CA Foundation Exam > CA Foundation Questions > Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. o...
Start Learning for Free
Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.
- a)Consideration is unlawful
- b)Object of consideration is unlawful
- c)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawful
- d)Consideration and its object both are unlawful
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys th...
The object of the above contract is destroying the property of Swaminathan. Any contract in which the object involves injury to a person or his property is unlawful
Similarly, the consideration here is 1 kg of opium. The consideration is unlawful when it opposes social policy.
Similarly, the consideration here is 1 kg of opium. The consideration is unlawful when it opposes social policy.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys th...
Understanding the Scenario
In the scenario presented, Gopalaswami offers Raman 1 kg of opium to destroy Swami Nathan's property. This situation raises questions about the legality of both the consideration and the object of the agreement.
Legal Principles Involved
- Consideration: This refers to what each party stands to gain or lose in a contract. For a contract to be valid, the consideration must be lawful.
- Object of the Contract: This refers to the purpose or aim of the agreement. The object must also be lawful for the contract to be enforceable.
Analysis of the Proposition
- Unlawful Consideration: The offer of opium constitutes unlawful consideration because opium is a controlled substance in most jurisdictions. Offering or receiving it as a part of a contract is illegal.
- Unlawful Object: The objective of destroying someone else's property is also illegal. Such actions are considered criminal acts, which makes the object of the contract unlawful.
Conclusion
Given the above points, both the consideration (1 kg of opium) and the object (destruction of property) are illegal. Thus, the correct answer to the question is option D:
- Consideration and its object both are unlawful.
In summary, this agreement cannot be enforced legally due to the presence of both unlawful consideration and object. As a result, it holds no legal validity in a court of law.
In the scenario presented, Gopalaswami offers Raman 1 kg of opium to destroy Swami Nathan's property. This situation raises questions about the legality of both the consideration and the object of the agreement.
Legal Principles Involved
- Consideration: This refers to what each party stands to gain or lose in a contract. For a contract to be valid, the consideration must be lawful.
- Object of the Contract: This refers to the purpose or aim of the agreement. The object must also be lawful for the contract to be enforceable.
Analysis of the Proposition
- Unlawful Consideration: The offer of opium constitutes unlawful consideration because opium is a controlled substance in most jurisdictions. Offering or receiving it as a part of a contract is illegal.
- Unlawful Object: The objective of destroying someone else's property is also illegal. Such actions are considered criminal acts, which makes the object of the contract unlawful.
Conclusion
Given the above points, both the consideration (1 kg of opium) and the object (destruction of property) are illegal. Thus, the correct answer to the question is option D:
- Consideration and its object both are unlawful.
In summary, this agreement cannot be enforced legally due to the presence of both unlawful consideration and object. As a result, it holds no legal validity in a court of law.
|
Explore Courses for CA Foundation exam
|
|
Top Courses for CA FoundationView all
Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2025 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CA Foundation 2025 is part of CA Foundation preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CA Foundation exam syllabus. Information about Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CA Foundation 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CA Foundation.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CA Foundation Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Gopalaswami proposed to Raman to give 1 kg. of opium if he destroys the property of Swami Nathan, In this case_______.a)Consideration is unlawfulb)Object of consideration is unlawfulc)Consideration is unlawful and object of consideration is partly unlawfuld)Consideration and its object both are unlawfulCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CA Foundation tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CA Foundation exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup