CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: Each question below is followed b... Start Learning for Free
Directions:  Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.
Statement:
Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India?
Arguments:
I. No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population.
II. Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings.
III. Yes, the Government should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.
  • a)
    only II is strong
  • b)
    only III is strong
  • c)
    I and III are strong
  • d)
    only I is strong
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: Each question below is followed by three arguments numbere...
Only Argument I is strong.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens certain fundamental freedoms, which are recognized as their fundamental rights. However, these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of India are not absolute as no right can be. Each of these fundamental rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by the Parliament or the State Legislatures. Accordingly, the Constitution of India lays down the grounds and the purposes for which a legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the rights guaranteed to citizens. The State cannot travel beyond the contours of these reasonable restrictions in curbing the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. While determining the constitutional validity of a restriction imposed on a fundamental right by a legislation, the Court is not concerned with the necessity of the restriction or the wisdom of the policy underlying it, but only whether the restriction is in excess of the requirement, and whether the legislature has overstepped the Constitutional limitations. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of India are- the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and the right to reside and settle in any part of India. However, the State may impose reasonable restrictions on these rights by law, in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled tribes.Q. Mr. Z, a citizen of India, was issued a passport on June 1, 2020 by the Passport Office. Mr. Z was due to travel to Spain on July 15, 2021. On July 11, 2021, Mr. Z received a letter from the Regional Passport Officer intimating him that it was decided by the Government of India to seize his passport in public interest. Mr. Z was required to surrender his passport within seven days of the receipt of that letter. In the given situation, which of the following statements is correct?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens certain fundamental freedoms, which are recognized as their fundamental rights. However, these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of India are not absolute as no right can be. Each of these fundamental rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by the Parliament or the State Legislatures. Accordingly, the Constitution of India lays down the grounds and the purposes for which a legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the rights guaranteed to citizens. The State cannot travel beyond the contours of these reasonable restrictions in curbing the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. While determining the constitutional validity of a restriction imposed on a fundamental right by a legislation, the Court is not concerned with the necessity of the restriction or the wisdom of the policy underlying it, but only whether the restriction is in excess of the requirement, and whether the legislature has overstepped the Constitutional limitations. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of India are- the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and the right to reside and settle in any part of India. However, the State may impose reasonable restrictions on these rights by law, in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled tribes.Q.A group of Indian students of XYZ University located in New Delhi, India posted on social networking sites that they would hold a demonstration outside the university campus, protesting against a recently passed law which made it compulsory for university students to wear uniforms while attending classes. The students further threatened to use whatever means necessary to stop the oppression of students. Therefore, the State Authorities placed barricades around the university campus in order to restrict movement of the students carrying out the demonstration and ensuring that the demonstration does not turn violent. In the given situation, which of the following statements is correct regarding the act of placing of barricades by State Authorities?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens certain fundamental freedoms, which are recognized as their fundamental rights. However, these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of India are not absolute as no right can be. Each of these fundamental rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by the Parliament or the State Legislatures. Accordingly, the Constitution of India lays down the grounds and the purposes for which a legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the rights guaranteed to citizens. The State cannot travel beyond the contours of these reasonable restrictions in curbing the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. While determining the constitutional validity of a restriction imposed on a fundamental right by a legislation, the Court is not concerned with the necessity of the restriction or the wisdom of the policy underlying it, but only whether the restriction is in excess of the requirement, and whether the legislature has overstepped the Constitutional limitations. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of India are- the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and the right to reside and settle in any part of India. However, the State may impose reasonable restrictions on these rights by law, in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled tribes.Q. Which of the following statements is incorrect?

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.Statement:Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India?Arguments:I. No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population.II. Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings.III. Yes, the Government should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.a)only II is strongb)only III is strongc)I and III are strongd)only I is strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.Statement:Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India?Arguments:I. No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population.II. Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings.III. Yes, the Government should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.a)only II is strongb)only III is strongc)I and III are strongd)only I is strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.Statement:Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India?Arguments:I. No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population.II. Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings.III. Yes, the Government should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.a)only II is strongb)only III is strongc)I and III are strongd)only I is strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.Statement:Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India?Arguments:I. No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population.II. Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings.III. Yes, the Government should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.a)only II is strongb)only III is strongc)I and III are strongd)only I is strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.Statement:Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India?Arguments:I. No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population.II. Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings.III. Yes, the Government should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.a)only II is strongb)only III is strongc)I and III are strongd)only I is strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.Statement:Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India?Arguments:I. No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population.II. Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings.III. Yes, the Government should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.a)only II is strongb)only III is strongc)I and III are strongd)only I is strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.Statement:Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India?Arguments:I. No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population.II. Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings.III. Yes, the Government should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.a)only II is strongb)only III is strongc)I and III are strongd)only I is strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.Statement:Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India?Arguments:I. No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population.II. Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings.III. Yes, the Government should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.a)only II is strongb)only III is strongc)I and III are strongd)only I is strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.Statement:Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India?Arguments:I. No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population.II. Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings.III. Yes, the Government should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.a)only II is strongb)only III is strongc)I and III are strongd)only I is strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Each question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.Statement:Should there be a restriction on the construction of high rise buildings in big cities in India?Arguments:I. No, big cities in India do not have adequate open land plots to accommodate the growing population.II. Yes, only the builders and developers benefit from the construction of high rise buildings.III. Yes, the Government should first provide adequate infrastructural facilities to existing buildings before allowing the construction of new high rise buildings.a)only II is strongb)only III is strongc)I and III are strongd)only I is strongCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev