Railways Exam > Railways Questions > Direction:A statement is given followe...
Start Learning for Free
Direction: A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.
Statement: There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.
Inference:
I. Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.
II. The members of the commission should be severely punished.
I. Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.
II. The members of the commission should be severely punished.
- a)Only I follows
- b)Only II follows.
- c)Both I and II follow.
- d)Neither I nor II follows.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and...
None of the inferences follow as they are not inferences but courses of actions that should be taken in the situation expressed in the statement.
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and...
Understanding the Statement
The statement presents a scenario where the inhabitants of a certain area are protesting against a report from an inquiry commission regarding a riot. They claim that the report is fabricated and influenced by biases.
Analyzing Inferences
To determine the validity of Inferences I and II, we need to examine their relevance to the statement.
Inference I: Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.
- This inference suggests a solution to the problem of distrust in the initial report.
- However, the statement does not indicate that the inhabitants want another inquiry. Their protest focuses on the validity of the current report rather than suggesting a new investigation.
- Thus, this inference does not logically follow from the statement.
Inference II: The members of the commission should be severely punished.
- This inference implies a punitive action against the commission members based on the allegations of fabrication.
- While there is a protest against the report, the statement does not provide evidence or reasoning that supports punishing the commission members. It merely states the inhabitants' discontent.
- Therefore, this inference also does not logically follow from the statement.
Conclusion
Since neither inference I nor II logically follows from the given statement, the correct answer is:
Option D: Neither I nor II follows.
This conclusion emphasizes the need for a clear connection between the statement and the inferences, which is lacking in both cases.
The statement presents a scenario where the inhabitants of a certain area are protesting against a report from an inquiry commission regarding a riot. They claim that the report is fabricated and influenced by biases.
Analyzing Inferences
To determine the validity of Inferences I and II, we need to examine their relevance to the statement.
Inference I: Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.
- This inference suggests a solution to the problem of distrust in the initial report.
- However, the statement does not indicate that the inhabitants want another inquiry. Their protest focuses on the validity of the current report rather than suggesting a new investigation.
- Thus, this inference does not logically follow from the statement.
Inference II: The members of the commission should be severely punished.
- This inference implies a punitive action against the commission members based on the allegations of fabrication.
- While there is a protest against the report, the statement does not provide evidence or reasoning that supports punishing the commission members. It merely states the inhabitants' discontent.
- Therefore, this inference also does not logically follow from the statement.
Conclusion
Since neither inference I nor II logically follows from the given statement, the correct answer is:
Option D: Neither I nor II follows.
This conclusion emphasizes the need for a clear connection between the statement and the inferences, which is lacking in both cases.
Attention Railways Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Railways study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Railways.
|
Explore Courses for Railways exam
|
|
Similar Railways Doubts
Top Courses for RailwaysView all
Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Railways 2024 is part of Railways preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Railways exam syllabus. Information about Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Railways 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Railways 2024 is part of Railways preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Railways exam syllabus. Information about Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Railways 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Railways.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Railways Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Direction:A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. Youhave to consider thestatement to be true even if it seems to be at variancefrom commonly known facts. Youhave to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.Statement:There is a general protest from the inhabitants of a certain area that the report submitted about a riot in that area by the inquiry commission has been fabricated, based on prejudices.Inference:I.Another inquiry commission should be sent for proper investigations.II.The members of the commission should be severely punished.a)Only I followsb)Only II follows.c)Both I and II follow.d)Neither I nor II follows.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Railways tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for Railways exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup