CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  There are 5 companies competing against each ... Start Learning for Free
There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market.  The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs. crore) is as shown below
Each of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given below
 
Q. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?
  • a)
    P
  • b)
    Q
  • c)
    R
  • d)
    S
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market...
The revenue from each business unit in 2013 is as follows
Thus the total revenue from each business unit is as follows
Since, revenue from P is the highest and percentage profitability of all the business units are the same, profitability of P is the highest.
Hence, option 1.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Answer the questions based on the following information :Rahul is sales manager of XYZ Computers Ltd. and looks after Delhi market. The company sells laptops in India. He is currently trying to select a distributor for coming five years. The distributor ensures that the products are accessible to the customers in the market. Market share of a company depends on the coverage by the distributor. The total profit potential of the entire laptop market in Delhi is Rs. 5 crores in the current year and present value of next four years’ cumulative profit potential is Rs. 15 crores. The first choice for Rahul is to enter into long-term contract with a distributor M/s Jayshree with whom XYZ company has done business in the past, and whose distribution system reaches 55 percent of all potential customers. At the last moment, however, a colleague suggests Rahul to consider signing a oneyear contract with other distributors. Distributors M/s Bola and M/s James are willing to be partner with Dubin. Although a year ago M/s Bola’s and M/s James’s coverage reached only 40 and 25 percent of customers respectively, they claim to have invested heavily in distribution resources and now expect to be able to reach 60 percent and 75 percent of customers respectively. The probability of M/s Bola’s claim and M/s James’s claim to be true is 0.60 and 0.20 respectively. The knowledge about distributors’ coverage will evolve over time. The assumption is that the true level of coverage offered by the new distributors could be discovered, with certainty, through a one-year trail, and this trail will reveal exactly one of the two levels of coverage: for example in case of M/s Bola – 40 percent (as it was last year) or 60 percent (as claime d). In addition, it is also assumed that whatever the coverage is for both distributors, it will not change over time. Rahul narrows down on three choices, which are as follows:Choice 1. Give a five year contract to the familiar distributor M/s Jayshree.Choice 2. Give a one year contract to the new distributor M/s Bola, and base next year’s decision to renew contract with M/s Bola on observed coverage for next four years or enter into a four years contract with M/s Jayshree.Choice 3. Give a one-year contract to the new distributor M/s James, and base next year’s decision to renew contract with M/s James on observed coverage for next four years or enter into a four years contract with M/s Jayshree..Q.If the distributor M/s James claims a coverage of 55% instead of 75% and probability of this claim to be true is 0.70 instead of 0.20 then which of the following statement is true?

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:Our meritocracy looks to markets to measure merit. Prices—including, crucially, wages—establish what things are worth. Greg Mankiw, who chaired George Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers, captures the ideal in his “principle of just deserts.” Meritocracy holds that “a person who contributes more to society deserves a higher income that reflects those greater contributions.” Moreover, meritocracy measures each person’s contribution as the market value that she adds “to society’s production of goods and services.”But in reality, meritocratic hierarchies now distort market valuations, especially wages. Elites remake work in their own image, to privilege education and skills that only they can afford to acquire. Finance illustrates the pattern. In the mid 20th century, when the Economist called banking “the world’s most respectable dying industry,” those in the field were neither better educated nor better paid than others. Since then, super-educated elites have developed technologies—financial instruments, digital tools and legal regimes—that dramatically favour their own skills. Today, no sector is more closely associated with high wages. But the innovation is not a true advance, and the new style of finance does not make a greater social contribution than the old. The transaction costs of financial intermediation have not declined, and overall financial risk is neither reduced nor better shared.Similar patterns pervade the wider economy. Elites remake work to favour their peculiar skills and then use the enormous incomes that ensue to buy educations for their children that the rest cannot match. Far from correcting itself, meritocratic inequality triggers a feedback loop that undermines meritocracy’s core claims. Merit is an ideology built to launder offensive hierarchies.But,todays distribution of rewards and opportunities is notso repugnant that we need to junk the idea of merit.The meritocratic idea was forged in the revolt against the old society that fixed people’s position at birth, most notably in the French and American Revolutions of the 18th century and the English liberal revolution of the 19th. But things didn’t stop there. Prominent thinkers of the time like Du Bois and Luther King,all rested their arguments on the idea that people should be judged on the basis of their own abilities.I would agree with a reworded version of Mankiw’s principle: someone who contributes more to prosperity deserves a higher income that reflects their greater contribution.There is more to meritocracy than money-making.The meritocratic idea tries to address two of the great problems at the heart of modernity: how do we reconcile the moral equality of individuals with social differentiation? And how do we secure the economic growth that pays for the things we have come to expect, such as social welfare?Meritocracy answers the first question by providing a combination of equality of opportunity and competition. Universal education gives everybody a basic shot at succeeding. Competition allows people to discover their unique talents. And if competition has downsides, they are nothing compared with the risks of allowing talents to go undiscovered.The evidence that meritocracy promotes economic efficiency is overwhelming: meritocratic countries such as Singapore grow more robustly than non-meritocratic ones such as Greece; public companies that recruit people on merit are more successful than family companies that rely on nepotism.The solution to the inequalities produced by meritocracy’s success is to tax the winners rather than to bind Prometheus.Q. The author cites the example of developments in finance to drive home all of the following points, EXCEPT

There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?a)Pb)Qc)Rd)SCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?a)Pb)Qc)Rd)SCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?a)Pb)Qc)Rd)SCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?a)Pb)Qc)Rd)SCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?a)Pb)Qc)Rd)SCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?a)Pb)Qc)Rd)SCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?a)Pb)Qc)Rd)SCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?a)Pb)Qc)Rd)SCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?a)Pb)Qc)Rd)SCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice There are 5 companies competing against each other in a certain market. The performance of each company in terms of its revenue (in Rs.crore) is as shown belowEach of these companies has some of the business units among P, Q, R, S and T contributing to its revenue. The contribution from each business unit over the years is the same and the distribution is as given belowQ. If profitability of a business unit is 15% of the revenue in each year, then which business unit is the most profitable in 2013?a)Pb)Qc)Rd)SCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev