GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a... Start Learning for Free
Passage
In the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.
The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.
However, the author doesn't shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.
The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.
Q. It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?
  • a)
    Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.
  • b)
    Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.
  • c)
    The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.
  • d)
    Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.
  • e)
    Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé tit...
To infer the author's viewpoint, we need to examine the passage for clues. The passage discusses both the positive aspects of tech collaborations, such as fostering innovation, and the negative aspects, including the potential exploitation of startups. Option B, stating that collaborations lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem, aligns with the positive aspects discussed in the passage.
Option A reflects a negative viewpoint, and the passage suggests that acquisitions for the sole purpose of eliminating competition are detrimental. Option C is not supported by the passage, which advocates for antitrust measures to prevent concentration of power. Option D contradicts the passage's call for modern antitrust measures. Option E aligns with the passage's discussion on the negative impact of exploitative tactics.
Free Test
Community Answer
PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé tit...


Understanding the Author's Stance on Tech Collaborations:

In the passage, the author, Jane Anderson, discusses the relationships between tech giants and startups in the context of the tech ecosystem. From the details provided, it can be inferred that Anderson would most likely agree with the statement that collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.

Reasoning behind the Inference:

- Symbiotic Nature of Relationships: The author highlights the symbiotic nature of these collaborations, emphasizing how tech giants often invest in or acquire startups to stay innovative. This suggests that such collaborations can bring fresh ideas and perspectives into the tech industry, leading to a more diverse ecosystem.

- Fueling Technological Advancements: Anderson mentions that these collaborations fuel technological advancements, indicating that they contribute to the growth and diversity of technology within the industry.

- Need for Antitrust Measures: The author also argues for modern antitrust measures to prevent the concentration of power within the tech sector. This implies that promoting diversity and preventing monopolistic practices are essential for a healthy tech ecosystem.

Conclusion:

Given the author's emphasis on the benefits of collaborations for innovation and the call for antitrust measures to maintain a level playing field, it can be inferred that Jane Anderson would agree with the statement that collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PassageIn the bustling world of technology, a recent exposé titled "Tech Titans and their Ties" has shed light on the intricate relationships between major Silicon Valley players and the startup ecosystem. The author, Jane Anderson, delves into the alliances, partnerships, and financial dealings that shape the landscape of innovation and entrepreneurship.The exposé begins by highlighting the symbiotic nature of these relationships, emphasizing how established tech giants often invest in or acquire promising startups to stay at the forefront of innovation. Anderson contends that this synergy not only fuels technological advancements but also strategically positions the larger companies as key players in emerging markets.However, the author doesnt shy away from the darker side of these collaborations. Anderson points out that some tech titans exploit their financial muscle to stifle competition, acquiring startups merely to eliminate potential rivals rather than fostering genuine innovation. The cutthroat tactics employed by these industry behemoths, she argues, can stifle creativity and limit the diversity of ideas in the tech ecosystem.The exposé then takes a historical turn, drawing parallels between the current state of the tech industry and the corporate landscape of the early 20th century. Anderson suggests that just as monopolies were scrutinized and regulated in the past, there is a growing need for modern antitrust measures to curb the concentration of power within the tech sector. She argues that such regulations are essential to ensure a level playing field for startups and prevent the formation of digital monopolies that could stifle healthy competition.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that the author, Jane Anderson, would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding tech collaborations?a)Tech giants should acquire startups to eliminate potential competition.b)Collaborations between tech giants and startups lead to a more diverse tech ecosystem.c)The concentration of power in the tech sector is inevitable and beneficial.d)Antitrust measures are unnecessary in the modern tech industry.e)Exploitative tactics in tech collaborations hinder genuine innovation.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev