GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Editor: The Economic Council’s declarat... Start Learning for Free
Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are effectively insignificant because there is no evidence that such cuts lead to lower economic growth is irresponsible and self-serving. A recent study has shown that budget cuts lead to a reduction in a country’s income over a long term period.  Since these cuts are usually enforced following an increase in national debt, which in turn has an impact on a country’s income, budget cuts clearly curtail a country’s long-term economic growth.
In the editor’s argument, the statements in boldface play which of the following roles?
  • a)
    The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.
  • b)
    The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.
  • c)
    The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.
  • d)
    The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.
  • e)
    The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are ...
Argument Analysis
Pre-Thinking
The question requires us to identify the role played by the two bold face portions in the argument. To do so, we would examine the argument structure and the relationship of the bolded portions with respect to the main conclusion of the argument.
BF1 – As identified in the passage analysis, BF 1 is the main conclusion of the argument.
BF2 – It is an opinion that supports the main conclusion. This opinion is based on the statement preceding it, so it acts as an intermediate conclusion as well.
With this understanding in mind, let’s take a look at the option statements.
Answer Choices
A
The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.
Incorrect – Both parts wrong
BF1 isn’t the intermediate conclusion; it’s the main conclusion.
Here “that position” refers to the one mentioned in the description of BF1. BF2 isn’t the position taken by the argument (main conclusion); it’s an intermediate conclusion.
B
The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.
Incorrect – 2nd part wrong
BF1 is the main conclusion.
BF2 isn’t a reason to support the intermediate conclusion; it is the intermediate conclusion.
C
The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.
Incorrect  Both parts wrong
BF1 doesn’t support the main conclusion; it is the main conclusion. BF2 does support the main conclusion but it isn’t evidence, it’s an opinion.
D
The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.
Correct
This choice is written along the lines of our pre-thinking. BF1 is the main conclusion, which can also be called the position taken by the argument. BF2 is indeed an intermediate conclusion and it supports the main conclusion.
E
The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.
Incorrect – Both parts wrong
BF1 doesn’t provide evidence, it is the main conclusion. BF2 is the intermediate conclusion and not the main conclusion.
 
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are ...
Argument Analysis
Pre-Thinking
The question requires us to identify the role played by the two bold face portions in the argument. To do so, we would examine the argument structure and the relationship of the bolded portions with respect to the main conclusion of the argument.
BF1 – As identified in the passage analysis, BF 1 is the main conclusion of the argument.
BF2 – It is an opinion that supports the main conclusion. This opinion is based on the statement preceding it, so it acts as an intermediate conclusion as well.
With this understanding in mind, let’s take a look at the option statements.
Answer Choices
A
The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.
Incorrect – Both parts wrong
BF1 isn’t the intermediate conclusion; it’s the main conclusion.
Here “that position” refers to the one mentioned in the description of BF1. BF2 isn’t the position taken by the argument (main conclusion); it’s an intermediate conclusion.
B
The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.
Incorrect – 2nd part wrong
BF1 is the main conclusion.
BF2 isn’t a reason to support the intermediate conclusion; it is the intermediate conclusion.
C
The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.
Incorrect  Both parts wrong
BF1 doesn’t support the main conclusion; it is the main conclusion. BF2 does support the main conclusion but it isn’t evidence, it’s an opinion.
D
The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.
Correct
This choice is written along the lines of our pre-thinking. BF1 is the main conclusion, which can also be called the position taken by the argument. BF2 is indeed an intermediate conclusion and it supports the main conclusion.
E
The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.
Incorrect – Both parts wrong
BF1 doesn’t provide evidence, it is the main conclusion. BF2 is the intermediate conclusion and not the main conclusion.
 
Free Test
Community Answer
Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are ...
Argument Analysis
Pre-Thinking
The question requires us to identify the role played by the two bold face portions in the argument. To do so, we would examine the argument structure and the relationship of the bolded portions with respect to the main conclusion of the argument.
BF1 – As identified in the passage analysis, BF 1 is the main conclusion of the argument.
BF2 – It is an opinion that supports the main conclusion. This opinion is based on the statement preceding it, so it acts as an intermediate conclusion as well.
With this understanding in mind, let’s take a look at the option statements.
Answer Choices
A
The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.
Incorrect – Both parts wrong
BF1 isn’t the intermediate conclusion; it’s the main conclusion.
Here “that position” refers to the one mentioned in the description of BF1. BF2 isn’t the position taken by the argument (main conclusion); it’s an intermediate conclusion.
B
The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.
Incorrect – 2nd part wrong
BF1 is the main conclusion.
BF2 isn’t a reason to support the intermediate conclusion; it is the intermediate conclusion.
C
The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.
Incorrect  Both parts wrong
BF1 doesn’t support the main conclusion; it is the main conclusion. BF2 does support the main conclusion but it isn’t evidence, it’s an opinion.
D
The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.
Correct
This choice is written along the lines of our pre-thinking. BF1 is the main conclusion, which can also be called the position taken by the argument. BF2 is indeed an intermediate conclusion and it supports the main conclusion.
E
The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.
Incorrect – Both parts wrong
BF1 doesn’t provide evidence, it is the main conclusion. BF2 is the intermediate conclusion and not the main conclusion.
 
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Top Courses for GMAT

Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are effectively insignificant because there is no evidence that such cuts lead to lower economic growth is irresponsible and self-serving. A recent study has shown that budget cuts lead to a reduction in a country’s income over a long term period. Since these cuts are usually enforced following an increase in national debt, which in turn has an impact on a country’s income, budget cuts clearly curtail a country’s long-term economic growth.In the editor’s argument, the statements in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.c)The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.d)The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.e)The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are effectively insignificant because there is no evidence that such cuts lead to lower economic growth is irresponsible and self-serving. A recent study has shown that budget cuts lead to a reduction in a country’s income over a long term period. Since these cuts are usually enforced following an increase in national debt, which in turn has an impact on a country’s income, budget cuts clearly curtail a country’s long-term economic growth.In the editor’s argument, the statements in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.c)The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.d)The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.e)The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are effectively insignificant because there is no evidence that such cuts lead to lower economic growth is irresponsible and self-serving. A recent study has shown that budget cuts lead to a reduction in a country’s income over a long term period. Since these cuts are usually enforced following an increase in national debt, which in turn has an impact on a country’s income, budget cuts clearly curtail a country’s long-term economic growth.In the editor’s argument, the statements in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.c)The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.d)The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.e)The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are effectively insignificant because there is no evidence that such cuts lead to lower economic growth is irresponsible and self-serving. A recent study has shown that budget cuts lead to a reduction in a country’s income over a long term period. Since these cuts are usually enforced following an increase in national debt, which in turn has an impact on a country’s income, budget cuts clearly curtail a country’s long-term economic growth.In the editor’s argument, the statements in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.c)The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.d)The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.e)The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are effectively insignificant because there is no evidence that such cuts lead to lower economic growth is irresponsible and self-serving. A recent study has shown that budget cuts lead to a reduction in a country’s income over a long term period. Since these cuts are usually enforced following an increase in national debt, which in turn has an impact on a country’s income, budget cuts clearly curtail a country’s long-term economic growth.In the editor’s argument, the statements in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.c)The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.d)The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.e)The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are effectively insignificant because there is no evidence that such cuts lead to lower economic growth is irresponsible and self-serving. A recent study has shown that budget cuts lead to a reduction in a country’s income over a long term period. Since these cuts are usually enforced following an increase in national debt, which in turn has an impact on a country’s income, budget cuts clearly curtail a country’s long-term economic growth.In the editor’s argument, the statements in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.c)The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.d)The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.e)The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are effectively insignificant because there is no evidence that such cuts lead to lower economic growth is irresponsible and self-serving. A recent study has shown that budget cuts lead to a reduction in a country’s income over a long term period. Since these cuts are usually enforced following an increase in national debt, which in turn has an impact on a country’s income, budget cuts clearly curtail a country’s long-term economic growth.In the editor’s argument, the statements in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.c)The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.d)The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.e)The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are effectively insignificant because there is no evidence that such cuts lead to lower economic growth is irresponsible and self-serving. A recent study has shown that budget cuts lead to a reduction in a country’s income over a long term period. Since these cuts are usually enforced following an increase in national debt, which in turn has an impact on a country’s income, budget cuts clearly curtail a country’s long-term economic growth.In the editor’s argument, the statements in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.c)The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.d)The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.e)The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are effectively insignificant because there is no evidence that such cuts lead to lower economic growth is irresponsible and self-serving. A recent study has shown that budget cuts lead to a reduction in a country’s income over a long term period. Since these cuts are usually enforced following an increase in national debt, which in turn has an impact on a country’s income, budget cuts clearly curtail a country’s long-term economic growth.In the editor’s argument, the statements in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.c)The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.d)The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.e)The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Editor: The Economic Council’s declaration that budget cuts are effectively insignificant because there is no evidence that such cuts lead to lower economic growth is irresponsible and self-serving. A recent study has shown that budget cuts lead to a reduction in a country’s income over a long term period. Since these cuts are usually enforced following an increase in national debt, which in turn has an impact on a country’s income, budget cuts clearly curtail a country’s long-term economic growth.In the editor’s argument, the statements in boldface play which of the following roles?a)The first is an intermediate conclusion that supports the position taken by the argument; the second is that position.b)The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides a reason to support an intermediate conclusion drawn in the argument.c)The first and the second both provide evidence in support of the position taken by the argument.d)The first is the position taken by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that supports that position.e)The first provides evidence supporting a conclusion stated in the argument; the second is the author’s main conclusion.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev