All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  When used repeatedly, financial tools such as... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them, reaping greater benefits than the sectors that do not.
  • a)
    When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them
  • b)
    When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them
  • c)
    When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit them
  • d)
    Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the tools
  • e)
    A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to 
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may ...
Meaning Analysis
The sentence states that financials tools may lose their ability to stimulate the economy, if these tools are used repeatedly. The reason is that few sectors of the economy, which learn to exploit these tools reap greater benefits than sectors that do not learn to exploit these tools.
The question tests your ability to read the sentence carefully and understand how each clause is connected to other.
Error Analysis
There are no errors in the original sentence.
Answer Choices
A
When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them
Correct
B
When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them
Modifier error: In this option, "When uses repeatedly" incorrectly refers to "a potential reason".
C
When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit them
There are two errors in this option:
  1. Modifier error: “When used repeatedly” incorrectly refers to “a potential reason”.
  2. Meaning: “disproportionately” modifies adjective “few” and distorts the intended meaning of the sentence.
D
Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the tools
There are two errors in this option:
  1. Modifier placement: Modifier “When used repeatedly” should be placed close to “financial tools”. In the current location, its use is ambiguous. It may refer to “economy” as well
  2. Meaning: “with each repeated use” distorts the intended meaning of the original sentence.
E
A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to 
Meaning: Per this choice, the loss of ability of the financial tools is a sure thing while the original sentence presents a possibility of the same.
View all questions of this test
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.Caffeine, the stimulant in coffee, has been called“the most widely used psychoactive substance on Earth .”Synder, Daly and Bruns have recently proposed thatcaffeine affects behavior by countering the activity in(5) the human brain of a naturally occurring chemical calledadenosine. Adenosine normally depresses neuron firingin many areas of the brain. It apparently does this byinhibiting the release of neurotransmitters, chemicalsthat carry nerve impulses from one neuron to the next.(10) Like many other agents that affect neuron firing,adenosine must first bind to specific receptors onneuronal membranes. There are at least two classesof these receptors, which have been designated A1 andA2. Snyder et al propose that caffeine, which is struc-(15) turally similar to adenosine, is able to bind to both typesof receptors, which prevents adenosine from attachingthere and allows the neurons to fire more readily thanthey otherwise would.For many years, caffeine’s effects have been attri-(20) buted to its inhibition of the production of phosphodi-esterase, an enzyme that breaks down the chemicalcalled cyclic AMP.A number of neurotransmitters exerttheir effects by first increasing cyclic AMP concentra-tions in target neurons. Therefore, prolonged periods at(25) the elevated concentrations, as might be brought aboutby a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, could lead to a greateramount of neuron firing and, consequently, to behav-ioral stimulation. But Snyder et al point out that thecaffeine concentrations needed to inhibit the production(30) of phosphodiesterase in the brain are much higher thanthose that produce stimulation. Moreover, other com-pounds that block phosphodiesterase’s activity are notstimulants.To buttress their case that caffeine acts instead by pre-(35) venting adenosine binding, Snyder et al compared thestimulatory effects of a series of caffeine derivatives withtheir ability to dislodge adenosine from its receptors inthe brains of mice. “In general,” they reported, “theability of the compounds to compete at the receptors(40) correlates with their ability to stimulate locomotion inthe mouse; i.e., the higher their capacity to bind at thereceptors, the higher their ability to stimulate locomo-tion.” Theophylline, a close structural relative of caffeineand the major stimulant in tea, was one of the most(45) effective compounds in both regards.There were some apparent exceptions to the generalcorrelation observed between adenosine-receptor bindingand stimulation. One of these was a compound called3-isobuty1-1-methylxanthine(IBMX), which bound very(50) well but actually depressed mouse locomotion. Snyderet al suggest that this is not a major stumbling block totheir hypothesis. The problem is that the compound hasmixed effects in the brain, a not unusual occurrence withpsychoactive drugs. Even caffeine, which is generally(55) known only for its stimulatory effects, displays thisproperty, depressing mouse locomotion at very low concentrations and stimulating it at higher ones.Q.According so Snyder et al, caffeine differs from adenosine in that caffeine

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.Caffeine, the stimulant in coffee, has been called“the most widely used psychoactive substance on Earth .”Synder, Daly and Bruns have recently proposed thatcaffeine affects behavior by countering the activity in(5) the human brain of a naturally occurring chemical calledadenosine. Adenosine normally depresses neuron firingin many areas of the brain. It apparently does this byinhibiting the release of neurotransmitters, chemicalsthat carry nerve impulses from one neuron to the next.(10) Like many other agents that affect neuron firing,adenosine must first bind to specific receptors onneuronal membranes. There are at least two classesof these receptors, which have been designated A1 andA2. Snyder et al propose that caffeine, which is struc-(15) turally similar to adenosine, is able to bind to both typesof receptors, which prevents adenosine from attachingthere and allows the neurons to fire more readily thanthey otherwise would.For many years, caffeine’s effects have been attri-(20) buted to its inhibition of the production of phosphodi-esterase, an enzyme that breaks down the chemicalcalled cyclic AMP.A number of neurotransmitters exerttheir effects by first increasing cyclic AMP concentra-tions in target neurons. Therefore, prolonged periods at(25) the elevated concentrations, as might be brought aboutby a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, could lead to a greateramount of neuron firing and, consequently, to behav-ioral stimulation. But Snyder et al point out that thecaffeine concentrations needed to inhibit the production(30) of phosphodiesterase in the brain are much higher thanthose that produce stimulation. Moreover, other com-pounds that block phosphodiesterase’s activity are notstimulants.To buttress their case that caffeine acts instead by pre-(35) venting adenosine binding, Snyder et al compared thestimulatory effects of a series of caffeine derivatives withtheir ability to dislodge adenosine from its receptors inthe brains of mice. “In general,” they reported, “theability of the compounds to compete at the receptors(40) correlates with their ability to stimulate locomotion inthe mouse; i.e., the higher their capacity to bind at thereceptors, the higher their ability to stimulate locomo-tion.” Theophylline, a close structural relative of caffeineand the major stimulant in tea, was one of the most(45) effective compounds in both regards.There were some apparent exceptions to the generalcorrelation observed between adenosine-receptor bindingand stimulation. One of these was a compound called3-isobuty1-1-methylxanthine(IBMX), which bound very(50) well but actually depressed mouse locomotion. Snyderet al suggest that this is not a major stumbling block totheir hypothesis. The problem is that the compound hasmixed effects in the brain, a not unusual occurrence withpsychoactive drugs. Even caffeine, which is generally(55) known only for its stimulatory effects, displays thisproperty, depressing mouse locomotion at very low concentrations and stimulating it at higher ones.Q.The primary purpose of the passage is to

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.Caffeine, the stimulant in coffee, has been called“the most widely used psychoactive substance on Earth .”Synder, Daly and Bruns have recently proposed thatcaffeine affects behavior by countering the activity in(5) the human brain of a naturally occurring chemical calledadenosine. Adenosine normally depresses neuron firingin many areas of the brain. It apparently does this byinhibiting the release of neurotransmitters, chemicalsthat carry nerve impulses from one neuron to the next.(10) Like many other agents that affect neuron firing,adenosine must first bind to specific receptors onneuronal membranes. There are at least two classesof these receptors, which have been designated A1 andA2. Snyder et al propose that caffeine, which is struc-(15) turally similar to adenosine, is able to bind to both typesof receptors, which prevents adenosine from attachingthere and allows the neurons to fire more readily thanthey otherwise would.For many years, caffeine’s effects have been attri-(20) buted to its inhibition of the production of phosphodi-esterase, an enzyme that breaks down the chemicalcalled cyclic AMP.A number of neurotransmitters exerttheir effects by first increasing cyclic AMP concentra-tions in target neurons. Therefore, prolonged periods at(25) the elevated concentrations, as might be brought aboutby a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, could lead to a greateramount of neuron firing and, consequently, to behav-ioral stimulation. But Snyder et al point out that thecaffeine concentrations needed to inhibit the production(30) of phosphodiesterase in the brain are much higher thanthose that produce stimulation. Moreover, other com-pounds that block phosphodiesterase’s activity are notstimulants.To buttress their case that caffeine acts instead by pre-(35) venting adenosine binding, Snyder et al compared thestimulatory effects of a series of caffeine derivatives withtheir ability to dislodge adenosine from its receptors inthe brains of mice. “In general,” they reported, “theability of the compounds to compete at the receptors(40) correlates with their ability to stimulate locomotion inthe mouse; i.e., the higher their capacity to bind at thereceptors, the higher their ability to stimulate locomo-tion.” Theophylline, a close structural relative of caffeineand the major stimulant in tea, was one of the most(45) effective compounds in both regards.There were some apparent exceptions to the generalcorrelation observed between adenosine-receptor bindingand stimulation. One of these was a compound called3-isobuty1-1-methylxanthine(IBMX), which bound very(50) well but actually depressed mouse locomotion. Snyderet al suggest that this is not a major stumbling block totheir hypothesis. The problem is that the compound hasmixed effects in the brain, a not unusual occurrence withpsychoactive drugs. Even caffeine, which is generally(55) known only for its stimulatory effects, displays thisproperty, depressing mouse locomotion at very low concentrations and stimulating it at higher ones.Q.Snyder et al suggest that caffeine’s ability to bind to A1 and A2 receptors can be at least partially attributed to which of the following?(

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.Caffeine, the stimulant in coffee, has been called“the most widely used psychoactive substance on Earth .”Synder, Daly and Bruns have recently proposed thatcaffeine affects behavior by countering the activity in(5) the human brain of a naturally occurring chemical calledadenosine. Adenosine normally depresses neuron firingin many areas of the brain. It apparently does this byinhibiting the release of neurotransmitters, chemicalsthat carry nerve impulses from one neuron to the next.(10) Like many other agents that affect neuron firing,adenosine must first bind to specific receptors onneuronal membranes. There are at least two classesof these receptors, which have been designated A1 andA2. Snyder et al propose that caffeine, which is struc-(15) turally similar to adenosine, is able to bind to both typesof receptors, which prevents adenosine from attachingthere and allows the neurons to fire more readily thanthey otherwise would.For many years, caffeine’s effects have been attri-(20) buted to its inhibition of the production of phosphodi-esterase, an enzyme that breaks down the chemicalcalled cyclic AMP.A number of neurotransmitters exerttheir effects by first increasing cyclic AMP concentra-tions in target neurons. Therefore, prolonged periods at(25) the elevated concentrations, as might be brought aboutby a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, could lead to a greateramount of neuron firing and, consequently, to behav-ioral stimulation. But Snyder et al point out that thecaffeine concentrations needed to inhibit the production(30) of phosphodiesterase in the brain are much higher thanthose that produce stimulation. Moreover, other com-pounds that block phosphodiesterase’s activity are notstimulants.To buttress their case that caffeine acts instead by pre-(35) venting adenosine binding, Snyder et al compared thestimulatory effects of a series of caffeine derivatives withtheir ability to dislodge adenosine from its receptors inthe brains of mice. “In general,” they reported, “theability of the compounds to compete at the receptors(40) correlates with their ability to stimulate locomotion inthe mouse; i.e., the higher their capacity to bind at thereceptors, the higher their ability to stimulate locomo-tion.” Theophylline, a close structural relative of caffeineand the major stimulant in tea, was one of the most(45) effective compounds in both regards.There were some apparent exceptions to the generalcorrelation observed between adenosine-receptor bindingand stimulation. One of these was a compound called3-isobuty1-1-methylxanthine(IBMX), which bound very(50) well but actually depressed mouse locomotion. Snyderet al suggest that this is not a major stumbling block totheir hypothesis. The problem is that the compound hasmixed effects in the brain, a not unusual occurrence withpsychoactive drugs. Even caffeine, which is generally(55) known only for its stimulatory effects, displays thisproperty, depressing mouse locomotion at very low concentrations and stimulating it at higher ones.Q.The author quotes Snyder et al in lines 38-43 most probably in order to

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.Caffeine, the stimulant in coffee, has been called“the most widely used psychoactive substance on Earth .”Synder, Daly and Bruns have recently proposed thatcaffeine affects behavior by countering the activity in(5) the human brain of a naturally occurring chemical calledadenosine. Adenosine normally depresses neuron firingin many areas of the brain. It apparently does this byinhibiting the release of neurotransmitters, chemicalsthat carry nerve impulses from one neuron to the next.(10) Like many other agents that affect neuron firing,adenosine must first bind to specific receptors onneuronal membranes. There are at least two classesof these receptors, which have been designated A1 andA2. Snyder et al propose that caffeine, which is struc-(15) turally similar to adenosine, is able to bind to both typesof receptors, which prevents adenosine from attachingthere and allows the neurons to fire more readily thanthey otherwise would.For many years, caffeine’s effects have been attri-(20) buted to its inhibition of the production of phosphodi-esterase, an enzyme that breaks down the chemicalcalled cyclic AMP.A number of neurotransmitters exerttheir effects by first increasing cyclic AMP concentra-tions in target neurons. Therefore, prolonged periods at(25) the elevated concentrations, as might be brought aboutby a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, could lead to a greateramount of neuron firing and, consequently, to behav-ioral stimulation. But Snyder et al point out that thecaffeine concentrations needed to inhibit the production(30) of phosphodiesterase in the brain are much higher thanthose that produce stimulation. Moreover, other com-pounds that block phosphodiesterase’s activity are notstimulants.To buttress their case that caffeine acts instead by pre-(35) venting adenosine binding, Snyder et al compared thestimulatory effects of a series of caffeine derivatives withtheir ability to dislodge adenosine from its receptors inthe brains of mice. “In general,” they reported, “theability of the compounds to compete at the receptors(40) correlates with their ability to stimulate locomotion inthe mouse; i.e., the higher their capacity to bind at thereceptors, the higher their ability to stimulate locomo-tion.” Theophylline, a close structural relative of caffeineand the major stimulant in tea, was one of the most(45) effective compounds in both regards.There were some apparent exceptions to the generalcorrelation observed between adenosine-receptor bindingand stimulation. One of these was a compound called3-isobuty1-1-methylxanthine(IBMX), which bound very(50) well but actually depressed mouse locomotion. Snyderet al suggest that this is not a major stumbling block totheir hypothesis. The problem is that the compound hasmixed effects in the brain, a not unusual occurrence withpsychoactive drugs. Even caffeine, which is generally(55) known only for its stimulatory effects, displays thisproperty, depressing mouse locomotion at very low concentrations and stimulating it at higher ones.Q.According to Snyder et al, all of the following compounds can bind to specific receptors in the brain EXCEPT

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them, reaping greater benefits than the sectors that do not.a)When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themb)When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themc)When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit themd)Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the toolse)A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn toCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them, reaping greater benefits than the sectors that do not.a)When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themb)When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themc)When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit themd)Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the toolse)A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn toCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them, reaping greater benefits than the sectors that do not.a)When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themb)When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themc)When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit themd)Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the toolse)A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn toCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them, reaping greater benefits than the sectors that do not.a)When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themb)When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themc)When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit themd)Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the toolse)A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn toCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them, reaping greater benefits than the sectors that do not.a)When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themb)When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themc)When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit themd)Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the toolse)A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn toCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them, reaping greater benefits than the sectors that do not.a)When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themb)When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themc)When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit themd)Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the toolse)A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn toCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them, reaping greater benefits than the sectors that do not.a)When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themb)When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themc)When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit themd)Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the toolse)A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn toCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them, reaping greater benefits than the sectors that do not.a)When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themb)When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themc)When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit themd)Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the toolse)A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn toCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them, reaping greater benefits than the sectors that do not.a)When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themb)When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themc)When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit themd)Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the toolse)A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn toCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit them, reaping greater benefits than the sectors that do not.a)When used repeatedly, financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy; a potential reason is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themb)When used repeatedly, a potential reason that financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit themc)When used repeatedly, a potential reason of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing losing their ability to stimulate the economy is that as these tools are employed repeatedly, disproportionately few select sectors of the economy learn to exploit themd)Financial tools such as Quantitative Easing may lose their ability to stimulate the economy when used repeatedly; a potential reason is that with each repeated use few select sectors of the economy learn to disproportionately exploit the toolse)A potential reason of loss of ability of financial tools such as Quantitative Easing in stimulating the economy when these tools are used repeatedly may be that as these tools are employed repeatedly, few select sectors of the economy learn toCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup