In the case of Machal Lalung of Assam, the justice was made after the ...
Machal Lalung was 23 when he was arrested and he was released in July 2005 at age of 77. He spent 54 years under custody during which his case never came up for hearing. He was freed when a team appointed by the National Human Rights Commission intervened after an inspection of undertrials in the State.
View all questions of this test
In the case of Machal Lalung of Assam, the justice was made after the ...
Intervention of National Human Rights Commission in the case of Machal Lalung
The correct answer to the question is option 'B', National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). The intervention of NHRC played a significant role in delivering justice in the case of Machal Lalung, a resident of Assam.
Background of the Case
Machal Lalung, a mentally ill person, was wrongly declared as a foreigner by the Foreigners' Tribunal in Assam. He was detained in the detention center for several years despite being an Indian citizen. His case gained attention when it was reported in the media, highlighting the violation of his human rights.
Role of National Human Rights Commission
1. Investigation and Action: NHRC took suo motu cognizance of the case based on media reports and initiated an investigation. The Commission's officials visited the detention center and met with Machal Lalung to gather information about his condition and the circumstances of his detention.
2. Legal Intervention: NHRC filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India seeking justice for Machal Lalung. The Commission argued that his detention was a gross violation of his fundamental rights and demanded his immediate release.
3. Human Rights Advocacy: NHRC raised awareness about the case and the plight of Machal Lalung through its media statements and press releases. This helped generate public support and drew attention to the issue.
4. Monitoring and Follow-up: NHRC closely monitored the progress of the case and ensured that appropriate action was taken by the concerned authorities. The Commission regularly communicated with the Government of Assam and the relevant departments to expedite the legal proceedings and secure justice for Machal Lalung.
5. Recommendations and Guidelines: NHRC issued recommendations and guidelines to the government authorities to prevent similar human rights violations in the future. These guidelines aimed at ensuring fair treatment of mentally ill individuals and preventing their wrongful detention.
Conclusion
In the case of Machal Lalung, the National Human Rights Commission played a crucial role in advocating for justice and human rights. Through its investigation, legal intervention, advocacy, and continuous monitoring, NHRC contributed to the release of Machal Lalung and brought attention to the violation of his fundamental rights. The intervention of NHRC highlights the significance of independent human rights institutions in safeguarding the rights of individuals and ensuring justice.
In the case of Machal Lalung of Assam, the justice was made after the ...
B