CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Group QuestionA passage is followed by questi... Start Learning for Free
Group Question
A passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.
Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartime) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.
Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers' incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the direct cost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.
 
Q. Which of the following is the most suitable title for the above passage?
  • a)
    Policies and Protectionism
  • b)
    Agricultural Support and Global Free Trade
  • c)
    Challenges in Global Free Trade
  • d)
    Trade Barriers and Subsidy
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the pas...
The first paragraph is about various reasons for supporting a country’s agricultural system. The second paragraph mentions different ways (practiced in US and UK) of how agriculture (farmers) is supported through income top-ups and guaranteed prices. The passage ends with the mention of agricultural subsidies being the biggest challenge for those in favour of global free trade.
Options 1, 3 and 4 do not mention agriculture, which is a key focus area in the passage. Therefore, they cannot be considered.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the pas...
The first paragraph is about various reasons for supporting a country’s agricultural system. The second paragraph mentions different ways (practiced in US and UK) of how agriculture (farmers) is supported through income top-ups and guaranteed prices. The passage ends with the mention of agricultural subsidies being the biggest challenge for those in favour of global free trade.
Options 1, 3 and 4 do not mention agriculture, which is a key focus area in the passage. Therefore, they cannot be considered.
Hence, the correct answer is option 2.
Free Test
Community Answer
Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the pas...
The correct answer is B as in the starting it has said that if the domestic agriculture is working fine and have a support then during the crisis the excess amount that is spent on trading the agricultural products from abroad are reduced
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartim e) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.According to the passage, governments subsidize agriculture in which of the following ways?A. Governments directly pay the farmer.B. Governments cut down on foreign aid.C. Governments procure farm produce to maintain prices.D. Governments impose import levies.

Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartim e) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.Trade barriers and subsidies as agricultural policies arise because ofA. globally competitive domestic agriculture.B. political pressure from farmers and politicians.C. market conditions.D. unpredictable weather.

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:The recent assessment report published in the leading dailies on climate change dispels any lingering doubts. Various long-term changes in climate have been observed. Global warming would mean flooded rivers, submerged sea coasts and hence fewer islands, apart from disruption in agriculture. This may lead to ecological imbalance, may cause ocean salinity, affect wind patterns and cause calamities including drought. It is pertinent to note that heavy precipitation, heat waves, and intensity of tropical cyclones have been observed in the continents. The concurrent occurrence of last years floods and droughts in several regions may actually become "normal." in foreseeable future and a large number of people are likely to be affected by this ecological imbalance. The report has cautioned the world leaders about the fallout and the disastrous repercussions if the warnings of the report are ignored.Countries like India can and must be leaders in responding to this cataclysmic change, both nationally and internationally. Domestic emissions of black carbon/elemental carbon are an easy target. It is time to do more than subsidizing cooking gas: supporting its distribution to rural areas and cracking down on tampering with the cylinders. It should be noted that less than half of Indias population is covered by domestic LPG gas. The best solution is moving on to and rationalizing the fossil fuel. We must crack down on fuel adulteration and provide incentives for engine tuning. Rural electrification promises must be fulfilled to reduce reliance on diesel generators. The government should encourage CNG buses and cabs.India, along with China, is among the largest future centre of emissions resulting from expected higher economic activity. India has two choices: stubbornly claim its right to unfettered emissions in its economic transition, or acknowledge that things have changed and that development today might require new policy concerning energy emissions.India being an underdeveloped country has always sought differentiated treatment in international agreements aimed to limit emissions. There are no reduction obligations currently and the country can earn credit under the Clean Development Mechanism. There are reasons to reconsider this stance and to strive for phased limits on emissions growth.First, full exemption from emission controls in the changed scenario is not workable for a long time. The negotiations over emission controls are nothing but stubborn adherence to given positions, although the costs keep increasing steadily. The emission controls will certainly come at some point in the future. Most wars of attrition end when the party with the highest costs of continuing cedes ground and agrees to do something about the existing problem. India could introduce an emission control regime by taking a proactive stance now. It is also easier to plan for the future safety of the people than to do midcourse correction and replace investments already made.Second, the energy intensity coupled with inefficiency is incompatible with rapid growth. It is needless to state that India has the domestic scientific/technical capacity to compete globally even in green technology. The urge for global reach would be enough to spur innovation and R&D, apart from the fact that emission controls would help create stronger domestic demand for green technology. India must not forget the warning that Death waits for no man. The demonstration value of emission controls would have a cascading effect internationally. One-fifth of the worlds population lives in India. If the country commits to emission reductions, the pressure will come to bear on the others to follow suit. It can play the leadership role.Q.Which of the following statements cannot be inferred about emission control from the passage?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.As climate change accelerates, its impact on agriculture has become a subject of significant research and debate. In many developing countries, agriculture is not just an economic activity but a way of life that defines the cultural and social fabric of the community. The increasing unpredictability of weather patterns, due to climate change, has led to erratic rainfall, prolonged droughts, and unexpected frost, all of which pose severe threats to agricultural productivity and food security.In a small village in West Africa, a community that has depended on rain-fed agriculture for generations is now facing the brunt of these changes. The traditional knowledge systems, passed down over centuries, are becoming less reliable as the climatic cues they depend on are shifting. Crops are failing, and food shortages are becoming more common, leading to malnutrition and increased poverty levels.In response to this, a group of local farmers have begun experimenting with drought-resistant crop varieties and have started adopting water conservation techniques such as rainwater harvesting. These adaptation strategies are a blend of traditional knowledge and modern science, an approach that has shown promise in mitigating some of the adverse effects of climate change on agriculture.However, the challenges are not just environmental. There is also a socio-economic dimension to this issue. Many of these communities lack the financial resources to invest in new technologies or infrastructure that could help them adapt more effectively. Moreover, there is often a lack of access to accurate and timely information about weather patterns, which is crucial for making informed agricultural decisions.International organizations and local governments have a role to play in supporting these communities. Investments in climate-resilient infrastructure, research in sustainable agricultural practices, and the dissemination of climate information are vital steps that can help vulnerable populations adapt to the changing climate and secure their livelihoods.Q. Which of the following is NOT mentioned as a challenge faced by the community in adapting to climate change?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.As climate change accelerates, its impact on agriculture has become a subject of significant research and debate. In many developing countries, agriculture is not just an economic activity but a way of life that defines the cultural and social fabric of the community. The increasing unpredictability of weather patterns, due to climate change, has led to erratic rainfall, prolonged droughts, and unexpected frost, all of which pose severe threats to agricultural productivity and food security.In a small village in West Africa, a community that has depended on rain-fed agriculture for generations is now facing the brunt of these changes. The traditional knowledge systems, passed down over centuries, are becoming less reliable as the climatic cues they depend on are shifting. Crops are failing, and food shortages are becoming more common, leading to malnutrition and increased poverty levels.In response to this, a group of local farmers have begun experimenting with drought-resistant crop varieties and have started adopting water conservation techniques such as rainwater harvesting. These adaptation strategies are a blend of traditional knowledge and modern science, an approach that has shown promise in mitigating some of the adverse effects of climate change on agriculture.However, the challenges are not just environmental. There is also a socio-economic dimension to this issue. Many of these communities lack the financial resources to invest in new technologies or infrastructure that could help them adapt more effectively. Moreover, there is often a lack of access to accurate and timely information about weather patterns, which is crucial for making informed agricultural decisions.International organizations and local governments have a role to play in supporting these communities. Investments in climate-resilient infrastructure, research in sustainable agricultural practices, and the dissemination of climate information are vital steps that can help vulnerable populations adapt to the changing climate and secure their livelihoods.Q. What is the primary concern addressed in the passage regarding climate change?

Top Courses for CAT

Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartime) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.Which of the following is the most suitable title for the above passage?a)Policies and Protectionismb)Agricultural Support and Global Free Tradec)Challenges in Global Free Traded)Trade Barriers and SubsidyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartime) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.Which of the following is the most suitable title for the above passage?a)Policies and Protectionismb)Agricultural Support and Global Free Tradec)Challenges in Global Free Traded)Trade Barriers and SubsidyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartime) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.Which of the following is the most suitable title for the above passage?a)Policies and Protectionismb)Agricultural Support and Global Free Tradec)Challenges in Global Free Traded)Trade Barriers and SubsidyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartime) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.Which of the following is the most suitable title for the above passage?a)Policies and Protectionismb)Agricultural Support and Global Free Tradec)Challenges in Global Free Traded)Trade Barriers and SubsidyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartime) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.Which of the following is the most suitable title for the above passage?a)Policies and Protectionismb)Agricultural Support and Global Free Tradec)Challenges in Global Free Traded)Trade Barriers and SubsidyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartime) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.Which of the following is the most suitable title for the above passage?a)Policies and Protectionismb)Agricultural Support and Global Free Tradec)Challenges in Global Free Traded)Trade Barriers and SubsidyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartime) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.Which of the following is the most suitable title for the above passage?a)Policies and Protectionismb)Agricultural Support and Global Free Tradec)Challenges in Global Free Traded)Trade Barriers and SubsidyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartime) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.Which of the following is the most suitable title for the above passage?a)Policies and Protectionismb)Agricultural Support and Global Free Tradec)Challenges in Global Free Traded)Trade Barriers and SubsidyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartime) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.Which of the following is the most suitable title for the above passage?a)Policies and Protectionismb)Agricultural Support and Global Free Tradec)Challenges in Global Free Traded)Trade Barriers and SubsidyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Group QuestionA passage is followed by questions pertaining to the passage. Read the passage and answer the questions. Choose the most appropriate answer.Countries often provide support for their farmers using trade barriers and subsidy because: domestic agriculture, even if it is inefficient by world standards, can be an insurance policy in case it becomes difficult (as it does, for example, in wartime) to buy agricultural produce from abroad; farmers groups have proved adept at lobbying; politicians have sought to slow the depopulation of rural areas; agricultural prices can be volatile, as a result of unpredictable weather, among other things; and financial support can provide a safety net in unexpectedly severe market conditions.Broadly speaking, governments have tried two methods of subsidising agriculture. The first, used in the United States during the 1930s and in the UK before it joined the European Union, is to top up farmers incomes if they fall below a level deemed acceptable. Farmers may be required to set aside some of their land in return for this support. The second is to guarantee a minimum level of farm prices by buying up surplus supply and storing or destroying it if prices would otherwise fall below the guaranteed levels. This was the approach adopted by the EU when it set up its Common Agricultural Policy. To keep down the directcost of this subsidy the EU used trade barriers, including import levies, to minimise competition to EU farmers from produce available more cheaply on world agriculture markets. Recent American farm-support policy has combined income top-ups and some guaranteed prices. As most governments have become more committed to international trade, such agricultural policies have come under increasing attack, although the free trade rhetoric has often run far ahead of genuine reform. In 2003, rich countries together spent over $300 billion a year supporting their farmers, more than six times what they spent on foreign aid. Finding a way to end agricultural support had become by far the biggest remaining challenge for those trying to negotiate global free trade.Q.Which of the following is the most suitable title for the above passage?a)Policies and Protectionismb)Agricultural Support and Global Free Tradec)Challenges in Global Free Traded)Trade Barriers and SubsidyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev