CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Analyze the following passage and provide app... Start Learning for Free
Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.
The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of "minerals" or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and "contingent". It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.
At the level of "animal", through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an “inner life”, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.
At the human level, there is a subject that says “I” — a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.
This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the "Unmoved Mover". The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.
 Consider the statement given below as true:
 “A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.”
Q.
The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?
 
  • a)
    Conscious beings are capable of displaying a lack of empathy towards each other.
  • b)
    The autonomy of active beings is sometimes contingent on their circumstances.
  • c)
    The movement from passivity to activity is infinite in nature.
  • d)
    Mankind is able to transcend its practical limitations through the products of its imagination.
  • e)
    The higher levels of being display both, an objective as well as a subjective type of existence.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the ...
According to the passage, the movement from passivity to activity is not complete as even the most independent and free individual experiences a certain level of limitation and is “.. .in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances.”. Therefore, in-order to complete the scope of existence mankind conceived “.. .a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons...”. Therefore, a personal God can be termed as a product of human imagination. According to the author, the conception of God only helps mankind in completing the progression from passivity to activity and in pointing towards the invisible existence of a level higher than its own. The author does not claim that such a conception helps mankind in transcending its own practical limitations. Therefore, the author is least likely to agree with option 4.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Q.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Which of the following statements would concur with the above idea and the theme of the passage?

Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The statement, The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human implies that

Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of "minerals" or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and "contingent". It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of "animal", through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an “inner life”, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says “I” — a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the "Unmoved Mover". The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:“A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.”Q.Replace the italicized phrase with the best alternative. The price of the tickets for the Pink Floyd concert went up to 200$ but most fans could care about it

Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.Six words are given below:I. ParagonII. PrognosticIII. PalaverIV. PortentV. PresentimentVI. PremonitionWhich of the above words have similar meanings?

Group QuestionThe passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.You cannot be surprised that under the conditions of continued disappearance of functions, the unfortunate student asks: "What becomes of the mind itself? If you suppress all the functions, what is left?" In the Indian way of teaching, when you come to a difficulty, someone jumps up and asks a question. And in the commentaries, the question which raises the difficulty is always put. The answer of Patanjali is: "Then the spectator remains in his own form." Theosophy answers: "The Monad remains." It is the end of the human pilgrimage. That is the highest point to which humanity mayclimb: to suppress all the reflections in the fivefold universe through which the Monad has manifested his powers, and then for the Monad to realize himself, enriched by the experiences through which his manifested aspects have passed. But to the Samkhyan the difficulty is very great, for when he has only his spectator left, when spectacle ceases, the spectator himself almost vanishes. His only function was to look on at the play of mind. When the play of mind is gone, what is left? He can no longer be a spectator, since there is nothing to see. The only answer is: "He remains in his own form." He is now out of manifestation, the duality is transcended, and so the Spirit sinks back into latency, no longer capable of manifestation. There you come to a very serious difference with the Theosophical view of the universe, for according to that view of the universe, when all these functions have been suppressed, then the Monad is ruler over matter and is prepared for a new cycle of activity, no longer slave but master.All analogy shows us that as the Self withdraws from sheath after sheath, he does not lose but gains in Self- realization. Self- realization becomes more and more vivid with each successive withdrawal; so that as the Self puts aside one veil of matter after another, recognises in regular succession that each body in turn is not himself, by that process of withdrawal his sense of Self-reality becomes keener, not less keen. It is important to remember that, because often Western readers, dealing with Eastern ideas, in consequence of misunderstanding the meaning of the state of liberation, or the condition of Nirvana, identify it with nothingness or unconsciousness—an entirely mistaken idea which is apt to colour the whole of their thought when dealing with Yogic processes. Imagine the condition of a man who identifies himself completely with the body, so that he cannot, even in thought, separate himself from it—the state of the early undeveloped man—and compare that with the strength, vigour and lucidity of your own mental consciousness.The consciousness of the early man limited to the physical body, with occasional touches of dream consciousness, is very restricted in its range. He has no idea of the sweep of your consciousness, of your abstract thinking. But is that consciousness of the early man more vivid, or less vivid, than yours? Certainly you will say, it is less vivid. You have largely transcended his powers of consciousness. Your consciousness is astral rather than physical, but has therebyincreased its vividness. As the Self withdraws himself from sheath after sheath, he realizes himself more and more, not less and less; Self-realization becomes more intense, as sheath after sheath is cast aside. The centre grows more powerful as the circumference becomes more permeable, and at last a stage is reached when the centre knows itself at every point of the circumference. When that is accomplished the circumference vanishes, but not so the centre. The centre still remains. Just as you are more vividly conscious than the early man, just as your consciousness is more alive, not less, than that of an undeveloped man, so it is as we climb up the stairway of life and cast away garment after garment. We become more conscious of existence, more conscious of knowledge, more conscious of Self-determined power. The faculties of the Self shine out more strongly, as veil after veil falls away. By analogy, then, when we touch the Monad, our consciousness should be mightier, more vivid, and more perfect. As you learn to truly live, your powers and feelings grow in strength.And remember that all control is exercised over sheaths, over portions of the Not-Self. You do not control your Self; that is a misconception; you control your Not-Self. The Self is never controlled; He is the Inner Ruler Immortal. He is the controller, not the controlled. As sheath after sheath becomes subject to your Self, and body after body becomes the tool of your Self, then shall you realize the truth of the saying of the Upanishad, that you are the Self, the Inner Ruler, the immortal.Q. Which of the statements below best describes the Theosophical view of the universe?

Top Courses for CAT

Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?a)Conscious beings are capable of displaying a lack of empathy towards each other.b)The autonomy of active beings is sometimes contingent on their circumstances.c)The movement from passivity to activity is infinite in nature.d)Mankind is able to transcend its practical limitations through the products of its imagination.e)The higher levels of being display both, an objective as well as a subjective type of existence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?a)Conscious beings are capable of displaying a lack of empathy towards each other.b)The autonomy of active beings is sometimes contingent on their circumstances.c)The movement from passivity to activity is infinite in nature.d)Mankind is able to transcend its practical limitations through the products of its imagination.e)The higher levels of being display both, an objective as well as a subjective type of existence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?a)Conscious beings are capable of displaying a lack of empathy towards each other.b)The autonomy of active beings is sometimes contingent on their circumstances.c)The movement from passivity to activity is infinite in nature.d)Mankind is able to transcend its practical limitations through the products of its imagination.e)The higher levels of being display both, an objective as well as a subjective type of existence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?a)Conscious beings are capable of displaying a lack of empathy towards each other.b)The autonomy of active beings is sometimes contingent on their circumstances.c)The movement from passivity to activity is infinite in nature.d)Mankind is able to transcend its practical limitations through the products of its imagination.e)The higher levels of being display both, an objective as well as a subjective type of existence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?a)Conscious beings are capable of displaying a lack of empathy towards each other.b)The autonomy of active beings is sometimes contingent on their circumstances.c)The movement from passivity to activity is infinite in nature.d)Mankind is able to transcend its practical limitations through the products of its imagination.e)The higher levels of being display both, an objective as well as a subjective type of existence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?a)Conscious beings are capable of displaying a lack of empathy towards each other.b)The autonomy of active beings is sometimes contingent on their circumstances.c)The movement from passivity to activity is infinite in nature.d)Mankind is able to transcend its practical limitations through the products of its imagination.e)The higher levels of being display both, an objective as well as a subjective type of existence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?a)Conscious beings are capable of displaying a lack of empathy towards each other.b)The autonomy of active beings is sometimes contingent on their circumstances.c)The movement from passivity to activity is infinite in nature.d)Mankind is able to transcend its practical limitations through the products of its imagination.e)The higher levels of being display both, an objective as well as a subjective type of existence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?a)Conscious beings are capable of displaying a lack of empathy towards each other.b)The autonomy of active beings is sometimes contingent on their circumstances.c)The movement from passivity to activity is infinite in nature.d)Mankind is able to transcend its practical limitations through the products of its imagination.e)The higher levels of being display both, an objective as well as a subjective type of existence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?a)Conscious beings are capable of displaying a lack of empathy towards each other.b)The autonomy of active beings is sometimes contingent on their circumstances.c)The movement from passivity to activity is infinite in nature.d)Mankind is able to transcend its practical limitations through the products of its imagination.e)The higher levels of being display both, an objective as well as a subjective type of existence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Analyze the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow.The Levels of Being exhibit certain characteristics in a manner which can be termed as progressions. Perhaps the most striking progression is the movement from Passivity to Activity. At the lowest level, that of minerals or inanimate matter, there is pure passivity. A stone is wholly passive, a pure object, totally dependent on circumstances and contingent. It can do nothing, organize nothing, utilize nothing. Even radioactive material is passive.At the level of animal, through the appearance of consciousness, there is a striking shift from passivity to activity. The processes of life are speeded up; activity becomes more autonomous, as evidenced by free and often purposeful movement such as swift action to obtain food and escape danger. The power of doing, organizing and utilizing is immeasurably extended; there is evidence of an inner life, of happiness and unhappiness, confidence, fear, expectation, disappointment and so forth. Any being with an inner life cannot be a mere object: it is a subject itself, capable even of treating other beings as mere objects, as the cat treats the mouse.At the human level, there is a subject that says I a person: another marked change from passivity to activity, from object to subject. To treat a person as if he or she were a mere object is a perversity, not to say a crime. No matter how such a person may be weighed down and enslaved by circumstances, there is always the possibility of self-assertion and rising above circumstances. There is no definable limit to his possibilities, even though there are practical limitations which he has to recognize and respect.This progressive movement from passivity to activity, which we observe in the Levels of Being, is indeed striking, but it is not complete. A large weight of passivity remains even in the most sovereign and autonomous human person; while he is undoubtedly a subject, he remains in many respects an object -dependent, contingent, pushed around by circumstances. Aware of this, mankind has always used its imagination, or its intuitive powers, to complete the process, to extrapolate (as we might say today) the observed curve to its completion. Thus, was conceived a Being, wholly active, wholly sovereign and autonomous; a Person above all merely human persons, in no way an object, above all circumstances and contingencies, entirely in control of everything: a personal God, the Unmoved Mover. The Levels of Being are thus, seen as pointing to the invisible existence of a level (or Levels) of Being above the human.Consider the statement given below as true:A plant is mainly, but not totally, passive; it grows toward the light and extends its Marks roots toward moisture and nutrients in the soil.Q.The author of this passage is least likely to agree with which of the following statements?a)Conscious beings are capable of displaying a lack of empathy towards each other.b)The autonomy of active beings is sometimes contingent on their circumstances.c)The movement from passivity to activity is infinite in nature.d)Mankind is able to transcend its practical limitations through the products of its imagination.e)The higher levels of being display both, an objective as well as a subjective type of existence.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev