All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
SAT Exam  >  SAT Questions  >  The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the ... Start Learning for Free
The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, – 3, – 5) to a plane is (2, 4, 6). The equation of the plane is:​
  • a)
    x + y + z = 44
  • b)
    3x + 7y + 11z = 100
  • c)
    3x + 7y + 11z = 88
  • d)
    3x + 7y + 11z = 44
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your SAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane ...
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane ...
Simply point of perpendicular Jo h usse option mein substitute Kar de.. ek hi toh match ho Raha h. and if 2 match ho Jaye toh method se jana
Explore Courses for SAT exam

Similar SAT Doubts

Question based on the following passage and supplementary material.This passage is adapted from Bryan Walsh, "Whole Food Blues: Why Organic Agriculture May Not Be So Sustainable." ©2012 by Time Inc.When it comes to energy, everyone lovesefficiency. Cutting energy waste is one of those goalsthat both sides of the political divide can agree on,even if they sometimes diverge on how best to get(5) there. Energy efficiency allows us to get more out ofour given resources, which is good for the economyand (mostly) good for the environment as well. Inan increasingly hot and crowded world, the onlysustainable way to live is to get more out of less.(10) Every environmentalist would agree.But change the conversation to food, andsuddenly efficiency doesn’t look so good.Conventional industrial agriculture has becomeincredibly efficient on a simple land to food basis.(15) Thanks to fertilizers, mechanization and irrigation,each American farmer feeds over 155 peopleworldwide. Conventional farming gets more andmore crop per square foot of cultivated land—over 170 bushels of corn per acre in Iowa, for(20) example—which can mean less territory needs tobe converted from wilderness to farmland.And since a third of the planet is already used foragriculture—destroying forests and other wildhabitats along the way—anything that could help us(25) produce more food on less land would seem to begood for the environment.Of course, that’s not how most environmentalistsregard their arugula [a leafy green]. They haveembraced organic food as better for the planet—and(30) healthier and tastier, too—than the stuff produced byagricultural corporations. Environmentalists disdainthe enormous amounts of energy needed and wastecreated by conventional farming, while organicpractices—forgoing artificial fertilizers and chemical(35) pesticides—are considered far more sustainable.Sales of organic food rose 7.7% in 2010, up to $26.7billion—and people are making those purchases fortheir consciences as much as their taste buds.Yet a new meta-analysis in Nature does the math(40) and comes to a hard conclusion: organic farmingyields 25% fewer crops on average than conventionalagriculture. More land is therefore needed toproduce fewer crops—and that means organicfarming may not be as good for the planet as(45) we think.In the Nature analysis, scientists from McGillUniversity in Montreal and the University ofMinnesota performed an analysis of 66 studiescomparing conventional and organic methods across(50) 34 different crop species, from fruits to grains tolegumes. They found that organic farming delivereda lower yield for every crop type, though the disparityvaried widely. For rain-watered legume crops likebeans or perennial crops like fruit trees, organic(55) trailed conventional agriculture by just 5%. Yet formajor cereal crops like corn or wheat, as well as mostvegetables—all of which provide the bulk of theworld’s calories—conventional agricultureoutperformed organics by more than 25%.(60) The main difference is nitrogen, the chemical keyto plant growth. Conventional agriculture makes useof 171 million metric tons of synthetic fertilizer eachyear, and all that nitrogen enables much faster plantgrowth than the slower release of nitrogen from the(65) compost or cover crops used in organic farming.When we talk about a Green Revolution, we reallymean a nitrogen revolution—along with a lot ofwater.But not all the nitrogen used in conventional(70) fertilizer ends up in crops—much of it ends uprunning off the soil and into the oceans, creating vastpolluted dead zones. We’re already putting morenitrogen into the soil than the planet can stand overthe long term. And conventional agriculture also(75) depends heavily on chemical pesticides, which canhave unintended side effects.What that means is that while conventionalagriculture is more efficient—sometimes much moreefficient—than organic farming, there are trade-offs(80) with each. So an ideal global agriculture system, inthe views of the study’s authors, may borrow the bestfrom both systems, as Jonathan Foley of theUniversity of Minnesota explained:The bottom line? Today’s organic farming(85) practices are probably best deployed in fruit andvegetable farms, where growing nutrition (notjust bulk calories) is the primary goal. But fordelivering sheer calories, especially in our staplecrops of wheat, rice, maize, soybeans and so on,(90) conventional farms have the advantage right now.Looking forward, I think we will need to deploydifferent kinds of practices (especially new,mixed approaches that take the best of organic(95) and conventional farming systems) where theyare best suited—geographically, economically,socially, etc.Q.Which of the following claims is supported by figure 2?

Top Courses for SATView all

Top Courses for SAT

The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane is (2, 4, 6). The equation of the plane is:a)x + y + z = 44b)3x + 7y + 11z = 100c)3x + 7y + 11z = 88d)3x + 7y + 11z = 44Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane is (2, 4, 6). The equation of the plane is:a)x + y + z = 44b)3x + 7y + 11z = 100c)3x + 7y + 11z = 88d)3x + 7y + 11z = 44Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for SAT 2025 is part of SAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the SAT exam syllabus. Information about The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane is (2, 4, 6). The equation of the plane is:a)x + y + z = 44b)3x + 7y + 11z = 100c)3x + 7y + 11z = 88d)3x + 7y + 11z = 44Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for SAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane is (2, 4, 6). The equation of the plane is:a)x + y + z = 44b)3x + 7y + 11z = 100c)3x + 7y + 11z = 88d)3x + 7y + 11z = 44Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane is (2, 4, 6). The equation of the plane is:a)x + y + z = 44b)3x + 7y + 11z = 100c)3x + 7y + 11z = 88d)3x + 7y + 11z = 44Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for SAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane is (2, 4, 6). The equation of the plane is:a)x + y + z = 44b)3x + 7y + 11z = 100c)3x + 7y + 11z = 88d)3x + 7y + 11z = 44Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane is (2, 4, 6). The equation of the plane is:a)x + y + z = 44b)3x + 7y + 11z = 100c)3x + 7y + 11z = 88d)3x + 7y + 11z = 44Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane is (2, 4, 6). The equation of the plane is:a)x + y + z = 44b)3x + 7y + 11z = 100c)3x + 7y + 11z = 88d)3x + 7y + 11z = 44Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane is (2, 4, 6). The equation of the plane is:a)x + y + z = 44b)3x + 7y + 11z = 100c)3x + 7y + 11z = 88d)3x + 7y + 11z = 44Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The foot of the perpendicular drawn from the (- 1, 3, 5) to a plane is (2, 4, 6). The equation of the plane is:a)x + y + z = 44b)3x + 7y + 11z = 100c)3x + 7y + 11z = 88d)3x + 7y + 11z = 44Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice SAT tests.
Explore Courses for SAT exam

Top Courses for SAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup