GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Earlier, any trade relation between the ancie... Start Learning for Free
Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.
Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?
  • a)
    Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.
  • b)
    Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.
  • c)
    It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.
  • d)
    At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.
  • e)
    No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor a...
Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.
Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?
Argument Analysis
 
 
Pre-Thinking
Conclusion Clarification
The question stem says “Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?”. To understand their conclusion, let’s review the last statement – “However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise”. Here, “otherwise” has been used to indicate an opinion that is opposite to the belief that no trade relation existed between Sphyglor and Gorphyl. Therefore, the archaeologists’ conclusion is that trade relation existed between Sphyglor and Gorphyl. Our objective is to weaken this conclusion.
Pre-Thinking Approach
Let’s see how we can make the conclusion less believable.  To do so, we will look at the logical structure, focusing on the linkage 1 and the conclusion. 
Linkage#1
Treating the discovery of a large number of Sphyglorian coins in Gorphyl as evidence, the archaeologists have concluded that trade relations existed between the two kingdoms.
This conclusion can be weakened if we can make the logic less believable. The same can be done by:
  • Weakener: showing the possibility that an alternate cause may have been responsible for the existence of large number of Sphyglorian coins in Gorphyl
    • Instance: The coins were gifted by Sphyglorian ruler to Gorphyl after a huge inter-kingdom annual celebration at Gorphyl.
With this understanding lets evaluate the option statements.
Answer Choices
A
Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.
Incorrect - Irrelevant
The passage already tells us that the coins were Sphylgorian. Therefore, the information provided in this choice is not relevant.
B
Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.
Incorrect - Irrelevant
This statement talks about trade within the kingdom of Gorphyl and has nothing to do with explaining the presence of coins from another kingdom in Gorphyl.
C
It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.
Incorrect - Irrelevant
Sharing of trade secrets is not relevant here as long as trade existed between the two kingdoms.
D
At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.
Correct
This options talks about the possibility of exchange of a large amount of currency between the two kingdoms during marriages. It provides an alternate cause that could explain the presence of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl even if trade was absent.
E
No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.
Incorrect - Irrelevant
The argument is concerned not with the existence of amiable relations between the two kingdoms but with the existence of trade relation between them.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?a)Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.b)Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.c)It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.d)At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.e)No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?a)Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.b)Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.c)It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.d)At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.e)No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?a)Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.b)Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.c)It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.d)At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.e)No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?a)Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.b)Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.c)It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.d)At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.e)No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?a)Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.b)Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.c)It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.d)At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.e)No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?a)Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.b)Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.c)It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.d)At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.e)No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?a)Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.b)Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.c)It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.d)At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.e)No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?a)Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.b)Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.c)It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.d)At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.e)No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?a)Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.b)Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.c)It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.d)At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.e)No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Earlier, any trade relation between the ancient kingdoms of Sphylgor and Gorphyl was ruled out because of the inhospitable desert between them. The desert would have made it impossible for them to regularly travel such long distances at a time when the Syphlgorians were not aware of the use of the wheel. However, the discovery of large numbers of Sphylgorian coins in Gorphyl has prompted archeologists to conclude otherwise.Which of the following, if true, weakens the archaeologists’ conclusion?a)Sphylgorian and Gorphylians coins were so similar in appearance that it would take an expert archeologist to differentiate between the two.b)Sometimes the local Gorphylians engaged in the barter system and as such exchanged goods among themselves for commercial purposes.c)It has been asserted that the Syphylgorians were part of a very secretive society and would not have easily given out any of their trade secrets.d)At the time of solemnizing marriages, royal families of different kingdoms would exchange local artifacts, garments, currency etc. in remarkable quantities.e)No precedence exists in history where there were amiable relations between two kingdoms that did not engage in any trade relations.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev