In an attempt to improve the economic and social welfare of the people...
To evaluate the argument, we need to consider various factors that could impact the effectiveness and feasibility of the government's scheme. Option E is the most useful in this regard as it focuses on the potential impact on the budgetary allocation of other welfare initiatives taken by the government.
**Evaluating the Impact on Budgetary Allocation**
- The scheme aims to provide staple foods at a 30% discount to authorized dealers. This means that the government would need to allocate funds to cover the cost of the discount.
- By evaluating the impact on the budgetary allocation, we can determine whether the scheme would divert funds from other welfare initiatives. This is important because if the scheme negatively affects the funding of other initiatives, it may undermine the overall goal of improving economic and social welfare.
- For example, if the government needs to reduce funding for education or healthcare in order to finance the discounted staple foods, it could have a detrimental effect on the well-being of the people from low-income groups.
- On the other hand, if the scheme does not have a significant impact on the budgetary allocation of other welfare initiatives, it would strengthen the argument that it can effectively improve economic conditions without compromising other important areas of social welfare.
**Considering Alternatives**
It is also important to consider whether there are alternative ways to improve the economic and social welfare of the people. While option A addresses this concern, it is not the most useful in evaluating the argument because it does not directly assess the effectiveness or feasibility of the proposed scheme.
**Other Factors to Consider**
Options B, C, and D address different aspects of the scheme, such as the potential benefits to different income groups, the significance of staple food expenditure for low-income groups, and the preferences of low-income groups for financial assistance. While these factors may be relevant, they are not as crucial as evaluating the impact on budgetary allocation, as discussed in option E.
Therefore, option E is the most useful in evaluating the argument as it directly assesses the potential impact of the scheme on the budgetary allocation of other welfare initiatives taken by the government.
In an attempt to improve the economic and social welfare of the people...
The correct official answer is not present in the options made.and E option is totally irrelevant.in case an answer to be choosen ,it would be option C..
in option E,other welfare initiative is not at all discussed in the passage.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.