Does it amount to a force majeure event ? Has it made performance impossible ? Is a party to a contract relieved from its obligation to perform, as the COVID-1919 instigated lockdown amounts to a material adverse event ? What will be the economic consequences if we default on our obligations and commit a breach ?To perform such contracts, on the other hand, is to invite financial disaster. Like Hamlet, to perform or not to perform is the question agitating the minds of CEO's, CFO's and general counsel of India's corporates. Long term commitments to purchase goods or render services have suddenly become commercially unveil. The coveted acquisition that seemed so lucrative has turned into a nightmare. A single breach may trigger several such breaches through multiple, interlinked contracts. Corporate reputations and carefully cultivated long-term business relationships are at stake.Request for extending time and forbearance in performance will soon turn into nasty correspondence and, subsequently, legal notices being exchanged. Most of these contracts contain an arbitration clause, with reference to a three-member arbitral tribunal. If the counterparty to the dispute is not interested in expeditious disposal, the constitution of such tribunal itself can be a long drawn-out affair. Meanwhile, if interim orders are required to be obtained, the parties will be compelled to approach a court of law. This translates into multiple legal proceedings before different fora, and mounting cost of litigation.Cash flows are the biggest victims of this crisis. At the same time, when commercial stakes are so high, most corporates would like to avail of the best possible professional assistance. Success fees are not legally permissible in India. At the same time, law firms can't be expected to provide credit to clients for work done as also third-party liability like payment of fees to senior counsel.To compound matters, the jurisprudence on the subject in India is hardly enlightening. If there is no express provision in the contract for force majeure, Indian law ordinarily does not imply such a clause. The same goes for material adverse change (MAC) clauses in a contract. The doctrine of commercial impracticability to perform a contract, developed under New York law, has not found much favour with the Indian Supreme Court. The legal outcome of such disputes is, therefore, anybody's guess.Needless to add, the time taken in arriving at a final determination of such a dispute can be horrendously long. Even if an arbitral tribunal publishes its award fairly quickly, challenges to such an award before the high court and the Supreme Court are inevitable.The privy council has caustically observed that the trouble of a litigant in India begins when he gets hold of a decree. To implement or execute such a judgment is another long-drawn-out process. In this Kafkaesque scenario, the litigants could well become sick or insolvent. In these circumstances, is there a practical commercial solution before a corporate embarks upon a highly unproductive litigation? Courts highly encourage mediation.Unlike arbitration, mediation is not legally binding. However, in the current scenario, formal mediation may not work so effectively. Disputing parties to a contract may, instead, explore obtaining a dispassionate view of the dispute from a seasoned person having commercial experience and knowledge, not necessarily a lawyer. What is required is a creative commercial solution to the dispute. Courts do not rewrite contracts for the parties.However, such an informal mediator can rewrite and redesign the contract that causes minimal damage or disruption to both disputing parties. Of course, if such a mediation effort fails, the contracting parties are at liberty to litigate. Such an exercise is bound to narrow differences and result in a solution that may have escaped both the contracting parties.Q. Why is it so that the trouble of a litigant in India begins when he gets hold of a decree ?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The COVID-1919 pandemic damage is taking the bottom out of commercial contracts. It is becoming commercially impracticable to perform such contracts. Is the pandemic an 'act of god' ? Does it amount to a force majeure event ? Has it made performance impossible ? Is a party to a contract relieved from its obligation to perform, as the COVID-1919 instigated lockdown amounts to a material adverse event ? What will be the economic consequences if we default on our obligations and commit a breach ?To perform such contracts, on the other hand, is to invite financial disaster. Like Hamlet, to perform or not to perform is the question agitating the minds of CEO's, CFO's and general counsel of India's corporates. Long term commitments to purchase goods or render services have suddenly become commercially unveil. The coveted acquisition that seemed so lucrative has turned into a nightmare. A single breach may trigger several such breaches through multiple, interlinked contracts. Corporate reputations and carefully cultivated long-term business relationships are at stake.Request for extending time and forbearance in performance will soon turn into nasty correspondence and, subsequently, legal notices being exchanged. Most of these contracts contain an arbitration clause, with reference to a three-member arbitral tribunal. If the counterparty to the dispute is not interested in expeditious disposal, the constitution of such tribunal itself can be a long drawn-out affair. Meanwhile, if interim orders are required to be obtained, the parties will be compelled to approach a court of law. This translates into multiple legal proceedings before different fora, and mounting cost of litigation.Cash flows are the biggest victims of this crisis. At the same time, when commercial stakes are so high, most corporates would like to avail of the best possible professional assistance. Success fees are not legally permissible in India. At the same time, law firms can't be expected to provide credit to clients for work done as also third-party liability like payment of fees to senior counsel.To compound matters, the jurisprudence on the subject in India is hardly enlightening. If there is no express provision in the contract for force majeure, Indian law ordinarily does not imply such a clause. The same goes for material adverse change (MAC) clauses in a contract. The doctrine of commercial impracticability to perform a contract, developed under New York law, has not found much favour with the Indian Supreme Court. The legal outcome of such disputes is, therefore, anybody's guess.Needless to add, the time taken in arriving at a final determination of such a dispute can be horrendously long. Even if an arbitral tribunal publishes its award fairly quickly, challenges to such an award before the high court and the Supreme Court are inevitable.The privy council has caustically observed that the trouble of a litigant in India begins when he gets hold of a decree. To implement or execute such a judgment is another long-drawn-out process. In this Kafkaesque scenario, the litigants could well become sick or insolvent. In these circumstances, is there a practical commercial solution before a corporate embarks upon a highly unproductive litigation? Courts highly encourage mediation.Unlike arbitration, mediation is not legally binding. However, in the current scenario, formal mediation may not work so effectively. Disputing parties to a contract may, instead, explore obtaining a dispassionate view of the dispute from a seasoned person having commercial experience and knowledge, not necessarily a lawyer. What is required is a creative commercial solution to the dispute. Courts do not rewrite contracts for the parties.However, such an informal mediator can rewrite and redesign the contract that causes minimal damage or disruption to both disputing parties. Of course, if such a mediation effort fails, the contracting parties are at liberty to litigate. Such an exercise is bound to narrow differences and result in a solution that may have escaped both the contracting parties.Q. Which of the following provisions have not found much importance in Indian Contract Law ?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The COVID-1919 pandemic damage is taking the bottom out of commercial contracts. It is becoming commercially impracticable to perform such contracts. Is the pandemic an 'act of god' ? Does it amount to a force majeure event ? Has it made performance impossible ? Is a party to a contract relieved from its obligation to perform, as the COVID-1919 instigated lockdown amounts to a material adverse event ? What will be the economic consequences if we default on our obligations and commit a breach ?To perform such contracts, on the other hand, is to invite financial disaster. Like Hamlet, to perform or not to perform is the question agitating the minds of CEO's, CFO's and general counsel of India's corporates. Long term commitments to purchase goods or render services have suddenly become commercially unveil. The coveted acquisition that seemed so lucrative has turned into a nightmare. A single breach may trigger several such breaches through multiple, interlinked contracts. Corporate reputations and carefully cultivated long-term business relationships are at stake.Request for extending time and forbearance in performance will soon turn into nasty correspondence and, subsequently, legal notices being exchanged. Most of these contracts contain an arbitration clause, with reference to a three-member arbitral tribunal. If the counterparty to the dispute is not interested in expeditious disposal, the constitution of such tribunal itself can be a long drawn-out affair. Meanwhile, if interim orders are required to be obtained, the parties will be compelled to approach a court of law. This translates into multiple legal proceedings before different fora, and mounting cost of litigation.Cash flows are the biggest victims of this crisis. At the same time, when commercial stakes are so high, most corporates would like to avail of the best possible professional assistance. Success fees are not legally permissible in India. At the same time, law firms can't be expected to provide credit to clients for work done as also third-party liability like payment of fees to senior counsel.To compound matters, the jurisprudence on the subject in India is hardly enlightening. If there is no express provision in the contract for force majeure, Indian law ordinarily does not imply such a clause. The same goes for material adverse change (MAC) clauses in a contract. The doctrine of commercial impracticability to perform a contract, developed under New York law, has not found much favour with the Indian Supreme Court. The legal outcome of such disputes is, therefore, anybody's guess.Needless to add, the time taken in arriving at a final determination of such a dispute can be horrendously long. Even if an arbitral tribunal publishes its award fairly quickly, challenges to such an award before the high court and the Supreme Court are inevitable.The privy council has caustically observed that the trouble of a litigant in India begins when he gets hold of a decree. To implement or execute such a judgment is another long-drawn-out process. In this Kafkaesque scenario, the litigants could well become sick or insolvent. In these circumstances, is there a practical commercial solution before a corporate embarks upon a highly unproductive litigation? Courts highly encourage mediation.Unlike arbitration, mediation is not legally binding. However, in the current scenario, formal mediation may not work so effectively. Disputing parties to a contract may, instead, explore obtaining a dispassionate view of the dispute from a seasoned person having commercial experience and knowledge, not necessarily a lawyer. What is required is a creative commercial solution to the dispute. Courts do not rewrite contracts for the parties.However, such an informal mediator can rewrite and redesign the contract that causes minimal damage or disruption to both disputing parties. Of course, if such a mediation effort fails, the contracting parties are at liberty to litigate. Such an exercise is bound to narrow differences and result in a solution that may have escaped both the contracting parties.Q. Why is the time taken in arriving at a final determination of such kind of disputes can be horrendously long ?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the low suit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singer's services cost more than those of their imitators.' This paragraph best supports the statement thata)commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singersb)most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same songc)the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercialsd)the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercialsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the low suit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singer's services cost more than those of their imitators.' This paragraph best supports the statement thata)commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singersb)most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same songc)the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercialsd)the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercialsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the low suit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singer's services cost more than those of their imitators.' This paragraph best supports the statement thata)commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singersb)most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same songc)the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercialsd)the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercialsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the low suit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singer's services cost more than those of their imitators.' This paragraph best supports the statement thata)commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singersb)most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same songc)the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercialsd)the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercialsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the low suit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singer's services cost more than those of their imitators.' This paragraph best supports the statement thata)commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singersb)most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same songc)the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercialsd)the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercialsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the low suit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singer's services cost more than those of their imitators.' This paragraph best supports the statement thata)commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singersb)most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same songc)the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercialsd)the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercialsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the low suit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singer's services cost more than those of their imitators.' This paragraph best supports the statement thata)commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singersb)most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same songc)the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercialsd)the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercialsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the low suit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singer's services cost more than those of their imitators.' This paragraph best supports the statement thata)commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singersb)most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same songc)the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercialsd)the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercialsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the low suit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singer's services cost more than those of their imitators.' This paragraph best supports the statement thata)commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singersb)most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same songc)the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercialsd)the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercialsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A famous singer recently won a low suit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the low suit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singer's services cost more than those of their imitators.' This paragraph best supports the statement thata)commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singersb)most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same songc)the original versions of some well-known songs unavailable for use in commercialsd)the advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercialsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam