The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that Nature to be commanded must be obeyed, Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we discover that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of machine of the world to the metaphysics of matter in motion.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, unreasonably effective.Q.If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?a)How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?b)How can computation tell us anything about nature?c)Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?d)Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > The passage given below is followed by a set ...

Join the Discussion on the App

The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.

The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that ‘Nature to be commanded must be obeyed,’ Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.

Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we ‘discover’ that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of ‘machine of the world’ to the metaphysics of 'matter in motion'.

The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, ‘unreasonably effective’.

If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?

a)
How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?
b)
How can computation tell us anything about nature?
c)
Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?
d)
Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the ...

Option 4 is the follow up question that needs to be asked.

Earlier in the passage the author makes an assertion that - “...mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science.”. This is challenged as a result of the advent of computer science. The passage states - “The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways.”.

The interview would eventually continue in the below mentioned vein and therefore, the logical follow up question asked to the author would be - “Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?” The passage states- “The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity.

Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out.”.

Options 1,2 and 3 have been explained in the passage in their entirety and cannot be follow up questions.

Hence, the correct answer is option 4.

This question is part of UPSC exam. View all CAT courses

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that Nature to be commanded must be obeyed, Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we discover that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of machine of the world to the metaphysics of matter in motion.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, unreasonably effective.Q.Which of the following best states the style in which this passage has been written?

View answer

The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that Nature to be commanded must be obeyed, Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we discover that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of machine of the world to the metaphysics of matter in motion.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, unreasonably effective.Q.All of the following statements can be inferred from the passage except

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:Humans are strange. For a global species, we’re not particularly genetically diverse, thanks in part to how our ancient roaming explorations caused “founder effects” and “bottleneck events” that restricted our ancestral gene pool. We also have a truly outsize impact on the planetary environment without much in the way of natural attrition to trim our influence.But the strangest thing of all is how we generate, exploit, and propagate information that is not encoded in our heritable genetic material, yet travels with us through time and space. Not only is much of that information represented in purely symbolic forms—alphabets, languages, binary codes—it is also represented in each brick, alloy, machine, and structure we build from the materials around us. Even the symbolic stuff is instantiated in some material form or the other, whether as ink on pages or electrical charges in nanoscale pieces of silicon. Altogether, this “dataome” has become an integral part of our existence. In fact, it may have always been an integral, and essential, part of our existence since our species of hominins became more and more distinct some 200,000 years ago.For example, let’s consider our planetary impact. Today we can look at our species’ energy use and see that of the roughly six to seven terawatts of average global electricity production, about 3 percent to 4 percent is gobbled up by our digital electronics, in computing, storing and moving information. That might not sound too bad—except the growth trend of our digitized informational world is such that it requires approximately 40 percent more power every year. Even allowing for improvements in computational efficiency and power generation, this points to a world in some 20 years where all of the energy we currently generate in electricity will be consumed by digital electronics alone.And that’s just one facet of the energy demands of the human dataome. We still print onto paper, and the energy cost of a single page is the equivalent of burning five grams of high-quality coal. Digital devices, from microprocessors to hard drives, are also extraordinarily demanding in terms of their production, owing to the deep repurposing of matter that is required. We literally fight against the second law of thermodynamics to forge these exquisitely ordered, restricted, low-entropy structures out of raw materials that are decidedly high-entropy in their messy natural states. It is hard to see where this informational tsunami slows or ends.Our dataome looks like a distinct, although entirely symbiotic phenomenon. Homo sapiens arguably only exists as a truly unique species because of our coevolution with a wealth of externalized information; starting from languages held only in neuronal structures through many generations, to our tools and abstractions on pottery and cave walls, all the way to today’s online world.But symbiosis implies that all parties have their own interests to consider as well. Seeing ourselves this way opens the door to asking whether we’re calling all the shots. After all, in a gene-centered view of biology, all living things are simply temporary vehicles for the propagation and survival of information. In that sense the dataome is no different, and exactly how information survives is less important than the fact that it can do so. Once that information and its algorithmic underpinnings are in place in the world, it will keep going forever if it can.Q.According to the author, which of the following reason makes humans a truly unique species?

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:Humans are strange. For a global species, we’re not particularly genetically diverse, thanks in part to how our ancient roaming explorations caused “founder effects” and “bottleneck events” that restricted our ancestral gene pool. We also have a truly outsize impact on the planetary environment without much in the way of natural attrition to trim our influence.But the strangest thing of all is how we generate, exploit, and propagate information that is not encoded in our heritable genetic material, yet travels with us through time and space. Not only is much of that information represented in purely symbolic forms—alphabets, languages, binary codes—it is also represented in each brick, alloy, machine, and structure we build from the materials around us. Even the symbolic stuff is instantiated in some material form or the other, whether as ink on pages or electrical charges in nanoscale pieces of silicon. Altogether, this “dataome” has become an integral part of our existence. In fact, it may have always been an integral, and essential, part of our existence since our species of hominins became more and more distinct some 200,000 years ago.For example, let’s consider our planetary impact. Today we can look at our species’ energy use and see that of the roughly six to seven terawatts of average global electricity production, about 3 percent to 4 percent is gobbled up by our digital electronics, in computing, storing and moving information. That might not sound too bad—except the growth trend of our digitized informational world is such that it requires approximately 40 percent more power every year. Even allowing for improvements in computational efficiency and power generation, this points to a world in some 20 years where all of the energy we currently generate in electricity will be consumed by digital electronics alone.And that’s just one facet of the energy demands of the human dataome. We still print onto paper, and the energy cost of a single page is the equivalent of burning five grams of high-quality coal. Digital devices, from microprocessors to hard drives, are also extraordinarily demanding in terms of their production, owing to the deep repurposing of matter that is required. We literally fight against the second law of thermodynamics to forge these exquisitely ordered, restricted, low-entropy structures out of raw materials that are decidedly high-entropy in their messy natural states. It is hard to see where this informational tsunami slows or ends.Our dataome looks like a distinct, although entirely symbiotic phenomenon. Homo sapiens arguably only exists as a truly unique species because of our coevolution with a wealth of externalized information; starting from languages held only in neuronal structures through many generations, to our tools and abstractions on pottery and cave walls, all the way to today’s online world.But symbiosis implies that all parties have their own interests to consider as well. Seeing ourselves this way opens the door to asking whether we’re calling all the shots. After all, in a gene-centered view of biology, all living things are simply temporary vehicles for the propagation and survival of information. In that sense the dataome is no different, and exactly how information survives is less important than the fact that it can do so. Once that information and its algorithmic underpinnings are in place in the world, it will keep going forever if it can.Q.Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:Humans are strange. For a global species, we’re not particularly genetically diverse, thanks in part to how our ancient roaming explorations caused “founder effects” and “bottleneck events” that restricted our ancestral gene pool. We also have a truly outsize impact on the planetary environment without much in the way of natural attrition to trim our influence.But the strangest thing of all is how we generate, exploit, and propagate information that is not encoded in our heritable genetic material, yet travels with us through time and space. Not only is much of that information represented in purely symbolic forms—alphabets, languages, binary codes—it is also represented in each brick, alloy, machine, and structure we build from the materials around us. Even the symbolic stuff is instantiated in some material form or the other, whether as ink on pages or electrical charges in nanoscale pieces of silicon. Altogether, this “dataome” has become an integral part of our existence. In fact, it may have always been an integral, and essential, part of our existence since our species of hominins became more and more distinct some 200,000 years ago.For example, let’s consider our planetary impact. Today we can look at our species’ energy use and see that of the roughly six to seven terawatts of average global electricity production, about 3 percent to 4 percent is gobbled up by our digital electronics, in computing, storing and moving information. That might not sound too bad—except the growth trend of our digitized informational world is such that it requires approximately 40 percent more power every year. Even allowing for improvements in computational efficiency and power generation, this points to a world in some 20 years where all of the energy we currently generate in electricity will be consumed by digital electronics alone.And that’s just one facet of the energy demands of the human dataome. We still print onto paper, and the energy cost of a single page is the equivalent of burning five grams of high-quality coal. Digital devices, from microprocessors to hard drives, are also extraordinarily demanding in terms of their production, owing to the deep repurposing of matter that is required. We literally fight against the second law of thermodynamics to forge these exquisitely ordered, restricted, low-entropy structures out of raw materials that are decidedly high-entropy in their messy natural states. It is hard to see where this informational tsunami slows or ends.Our dataome looks like a distinct, although entirely symbiotic phenomenon. Homo sapiens arguably only exists as a truly unique species because of our coevolution with a wealth of externalized information; starting from languages held only in neuronal structures through many generations, to our tools and abstractions on pottery and cave walls, all the way to today’s online world.But symbiosis implies that all parties have their own interests to consider as well. Seeing ourselves this way opens the door to asking whether we’re calling all the shots. After all, in a gene-centered view of biology, all living things are simply temporary vehicles for the propagation and survival of information. In that sense the dataome is no different, and exactly how information survives is less important than the fact that it can do so. Once that information and its algorithmic underpinnings are in place in the world, it will keep going forever if it can.Q.The author calls humans strange for all of the following reasons, EXCEPT

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that ‘Nature to be commanded must be obeyed,’ Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we ‘discover’ that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of ‘machine of the world’ to the metaphysics of 'matter in motion'.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, ‘unreasonably effective’.Q.If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?a)How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?b)How can computation tell us anything about nature?c)Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?d)Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that ‘Nature to be commanded must be obeyed,’ Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we ‘discover’ that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of ‘machine of the world’ to the metaphysics of 'matter in motion'.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, ‘unreasonably effective’.Q.If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?a)How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?b)How can computation tell us anything about nature?c)Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?d)Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that ‘Nature to be commanded must be obeyed,’ Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we ‘discover’ that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of ‘machine of the world’ to the metaphysics of 'matter in motion'.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, ‘unreasonably effective’.Q.If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?a)How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?b)How can computation tell us anything about nature?c)Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?d)Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that ‘Nature to be commanded must be obeyed,’ Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we ‘discover’ that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of ‘machine of the world’ to the metaphysics of 'matter in motion'.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, ‘unreasonably effective’.Q.If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?a)How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?b)How can computation tell us anything about nature?c)Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?d)Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that ‘Nature to be commanded must be obeyed,’ Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we ‘discover’ that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of ‘machine of the world’ to the metaphysics of 'matter in motion'.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, ‘unreasonably effective’.Q.If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?a)How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?b)How can computation tell us anything about nature?c)Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?d)Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that ‘Nature to be commanded must be obeyed,’ Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we ‘discover’ that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of ‘machine of the world’ to the metaphysics of 'matter in motion'.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, ‘unreasonably effective’.Q.If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?a)How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?b)How can computation tell us anything about nature?c)Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?d)Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that ‘Nature to be commanded must be obeyed,’ Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we ‘discover’ that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of ‘machine of the world’ to the metaphysics of 'matter in motion'.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, ‘unreasonably effective’.Q.If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?a)How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?b)How can computation tell us anything about nature?c)Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?d)Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that ‘Nature to be commanded must be obeyed,’ Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we ‘discover’ that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of ‘machine of the world’ to the metaphysics of 'matter in motion'.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, ‘unreasonably effective’.Q.If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?a)How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?b)How can computation tell us anything about nature?c)Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?d)Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that ‘Nature to be commanded must be obeyed,’ Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we ‘discover’ that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of ‘machine of the world’ to the metaphysics of 'matter in motion'.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, ‘unreasonably effective’.Q.If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?a)How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?b)How can computation tell us anything about nature?c)Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?d)Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.The computer is an artifact, not a natural phenomenon, and science is about natural phenomena. As a creation of the human mind, independent of the physical world, mathematics is not a science but a tool for doing science. Modern techno-science undercuts the first point. How does one distinguish between nature and artifact when we rely on artifacts to produce or afford access to the natural phenomena? In insisting that ‘Nature to be commanded must be obeyed,’ Francis Bacon placed nature and art on the same physical and epistemological level.Artifacts work by the laws of nature, and by working to reveal those laws. Only with the development of thermodynamics, through the analysis of steam engines, did we ‘discover’ that world is a heat engine subject to the laws of entropy. Later came the information theory - the analysis of communications systems arising from the problems of long-distance telephony. Now, with the computer, nature has increasingly become a computation. DNA is code, the program for the process of development. Although the computational world may have begun as a metaphor, it is now acquiring the status of metaphysics, thus repeating the early modern transition from the metaphor of ‘machine of the world’ to the metaphysics of 'matter in motion'.The artifact as conceptual scheme is deeply, indeed inseparably, embedded in nature, and the relationship works both ways, as computer scientists turn to biological models to address problems of stability, adaptability, and complexity. Embedded too is the mathematics that has played a central role in the articulation of many of these models of nature - thermodynamical, informational, and computational - not simply by quantifying them but also, and more importantly, by capturing their structure and even filling it out. Applied to the world as models, mathematical structures have captured its workings in uncanny ways or as Eugene Wigner put it, ‘unreasonably effective’.Q.If you were to interview the author, what would be your follow up question to this passage?a)How can mathematics be said to influence computation and vice versa?b)How can computation tell us anything about nature?c)Does the relationship between technology, mathematics, and science need to be redefined?d)Given the advent of computational science, can mathematics be a science of the natural world?Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam