There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?a)39.73%b)40.34%c)43.16%d)44.70%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > There are 5 companies competing against each ...

Join the Discussion on the App

There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs. crore) is as shown below

Each of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given below

Q. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?

a)
39.73%
b)
40.34%
c)
43.16%
d)
44.70%

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

CAT Practice Test - 22

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market...

Business unit S contributes to companies C, D and E.
Revenue due to business unit S = 0.3 * (Revenue of company C + Revenue of company D + revenue of company E) Since each business unit contributes to the revenue of a company in the same proportion every year, this relationship will remain constant for 2009 and 2013.
Revenue to business unit S in 2009 = 0.3 * (40 + 39 + 40) = Rs. 35.7 crores Revenue to business unit S in 2013 = 0.3 x (52 + 57 + 58) = Rs. 50.1 crores

Hence, option 2.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.cror e) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If company D acquires company B in 2013, what is the percentage contribution of business unit P (of company B) to the total revenue of company D in that year?Assume that the total revenue is the sum of revenues before acquisition. Round off the answer to the nearest decimal.

View answer

There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.cror e) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?

View answer

Group QuestionAnswer the following question based on the information given below.There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.cror e) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. What is the total revenue due to business unit T from the market in the year 2012?

View answer

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.Consumers increasingly expect brands to have not just functional benefits but a social purpose. As a result, companies are taking social stands in very visible ways. Airbnb used a Super Bowl ad to publicly cement its commitment to diversity. Tecate, based in Mexico, is investing heavily in programs to reduce violence against women, and Vicks, a P&G brand in India, supports child-adoption rights for transgender people. Brands increasingly use social purpose to guide marketing communications, inform product innovation, and steer investments toward social cause programs. And that's all well and good when it works. But missteps are common, and they can have real consequences.Countless well-intentioned social-purpose programs have consumed resources and management time only to end up in obscurity. Sometimes they backfire because the brand messages designed to promote them anger or offend customers - or they simply go unnoticed because they fail to resonate. Other times, managers use these initiatives solely to pursue intangible benefits such as brand affection or as a means to communicate the company's corporate social responsibility, without consideration of how they might be able to create business value for the firm.To develop a social purpose strategy, managers should begin by identifying a set of social or environmental needs to which the brand can make a meaningful contribution. (For simplicity, we'll use the term "social needs" to refer to both social and environmental concerns.) Few brands are likely to start with a blank slate - most have corporate social responsibility programs under way, some of which could become relevant aspects of the brand's value proposition. Yet focusing on only those initiatives could limit the potential of a purpose-driven brand strategy or divert marketing resources meant to stimulate the brand's growth toward corporate initiatives. To create a more comprehensive set of choices, managers should explore social purpose ideas in three domains: brand heritage, customer tensions, and product externalities.Of the many benefits a brand may confer, only a few are likely to have defined the brand from the start and be the core reason for its success. Since its launch, in 1957, Dove has been promoted as a beauty bar, not a soap. Enhancing beauty has always been central to its value proposition. Therefore, it makes sense that Dove focuses on social needs tied to perceptions of beauty.Finally, examine your product's or industry's externalities - the indirect costs borne or benefits gained by a third party as a result of your products' manufacture or use. For instance, the food and beverage industry has been criticized for the contribution of some of its products to the increasing rates of childhood obesity. It has also faced concerns about negative health effects resulting from companies' use of artificial ingredients and other chemicals in their products. Panera Bread's decision to position its offerings as "clean food" - made without "artificial preservatives, sweeteners, flavours, or colours from artificial sources" - is a direct response to a social need created by industry externalities.Managers often have the best intentions when trying to link their brands with a social need, but choosing the right one can be difficult and risky and has long-term implications. Competing on social purpose requires managers to create value for all stakeholders - customers, the company, shareholders, and society at large - merging strategic acts of generosity with the diligent pursuit of brand goals.Q. Which of the following is the most appropriate title for the passage?

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:Our meritocracy looks to markets to measure merit. Prices—including, crucially, wages—establish what things are worth. Greg Mankiw, who chaired George Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers, captures the ideal in his “principle of just deserts.” Meritocracy holds that “a person who contributes more to society deserves a higher income that reflects those greater contributions.” Moreover, meritocracy measures each person’s contribution as the market value that she adds “to society’s production of goods and services.”But in reality, meritocratic hierarchies now distort market valuations, especially wages. Elites remake work in their own image, to privilege education and skills that only they can afford to acquire. Finance illustrates the pattern. In the mid 20th century, when the Economist called banking “the world’s most respectable dying industry,” those in the field were neither better educated nor better paid than others. Since then, super-educated elites have developed technologies—financial instruments, digital tools and legal regimes—that dramatically favour their own skills. Today, no sector is more closely associated with high wages. But the innovation is not a true advance, and the new style of finance does not make a greater social contribution than the old. The transaction costs of financial intermediation have not declined, and overall financial risk is neither reduced nor better shared.Similar patterns pervade the wider economy. Elites remake work to favour their peculiar skills and then use the enormous incomes that ensue to buy educations for their children that the rest cannot match. Far from correcting itself, meritocratic inequality triggers a feedback loop that undermines meritocracy’s core claims. Merit is an ideology built to launder offensive hierarchies.But,todays distribution of rewards and opportunities is notso repugnant that we need to junk the idea of merit.The meritocratic idea was forged in the revolt against the old society that fixed people’s position at birth, most notably in the French and American Revolutions of the 18th century and the English liberal revolution of the 19th. But things didn’t stop there. Prominent thinkers of the time like Du Bois and Luther King,all rested their arguments on the idea that people should be judged on the basis of their own abilities.I would agree with a reworded version of Mankiw’s principle: someone who contributes more to prosperity deserves a higher income that reflects their greater contribution.There is more to meritocracy than money-making.The meritocratic idea tries to address two of the great problems at the heart of modernity: how do we reconcile the moral equality of individuals with social differentiation? And how do we secure the economic growth that pays for the things we have come to expect, such as social welfare?Meritocracy answers the first question by providing a combination of equality of opportunity and competition. Universal education gives everybody a basic shot at succeeding. Competition allows people to discover their unique talents. And if competition has downsides, they are nothing compared with the risks of allowing talents to go undiscovered.The evidence that meritocracy promotes economic efficiency is overwhelming: meritocratic countries such as Singapore grow more robustly than non-meritocratic ones such as Greece; public companies that recruit people on merit are more successful than family companies that rely on nepotism.The solution to the inequalities produced by meritocracy’s success is to tax the winners rather than to bind Prometheus.Q. The author cites the example of developments in finance to drive home all of the following points, EXCEPT

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?a)39.73%b)40.34%c)43.16%d)44.70%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?a)39.73%b)40.34%c)43.16%d)44.70%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?a)39.73%b)40.34%c)43.16%d)44.70%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?a)39.73%b)40.34%c)43.16%d)44.70%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?a)39.73%b)40.34%c)43.16%d)44.70%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?a)39.73%b)40.34%c)43.16%d)44.70%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?a)39.73%b)40.34%c)43.16%d)44.70%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?a)39.73%b)40.34%c)43.16%d)44.70%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?a)39.73%b)40.34%c)43.16%d)44.70%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. How much has the revenue from business unit S grown from the year 2009 to 2013?a)39.73%b)40.34%c)43.16%d)44.70%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam