GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Advisor: The city of Benzaria should disconti... Start Learning for Free
Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.
Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.
hich of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?
  • a)
    The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.
  • b)
    The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.
  • c)
    Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.
  • d)
    Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.
  • e)
    Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from ...
Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.
Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.
Which of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?
Argument Analysis
 
Pre-Thinking
Conclusion Clarification
We are given two conclusions in the argument. The question stem asks us to find the assumption in the critic’s argument. The critic disagrees with the advisor’s conclusion. Therefore, the critic concludes that Benzaria should continue RVR.
Pre-Thinking Approach
To pre-think assumptions, we will falsify the critic’s conclusion or look for scenarios under which it is no longer valid even when the given premises are true. The assumption then will be that such conditions don’t exist.
Please note that the critic’s opinion goes against the advisor’s. Therefore, let’s understand the advisor’s opinion fully.
Linkage #1: Difference in the test scores of Benzaria and Karamal hasn’t reduced
What if TS in both B and K have improved? For example, it is possible that the average test scores in Benzaria were at 50% and those in Karamal at 80%. The difference is that of 30%. However, because of the institution of the RVR, the test scores in Benzaria have risen to 60% and incidentally, in Karamal to 90%.  Now, even though the difference hasn’t come down, the test scores in Benzaria have improved.  So the advisor cannot conclude that benefit from RVR is non-existent.
  • Advisor’s Assumption: Test-scores in both Benzaria and Karamal haven’t improved.
Keeping in mind the above understanding, let’s take a look at the critic’s argument.
Linkage #3: Implementation of RVR in B has led to government of K maintaining better school standards.
From the critic’s argument, we can understand that the critic is attributing the lack of decrease in the difference of the test scores of the two cities to the improved test scores of Karamal. However, what if the better school standards in Karamal due to RVR in Benzaria haven’t positively impacted the test scores? If they haven’t, then the critic can’t draw a link between the two and conclude that there is some benefit from RVR or that RVR should continue.
  • Assumption 1: Better school standards in Karamal have impacted the test scores positively.
With this understanding in mind, let’s take a look at the option statements.
 
Answer Choices
A
The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.
Correct
This choice is written along the lines of our pre-thinking per Linkage #3, Assumption 1.
B
The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.
Incorrect - Not a must be true
This is not a must-be-true statement for the critic’s conclusion to hold. RVR could be beneficial even if better quality instructors haven’t been hired.
C
Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.
Incorrect - Opposite
This option weakens the critic’s conclusion by undermining the importance of test scores.
D
Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.
Incorrect - Irrelevant
We aren’t concerned with whether TS can be improved otherwise or not. We are only looking at whether RVR is beneficial for TS or not.
E
Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.
Incorrect - Irrelevant
This is not relevant as the passage doesn’t provide any link between attendance and TS.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from ...
Explanation of the Critic's Argument
The critic argues that the implementation of the video recording requirement in Benzaria has indirectly benefited Karamal by pushing the government there to improve school standards. This improvement, in turn, is claimed to have led to better test scores in Karamal.

Assumption Underlying the Argument
For the critic's argument to hold, it must be assumed that:

- The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.
This assumption is crucial because it links the enhanced school standards in Karamal directly with improved student performance. If better standards do not correlate with better test scores, then the argument that Benzaria's program has positively influenced Karamal's performance falls apart.

Analysis of Other Options
- The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.
This statement is not essential for the critic's argument; the focus is on Karamal's performance, not Benzaria's hiring practices.
- Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.
While valid, this statement does not support the critic's claim about Karamal's improvements.
- Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.
This is irrelevant as it does not directly relate to the performance of Karamal.
- Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn't decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.
This point does not address the core of the critic's argument regarding Karamal's improved test scores.
In summary, the argument hinges on the assumption that improved school standards in Karamal directly lead to better test scores, making option 'A' the correct answer.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Direction:Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.In the world of modern technology, the race to develop quantum computers has become the new gold rush. While classical computers have driven the digital age, quantum computers hold the promise of solving problems beyond the reach of classical systems. This race, however, is not just about technological superiority; its a strategic chess game involving national pride and potential economic supremacy.The United States and China have emerged as the front-runners in this race. The U.S., with its long history of technological innovation, has poured billions into research and development. Silicon Valley giants like Google and IBM are in a fierce competition to build the first fully functional quantum computer. On the other hand, Chinas ambitious national strategy has led to significant advancements, including the launch of the worlds first quantum satellite.At the heart of this competition lies the principle of quantum supremacy - the point at which a quantum computer can perform a calculation that is impossible for a classical computer. Achieving this would not only be a scientific breakthrough but also have profound implications for cybersecurity, as quantum computers can potentially break many of the encryption methods currently in use.Despite the excitement, there are skeptics who question the practicality of quantum computing. They argue that these computers are incredibly sensitive to environmental factors and require extreme conditions to function, such as near-absolute zero temperatures. Moreover, the technology is still in its infancy, and real-world applications are years, if not decades, away.As the race continues, one thing is certain: the arrival of quantum computing will mark a new era in the technological landscape, reshaping industries and possibly redefining global power dynamics.Q.The passage provides support for which of the following statements?

PassageIn the fast-evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, recent debates have surfaced regarding the ethical implications of deploying advanced AI systems in critical domains such as healthcare and finance. The author, Sarah Thompson, explores the intersection of AI and ethics, highlighting the potential pitfalls and the urgent need for responsible development and deployment.Thompson begins by addressing the increasing integration of AI in decision-making processes, emphasizing the risk of bias and discrimination inherent in algorithms trained on biased datasets. She points to instances where AI systems have perpetuated existing societal inequalities, raising concerns about the ethical implications of such unintentional consequences.Moving beyond biases, Thompson delves into the issue of transparency in AI systems. She argues that the opacity of many advanced AI algorithms poses a significant ethical challenge, as users, and even developers, struggle to understand the decision-making processes of these complex systems. The lack of transparency, she contends, hinders accountability and exacerbates ethical concerns surrounding AI applications.The exposé then shifts to the ethical considerations in AI-driven automation, particularly in industries where jobs are at risk of displacement. Thompson asserts that responsible AI development should prioritize the well-being of workers and ensure that the benefits of automation are equitably distributed. The ethical framework, she argues, should extend beyond mere technological advancements to encompass the broader societal impact of AI implementation.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that Sarah Thompson would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding AI development?

PassageIn the fast-evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, recent debates have surfaced regarding the ethical implications of deploying advanced AI systems in critical domains such as healthcare and finance. The author, Sarah Thompson, explores the intersection of AI and ethics, highlighting the potential pitfalls and the urgent need for responsible development and deployment.Thompson begins by addressing the increasing integration of AI in decision-making processes, emphasizing the risk of bias and discrimination inherent in algorithms trained on biased datasets. She points to instances where AI systems have perpetuated existing societal inequalities, raising concerns about the ethical implications of such unintentional consequences.Moving beyond biases, Thompson delves into the issue of transparency in AI systems. She argues that the opacity of many advanced AI algorithms poses a significant ethical challenge, as users, and even developers, struggle to understand the decision-making processes of these complex systems. The lack of transparency, she contends, hinders accountability and exacerbates ethical concerns surrounding AI applications.The exposé then shifts to the ethical considerations in AI-driven automation, particularly in industries where jobs are at risk of displacement. Thompson asserts that responsible AI development should prioritize the well-being of workers and ensure that the benefits of automation are equitably distributed. The ethical framework, she argues, should extend beyond mere technological advancements to encompass the broader societal impact of AI implementation.Q.The passage supplies information for answering which of the following questions?

Top Courses for GMAT

Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.hich of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?a)The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.b)The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.c)Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.d)Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.e)Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.hich of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?a)The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.b)The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.c)Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.d)Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.e)Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.hich of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?a)The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.b)The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.c)Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.d)Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.e)Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.hich of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?a)The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.b)The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.c)Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.d)Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.e)Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.hich of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?a)The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.b)The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.c)Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.d)Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.e)Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.hich of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?a)The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.b)The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.c)Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.d)Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.e)Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.hich of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?a)The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.b)The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.c)Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.d)Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.e)Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.hich of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?a)The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.b)The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.c)Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.d)Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.e)Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.hich of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?a)The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.b)The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.c)Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.d)Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.e)Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Advisor: The city of Benzaria should discontinue the requirement from all schools to provide video recordings of classroom sessions to the students. The cost implications to maintain such a facility are quite significant for the schools, and the benefit is non-existent as can be seen from the fact that since the implementation of the plan, the difference in the test scores of students in Benzaria and those of students in Karamal has not come down even though Karamal has not implemented this program.Critic: I disagree as the test scores in Karamal have improved. The implementation of the program in Benzaria has forced the government in Karamal to maintain better school standards in order to compete with Benzaria for federal government funds, the allocation of which is determined by average student test scores in the city.hich of the following statements is an assumption underlying the critic’s argument?a)The better school standards in the city of Karamal have led to better test scores for its students.b)The requirement of recording classroom sessions has led schools in Benzaria to hire better quality instructors.c)Test scores are not the only way to compare student performance across different schools.d)Student test scores in Benzaria cannot be increased significantly without the requirement on the schools to record classroom sessions.e)Student attendance in the classrooms in Benzaria hasn’t decreased after the introduction of the requirement to record classroom sessions.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev