GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The concept of difference feminism, proposed ... Start Learning for Free
The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal.  What’s most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.
But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligan’s views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings’ Caring, Sara Ruddick’s Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarule’s Women’s way of Knowing. In fact Women’s way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.
The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Women’s way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.
Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?
  • a)
    Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.
  • b)
    The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.
  • c)
    The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically. 
  • d)
    Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.
  • e)
    The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gil...
Passage Analysis
Summary and Main Point
 
 
Pre-Thinking
This is a Detail question. Your job in this question is to find out one statement that directly flows from the given passage. In order to select the correct answer, make sure to refer to the passage and do not rely solely on your memory.
Answer Choices
A
Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.
Incorrect: Out of Scope
Although the author does mention that what most infuriates the critics of Gilligan is her view that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity, there is no such comparison given for critics' take on the views expressed in the two books.
B
The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.
Incorrect: Out of Scope
In the final paragraph, the author does agree with the critics that the findings were not contamination-free but nowhere does he/she make the allegation that it was a deliberate effort to do so.
C
The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically. 
Correct
This information is explicitly stated in the final sentence of the passage: ... the whole point of critical thinking...is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.
D
Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.
Incorrect: Inconsistent
The author definitely agrees that the findings of Women’s way of Knowing are contaminated but doesn’t hold the same opinion about In a Different Voice. What the author says in the final paragraph is that even if we don’t take the authenticity of the findings in to account, the conclusions drawn by the authors are not justified.
E
The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.
Incorrect: Out of Scope
The only information we get to know about these women is that they knew the topic of the study prior to be interviewed. Nowhere does the author mention that they were aware of how their views were going to be perceived.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gil...
Understanding the Correct Answer: Option C
The passage critiques Carol Gilligan's concept of difference feminism and the conclusions drawn in related works, particularly in “In a Different Voice” and “Women’s Way of Knowing.” Among the options presented, option C is the most relevant and accurately reflects a key point made in the passage.
Critical Thinking as Fundamental
- The passage emphasizes the importance of critical thinking in education, suggesting that it involves:
- Evaluation of Information: Knowing what to accept or reject based on assessment.
- Judgment Formation: Arriving at conclusions through careful consideration.
Rejection of Generalizations
- The author challenges the notion that women inherently prefer collaboration over disagreement:
- If this were true, there would be a notable demand from women to reform educational practices.
- The argument indicates that education's core purpose is to cultivate critical thinking, which necessitates judgment.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
- Option A: While critics may be enraged, the passage does not explicitly state this comparison to women’s morality.
- Option B: The passage mentions that the findings were challenged but does not assert that they were deliberately contaminated.
- Option D: The passage does discuss concerns about contamination in studies but does not claim both works are based on contaminated studies.
- Option E: There is no mention of the interviewees’ awareness of how their opinions could be perceived as regressive.
In conclusion, option C best encapsulates the essence of critical thinking that the author believes is necessary for a robust educational framework, making it the correct choice.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. Whats most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligans views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings Caring, Sara Ruddicks Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarules Womens way of Knowing. In fact Womens way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Womens way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following is the function of the second paragraph in the passage?

The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. Whats most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligans views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings Caring, Sara Ruddicks Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarules Womens way of Knowing. In fact Womens way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Womens way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following statements can be derived from the passage?

The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. Whats most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligans views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings Caring, Sara Ruddicks Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarules Womens way of Knowing. In fact Womens way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Womens way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.The author is primarily concerned with

PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?

PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the passage?

Top Courses for GMAT

The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. What’s most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligan’s views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings’ Caring, Sara Ruddick’s Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarule’s Women’s way of Knowing. In fact Women’s way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Women’s way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?a)Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.b)The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.c)The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically.d)Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.e)The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. What’s most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligan’s views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings’ Caring, Sara Ruddick’s Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarule’s Women’s way of Knowing. In fact Women’s way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Women’s way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?a)Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.b)The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.c)The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically.d)Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.e)The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. What’s most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligan’s views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings’ Caring, Sara Ruddick’s Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarule’s Women’s way of Knowing. In fact Women’s way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Women’s way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?a)Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.b)The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.c)The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically.d)Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.e)The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. What’s most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligan’s views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings’ Caring, Sara Ruddick’s Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarule’s Women’s way of Knowing. In fact Women’s way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Women’s way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?a)Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.b)The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.c)The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically.d)Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.e)The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. What’s most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligan’s views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings’ Caring, Sara Ruddick’s Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarule’s Women’s way of Knowing. In fact Women’s way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Women’s way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?a)Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.b)The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.c)The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically.d)Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.e)The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. What’s most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligan’s views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings’ Caring, Sara Ruddick’s Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarule’s Women’s way of Knowing. In fact Women’s way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Women’s way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?a)Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.b)The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.c)The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically.d)Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.e)The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. What’s most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligan’s views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings’ Caring, Sara Ruddick’s Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarule’s Women’s way of Knowing. In fact Women’s way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Women’s way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?a)Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.b)The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.c)The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically.d)Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.e)The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. What’s most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligan’s views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings’ Caring, Sara Ruddick’s Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarule’s Women’s way of Knowing. In fact Women’s way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Women’s way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?a)Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.b)The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.c)The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically.d)Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.e)The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. What’s most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligan’s views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings’ Caring, Sara Ruddick’s Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarule’s Women’s way of Knowing. In fact Women’s way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Women’s way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?a)Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.b)The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.c)The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically.d)Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.e)The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The concept of difference feminism, proposed by psychologist Carol Gilligan and criticized by many, holds that men and women have genuine differences that need not all be considered equal. What’s most enraging, aptly so, to the critics of Gilligan is the idea proposed by her in her book In a Different Voice that women have their own special version of morality rooted in relationships and caring rather than the supposedly abstract notions of justice and equity.But however regressive her ideas were, Gilligan’s views garnered popularity and admiration in the writings of many others; lesser known imitations of her book include Nell Noddings’ Caring, Sara Ruddick’s Maternal Thinking, and Belenky, Clunchy, Golberger and Tarule’s Women’s way of Knowing. In fact Women’s way of Knowing, a book based on the responses gathered from 135 women interviewees, goes so far as to claim that women are not comfortable with argumentation and disagreement and that they have a distinct approach to knowledge, one that underlines collaboration, consensus, and mutual understanding.The findings of the book have rightly been challenged by critics who point out that the responses elicited from the interviewees were not fully uncontaminated as these women were told the topic of the study in advance. However, irrespective of the authenticity of the findings of studies that confirm the ideas propagated in books such as In a Different Voice and Women’s way of Knowing, the conclusions drawn by the authors of these books are unwarranted. If the idea that women prefer to avoid disagreement and to promote understanding and acceptance over judgment and assessment had been true, there would have been clear and loud demands from women to change the basic nature of education provided to them as clearly the whole point of critical thinking, which forms an integral part of the education system, is to know what to accept and what to reject by assessment and judgment.Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?a)Many people who criticize Gilligan's concept of difference feminism are more enraged by her take on women's idea of morality than by any idea in Women's Way of Knowing.b)The findings of Women's Way of Knowing were deliberately contaminated by the writers of the book.c)The process of evaluating and forming an opinion forms the basis for thinking critically.d)Both In a Different Voice and Women's way of Knowing are based on studies that are somewhat contaminated.e)The 135 women interviewees who contributed to Women's Way of Knowing were aware of how their opinions could be construed as regressive.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev