Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the globalised architecture which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.Q.Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universitiesa)which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in governments hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economicb)backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.c)Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.d)Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.e)Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universitiesand appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > Answer the question based on the passage give...

Answer the question based on the passage given below.

The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the "globalised architecture" which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.

Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universities

a)
which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in government’s hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economic
b)
backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.
c)
Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.
d)
Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.
e)
Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universities and appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wa...

Options 3 and 5 are far fetched and too negative in their tone, they do not provide a viable solution for the situation.
Even if the government has a hold over the fee structure, it does not mean that fees will be cheaper as the cost to bring in global education may be quite high. Hence, option 1 can be eliminated.
Option 4 unnecessarily brings in “gender, race, religion and caste”; whereas the passage only talks about financial issues, which option 2 takes care of.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Directions:Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Not for the first time, I watched as one of our PhD students was loaded into an ambulance and taken to hospital. He had collapsed in one of the university research labs about 20 minutes earlier. A few hours later we received word from the hospital that the student was now alert and all tests were normal. Just as I had seen previously, the student had fainted as a result of stress, anxiety and fatigue.This was not what I had in mind when I accepted a position as a non-academic member of staff. Rather than the relaxed conditions I expected, I found myself in the most stressful environment I had ever experienced.I initially assumed this was isolated to my university. However with a little online research, I found these toxic conditions were commonplace in universities the world over. Having been part of the university system for some time, Im now able to see past the imposing architecture and impressive titles.These figures sit uncomfortably next to the professed ideals of these institutions. Our universities claim to exist to provide our most brilliant minds the freedom to nurture their greatest ideas and inspire the next generation.To facilitate this, the organisation provides infrastructure and services. With these resources, hundreds of academics are then free to pursue their goals and further their own positions as quasi-entrepreneurs. Unfortunately, these untethered conditions are also very favourable for those with an unhinged sense of entitlement. It strikes me that a rogue professor can often operate on campus with virtual impunity.Even a well-meaning academic has to juggle many responsibilities. For example, a research professor must teach hundreds of undergraduates, supervise a team of PhD researchers, manage research grants and collaborations and edit publications and dissertations. Very few professors are able to accomplish all this without the overwhelming burden affecting their character and judgement. The resulting stress often manifests as poor judgement and negative behaviour.Unfortunately, the ones most likely to be on the receiving end of this are the PhD students, postdoctoral researchers and non-academic staff, who are often on short employment contracts. These people are in very tenuous positions and have little if any recourse. This situation creates a dynamic where the boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour are often blurred.There are also many academics who can only muddle through by riding on the coattails of students. Sadly, students are also vulnerable to the theft of data, ideas and materials; not only by their colleagues, but sometimes by their own supervisor. In a university environment, this type of bad behaviour is unfortunately so frequent, it is too often normalised and ignored.The surprising tolerance of this type of behaviour is likely a result of academia being a product of itself. After all, all academics were once long-suffering PhD students. Hence because of the familiarity, academia often fails to see the gravity of the situation.But the wider community would be shocked to know this behaviour was so prevalent at the very highest level of education. The community expects so much more from people calling themselves doctor or professor. The current model of postgraduate research is severely flawed and should be urgently addressed. If we dont, the vicious circle will continue.Q. The author of the passage is most likely to support which one of the following statements?

View answer

Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and mark your answer accordingly.Should there be a common syllabus for a particular degree course in all the universities across India?Arguments:I. Yes, this will bring in uniformity in the degrees offered by various universities in India.II. No, this is just not practicable and there is no need for this.

View answer

Directions: In the question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Statements:All schools are colleges.Some universities are institutions.No school is university.Conclusions:I. All colleges are universities is not a possibility.II. No college is a university is not a possibility.III. Some institutions are not schools is not a possibility.

View answer

Directions : Study the given paragraph carefully to answer the following questions.Out of 2500 candidates eligible for an Assistant Professor post in a top-rated university, 120 candidates have prior experience of working in other universities, 15% have experience of working in colleges, 32% of them have post doctorate degrees, 65% of them have doctorate degrees, 20% of them are pursuing PHD and rest are only post graduates(not pursuing PHD). Among the candidates who have prior experiences with colleges 72 of them have post doctorate degree and 60% have doctorate degrees and the rest are pursuing PHD. Among the candidates who have experiences of working in universities 45% are post doctorates and rest are doctorates. The minimum qualification needed to be an assistant professor is post graduate degree.Find the number of candidates who are only post graduates but have the experience of working in a college.

View answer

Directions : Study the given paragraph carefully to answer the following questions.Out of 2500 candidates eligible for an Assistant Professor post in a top rated university, 120 candidates have prior experience of working in other universities, 15% have experience of working in colleges, 32% of them have post doctorate degrees, 65% of them have doctorate degrees, 20% of them are pursuing PHD and rest are only post graduates(not pursuing PHD). Among the candidates who have prior experiences with colleges 72 of them have post doctorate degree and 60% have doctorate degrees and the rest are pursuing PHD. Among the candidates who have experiences of working in universities 45% are post doctorates and rest are doctorates. The minimum qualification needed to be an assistant professor is post graduate degree.Find the number of candidates who are pursuing PHD but have no prior work experience.

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

CAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CAT

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the "globalised architecture" which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.Q.Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universitiesa)which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in government’s hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economicb)backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.c)Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.d)Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.e)Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universitiesand appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the "globalised architecture" which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.Q.Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universitiesa)which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in government’s hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economicb)backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.c)Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.d)Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.e)Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universitiesand appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the "globalised architecture" which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.Q.Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universitiesa)which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in government’s hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economicb)backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.c)Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.d)Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.e)Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universitiesand appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the "globalised architecture" which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.Q.Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universitiesa)which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in government’s hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economicb)backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.c)Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.d)Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.e)Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universitiesand appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the "globalised architecture" which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.Q.Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universitiesa)which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in government’s hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economicb)backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.c)Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.d)Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.e)Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universitiesand appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the "globalised architecture" which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.Q.Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universitiesa)which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in government’s hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economicb)backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.c)Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.d)Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.e)Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universitiesand appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the "globalised architecture" which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.Q.Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universitiesa)which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in government’s hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economicb)backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.c)Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.d)Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.e)Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universitiesand appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the "globalised architecture" which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.Q.Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universitiesa)which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in government’s hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economicb)backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.c)Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.d)Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.e)Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universitiesand appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the "globalised architecture" which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.Q.Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universitiesa)which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in government’s hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economicb)backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.c)Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.d)Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.e)Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universitiesand appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Answer the question based on the passage given below.The government wants to give out the postschool system for private (including foreign) investment, thus, not only saving from spending its own resources, but also conforming to the "globalised architecture" which will help students. But the detractors point out that it may not be affordable for every student to get admissions to these foreign or privately funded colleges and universities.Q.Which of the following decisions should the government take to tackle the opposition? Government should call for investments and tie ups in existing public universitiesa)which will allow students to get education but will keep fee structure in government’s hands.Government should keep a quota in these institutes based only on economicb)backwardness which will give meritorious students from this class, access to these colleges and universities.c)Government should not allow any foreign investment in the field of higher education at all and let the opposition come up with some solution on how to change it.d)Government should keep a quota for minorities based on gender, race, religion and caste for students who otherwise will not get access to these colleges and universities.e)Government should cancel the plans to open foreign or privately funded universitiesand appoint a committee to study the negative impact of such a decision.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam