CA Foundation Exam > CA Foundation Questions > Which of the following statement is true?a)A ...
Start Learning for Free
Which of the following statement is true?
- a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.
- b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.
- c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.
- d)Silence always amounts to fraud.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide ...
Ignorance of law is no excuse is a legal principle that means a person cannot avoid legal consequences simply because they claim to be unaware of the law. This principle applies to all individuals, regardless of whether they are citizens or non-citizens of a particular country.
Explanation:
Ignorance of law is no excuse is a fundamental legal principle that is recognized in many legal systems around the world. It essentially means that a person cannot claim that they are not aware of the law as a defense against a criminal charge or civil lawsuit. This principle is based on the idea that everyone is expected to know and follow the law, and that ignorance of the law is not a legitimate excuse for violating it.
There are several reasons why ignorance of the law is no excuse:
1. The law is publicly available: In most countries, the law is published and made available to the public. This means that anyone can access the law and become familiar with it.
2. The law is complex: While the law is publicly available, it can be complex and difficult to understand. However, this does not absolve individuals from the responsibility of knowing and following the law.
3. It encourages compliance with the law: If individuals were allowed to use ignorance of the law as an excuse, it would create a situation where people could simply claim they were unaware of a law in order to avoid legal consequences.
In conclusion, ignorance of law is no excuse is an important legal principle that helps to ensure that individuals are held accountable for their actions. It is essential that individuals take the time to become familiar with the laws that govern their actions, and to seek legal advice when necessary to avoid legal consequences.
Explanation:
Ignorance of law is no excuse is a fundamental legal principle that is recognized in many legal systems around the world. It essentially means that a person cannot claim that they are not aware of the law as a defense against a criminal charge or civil lawsuit. This principle is based on the idea that everyone is expected to know and follow the law, and that ignorance of the law is not a legitimate excuse for violating it.
There are several reasons why ignorance of the law is no excuse:
1. The law is publicly available: In most countries, the law is published and made available to the public. This means that anyone can access the law and become familiar with it.
2. The law is complex: While the law is publicly available, it can be complex and difficult to understand. However, this does not absolve individuals from the responsibility of knowing and following the law.
3. It encourages compliance with the law: If individuals were allowed to use ignorance of the law as an excuse, it would create a situation where people could simply claim they were unaware of a law in order to avoid legal consequences.
In conclusion, ignorance of law is no excuse is an important legal principle that helps to ensure that individuals are held accountable for their actions. It is essential that individuals take the time to become familiar with the laws that govern their actions, and to seek legal advice when necessary to avoid legal consequences.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide ...
Option C, because ignorance of law in India is not exusable as mistake done in own country but mistake of foreign law can be treated as mistake of fact and it can be exusable .
Attention CA Foundation Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CA Foundation study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CA Foundation.
|
Explore Courses for CA Foundation exam
|
|
Similar CA Foundation Doubts
Top Courses for CA FoundationView all
Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2024 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2024 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CA Foundation.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CA Foundation Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CA Foundation tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CA Foundation exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup