All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Passage
In the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.
The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.
However, the author doesn't shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.
The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.
Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?
  • a)
    Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.
  • b)
    Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.
  • c)
    The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.
  • d)
    Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.
  • e)
    Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé tit...
To infer the author's viewpoint, we need to examine the passage for clues. The passage discusses both the positive aspects of tech collaborations, such as fostering innovation, and the negative aspects, including the potential exploitation of startups. Option B, stating that collaborations lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem, aligns with the positive aspects discussed in the passage.
Option A reflects a negative viewpoint, and the passage suggests that acquisitions for the sole purpose of eliminating competition are detrimental. Option C is not supported by the passage, which advocates for antitrust measures to prevent concentration of power. Option D contradicts the passage's call for modern antitrust measures. Option E aligns with the passage's discussion on the negative impact of exploitative tactics.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé tit...


Understanding the Author's Stance on Tech Collaborations:

In the passage, the author, Jane Anderson, discusses the relationships between tech giants and startups in the context of the tech ecosystem. From the details provided, it can be inferred that Anderson would most likely agree with the statement that collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.

Reasoning behind the Inference:

- Symbiotic Nature of Relationships: The author highlights the symbiotic nature of these collaborations, emphasizing how tech giants often invest in or acquire startups to stay innovative. This suggests that such collaborations can bring fresh ideas and perspectives into the tech industry, leading to a more diverse ecosystem.

- Fueling Technological Advancements: Anderson mentions that these collaborations fuel technological advancements, indicating that they contribute to the growth and diversity of technology within the industry.

- Need for Antitrust Measures: The author also argues for modern antitrust measures to prevent the concentration of power within the tech sector. This implies that promoting diversity and preventing monopolistic practices are essential for a healthy tech ecosystem.

Conclusion:

Given the author's emphasis on the benefits of collaborations for innovation and the call for antitrust measures to maintain a level playing field, it can be inferred that Jane Anderson would agree with the statement that collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.Which of the following would be the most appropriate title for the passage?

PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.The passage supplies information for answering which of the following questions?

Direction:Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.In the world of modern technology, the race to develop quantum computers has become the new gold rush. While classical computers have driven the digital age, quantum computers hold the promise of solving problems beyond the reach of classical systems. This race, however, is not just about technological superiority; its a strategic chess game involving national pride and potential economic supremacy.The United States and China have emerged as the front-runners in this race. The U.S., with its long history of technological innovation, has poured billions into research and development. Silicon Valley giants like Google and IBM are in a fierce competition to build the first fully functional quantum computer. On the other hand, Chinas ambitious national strategy has led to significant advancements, including the launch of the worlds first quantum satellite.At the heart of this competition lies the principle of quantum supremacy - the point at which a quantum computer can perform a calculation that is impossible for a classical computer. Achieving this would not only be a scientific breakthrough but also have profound implications for cybersecurity, as quantum computers can potentially break many of the encryption methods currently in use.Despite the excitement, there are skeptics who question the practicality of quantum computing. They argue that these computers are incredibly sensitive to environmental factors and require extreme conditions to function, such as near-absolute zero temperatures. Moreover, the technology is still in its infancy, and real-world applications are years, if not decades, away.As the race continues, one thing is certain: the arrival of quantum computing will mark a new era in the technological landscape, reshaping industries and possibly redefining global power dynamics.Q. Which of the following titles best encapsulates the main idea of the passage?

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.Caffeine, the stimulant in coffee, has been called“the most widely used psychoactive substance on Earth .”Synder, Daly and Bruns have recently proposed thatcaffeine affects behavior by countering the activity in(5) the human brain of a naturally occurring chemical calledadenosine. Adenosine normally depresses neuron firingin many areas of the brain. It apparently does this byinhibiting the release of neurotransmitters, chemicalsthat carry nerve impulses from one neuron to the next.(10) Like many other agents that affect neuron firing,adenosine must first bind to specific receptors onneuronal membranes. There are at least two classesof these receptors, which have been designated A1 andA2. Snyder et al propose that caffeine, which is struc-(15) turally similar to adenosine, is able to bind to both typesof receptors, which prevents adenosine from attachingthere and allows the neurons to fire more readily thanthey otherwise would.For many years, caffeine’s effects have been attri-(20) buted to its inhibition of the production of phosphodi-esterase, an enzyme that breaks down the chemicalcalled cyclic AMP.A number of neurotransmitters exerttheir effects by first increasing cyclic AMP concentra-tions in target neurons. Therefore, prolonged periods at(25) the elevated concentrations, as might be brought aboutby a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, could lead to a greateramount of neuron firing and, consequently, to behav-ioral stimulation. But Snyder et al point out that thecaffeine concentrations needed to inhibit the production(30) of phosphodiesterase in the brain are much higher thanthose that produce stimulation. Moreover, other com-pounds that block phosphodiesterase’s activity are notstimulants.To buttress their case that caffeine acts instead by pre-(35) venting adenosine binding, Snyder et al compared thestimulatory effects of a series of caffeine derivatives withtheir ability to dislodge adenosine from its receptors inthe brains of mice. “In general,” they reported, “theability of the compounds to compete at the receptors(40) correlates with their ability to stimulate locomotion inthe mouse; i.e., the higher their capacity to bind at thereceptors, the higher their ability to stimulate locomo-tion.” Theophylline, a close structural relative of caffeineand the major stimulant in tea, was one of the most(45) effective compounds in both regards.There were some apparent exceptions to the generalcorrelation observed between adenosine-receptor bindingand stimulation. One of these was a compound called3-isobuty1-1-methylxanthine(IBMX), which bound very(50) well but actually depressed mouse locomotion. Snyderet al suggest that this is not a major stumbling block totheir hypothesis. The problem is that the compound hasmixed effects in the brain, a not unusual occurrence withpsychoactive drugs. Even caffeine, which is generally(55) known only for its stimulatory effects, displays thisproperty, depressing mouse locomotion at very low concentrations and stimulating it at higher ones.Q.Snyder et al suggest that caffeine’s ability to bind to A1 and A2 receptors can be at least partially attributed to which of the following?(

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup