CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is don...
Start Learning for Free
Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.
Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.
Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.
- a)C is liable
- b)C is not liable because he was intoxicated
- c)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohol
- d)A and C both are liable
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and ...
C is liable in this case because he have voluntary consumed the alcohol with full knowledge and causing serious injury to B will make him liable making option (a) as the correct choice.
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and ...
Principle: Under the principle, nothing is considered an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person committing the offence was incapable of understanding the nature of the act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.
Facts: A, B, and C were at a party in a bar. A persuaded B and C to consume alcoholic drinks, even though they had never consumed alcohol before. After becoming intoxicated, B and C got into an argument, during which C pushed B with full force, causing serious injury.
Answer:
C is liable:
C is liable for causing serious injury to B, even though C was intoxicated. The principle states that intoxication can be a defense if the person committing the offense was incapable of understanding the nature of the act. However, in this case, C's act of pushing B with full force indicates that C was capable of understanding the consequences of their actions. Therefore, C cannot use intoxication as a defense.
C is not liable because he was intoxicated:
This argument is not valid because C's liability is not based solely on intoxication. Even if C was intoxicated, their act of pushing B with full force shows that they were aware of their actions and understood the nature of the act.
A is liable because A persuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohol:
A's persuasion to consume alcohol does not make A liable for the injury caused by C. A can be held responsible for encouraging B and C to consume alcohol, but A cannot be held directly liable for the subsequent act of C pushing B.
A and C both are liable:
This argument is also not valid because A cannot be held directly liable for the act of C pushing B. A's role was limited to persuading B and C to consume alcohol, which does not directly link them to the injury caused by C.
In conclusion, based on the given facts and the principle, C is liable for causing serious injury to B. C's act of pushing B with full force indicates that they were capable of understanding the nature of the act, and intoxication cannot be used as a defense.
Facts: A, B, and C were at a party in a bar. A persuaded B and C to consume alcoholic drinks, even though they had never consumed alcohol before. After becoming intoxicated, B and C got into an argument, during which C pushed B with full force, causing serious injury.
Answer:
C is liable:
C is liable for causing serious injury to B, even though C was intoxicated. The principle states that intoxication can be a defense if the person committing the offense was incapable of understanding the nature of the act. However, in this case, C's act of pushing B with full force indicates that C was capable of understanding the consequences of their actions. Therefore, C cannot use intoxication as a defense.
C is not liable because he was intoxicated:
This argument is not valid because C's liability is not based solely on intoxication. Even if C was intoxicated, their act of pushing B with full force shows that they were aware of their actions and understood the nature of the act.
A is liable because A persuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohol:
A's persuasion to consume alcohol does not make A liable for the injury caused by C. A can be held responsible for encouraging B and C to consume alcohol, but A cannot be held directly liable for the subsequent act of C pushing B.
A and C both are liable:
This argument is also not valid because A cannot be held directly liable for the act of C pushing B. A's role was limited to persuading B and C to consume alcohol, which does not directly link them to the injury caused by C.
In conclusion, based on the given facts and the principle, C is liable for causing serious injury to B. C's act of pushing B with full force indicates that they were capable of understanding the nature of the act, and intoxication cannot be used as a defense.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and ...
"C" WOULD BE LIABLE AS HE DIDN't drink against his will, though "a" persuaded him to drink , it was in the knowledge of "c" that he would be intoxicated if he drinks, so option "A" is correct
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Question Description
Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done under intoxication and the person commiting the offence was incapable to understand the nature of the Act. Intoxication should be without knowledge or against the will of the person.Facts: A, B and C were having a party in Bar where A pursuaded B and C to take alcoholic drinks. On the persistent pursuation B and C also consumed alcohol along with A. B and C had never consumed alcohol before. After intoxiation, there was some argument between B and C where C pushed B with full force causing serious injury to B.a)C is liableb)C is not liable because he was intoxicatedc)A is liable because A pursuaded them to consume alcohol whereas they had never consumed alcohold)A and C both are liableCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup to solve all Doubts
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up
within 7 days!
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup