Railways Exam > Railways Questions > Direction:-In the question below is given a s...
Start Learning for Free
Direction:- In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.
Conclusions:
I. The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.
II. The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.
Conclusions:
I. The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.
II. The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.
- a)Only conclusion I follows.
- b)Only conclusion II follows.
- c)Neither I nor II follows.
- d)Both I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two ...
The only information given in the statement is that the Members of the Parliament have opposed a new rule regarding disclosing their sources of income.
From this, we cannot strongly conclude that all of them have additional disclosed income and that is the reason for them opposing the rule. Thus, this conclusion does not follow.
Their protest against one rule cannot be safely concluded as their disrespect for the court. Thus, this conclusion does not follow either.
Hence, neither I nor II follows.
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two ...
Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.
Conclusion I: The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.
Conclusion II: The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.
Explanation:
To determine whether the conclusions follow logically from the given statement, let's analyze each conclusion separately.
Conclusion I: The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.
The statement mentions that the court ruling requiring MPs to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them. However, this does not necessarily mean that the MPs have additional undisclosed income. The resistance could be due to various reasons such as privacy concerns, fear of political repercussions, or disagreement with the court ruling itself. Therefore, conclusion I does not logically follow from the given statement.
Conclusion II: The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.
The statement indicates that the MPs have strongly resisted the court ruling. This resistance could be a form of disagreement or opposition to the ruling, but it does not necessarily imply a lack of respect for the court. MPs, like any other individuals, have the right to express their dissent and challenge court rulings through legal means. Therefore, conclusion II does not logically follow from the given statement.
Conclusion:
Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II logically follows from the given statement. The resistance shown by the MPs does not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that they have additional undisclosed income or that they do not respect the court. It is important to avoid making assumptions or drawing conclusions that are not supported by the given information.
Answer: Option c) Neither I nor II follows.
Conclusion I: The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.
Conclusion II: The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.
Explanation:
To determine whether the conclusions follow logically from the given statement, let's analyze each conclusion separately.
Conclusion I: The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.
The statement mentions that the court ruling requiring MPs to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them. However, this does not necessarily mean that the MPs have additional undisclosed income. The resistance could be due to various reasons such as privacy concerns, fear of political repercussions, or disagreement with the court ruling itself. Therefore, conclusion I does not logically follow from the given statement.
Conclusion II: The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.
The statement indicates that the MPs have strongly resisted the court ruling. This resistance could be a form of disagreement or opposition to the ruling, but it does not necessarily imply a lack of respect for the court. MPs, like any other individuals, have the right to express their dissent and challenge court rulings through legal means. Therefore, conclusion II does not logically follow from the given statement.
Conclusion:
Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II logically follows from the given statement. The resistance shown by the MPs does not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that they have additional undisclosed income or that they do not respect the court. It is important to avoid making assumptions or drawing conclusions that are not supported by the given information.
Answer: Option c) Neither I nor II follows.
Attention Railways Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Railways study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Railways.
|
Explore Courses for Railways exam
|
|
Similar Railways Doubts
Top Courses for RailwaysView all
Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Railways 2024 is part of Railways preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Railways exam syllabus. Information about Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Railways 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Railways 2024 is part of Railways preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Railways exam syllabus. Information about Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Railways 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Railways.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Railways Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Direction:-In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically followed beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.Statement: The new court ruling requiring all the Members of Parliament to disclose their sources of income has been strongly resisted by them.Conclusions:I.The Members of Parliament have additional undisclosed income.II.The Members of Parliament do not respect the court.a)Only conclusion I follows.b)Only conclusion II follows.c)Neither I nor II follows.d)Both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Railways tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for Railways exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup