GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  A firm’s default risk, the measurement ... Start Learning for Free
A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firm’s managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firm’s value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the market’s perception of a firm’s risk.  Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as management’s ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firm’s expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing.
Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the market’s perception of the firm’s risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firm’s underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firm’s risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms’ costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.
Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?
  • a)
    Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.
  • b)
    The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.
  • c)
    Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.
  • d)
    As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.
  • e)
    By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the eve...
Passage Analysis
Summary and Main Point
 
This is an Inference question. Four out of the five given answer choices will not follow from what is stated in the passage; these answer choices are INCORRECT. Select the answer choice that is bolstered by specific facts mentioned in the passage.
Answer Choices
A
Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.
Incorrect: Partial Scope
Although the author does state that uncertainty about a new CFO could affect a firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing, there is no information given to compare this effect with the impact resulting from uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability.
B
The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.
Correct
This information can be deduced on the basis of the following information:
In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position… the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions.
C
Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
The author neither states nor suggests the cause and effect relationship stated in this choice.
D
As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
Although it is given that the uncertainty decreases with the passage of time, the passage gives us no information to support that it decreases “considerably”.
E
By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.
Incorrect: Out Of Scope
There is no given information to deduce anything about a firm’s success in negotiating its term.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

A firms default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firms managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firms value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the markets perception of a firms risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as managements ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an heir apparent prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEOs ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firms expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firms default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the markets perception of the firms risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firms underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firms risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.The author is primarily concerned with

A firms default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firms managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firms value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the markets perception of a firms risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as managements ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an heir apparent prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEOs ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firms expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firms default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the markets perception of the firms risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firms underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firms risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.Which of the following CANNOT be inferred from the passage?

American companies may find the solution to their performance related problems in their own backyard. A recently conducted independent study shows that in the business world, social and political skills have become the real key to getting ahead in organisations, skills that successful managers use to their advantage. The study found out that successful managers, those who get promoted relatively quickly vis--vis effective managers, perform day to day activities that are more or less dissimilar to the ones conducted by effective managers or those who have satisfied, committed subordinates, in addition to high performing units. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that networking, which consists of socializing or politicking and interacting with others, was one activity that, out of the core four activities among the plethora of activities performed by managers, topped the list for successful managers but was ranked the lowest in the list of activities performed by the effective ones. Indeed the findings of the study do not negate the reality that there are managers who strike a balance between the activities performed by both types of managers and hence are successful and effective at the same time, but the meagre percentage such managers formed of the studys sample, barely ten percent, affirms the general divide between successful and effective managers.These findings clearly belie the traditional assumption typically suggested by formal personnel policies that promotions are based purely on performance. In effect, the studys implications affirm the cynical, yet what now seems real, view that people who are not necessarily the most accomplishing in terms of performing well in the other three key activity areas, namely communication, traditional management, and human resource management, are being promoted to the top level. Therefore, American companies looking to improve their performance and productivity need to ensure that formal rewards, especially promotions, are tied to performance. This way companies will be promoting a work-culture that turns effective managers in to successful managers and gives the currently successful managers a chance to effectively focus on productivity and not just on socializing and politicking.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?

Read the passage and answer the question given below.American companies may find the solution to their performance related problems in their own backyard. A recently conducted independent study shows that in the business world, social and political skills have become the real key to getting ahead in organisations, skills that successful managers use to their advantage. The study found out that successful managers, those who get promoted relatively quickly vis-à-vis effective managers, perform day to day activities that are more or less dissimilar to the ones conducted by effective managers or those who have satisfied, committed subordinates, in addition to high performing units. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that networking, which consists of socializing or politicking and interacting with others, was one activity that, out of the core four activities among the plethora of activities performed by managers, topped the list for successful managers but was ranked the lowest in the list of activities performed by the effective ones. Indeed the findings of the study do not negate the reality that there are managers who strike a balance between the activities performed by both types of managers and hence are successful and effective at the same time, but the meagre percentage such managers formed of the study’s sample, barely ten percent, affirms the general divide between successful and effective managers.These findings clearly belie the traditional assumption typically suggested by formal personnel policies that promotions are based purely on performance. In effect, the study’s implications affirm the cynical, yet what now seems real, view that people who are not necessarily the most accomplishing in terms of performing well in the other three key activity areas, namely communication, traditional management, and human resource management, are being promoted to the top level. Therefore, American companies looking to improve their performance and productivity need to ensure that formal rewards, especially promotions, are tied to performance. This way companies will be promoting a work-culture that turns effective managers in to successful managers and gives the currently successful managers a chance to effectively focus on productivity and not just on socializing and politicking.Q. Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?

Disruptive innovators can hurt successful and immensely profitable incumbents that tend to ignore the markets most susceptible to disruptive innovations. Disruptive innovators offer technologically straightforward solutions consisting of off-the-shelf components put together in a product architecture that is often simpler, initially lower performing, and cheaper than established approaches. Considering disruptive technologies unprofitable, the executives at incumbents often ignored them at their own and companies peril. In 1981, the old 8 inch drives used in mini computers were vastly superior and much more profitable to the new 5.25 inch drives used in desktop computers. However, 8 inch drives were not affordable for the new desktop machines. Slowly, the makers of 5.25 inch drives improved the performance of the drives and moved the 8 inch drive companies that did not invest in the 5.25 inch technology out of the market as the latter could not compete on price. Similarly, digital cameras, when introduced in 1997 performed extremely poorly as compared to traditional film cameras. Consequently, many traditional film companies such as Kodak ignored this market only to be bankrupted by the rise of digital cameras a decade later.Leaders and strategists should be cautious while rejecting a technology that does not seem to be as high performing and hence not as profitable as their dominant technologies. A technology that initially provides low performance can drastically improve over time and often exceed the performance of the dominant technology at a much lower price-point, a scenario that could potentially bankrupt the incumbents who ignored the technology at their peril.The passage provides information in support of which of the following assertions?

Top Courses for GMAT

A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firm’s managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firm’s value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the market’s perception of a firm’s risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as management’s ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firm’s expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the market’s perception of the firm’s risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firm’s underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firm’s risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms’ costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.b)The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.c)Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.d)As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.e)By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firm’s managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firm’s value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the market’s perception of a firm’s risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as management’s ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firm’s expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the market’s perception of the firm’s risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firm’s underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firm’s risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms’ costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.b)The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.c)Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.d)As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.e)By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firm’s managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firm’s value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the market’s perception of a firm’s risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as management’s ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firm’s expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the market’s perception of the firm’s risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firm’s underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firm’s risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms’ costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.b)The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.c)Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.d)As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.e)By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firm’s managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firm’s value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the market’s perception of a firm’s risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as management’s ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firm’s expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the market’s perception of the firm’s risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firm’s underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firm’s risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms’ costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.b)The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.c)Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.d)As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.e)By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firm’s managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firm’s value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the market’s perception of a firm’s risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as management’s ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firm’s expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the market’s perception of the firm’s risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firm’s underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firm’s risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms’ costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.b)The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.c)Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.d)As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.e)By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firm’s managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firm’s value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the market’s perception of a firm’s risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as management’s ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firm’s expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the market’s perception of the firm’s risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firm’s underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firm’s risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms’ costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.b)The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.c)Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.d)As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.e)By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firm’s managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firm’s value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the market’s perception of a firm’s risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as management’s ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firm’s expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the market’s perception of the firm’s risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firm’s underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firm’s risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms’ costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.b)The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.c)Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.d)As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.e)By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firm’s managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firm’s value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the market’s perception of a firm’s risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as management’s ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firm’s expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the market’s perception of the firm’s risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firm’s underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firm’s risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms’ costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.b)The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.c)Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.d)As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.e)By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firm’s managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firm’s value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the market’s perception of a firm’s risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as management’s ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firm’s expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the market’s perception of the firm’s risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firm’s underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firm’s risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms’ costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.b)The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.c)Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.d)As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.e)By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A firm’s default risk, the measurement of the chances of the event in which the company will be unable to make the required payments on its debt obligations, reflects not only the likelihood that the firm will have bad luck but also the risk that the firm’s managerial decisions will lead the firm to default. Such management risk occurs because the impact of management on the firm’s value is uncertain, and this uncertainty affects the market’s perception of a firm’s risk. Uncertainty about management is likely to be the highest when there is a new management team and should decrease over time as management’s ability becomes known more precisely. In particular, when the new CEO is not considered an “heir apparent” prior to getting the position, or when he comes from outside of the company, or when the new CEO is younger, the market is expected to perceive relatively high uncertainty about the CEO’s ability or future actions. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that the CDS spread, a measure of a firm’s expected default risk, is about 35 basis points higher when a new CEO takes office than three years into his tenure. The CEO, however, is not the only member of the management team who is relevant for decision making in the firm. Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have a large role in financial decision-making, so uncertainty about new CFOs could also affect the firm’s default risk and cost of borrowing.Now, a central feature of financial markets is that the interest rate a firm pays on debt increases with an increase in the market’s perception of the firm’s risk. This risk occurs because of factors that affect the value of the firm’s underlying assets and because of uncertainty about how these assets will be managed. The literature on debt pricing typically does not distinguish between these types of underlying risks. However, all risks, including those generated by uncertainty about management, affect the likelihood of default. Consequently, a rational market should incorporate managerial-generated uncertainty into its assessment of a firm’s risk when pricing its securities. Also since uncertainty about management affects firms’ costs of borrowing and consequently their financial policies, the value of maintaining transparency in managerial policies and communicating them to the marketplace should be realised.Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?a)Even though uncertainty about a new CEO’s ability has more impact on a firm’s default risk, uncertainty about a new CFO could affect the rate at which the firm is lent money and its default risk.b)The uncertainty about a new CEO is likely to be comparably lower when an expected candidate takes over the position vis-à-vis an unexpected one.c)Because the literature on debt pricing normally does not differentiate between the types of risks, sometimes the default risk is not calculated thoroughly.d)As the tenure of a new CEO progresses, the uncertainty regarding his ability decreases considerably.e)By maintaining transparency in managerial policies, a firm can successfully negotiate its terms in the market.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev