A depth-first search is performed on a directed acyclic graph. Let d[u...
I'm gonna disprove all wrong options here.
A) d[u] < d[v] , Counter Example => Well if we directly start DFS on V first. Then I call DFS on X which visits U.
B) d[u] < f[v] Counter example => Same as A)
C) f[u] < f[v] Counter example => Same as A) again
So answer is D)
View all questions of this test
A depth-first search is performed on a directed acyclic graph. Let d[u...
Explanation:
In a depth-first search (DFS) on a directed acyclic graph (DAG), we traverse the graph by exploring as far as possible along each branch before backtracking. During this process, we assign discovery and finish times to each vertex.
The discovery time, denoted as d[u], is the time at which vertex u is first visited during the DFS traversal. The finish time, denoted as f[u], is the time at which the DFS call to vertex u terminates.
Statement: f[u] ≤ f[v] for all edges (u, v) in the graph.
Proof:
To prove this statement, let's consider an edge (u, v) in the graph.
During the DFS traversal, the vertex u must be discovered before the vertex v because u is the starting point for the DFS call that eventually leads to v.
Therefore, we can conclude that d[u] < />
Now, let's consider two cases:
Case 1: d[u] < />
In this case, it means that the discovery time of vertex u is earlier than the discovery time of vertex v. As the DFS traversal progresses, vertex u will finish before vertex v because we explore each branch completely before backtracking.
Therefore, we can conclude that f[u] < />
Case 2: d[u] = d[v]
In this case, it means that the discovery time of vertex u is the same as the discovery time of vertex v. However, since the graph is acyclic, vertex u cannot be an ancestor of vertex v in the DFS traversal.
Therefore, we can conclude that f[u] < />
Conclusion:
In both cases, we have f[u] < f[v].="" hence,="" the="" statement="" f[u]="" ≤="" f[v]="" for="" all="" edges="" (u,="" v)="" in="" the="" graph="" is="" always="" true="" in="" a="" depth-first="" search="" of="" a="" directed="" acyclic="" graph.="" f[v].="" hence,="" the="" statement="" f[u]="" ≤="" f[v]="" for="" all="" edges="" (u,="" v)="" in="" the="" graph="" is="" always="" true="" in="" a="" depth-first="" search="" of="" a="" directed="" acyclic="" />