CA Foundation Exam > CA Foundation Questions > Which of the following statement is true?a)A ...
Start Learning for Free
Which of the following statement is true?
- a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.
- b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.
- c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.
- d)Silence always amounts to fraud.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide ...
The correct statement is option 'C': Ignorance of law is no excuse.
Explanation:
Ignorance of law is a principle in legal systems that states that a person's lack of knowledge or awareness of a law does not excuse them from liability for violating that law. This means that even if a person is unaware of a law or claims to be ignorant of it, they can still be held responsible for any consequences or penalties that result from their actions.
This principle is based on the idea that laws are made known to the public through various means such as publication, education, and legal proceedings. It is expected that individuals should take reasonable steps to familiarize themselves with the laws that are relevant to their activities or conduct. Ignorance of the law is therefore considered to be a failure on the part of the individual to fulfill this responsibility.
There are several reasons why the principle of ignorance of law is no excuse is upheld:
1. Promotes legal certainty: Ignorance of the law would create uncertainty and undermine the effectiveness of the legal system. If individuals could avoid liability simply by claiming ignorance, it would be difficult to enforce laws and maintain order in society.
2. Encourages personal responsibility: Ignorance of the law is seen as a failure to take personal responsibility for one's actions. It is expected that individuals will make an effort to educate themselves about the laws that govern their behavior.
3. Prevents abuse and manipulation: Allowing ignorance as an excuse could open the door for individuals to claim ignorance as a way to avoid punishment or consequences for their actions. This could be exploited and lead to a breakdown of the legal system.
It is worth noting that there are some exceptions to this principle in certain circumstances, such as when a law is extremely obscure or when a person has a reasonable excuse for their ignorance, such as a language barrier or a lack of access to legal resources. However, these exceptions are limited and do not generally apply to the average individual.
In conclusion, the statement "Ignorance of law is no excuse" is true because individuals are expected to be aware of and comply with the laws that apply to them, regardless of their knowledge or understanding of those laws.
Explanation:
Ignorance of law is a principle in legal systems that states that a person's lack of knowledge or awareness of a law does not excuse them from liability for violating that law. This means that even if a person is unaware of a law or claims to be ignorant of it, they can still be held responsible for any consequences or penalties that result from their actions.
This principle is based on the idea that laws are made known to the public through various means such as publication, education, and legal proceedings. It is expected that individuals should take reasonable steps to familiarize themselves with the laws that are relevant to their activities or conduct. Ignorance of the law is therefore considered to be a failure on the part of the individual to fulfill this responsibility.
There are several reasons why the principle of ignorance of law is no excuse is upheld:
1. Promotes legal certainty: Ignorance of the law would create uncertainty and undermine the effectiveness of the legal system. If individuals could avoid liability simply by claiming ignorance, it would be difficult to enforce laws and maintain order in society.
2. Encourages personal responsibility: Ignorance of the law is seen as a failure to take personal responsibility for one's actions. It is expected that individuals will make an effort to educate themselves about the laws that govern their behavior.
3. Prevents abuse and manipulation: Allowing ignorance as an excuse could open the door for individuals to claim ignorance as a way to avoid punishment or consequences for their actions. This could be exploited and lead to a breakdown of the legal system.
It is worth noting that there are some exceptions to this principle in certain circumstances, such as when a law is extremely obscure or when a person has a reasonable excuse for their ignorance, such as a language barrier or a lack of access to legal resources. However, these exceptions are limited and do not generally apply to the average individual.
In conclusion, the statement "Ignorance of law is no excuse" is true because individuals are expected to be aware of and comply with the laws that apply to them, regardless of their knowledge or understanding of those laws.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide ...
C
|
Explore Courses for CA Foundation exam
|
|
Top Courses for CA FoundationView all
Question Description
Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2025 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2025 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CA Foundation.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CA Foundation Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Which of the following statement is true?a)A threat to commit suicide does not amount to coercion.b)Undue influence involves use of physical pressure.c)Ignorance of law is no excuse.d)Silence always amounts to fraud.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CA Foundation tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CA Foundation exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup